me trying to figure out why, in god’s good name, is johnny depp playing gellert grindelwald when colin farrell is alive and well
Sade Olutola
No title available

roma★
h
untitled
noise dept.

Product Placement
Not today Justin

if i look back, i am lost
No title available
hello vonnie
todays bird
macklin celebrini has autism
Interview Vampire Daily

#extradirty
YOU ARE THE REASON
cherry valley forever
ojovivo
taylor price
Keni
seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from Germany
seen from Poland

seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore

seen from Singapore
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Germany

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Germany
@claireyfairy1
me trying to figure out why, in god’s good name, is johnny depp playing gellert grindelwald when colin farrell is alive and well
I’d like to thank my friend Avistew Teague for translating this!
I LOVE THIS
Such a good explanation of actual feminism, rather than what most people think it is!
Imagine if 99.9% of terrorists were women.
We would not shut up about gender. There would be a million politicians and newspaper columns analysing “what is it about women that is making them kill?” “What is it about how women are raised?” “What is our culture telling women about violence?” “What books and movies are women reading and watching that compel them to do this?” “Is it biological? We should probably legislate their bodies right? They have an excess of a genetic chemical known as oxythorconopolonomon that makes them more prone to aggression and with just a small incision we can..” Everyone from Trump to Oprah would be talking about this non-stop.
But because 99.9% of terrorists are men, we don’t look at gender. That’s how much we’ve normalised male violence. We don’t ask what it is about *this* category of people and how we raise men that makes them feel validated to others’ bodies. Gender and patriarchy isn’t the only factor here but it’s a big one. Why are terrorists and shooters almost always men?
The only acceptable reason for this is if this character is actually a demon who seduces men and then eats them. [source]
who wrote this, expose him
my breasts are nicely separated. Completely divided, every year they move apart by half an inch.
My breasts are nicely separated though they still fight for custody of the children.
I,,a woman,,,am WiDeR LOweR dOwN
That was difficult to read.
My name is Ebony D'arkness Dementia Raven Way, and my breasts are nicely separated
OH MY GOD WHAT IS THAT AND HOW ON EARTH DID IT GET PUBLISHED
You can always tell when it’s a man writing a description because they focus oddly on the breasts. There will always be something about breasts and I can’t tell you how many times I’ve read historical or fantasy fiction and they talk about “her breasts hanging freely under her tunic” or what the fuck ever and it’s like…women don’t do that? We don’t describe ourselves by saying “I have blonde hair and blue eyes and my breasts hang freely under my tunic”. I kind of feel like we should counter by awkwardly mentioning all male character’s balls in their description. It’s kind of in the same vein.
“I have auburn hair and hazel eyes and my copious nicely separated balls hangs freely under my breeches”
“He was of middling height, had straight hair, and his crotch bulge was obviously on the right – my right, not his – and on the somewhat small side.”
With Liberty and Justice For All.
SPOILERS HARRY POTTER AND THE CURSED CHILD SPOILERS
There are major spoilers under this cut. I have to had a wee rant about something in the second part of the play.
DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU DON’T WANT TO BE SPOILED FOR THE CURSED CHILD.
i hate writers with a violent passion who justify their shitty writing decisions by saying “it’s good that people are upset/hurt/angry about this, it means we’ve done our jobs as storytellers”
like fuck you, your writing doesn’t exist in a vacuum and you can’t just create any emotional response and call it successful. there’s a type of pain that comes with a really satisfying character death or heart-breaking plot twist, and then there’s the type of pain that comes from storytelling that is disturbing in a real world context. one means you’ve written something well, the other should be apologizing for and learning from. and it’s not that hard to tell the difference between the two if you take your head out of your ass for a few seconds.
Erasure of Jewish Identity and Culture in Marvel
(Not including X-Men films: I’m not up to discussing the tragedy of the X-Men movies and the complete erasure of all Jewish characters besides Magneto, the villain, today.)
Honestly, as a Jewish person in America this ongoing erasure of Jewish identity and culture Marvel is committing doesn’t even surprise me. This sort of subtle anti-Semitism that Marvel is participating in is par for the course. The erasure of Jewish identity and culture is so common most people don’t even pause to consider it, and if they do they don’t consider it anti-Semitic. After all, they don’t hate Jews, they don’t insult Jews, they don’t attack Jews, they don’t think Jews are bad or evil, so OF COURSE it isn’t anti-Semitism if you just pretend that Jews don’t exist and destroy Jewish character’s identities. It’s just a change of backstory, after all!
The erasure of Jewish characters and the destruction of characters created by Jews is not a change of backstory, Marvel, it is anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism is defined as hostility, prejudice or discrimination against Jews. By erasing Jewish characters you are discriminating, or participating in unjust treatment, against them on account of their religion. By ignoring the huge contributions of Jewish writers and artists who gave life to so many comics characters you are being prejudiced. Your hostility, or unfriendliness and opposition, to the inclusion of Jewish characters and the defamation of characters created as allegories by Jews are anti-Semitism, Marvel.
Ignoring, or ret-conning, the fact that Wanda and Pietro Maximoff are ethnically half Jewish and Roma, and always have been, is anti-Semitic and racist. Their heritage may not have played a significant plot point, but it certainly influenced their decisions and motivations. Turning Jewish-Roma Wanda and Pietro Maximoff into volunteers for the fascist-Hydra organization headed by von Strucker, a Nazi, to conduct illegal medical experiments on, is wrong.
Turning Steve Rogers, who has always stood as an allegorical shield for the Jewish people against the Nazi’s and fascism in general, into a fascist Hydra member, is disgusting. Turning Steve Rogers’ who served as Erskine’s (a Jewish scientist’s) golem, his creation and stand-in, to defeat the Nazi’s into a member of Hydra, is revolting.
Fun fact: Captain America’s iconic shield is an allegory in and of itself. What in English is called the Jewish Star or Star of David, one of the most recognizable Jewish symbols in the world, is in Hebrew called the Magen David (Yiddish the Mogein Dovid) which translates to the Shield of David. Steve’s shield with the star on it, used to protect him as he fought Hitler and the Nazi’s in the early comics, was an allegory to a powerful and well known Jewish symbol that the Nazi’s were corrupting. It was a ‘spit in your eye, fuck you’ to the Nazi’s and Jack Kirby and Joe Simon knew that their Jewish readers, desperate for news that the Nazi’s would be stopped and their families were safe, would recognize it.
I’ve seen comments on the Jewish actors in the MCU not being allowed to play Jewish characters. I feel that if in canon the characters are actively shown not to be Jewish, or it’s heavily implied at least, then it’s appropriate for the Jewish actors to portray that character as Christian or Muslim or Hindu or Atheist, or whatever that character religiously identifies as. However, for a character like Darcy Lewis, who is not a canon character in the comics at all, how hard would it be to have her say a throwaway line about her Bat Mitzvah? Or to have Jane Foster (whose religion is never mentioned in the comics) mention her Bubbe (grandmother) in a ‘my Bubbe always said’ way?
I have to wonder what would happen if Marvel suddenly decided that Sam Wilson wasn’t black? What if they thought Wakanda would be better served as a European nation? What if Kamala Khan was found to support a fascist regime? Why is it okay to erase and ignore Jews as both characters and creators? Why are Marvel’s actions not being called out as the anti-Semitism it is?
It doesn’t matter what reason Marvel gives for their choice to make Steve Rogers’ a fascist, a Nazi. It doesn’t matter if it’s a plot twist, a time-change, a clone, a triple agent or a cry for attention. Marvel has taken a character that has stood for freedom and doing the right thing, a hero and a symbol of hope not only to Jews but to people around the world that there are people who have the courage to fight back against oppression, and they have destroyed him. They can never take this back, there is no ‘oops’ here. Even if they retcon this arc in the future, like they did with William Burnside, they have destroyed the legacy of Captain America.
Wasn’t it enough to erase Wanda and Pietro Maximoff’s past? Why do you have to ruin Captain America too?
Jack Kirby and Joe Simon received death threats for creating Steve Rogers, Captain America, in a time when many Americans were either Nazi sympathizers or content to keep their head in the sand. It was a time when Jewish families checked their mailboxes every day praying for a letter from their parents, siblings, aunts, uncles and cousins still in Europe. It was a time when the US turned away boatloads of Jewish refugees fleeing Europe. It was a time when the Third Reich steadily gained more and more land and more and more power, and while many European nations fought back against the rise of fascism the refused to involve itself in Europe’s war despite knowing the threat Hitler posed. Kirby and Simon were surrounded by this environment of fear, because no one knew what was truly happening in Europe, but knew they had to do something about it. It is an insult to the memories of Jack Kirby and Joe Simon. It is morally repugnant to make Captain America into a Nazi.
Marvel has erased Jewish identities of characters in both the comics and the films. That was bad enough. But now? Marvel has taken a hero I love, and have loved since I was a child, and perverted it. They have taken Captain America and twisted him around into a parody of all that he has ever stood for. They have taken a character that was literally created by two Jews to stand against the Nazi’s and say ‘screw you’ to Hitler for all the Jews who couldn’t, and made him into a Nazi. As a Jew and a fan of comics for most of my life I feel like I have been spat on and kicked while I’m down.
This needs to be shared far and wide.
And again, these themes are only possible with the Steve and Bucky relationship, and with the decisions that Steve makes over the course of the film. And it’s the strength of that central relationship - Crossbones simply mentioning Bucky’s name puts Steve off his game (hey, just like what happens with future lovers The Vision and Scarlet Witch… hmmm)–that sets all the events of this movie into motion. Zemo’s plan works, but it had to be predicated on one thing: that Bucky is the most important person in Steve Rogers’ life. That, when push comes to shove, Steve would choose Bucky over literally everything else in his life, including being an Avenger, his friendship with Tony Stark and even being a free man.
Devin Faraci, BirthMoviesDeath, “Stand By Your Man: Steve And Bucky At The Center Of CIVIL WAR” (via wavelette)
Hey, I mean it’s nice to have Justin Timberlake here, but I see what you’re trying to do America…
justin timberlake you don’t even go here
I liked Civil War – the acting was sound, characterizations weren’t destroyed, and the plot had some interesting moments. I’d see it again. There’s a lot that fandom can do with what we were given!
It’s heartbreaking, though, when I see what Captain America 3 could have been. The plotlines that we almost had, if the rumours are true. The loss of that emotional arc between Steve and Bucky, the removal of Bucky’s post-WS storyline, the things the Russos talked about exploring in the film that never happened, and all the things that Chris has confirmed were edited out, presumably to make room for non-Captain America characters.
I remember how excited I was when they released the CW teaser trailer, which was all about Steve and Bucky… not realizing that everything they showed was everything there was in the entire film, plus non-related scenes cut to seem like Steve/Bucky moments.
It’s disappointing to see how the already successful franchise was chipped away to make more money, because it removed the heart of the story in the process: Steve and Bucky’s friendship, their recovery, their lives.
@miriskusnik The more I read stuff like this and talk to you, the more I kind of mourn for what Civil War could have been. I really liked it, but it is a damn shame that we lost the emotional arc of Bucky and Steve. Glad I went with very very low expectations though - it allowed me enjoy what we did get.
The sexual tension between Steve and Bucky in the elevator reblog if u agree
if u think im ever going to move on from Steve dropping the shield for Bucky, ooohooho boy are u wrong, i ain’t ever moving on from this, Steve dropped the shield, Steve is happy to give up being Captain America™, to give up the fight, to live without the war that Ultron told him he couldn’t live without, he does all that,,,,for Bucky, so yh u’ll find me, in like 70 years, old and decrepit, and I’ll still be talking about this
Just remember. There is no such thing as a fake geek girl. There are only fake geek boys. Science fiction was invented by a woman.
Specifically a teenage girl. You know, someone who would be a part of the demographic that some of these boys are violently rejecting.
Isaac Asimov.
yo mary shelley wrote frankenstein in 1818 and isaac asimov was born in 1920 so you kinda get my point
If you want to push it back even further Margaret Cavendish, the duchess of Newcastle (1623-1673) wrote The Blazing World in 1666, about a young woman who discovers a Utopian world that can only be accessed via the North Pole - oft credited as one of the first scifi novels
Women have always been at the forefront of literature, the first novel (what we would consider a novel in modern terms) was written by a woman (Lady Muraskai’s the Tale of Genji in the early 1000s) take your snide “Isaac Asimov” reblogs and stick it
even in terms of male scifi authors, asimov was predated by Jules Verne, HG Wells, George Orwell, you could have even cited Poe or Jonathan Swift has a case but Asimov?
PbbBFFTTBBBTBTTBBTBTTT so desperate to discredit the idea of Mary Shelly as the mother of modern science fiction you didn’t even do a frickin google search For Shame
And if you want to go back even further, the first named, identified author in history was Enheduanna of Akkad, a Sumerian high priestess.
Kinda funny, considering this Isaac Asimov quote on the subject:
Mary Shelley was the first to make use of a new finding of science which she advanced further to a logical extreme, and it is that which makes Frankenstein the first true science fiction story.
Even Isaac Asimov ain’t having none of your shit, not even posthumously.
You know what else was invented by women? Masked vigilantes, the precursor to the modern superhero. Baroness Emma Orczy wrote The Scarlet Pimpernel in 1905. The character would later inspire better known masked vigilantes such as Zorro and Batman.
Got that?
Stick that in your international pipe and smoke it
I have literally been telling people this for over a year.
the first extended prose piece - ie a novel, was not, as many male scholars will shout, Don Quixote (1605) but The Tale of Genji (1008) written by a woman
The first autobiography ever written in English is also attributed to a woman, The Book of Margery Kempe (1430s).
“Beware, for I am fearless and therefore powerful” -Mary Shelley
My favorite one is, “come on Star Wars be original,” as if putting a man in the lead would be cutting edge stuff. Anyway…
Oh yes
It must be so annoying
When the leads of many different movies
Look exactly the same
not only do they look the same BUT THEY ARE ALL NAMED CHRIS