Spelling mistakes? I guarantee neither of us saw those at 3:00 AM Monday Morning.
LMAOOO why is this so accurate??? 😂😂😂
DEAR READER
will byers stan first human second
No title available

Discoholic 🪩
sheepfilms
todays bird

titsay
Xuebing Du
Keni
Stranger Things
Acquired Stardust
h

★
Not today Justin

No title available

tannertan36
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Origami Around
tumblr dot com
Three Goblin Art
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Spain

seen from Mexico

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from Germany
seen from Canada
seen from Canada

seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from France
seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from Czechia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
@captainbarinius
Spelling mistakes? I guarantee neither of us saw those at 3:00 AM Monday Morning.
LMAOOO why is this so accurate??? 😂😂😂
reblog if you’re anti censorship and against harassing real people over fictional characters
!!!!!!!!!!!! This made me cry. I visited a lot of historical sites as a kid travelling up and down the eastern seaboard with my grandparents. I grew up being told that they had probably all died and no one knew what happened to them. Absolutely incredible and so counter to the narrative that Americans deserve to not exist. People have been fighting for their survival and learning to live together here for over 10000 years. Our history is incredible and I am so looking forward to joining my local archaelogical society and doing my part to preserve American history.
This is akin all those hot takes about the 2k bug being an hoax:
"Remember when they told us every computer was going to crash on 1/1/01 and there would be chaos and then nothing happened?"
Yeah, I remember. And I'm sure every programmer and sysadmin that contributed the billion person/hour global effort to prevent it also remembers.
No one talks about acid rain anymore, either. And that's a very good thing.
see also START and START II, which significantly reduced nuclear stockpiles
International cooperation is actually so effective that most people don’t even notice it happening, and then erroneously believe it can’t solve anything.
Fixing issues before they develop into actual disasters is such an underappreciated thing it hurts at all levels.
We don't talk about acid rain because there isn't any more acid rain because when acid rain started happening and we learned that the cause was mainly sulphur oxide and carbon monooxide from car exhausts, countries all over the world made it a law that car companies had to produce cars that produced less exhaust with better effectivenes (burning the fuel all the way to CO2 instead of the halfassed CO) and oil rafineries to remove the sulphur from the gasoline in the first place.
We don't talk about computers crashing because of the turn of the century, because thousands of programmers worked very hard to write updates and patches for Every Single Program humanity as a whole used back in 1999 and then somehow managed to failtest, distribute, and update every single device and system, be it an online or offline one before the midnight of the 1st january of 2000.
On a much smaller scale, no one ever commenta or notices cleaners and housekeepers doing their job - be it at home or at whole buildings - because they always make sure that there's nothing to notice. But don't be fooled - at any point of your life you are one week of them not doing away from swimming in trash and filth with nothing to eat and nothing clean to wear. Only then you would notice.
Now it's time to do that thing again and make sure that we don't kill our whole planetary ecosystem within the next century.
[IDs:
1st image: two tweets.
From "Matt Walsh", @MattWalshBlog
Remember when they spent years telling us to panic over the hole in the ozone layer and then suddenly just stopped talking about it and nobody ever mentioned the ozone layer
From "Derek Thompson", @DKThomp
What happened is scientists discovered chlorofluorocarbons were bad for the ozone, countries believed them, the Montreal Protocol was signed, and CFC use fell by 99.7%, leading to the stabilization of the ozone layer, perhaps the greatest example of global cooperation in history.
2nd image: Bender, the robot from Futurama, staring out into space, showing blue and purple nebulas and bright white stars. A caption reads:
When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
/End ID.]
When you do things right,
people won’t be sure you’ve done
anything at all.
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.
Telling children they will go to hell for not joining religious activities will be regarded as abuse. Read more at straitstimes.com. Read mo
looks like the government is doing something about cults
yet another win for political violence
Wait prev I’m really confused what you mean by ‘another win for political violence’, are you able to explain please?
there’s a cult in japan that had deep ties with japans ruling party (a party which has held power almost continuously since 1955) including former prime minister shinzo abe.
shinzo abe was assassinated to bring attention to this cult and the power it held over the ruling party.
while the assassination was widely decried, since then the stranglehold the cult held over the ruling party and japanese politics generally has been exposed and the party has had to break ties. the cult is slowly being dismantled.
the proposal above is specifically being issued in response to forced indoctrination into this cult.
Zohran K Mamdani's NYC Mayoral Acceptance Speech - 11/4/2025
Full speech below:
Israeli media reported that Ben Gvir entered the prison holding prominent Palestinian detainees, personally verifying that they are being forced to stay seated on the floor at all times. During his visit, he also called for the execution of Palestinian detainees. these people are held without any charges they are kidnapped from their homes in the occupied west bank their only crime is being palastinian
Highly recommend Indie Nile recent video called Who Benefits from Israel to see how we got to this point in the first place!!!!!
Haha ...oh man the nostalgia is Crazzzzzyyy
DOUGLAS IS CANCELLED S01E04
I have never been more confused by a gifset in my life. trying to figure out what scene in doctor who this could possibly be from.
Outraged by the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, a wilderness survival trainer spent years undercover climbing the ranks of right-wing militias. He didn
Outraged by the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, a wilderness survival trainer spent years undercover climbing the ranks of right-wing militias. He didn’t tell police or the FBI. He didn’t tell family or friends. The one person he told was a ProPublica reporter.
This is such a wild story like holy shit dude
Crawling out of my hole to remind people that with this current update to Firefox (version 144) they've gone and dumped in their lot with a buncha lil AI tools, namely Perplexity as a new search engine.
So if the sound of that leaves your mouth tasting of tar, here's what you want to do:
In the url bar, type in about:config
It'll give you a big scary warning page that you might poke holes in your browser. Good. You want to do that. Click continue.
One by one, you're going to need to put each of these into the search bar in the page, not up top:
browser.ml.enable browser.ml.chat.enabled extensions.ml.enabled browser.ml.linkPreview.enabled browser.tabs.groups.smart.enabled browser.tabs.groups.smart.userEnabled
Each of these are gonna have a lil toggle icon on the right hand side that looks like a funky double-ended arrow. Click that and the value next to it should change to false. It all auto saves as you go. Some of these might already be set to false by default and that's peachy.
The next best thing you can do for yourself is to set your default search engine to udm14 or Qwant, but for now, we're just tidying the garden a lil bit.
Defunct ME1 Website Codex Entries
In the interest of preserving rare documents related to Mass Effect, I'm transcribing here the Codex entries which were on the ME1 website when the game first came out. They are reproduced here as they form much of the basis by which we understand Mass Effect ; in some cases, they are phrased differently from the Codex in the actual game, with additional information, or contradictions (e.g. the given length of the Krogan Rebellions). Link here : https://web.archive.org/web/20130326112139/http://masseffect.bioware.com/me1/galacticcodex/index.html
New post on Ebenezer D. Bassett (first African American diplomat) and his role in the early days of what is now Cheyney University (the oldest HBCU).
Get more from AlongTheEasternSeaboard on Patreon
This is a brief introductory post focusing on his role in educating the Black youth, I am currently working on writing about his work as a diplomat but there is a strong chance that that will be a podcast or video instead of a blog post ❤️.
So I decided to read the actual study (link) - it's totally free. TL;DR: the study is testing how well people in the 21st century can understand the specific nuances of 19th century London. This is not "reading comprehension", they are testing whether you know things like what a "Michaelmas Term" (Wikipedia) is. This is... to put it politely, not a normal part of reading comprehension in any sort of day to day task. This study is exclusively about your ability to read and be familiar with the nuances of 19th century English Literature as a specific body.
The study structure was 20 minutes to read aloud seven paragraphs. So, while one was allowed a quick Google or a peek at the dictionary, there isn't really time to do any sort of deep dive - this is a test of whether you are already familiar with this sort of work.
---
Oh, but it wasn't just 20 minutes to read it out loud: every few sentences, the facilitator would poke the subject to explain the last few sentences. Not summarize, no: they wanted a full dissection. "Dickens is setting the atmosphere by describing the fog" was considered a failure of comprehension. The only explanation they provide that counts as a "pass" is almost twice as long as the actual passage itself!
It's not even really clear if they made it clear to the subjects that they were looking for this sort of verbose summary - the facilitator just replies "O.K." regardless of how detailed their response is.
I cannot imagine I would do terribly better, given 20 minutes to read aloud 7 paragraphs, and being constantly prodded to regurgitate the material at random intervals!
---
I really do NOT consider it worth reading, but here's a link to the original post for posterity's sake: https://www.tumblr.com/prettyboysdontlookatexplosions/783379386552516608?source=share
I'm sorry, this is too ripe with irony for me to keep my mouth shut.
You failed at reading comprehension while reading a study about people failing at reading comprehension.
Quick summary of my response for you: It was not about existing knowledge. They were not required to get through all 7 paragraphs. They were not required to read aloud. They were analyzing one sentence at a time; read it, analyze it, move on. Comprehension is more than a simple summary. A dissection of a text will always be longer than the original. Facilitators prompted them with questions, but did not confirm if they were correct, because it is a study, not a work session for the student.
You can hear some of the shock and horror over the massive knowledge gaps in the study's writing, but that is separate from the study itself.
All the following quotes are from the study. Yes, it made me laugh how many typos there are in it.
So. first. They chose Dickens on purpose.
In Bleak House, Dickens also mixes specific, contemporary references (from the book’s first publication in 1852–3) to his 1820s setting.
Dickens’ rhetorical style is, to say the least, unfamiliar, so entering his world entails making imaginative leaps and consistently thinking on a higher level.
They acknowledge that modern students do not have default knowledge of 19th century references. They started by surveying what they knew about the culture, which let them account for the fact that most of them were starting from zero.
Each taped reading test began with a brief questionnaire in which subjects were asked to give authors and titles of specific nineteenth-century American and British literary works and to explain briefly what they knew about nineteenth-century American and British history and culture. The purpose of these questions was to see how much literary and/or cultural knowledge the subjects possessed. [...] The results from the questionnaire revealed that most of these subjects could not rely on previous knowledge to help them with Bleak House
It was very much not about their preexisting knowledge. It was about cognitive processing. How well they could encounter something they didn't know, like 'Michaelmas Term' and figure out what Dickens was talking about.
They wanted to see how the students thought through the problem when they encountered something they didn't understand. That's why they were asked to think-aloud. It lets them hear as a student stumbles on an unfamiliar word, and how they work out a definition. Then, if they looked up the word, if they integrated the definition to their understanding of the sentence.
They were looking for synthesization and inference.
A principal concern for us was to test whether the subjects had reached a level of “proficient-prose literacy,” which is defined by the U. S. Department of Education as the capability of “reading lengthy, complex, abstract prose texts as well as synthesizing information and making complex inferences”
When I read the selection, I encountered things I didn't know. For a simple example: 'blinkers' on horses. I paused, because I think of blinkers as a car thing, but I know the word blinders has to do with horses. They're similar words, and english is like this, so it was either a typo, or an alternate name for what I know as 'blinders'.
They wanted to hear that part, then how you integrate what you've worked out. They wanted to see if you could work out something in paragraph three, then update what you understood back in paragraph two. It was about how they thought.
They were looking for things like the subject who encountered Michaelmas Term and Lincoln's Inn Hall, and tried to look it up online. Then when they couldn't make sense of it, said they'd skip it. They're looking for the students that resorted to commentary because they didn't have an analysis. They're looking for how they faced the problem.
As much as I'd love to go through the whole study and respond to it, that feels both wasteful and insulting to you, which is not my intent.
You seem concerned that this is not a normal part of day to day reading comprehension. I fervently disagree. They were looking for the tactics students were using when they didn't understand something. That is a constant thing in day to day life, even on things you know decently well, even if you know the surrounding context, even on tumblr.
If you get a lease handed to you, and it is dense with legalese, reading tactics are how you decipher it. If you sign a contract for a job, you need to understand it. If a politician rattles off something that's very complex and metaphoric, with a bunch of weird vocabulary, reading tactics are how you know if they're lying to you.
If you're on this site, where we piss on the poor, if you read something and you jump from noun to noun, you can miss the intent of the post. If you read something that has an unfamiliar dogwhistle in it, and you're not actually comprehending what you're reading, you might take it as face value. Comprehension might only mean you pause and think 'that's a weird way to phrase that'. You probably don't go google that, but if you see it a couple times, you will. It will stand out to you if you were processing what you read, not just skimming across it.
I am not trying to be insulting, I'd be much ruder if I was. But OP, you did not comprehend what the study was doing, or what the write up is saying.
This is pretty good study. I wish it was a larger scale. Get them 1500 students from English education programs across the country, I want to see the data. I also want broader data sampling. It's fascinating, discouraging as hell, and we should use it to whack school boards until they change the way school gets structured, and how we teach students.
They were also testing whether these English majors—not a random sample of the population, people who chose to study English literature in college—could make literal sense of the sentences they were reading, or if they skimmed over them not expecting them to make any sense or matter if they did.
The article explains why they chose the study method they did: they wanted to test what strategies students use to understand a complex text. When people see students struggling to read, they usually assume the students can read and understand the words on the page in front of them, and are just having trouble extrapolating bigger themes and contexts and conclusions from it. This study was not making that assumption and was testing whether these students could literally understand what a sentence was talking about. And when the answer was “no, a bunch of them were not understanding the text at a sentence-by-sentence level,” letting them read silently and sit with the text is not going to show you that—and giving them time to read on their own is not going to indicate to you where exactly they’re having issues! The reason “Dickens is setting the atmosphere by describing the fog” is considered “competent” and not “proficient” is because there is a lot of concrete detail in all these long, winding sentences, and while saying “it’s full of fog” is true, the sentence is, say, literally describing a sky full of heavy clouds and people on the bridge looking down at the water and seeing only fog there as well—a “nether sky” i.e. the river below looks similar to the sky above, metaphorically unmooring the people in space. The language is doing something specific, and the study is asking whether the students think thoroughly about what the sentence is saying or if they just see “fog” again and move on.
The study method was chosen for a specific reason, and that specific reason was to test the assumption that these students are able to understand, at the sentence level, what is actually happening in the text they read and having them spell out their thought process. It is way better at pinpointing where particular comprehension disconnects happen than having them summarize the whole thing at the end.
I would LOVE to see this study sample a large number of students from different universities! This is not about shaming people, this is about figuring out how to teach students to read complex texts more effectively!
I don't see people talking about this so today is the 110th anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, in where the factory owners locked working women and girls inside to "eliminate the risk of theft" (in reality it was too keep them from taking breaks), which resulted in the gruesome deaths of 123 mostly immigrant women and girls and 23 men, many of whom jumped to their deaths from the ninth floor either in a panicked attempt to escape or in order to die quickly. There were reports that some of the workers were on fire already as they jumped.
The eighth floor of the building was able to telephone the tenth floor to warn them about the fire, but the factory on the ninth floor where these women and girls labored had no such communication and such warning.
The factory owners were criminally charged with manslaughter for actions that contributed to the mass deaths but acquitted. However, this tragedy led to mass sympathy to the labor movement, and unions spurred on safety regulations that passed in New York state and eventually the entire country, and activists were able to reduce child labor in the process.
This tragedy is a reminder that has been forgotten in the 110 years since: every safety regulation-- every scrap of paperwork contributing to the hundreds of pages of red tape people like to complain about--every word of it was written in the blood of a laborer.
111th anniversary
They were discouraged from breaks because they were actively trying to unionize, and bosses felt that keeping them from unsupervised contact would prevent them from joining the garment workers' union.
This is why unions are important. This is why today, right now, the biggest companies in America are trying to squash unionization of their laborers and why those workers are fighting so hard to unionize.
@tikkunolamorgtfo did a great write-up a few years ago about the aftermath of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire, and I highly recommend reading it (and anything else you can about the fire). It is painfully relevant still and it's incredibly important women's, Jewish, immigrants', and workers' history.
#most of the girls working there were either jewish immmigrants or southern italian immigrants #two of the more exploited immigrant groups at the turn of the century particularly in nyc but elsewhere too #the labor history element of it can't be overemphasized tbh (x)
Filed hours before his killing in an Israeli airstrike, journalist Hossam Shabat describes the resumption of Israel's scorched earth campaig
Hussam talked about how an IDF person called him and told him to leave the area and stop being a journalist
Hussam said he would not leave.
Silence.
“You will never hear the explosion” the voice on the other end said.
Hossam was literally outside his house when it was blown up a minute later.