Radfem Hours are 24/7

The evil feminist they told you about ( if I screenshot your reblog to add to mine it’s bc you made a great point! 🩷 )

[djuvlipen]

decrim for prostitution is not a socialist standpoint, is not a communist standpoint, is not a marxist standpoint, you are making a fool of yourself trying to pass gross liberalism when it comes to human rights violations, sexual slavery and extreme misogyny as revolutionary, progressive or anticapitalist like you are directly contradicting everything written by marxists (and marxist women in particular) on the matter and every policy passed by marxists, socialists and communists on the matter but i shouldnt have expected less from us americans who call themselves "leftist"

[djuvlipen]

this is about zohran mamdani

[djuvlipen]

politicians on the left are shooting themselves in the foot by supporting decrim, they are alienating a large part of the female voter population (in particular among feminists) at best and they show that their pro-working class, antiracist and feminist stances don’t apply to poor women and woc and are therefore meaningless at worse. like are you stupid.

[djuvlipen]

i was talking to a portuguese woman who was telling me she likes the communist portuguese party but won’t join them because while they support prostituted women and oppose pimps they keep shying away from openly condemning johns. meanwhile in my country the left-wing party i am in is openly abolitionist, works a lot with abolitionist radical feminist orgs and therefore enjoys a good reputation among feminists. the benefits of actually caring about women are endless. who would have thought 👍

[djuvlipen]

im going on a tangent but these tags reminded me abolition doesn’t stop at merely voting to criminalize pimps, johns and brothels. a country can be abolitionist but abolitionist laws won’t work if they are not coupled by socialist policies that make sure public housing is available to prostituted women, healthcare is free and accessible, training programs are funded, wages are secured and high enough for you to afford groceries and pay bills, cops who brutalize women and poc are actually being sentenced jailed and condemned by the law, nurseries are accessible for young and/or single mothers, higher education is free so female students won’t have to enter the sex trade to afford it, and access to citizenship is facilitated for migrant women in prostitution. being in favour of abolition and stopping the fight when the law is passed is a liberal pov; you can’t divorce feminism from socialism when it comes to fighting prostitution

[hugewoman]

Young women getting into sex work to pay for higher education has become so rampant. And it’s not just internally driven, there’s intense pressure and outside influence online grooming them into it. There is no discussion that can be had about the modern cost of living without scumbags creeping into the notes and comments unsolicited suggesting that girls start onlyfans accounts, or doing camwork, or becoming a sugarbaby, or selling feet pics, or even stripping and full prostitution - acting like it’s an easy harmless weekend side gig and that they’ll be able to afford anything they want with the extra income

[kkoffin]

It’s funny that when you address the fact that men have more physical strength than women, people act as though you’re saying women are inferior. Like do you people think gorillas are superior to humans? maybe in a boxing match, sure, but I don’t see gorillas running successful democracies and building rockets to take them to the moon.

[gender-machine-broke]

“Ohhh so you think women are just useless little fragile waifs who can’t take care of themselves and should be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen” no. Literally no one said that either. Women have several physical advantages over men including flexibility, more dexterous hands, and better resistance to famine and disease. But in a world where everything was designed for men and their bodies and men regularly use their greater physical strength to terrorize women, pretending there are zero physical differences between the sexes is not the more feminist stance. It puts women in harm’s way

[bushpropaganda]

exactly!!! painting physical strength disparities as anti-feminist only serves to aid male violence and victimize women. you teach a woman that she's as (physically) strong as any man, and she will be woefully unprepared when she's in a situation where it's her strength against his.

if you've ever had to fight off a man, either for your safety or another woman's, you would realize how insanely strong even the most sedentary man is. in addition to natural upper body strength, they have longer arms, larger hands, and stronger grip strength—it's easier for them to grab you, and when they do, you are not getting away without fighting dirty.

it's why women's self-defense classes teach unique incapacitation methods that do not rely on upper body strength, but on weak spots, dexterity, and making use of our legs.

i want all these feminists who have an issue with this to ask a man in their lives to subdue them without holding their strength back. then i want them to try and get away. then i want them to come back to me with how it went.

now, imagine a situation where a man's full intent is to hurt you, where he is exercising the full extent of his strength in an attempt to victimize you, and ask yourself how that would go.

instead of pretending that the strength disparity doesn't exist in an effort to prove women's value, stop making physical strength a defining factor of worthiness.

[tigerstale]

I tried this in my twenties with my husband - a man I trust never to use his physical strength to hurt me. We were both in good shape and pretty evenly matched when it comes to size.

I didn't stand a chance. We were both shocked.

Women, if you ever need to fight a man, fight mean. Bite, kick, scream, go for the eyes, tear his ears off, headbutt his nose, just go full tilt crazy bitch. Don't hold anything back.

[pisceanpharies]

[radsys]

I hate the idea that "rape isn't about sex, it's about power". It doesn't defend rape victims, it defends rapists. Most rapes happen because men think they deserve sex and won't take no for an answer. Men's entire lives revolve around sex, it's all they think about. Why would it not be about sex?

[hugewoman]

I’ve been thinking this exact thing for a long time now - bc it can be about power and control and sadism but the social narrative has gradually become that it’s always about that, and that’s just blatantly false

Horny entitled men who want sex and refuse to take no for an answer will always be the greatest perpetrators of rape and sexual assault. If anything the sociopaths that get no physical pleasure from it have to be a small minority compared to the amount of men that just thoughtlessly take

(I’m half convinced that this effort in modern society to remove the sexual element from sex crimes has gotta be a psyop)

[amilta]

[honeyapplebutterfly]

Controversial and terrifying thought: I’m a butch lesbian but I like having boobs and have zero interest in getting rid of them :) we exist believe it or not

[honeyapplebutterfly]

​I really wish people, particular nonlesbian women, would stop telling me to get a binder or get top because “masc outfits would look better”

I’m not getting a major surgery just so shirts will “fit me like a frat boy” YOU are projecting that onto me. Men do not have a monopoly on masculinity. If having boobs makes me “less butch” to you then I fear you don’t fucking know what it means to be butch.

Yes this is real shit ppl say to me just because I am a woman with short hair and pants

“Masc shortage” the way y’all treat mascs:

[bushpropaganda]

no cause its actually so predatory to try to pressure masculine women—specifically masc lesbians—into a trans identity. i've had this shit said to me before too and i dont give a fuck how pure you think your intentions are, stop trying to convince masculine women that we're men. it's homophobic at best and literal conversion therapy at worst.

just because your lesbophobia is disguised as progressive politics does not mean you're any less culpable in trying to turn us straight (aka "transing the gay away"). leave lesbians the fuck alone.

[riverlarking]

how it feels to become too feminist for things you were previously fine with

[hugewomanwatches]

[gatekeeper-of-witchcraft]

lowkey how it feels to be an actual homosexual during pride month

[kiefbowl]

it's so insane that so many gay and bi people just accepted the queer label and now people will ask "are you queer?" like that's normal lmao. now straight people say it like it's nothing it's CRAZYYY imagine any other group being bullied into doing this.

[kiefbowl]

we need one hot gay male celebrity de jour to just passively say "I think it's kind of unchic to use that word" in a non-political context and the walls may start to crumble. like just on jimmy kimmel promoting something gen z likes saying "oh, I don't use that word. it's not very chic imo"

[hugewoman]

Yeah bc there isn’t a female celebrity alive that could even attempt this without being canceled into oblivion, and any of the famous gay women who could try wouldn’t bc for most of them they bought in to hard and it’s their entire brand

But you know if one of those little twinks from heated rivalry started tweeting about how queer is so 2010s cringe and it’s actually much fresher now to call yourself gay/lesbian/bi again we’d have people seriously considering it

[phantomrose96]

I'm very very glad that my knee-jerk, gut-feeling, primal-instinct reaction to seeing a Default Influencer is embarrassment. I think this saves me from a lot of bullshit.

[phantomrose96]

Some lip-filler lady on enough Ozempic to euthanize a horse: "The sad truth is an elite lifestyle takes money and discipline. Buy these brands on credit if you have to. Skip meals."

Me: "Oh. Oh I'm physically experiencing the effects of secondhand embarrassment. You live like this? This is your life? Your interiority? If I was anything like this I'd kill myself I think."

[phantomrose96]

To be clear ☝️, absolutely not gender-exclusive. Some broccoli-haired shirtless 23-year-old man on enough trenbolone to euthanize a different horse starts talking about how to be a high-value male and I start thinking instantly about how I'd have 4,000 slugs use me as a jungle-gym before I'd want this man within cootie-contagion distance of me.

[hugewoman]

I have almost zero sympathy or empathy for the pornrotted young demons that grew up on the mannosphere and think they need to break their faces with hammers to be conventionally handsome… they may have been led down an alt right pipeline but they still chose to listen and absorb it and take it as their gospel. At the end of the day they fundamentally hate women, and their content overwhelmingly shows it

But there’s something about the young women who live such artificial and hyperdocumented lives for the sake of extra income that does feel uniquely heartbreaking to me. The camera that’s always watching, the audience in their head that they’re clearly always performing for, it’s such a gross violation of their own privacy. To potentially aways be observed sounds like a kind of hell, and I can’t even imagine how much I’d resent a friend or family member who decided to intentionally drag me into that lifestyle along with them.

It’s easy to act like they’re all just vapid idiots selling out for a buck on products they know are horseshit, but there’s really something tragic going on there. It’s a twisted mess of not just narcissism and mental illness, but also a sort of capitalistic pseudo-prostitution. These women are often pressured to do only fans, not just by inappropriate followers but also often by their male sex partners. If a woman starts to get an online audience, usually the first person suggesting that she take advantage of it to make a second income stream on OF is her boyfriend, who rapidly becomes her pimp if she goes down that route. There have even been cases where those men made accounts and started posting sexual content of their influencer girlfriends without them knowing or consenting.

And are those women complicit when they tell their female followers to get cosmetic surgeries and starve themselves on crash diets and buy makeup systems and get invested in crypto and buy into whatever other bullshit pyramid scheme they’re a part of? Of course they are. They’re directly taking part in grooming other women and girls. That’s as complicit as it gets.

But someone had to get them into it, and in many ways they’re likely just as much victims to whatever cult they’re trying to get you into

[kkoffin]

i’m sick to death of seeing male cosmetic surgeons on social media with this “cunty” “gay best friend” personality, making jokes about being “snatched” and “skinni” knowing damn well they’re all fucking evil greedy misogynists.

i also regularly see them making jokes about their young female clients being with elderly and borderline abusive men. also jokes about “maybe a bbl will make you feel better”, “you aren’t ugly, you just need to get bread and come into my practice”

THESE MFS ARE EVIL!! THEY ARE FUCKING EVIL!!! i want to throw BRICKS THROUGH THEIR PRACTICE WINDOWS WHENEVER I SEE THEM!!! THEY ARE FUCKING LYING TO YOU THEY ARE PROFITING OFF FEMALE INSECURITY THEY WANT YOU TO FEEL FAT AND UGLY!! THEY WILL BUTCHER UR SURGERY AND THEN TELL YOU ITS SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE THAT!! MOTHER FUCKER THEY WILL KILL YOU!! THEY ARE NOT UR FRIEND THEY ARE TRYING TO MAKE YOU HATE YOURSELF!! THEY ARE THE FUCKING ENEMY TO ALL WOMEN!!

DO NOT CALL ME BESTIE, GIRLIE, WHATEVER!! I NEED YOU IN A CELL!!!!!!

EHEHE!! NOT EATING FOR 8 HOURS AND CLOTHING SO TIGHT IT RESTRICTS YOU IS SO CUTE AND “SNATCHED” HEHE!! ANYWAYS UR UGLY IF YOU DONT PAY THOUSANDS FOR A BBL!! AAAAHH

[realist-fortheloveofwomen]

Yeah gonna be honest these men are insidious and from a soul perspective, absolutely viscerally disgusting. Nothing but hatred for them.

[mollythetruckdriver]

And the worst thing is that there is a certain percentage of women who seriously consider these men their friends and defend them, pouring filth on other women, when these same other women criticize or simply disagree

И самое ужасное, так это, что есть некоторый процент женщин, которые всерьёз считают этих мужчин своими друзьями и защищают их, обливая помоями других женщин, когда эти самые другие женщины критикуют или просто не согласны

[marmorada]

literally just fucking eviscerate them

[bettybeagettymcclanahan]

[hugewoman]

[diana-lostandfound]

"We're just making up for the girlhood we never got to have!!" 

My friend who left her Amish order at age 19, who was the eldest daughter to a family of nine, who never had a birthday party, whose days of cooking and cleaning and farm labor and taking care of her younger siblings started at 4:30 am, has never felt the urge to do ageplay 

My coworker, who raised her violent younger brother and fended for herself in a filthy double-wide trailer where her parents were either gone or raging drunk at home, who couldn't even dare to invite a friend over because of how horrifying her home life was, has never felt the urge to have a slumber party pillow fight

My neighbor's mother, who grew up as a house girl in southern India, who was born into a life of drugery and hiddenness and abuse, who wasn't allowed to even touch the toilet or dining utensils of the house she was forced to work in for 10 hours a day as a child, has never felt the urge to drink out of a Disney princess sippy cup 

MTFs do not want to experience girlhood. Girlhood as we lived it would have made these pampered, whiny, milksop men kill themselves. They want to live in the sexualized schoolgirl anime that was contrived entirely in the minds of men. None of us got to experience that girlhood, and yet none of us are desperately trying to recreate it as adults now.

[xcounterforcex]

"Parents usually try to protect girls more and dress them in pretty dresses" — yes, because for centuries, women's lives depended on whether the rich rapist would like them and buy them or not. Woman were literally raised for sale like cattle.

Just remember that "princesses," contrary to the stereotypes about their pampering, were mere bargaining chips. They were artificially pushed out of power, driven back to tea parties and dress fittings, because their primary function was to be sold and then regularly subjected to sexual and reproductive violence.

Your idea of ​​womanhood or girlhood is literally built on the propaganda of misogynists (who don't want to lose the opportunity to rape women so they block women's right movement) and the mockery of femicide. Just think about that twice.

[hugewoman]

[gnomebutch]

okay then don’t be the shitty man who perpetrates misogyny

[realist-fortheloveofwomen]

Why do men do this. Men love weaponizing “it hurts that you think of me like this”

Then stop making me think of you like that? Be a good partner who does the dishes and pulls your weight you lazy sack of shit. Holy fuck. Also “transmisogyny” bec you told a male he acted like a male. Buddy.

[hugewoman]

[feminist-furby-freak]

Why do you seem upset about being a gender studies major?

I literally went into my degree with all the correct woke opinions and it was just so insane I managed to leave a TERF. everyone on here is like read the literature talk to real trans people. Yall. I did an entire 4 year degree in this if I’m not sold “educating” isn’t going to fix it. Honestly reading less and knowing less and not thinking too hard makes it way easier to go along with everything. It was actually having to think and unpack everything that made me realize this shit lowkey doesn’t add up.

[girlfishes]

There’s a reason that post modern gender study folx try to use the most confusing and inaccessible language possible. It’s because if they wrote what they were arguing in plain English the general public would realize they make no sense. But now by using fancy words, if you don’t understand or agree they can say that you’re just not sophisticated enough to understand. Oddly reminiscent of the bourgeoisie they try to find a way to bash every other page or so.

I’ll always be recommending this article:

The Professor of Parody

The hip defeatism of Judith Butler

[feminist-furby-freak]

There’s definitely something very bourgeoise abt modern gender theory and “feminism.” Ironically, this version of “feminism” is considered to be correct while radical feminism is “white feminism.”

Something very dystopian that happened during some of my seminars is when outside speakers were brought in (mainstream journalists, black elder repro rights organizer from the south, indigenous elder promoting midwifery, etc.) my recitations would spend the entire section picking apart their language. They didn’t give a shit what they said their brains turned off after the they heard the word woman. Here is a group of one of touch undergrads literally ignoring these other (fascinating and important) perspectives. Even dismissing them as outdated! Feels like white feminism to me! Demanding everyone use the make up to date language which basically only people in academia will be aware of.

Then they tokenize these marginalized communities (two spirit, black women weren’t considered women etc) while actively silencing them and ignoring their issues to push their agenda! Then they gaslight us that *we* are the “white feminists.”

Like do you really think girls in Afghanistan are like damn wish these news outlets would say “people who identify as women.” Obviously not. You have to be incredibly privileged to think gender/trans/pronoun issues are the most pressing for modern feminism to address.

[whimsical-vanilla]

I took an LGBT Studies class at my university (a gay friend recommended the class) right around the time the trans rights movement was starting to gain traction online and coining the term TERF.

The first month or so of the class we actually learned gay history- about homosexuality in ancient societies; famous gay people throughout history; about the sexologists and their theories; about homophobia in Nazi Germany; and then about early gay right's movements in America and about Stonewall and the first pride parade.

After that, I swear the rest of the class was just about trans people and gender nonsense. Early on the professor told us that "sex" was biological and that "gender" was a social role, that transgender individuals wanted to live as the opposite gender but didn't necessarily want to undergo surgery and that their sex didn't change. That was the common understanding at the time.

Then suddenly near the end of the semester, the professor was claiming that when a male comes out as transgender, he didn't suddenly become a woman but "always was one." She also seemed to think that MichFest should've let TiMs in as guests, and misinterpreted Simon de Beauvoir's quote about how one isn't born a woman to mean "Cis men can be women if they want to, and therefore can also be lesbians." I'm not joking.

She also told us that words like "gay" and "lesbian" are labels, and labels are bad because they're limiting. *rolls eyes* Isn't that horribly homophobic?

I took a "Women and Gender Studies" class the next year, which was taught by a LibFem who didn't encourage my classmates to critique or analyze anything. She also didn't speak up when one of the few men in class compared prostitution to working in an office!

This is kinda related? A few years ago I was teaching at a high school in an urban area. During my lunch break, I liked to walk down the halls and look at student work that was on display sometimes. One day, I noticed a few articles hung up outside one of the English classrooms. A student had found an article online that criticized White Feminism, but what was described in the article was just Liberal Feminism.

It's really weird how some groups will call Radical Feminism, which aspires to help all women shed their shackles of male oppression, "white feminism," while others will say that feminist rhetoric that focuses on "empowerment" via beauty and consumerism and pleasing men is "white feminism." What's going on here?

[kiefbowl]

the female centered search for why men cheat and abuse has very little interest in the male psyche. that is male centered. why does he cheat, what does he get from it? might as well ask why some people like roller coasters and some don't. he gets out of it what he gets out of it. some men are so motivated by the pleasure of orgasm they don't care about much else, while other men are tantalized by the fantasy of flexing power over others for whatever complex or simple reasons are doodling in the background of his mind. it just doesn't matter. what matters is that they're wrong, and more importantly: arming women with knowledge and protection. perhaps he wouldn't have cheated if his father stayed or if his mother wasn't a w**** or w/e nonsense men want us to believe, but ultimately if he wasn't getting something out of his behavior, he wouldn't do it. because men do, literally, whatever they want. including cheating and abusing and spending your money and lying to get more of what he wants. men cheat because it's a belief that there's a hard-wired naturalness to it and that men have right to it, and so they get away with it by and large. the ultimate answer is: why wouldn't he??

So, what do women need? Women need to know that divorce is an option without shame, that they can survive on their own, and that they never have to tolerate humiliation to prove their "goodness." Get your money up, get your pussy up, etc. The intense interest in the male psyche is a TRAP. Have intense interest in YOUR OWN psyche. Are you well? Are you thriving? You must, you must!

[quinntheestallion]

The ppl saying pap smears "are just mild discomfort" have never gotten a pap smear as virgin, as a lesbian who has never been penentrated, as a woman with vaginismus, as a woman with pelvic floor dysfunction, as a woman with complex sexual trauma or sexual vaginal injury or injury from childbirth. We're trying to tell you huge groups of women are excluded/ not considered by the typical pap smear technique and its a real and significant barrier to health care access.

Despite these situations and conditions being very common, for some reason a lot health care providers that offer routine pap smears are totally inconpetent and unprepared to handle these conditions/situations. And many act like you have 3 heads or youre just being difficult when you bring it up and try to get your needs met.

So a lot of women with specific needs have to shop around and spend significant time and money just try to get their needs met by a competent health care provider.

This should not be the case and its just another huge barrier to getting, what should be, routine care.

So people are not being babies, they're describing an unaddressed barrier to care.

[evenlesssentimentaltranslator]

Also @ the straight-sex-having women who are saying “why are you being such babies about a little discomfort” regarding pap smears, I would like to gently ask y’all to reflect on what kind of treatment from men you’ve been getting that has amounted to “don’t be a baby about a little discomfort” that has maybe been more than a little discomfort.

[quinntheestallion]

I believe the entire pap smear proceedure was designed with women who get penetrated easily and regularly in mind and the medical industry has yet to acknowledge that getting penetrated with a penis regularly by the age of 21 is not a universal female experience

[hugewoman]

And if it was and is miraculously easy and painless and comfortable and fine for you then you HAVE to be able to learn to divorce yourself from the idea that your experience is in any way universal

If you have had a pap smear and didn’t experience, anxiety, fear, discomfort, or pain, then you need to acknowledge and hold space for the fact that you are incredibly fortunate. By some stroke of luck you had the perfect combination of a good and considerate doctor who was having a good day at the office.

It SHOULD be that way for everyone but it simply is not. I’ve seen way too many women express sentiments that they think other women are exaggerating about how bad paps can be, and i think that attitude is truly only possible for someone who’s never had a genuinely bad one

[mayonnaiseparade]

men either sexualize women or try to humiliate them if they don’t find them attractive

terfs better keep their ugly hands off this

[elfyprincess]

“men either sexualize women or try to humiliate them if they don’t find them attractive

terfs better keep their ugly hands off this.”

You really typed this out & hit post ? 💀

[wendyfooterf]

They proved the point in less than 10 seconds

[hugewoman]

[veritablevent]

women keep trying to invent the kind of femininity that will be subversive revolutionary and untouched by misogyny so that they don't have to feel bad for wanting to enjoy the social benefits of performing it but they can't and they never will because the express purpose of femininity is to shackle women up. so that's that.