no leaf clover lyrics
@ominous-signs
Official ominous sign
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Cosmic Funnies
Three Goblin Art

Kaledo Art
Jules of Nature

No title available
Today's Document

blake kathryn
Sweet Seals For You, Always

ellievsbear
$LAYYYTER

Origami Around

@theartofmadeline
untitled

★
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
One Nice Bug Per Day

Andulka
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Morocco

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Colombia

seen from Finland
seen from United States
@cringe-edition-syl
no leaf clover lyrics
@ominous-signs
Official ominous sign
Reblog this photo of a käpylehmä to have a käpylehmä in your blog
It's a trick! If you reblog you get TWO käpylehmäs in your blog!
why’re giraffes so violent
most big herbivores are, frankly. if you have a pretty steady supply of food and don’t have to worry about missing a hunt and starving to death, you can afford to throw your weight around more and generally be more aggressive!
that’s why the most dangerous big animals in the world are almost all herbivores.
this is also why walking right up to these things in Jurassic Park would have been a fantastically bad idea
Sauropods would be fucking TERRIFYING and it annoys the hell out of me that media constantly portrays them as passive and harmless. That Indominus from Jurassic World would have been SLAUGHTERED against an Apatosaurus, let alone a whole HERD of them
- @cappucino-commie
Ok but, bringing it back to sauropods, people dont really understand just HOW terrifying they were First, size. And yeah most people understand that sauropods were bit, but it really needs to be reinforced just how big they were.
This is Camarasaurus lentus, around 15 ish meters and over 16 tonnes, for reference sake, the largest african elephant bull EVER recorded was 11 tonnes. pretty decent difference right? Well, except one thing. This is a SMALL sauropod. Want to see a large one?
Yeah, you’re reading that right, 53 tonnes. Almost five times heavier than the largest recorded african elephant ever. And they get even larger.
This bastard was last estimated at 73 tonnes, the largest animal ever to walk the earth. And they didn’t just get big, they got l o n g, too
That right there, is BYU 9024, it (among with a few undescribed remains) shows an animal in the size range of 40+ meters, this one here clocks in at around 40, and the funny thing is? this is the *conservative* estimate, larger specimens are not unreasonable in the slightest. It’s not quite as heavy as the big south american bastard above it, but at 67 tonnes, its close.
Secondly, speed. We’ve all seen it, lumbering behemoths that were dumb as rocks and probably about as fast, with a tailwind, going downhill. Well…. Not really, the latest studies done as of Asier larramedi’s sauropod facts and figures book gives some… Horrifying estimates.
I’ll spare you the complete explanations, there will be a paper out soon that goes into greater depth, but I’d like to draw your attention to the speeds, specifically fo the animal called Giraffatitan. Most people are familiar with it in some way, shape or form, but to clear up what exactly Giraffatitan is.
They’re not the small ones in the foreground, they’re the big ones in the back. 33 tonnes of pure muscle, moving at 25 kp/h. Again, to provide further reference.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUE304bqwQc THIS is how fast that is. It’s a house running at you, forget a hippo charging you, this would be a tidal wave of flesh and hatred bearing down on you.
And finally, weapons.
Like someone earlier pointed out, Apatosaurus should have absolutely trounced the indominus, because quite frankly at such a size anything you do will hurt. Kicks with the front or hind limbs will be utterly devastating to anything except another of their kind, but Apatosaurus had another thing going in its favour.
One thicc-ass neck. Pictured here with speculative keratin spikes on the bottom, whilst the spikes are speculation, the neck itself would have essentially functioned like a fleshy battering ram, capable of pulping ribcages and smashing anything that could have “preyed” upon them. But that’s not even the most terrifying thing, though this is not specific to Apatosaurus itself, but to all diplodocoids (Apatosaurus, Barosaurus, Diplodocus, etc.) Specifically, the tail.
This is Diplodocus, as you can see, this animal is half tail, as you might also be able to see, the latter half of that tail tapers down to what can, in all essence be described as- a whip. A serrated whip, powered by some of the largest muscles in the largest animals that would have walked on earth. But it gets even MORE horrifying.
You see, there have been studies that have come to a conclusion, and though there are those that have doubted them, I personally have looked at the papers and found merit to the theories.
Well, I’ll not hold you in suspense any longer.
The tips of these tails, could have, and would have broken the sound barrier. Yup, you heard that right, and as soon as that fact begins to seep in, you’ll realize the horrifying implications. A diplodocoid whipping its tail, would blow out the eardrums of any animal close by and unfortunate enough to draw its ire, the sauropod itself would possibly not come out unscathed, but when you can literally give a would-be predator internal hemmorages by, what to them would be essentially like snapping a finger, the benefits begin to outweigh the risks involved. And that’s not even mentioning what would happen if it HIT anything, an impact at such velocity, with such mass driving it would be- quite frankly? Devastating beyond words. Flesh wouldn’t just tear, it wouldn’t just break skin or bones, flesh would MELT, bones would shatter, if not simply cease to be. And this is on a sufficiently sized animal such as Allosaurus or Torvosaurus. On a human? They would be ripped in half. So yeah, Sauropods get shafted in popular media to an extent that isn’t even possible, if you think hippo’s are scary, imagine something fourty times its size, faster than you, and able to kill you without even touching you. Sauropod are kaiju, plain and simple.
The babies were really cute though. This is andrew, and he’s a baby… the size of a horse. If you want to know just how tiny they began, this is probably a good reference.
Yeah, the largest animals ever to walk the earth started out life at about the size of a dachshund. Eat your greens everyone.
I would not be surprised if, in a world where human civilization and dinosaurs lived side by side, stampeding herds of sauropods at enemy farmland and villages was a military tactic.
@khorneschosen
I love this so much and have said a lot of this previously
As an alternative to 'sugar, spice, and everything nice'
I present: 'salt, vinegar, and everything sinister'
no it does not, I am perfectly happy with my obscurity
I do not agree with veganism as a moral standard. If it is your personal moral stance, that is fine. If you think humans eating meat is inherently immoral, I don’t want to deal with you, you’re hopeless. Vegan ideology behaves more like a sect of evangelical Christianity than a dietary choice.
Veganism is better for the environment, but claiming that it's a morally superior choice ignores cultural and economic factors that make people eat animal products.
It is not inherently better for the environment. That is the thing. When you begin trying to explain that local, sustainably sourced animal protein is better for the environment than imported plant proteins that are farmed 3,500 miles away using slave labor, they start tuning you out. Down is better for the environment than polyester stuffing, leather is better for the environment than pleather. We should work on making animal agricultural practices more sustainable instead of trying to shame everyone into eating plant products that are also farmed unethically and unsustainably.
Ok so I actually did the math on the first statement (local animal protein is better for the environment than imported plant based proteins).
I will be making a comparison between animal derived proteins (beef, poultry, and eggs) and plant based proteins (tofu and pulses)
First, I looked up the CO2-equivalents (CO2e)* emitted by producing 1kg of each protein source (Source), which yields the following results:
Beef: 498.9 kg CO2e
Poultry: 57 kg CO2e
Eggs: 42.1 kg CO2e
Tofu: 19.8 kg CO2e
Pulses: 8.4 kg CO2e
So we can see that plant-based proteins emit fewer greenhouse gasses than animal derived proteins.
Next, I looked at how transportation affects these numbers. I made the assumption that (1) no transportation is needed for the animal proteins and (2) the plant proteins are shipped from the other side of the world (so 20.000km). Shipping a kg of protein by freight ship at this distance emits about 0.6kg of CO2 equivalents (source)**.
So adding it up yields the following numbers***:
Beef: 498.9 kg CO2e + 0 kg CO2e from shipping = 498,9 kg CO2e Poultry: 57 kg CO2e + 0 kg CO2e from shipping = 57 kg CO2e Eggs: 42.1 kg CO2e + 0 kg CO2e from shipping = 42.1 kg CO2e Tofu: 19.8 kg CO2e + 0.6 kg CO2e from shipping = 20.4 kg CO2e Pulses: 8.4 kg CO2e + 0.6 kg CO2e from shipping = 9 kg CO2e
So even if we produce animal proteins locally and we ship all of our plant-based proteins halfway across the world, plant proteins are still far more environmentally friendly than animal proteins.
In other words, we can produce 55kg of pulse proteins, ship them 20.000km away and have the same environmental impact as producing 1kg of beef locally.
This is not even accounting for land use, water use, nitrate pollution, phosphate pollution etc., all of which have very real environmental impacts, and all of which are more present in the production of animal proteins****.
Factory farming is worse for the environment than what the farm actually produces. Also, there's always going to be some people that eat meat just like there's always going to be some people that never do. Both of these choices are morally neutral, because food is food and we do not get to tell people what to eat, because bodily autonomy is a human right.
This is not a problem math can or should solve, because math is unfortunately something that can only solve problems that have a single correct solution. And real life problems that involve living beings are not those types of problems.
Industry emits more CO2 than any living being. The plastic and rayon plants, the oil refineries, the mines, the data centers--they all are the main CO2 problem. Factory farms are the main animal welfare and groundwater/soil toxicity problem. Blaming this on people not being vegan is ridiculous. This is a problem created by industry and cannot be solved even if everyone in the world COULD get their protein from plants--and at least one person on this earth can't, because I can't. But I'm sure I'm not the only one.
There are several places where animals are overpopulous--some of them are invasive, some are not--and hunting them down and eating them is a very good solution. We have feral hogs where I am. We also have a native species of deer that is overpopulating. Humans stepping in and hunting them down and eating them so as not to waste the meat is a good solution here. In places that have a long tradition of NOT eating meat, eating meat isn't something anybody is saying they should do.
It IS however a fact that we are omnivores as a species. Some humans not being omnivores is not proof our species isn't. You have canine teeth. You have a gut that is arranged in a particular way. These are facts of our species. That we have the freedom of choice and adaptability to survive by genetically engineering plants to produce more protein and eating them instead does not erase that when looking us up as a species of animal, we are among the omnivores.
There is no one size fits all kind of answer. And vegans asserting there is and then doing a bunch of math about CO2 emissions like that proves it is not just doubling down, it's actively deciding to play into the oil executives who found out that oil was destroying the earth in the 1970s and spent millions of dollars in marketing the idea of a Carbon Footprint and guilt-tripping individual people into thinking THEY were responsible. No. It's the oil companies. It's the industrial factories and plants that are doing the bulk of the polluting. Nothing any individual person decides to eat or not eat is going to make more than a drop in the ocean's worth of difference.
Shut the factories down.
But don't lecture people on what food is and isn't moral to eat, especially if the only thing you're thinking about is CO2 emmission. What about the human cost of plants? What about the human agricultural workers? Quinoa getting popular fucked up Indigenous people who relied on quinoa as a staple and now they can't afford it. How is that less terrible than the CO2 emmissions of a single cow? What's the cost of suffering? Or does that not matter because you can't make a number out of it? Who is the "we" in "we can produce... pulses"? They don't produce themselves! There are humans out there picking them, weeding them, and those humans have a CO2 emission and take up resources the same as any other animal. But THOSE numbers aren't available, not like the handy numbers of a cow. Doesn't mean they aren't there!
Eating only plants are not some shortcut to being morally pure, that's what I'm saying. ALL food production involves something deeply exploitative and unethical in this age of factory farming and global exploitative economy and so forth. Vegans are not magically exempt from having blood on their hands just because the blood is human only and most agriculture statistics ignore the human cost of a crop.
You cannot diet your way into moral purity and it's folly to equate diet with morality anyway. That's not how morality works. It's messy and complicated and personal. It's not a math problem.
That's a big chunk of text to basically say "I want to keep eating meat no matter what but you don't get to judge me". You could do the exact same argument against every single social improvement that has happened in the last two centuries. Your point can be boiled down to "nothing I personally do really matters in the long term so I shouldn't have personal responsibility on anything".
And while I don't think we should put the responsibility of reducing the climate crisis on individual's shoulders, I'm very in favor of governments legislating your behavior for the common good based on scientific consensus. Which on this topic, had been massively clear for years.
So as with CFCs or leaded gas, this is not a "personal choice" matter, because your personal choice affects us all. Climate change is, very much, a math problem. A very complex one that very smart people have been studying for decades. You can listen to them when they talk or you can cover your ears and shout "ÑAÑAÑAÑA THIS PROBLEM IS TO HARD FOR ANYONE TO UNDERSTAND LET ME ALONE" or "WHAT ABOUT [this other thing that should also disappear]" the same moment they mention something you find personally inconvenient.
Sure.
Throw your tantrum.
Just don't try for everyone else to look at you as the smart one when you are thumping your feet and whining about those evil men that want to take away your burger.
Explain to me what the Inuit are supposed to do. That's thousands of people. Who cannot and have never been able to grow protein from plants. Explain to me why they should have to change their traditions, which have helped them to survive in their environment. Explain to me how demanding every human on earth stop eating meat isn't cultural genocide.
Explain to me the human cost of your plant crops. How much CO2 does a human worker put out? Because you talk like crops just spontaneously generate by themselves, which is a very privileged point of view. I've been in a field and picked crops. It's hard work. It requires LOTS of workers, every day.
Explain to me how a person who is deadly allergic to pulses is meant to be getting protein. That's not a hypothetical imaginary situation, there's a very common condition that makes someone unable to consume legumes of any kind.
Discover the Low FODMAP Diet for IBS sufferers. Access detailed research on how this diet can relieve gut disorders. Get accredited to share
Even one human being dying should not be acceptable to you. Human lives are valuable. Your solution would cause at least 1 human being to die in result. It is not a valid solution therefore.
The fact that you sit there accusing me of "throwing a tantrum" when you're the one dismissing everything I just said is ironic. The fact that you dismiss me as "throwing a tantrum" and tell me to my face that you wish me and people like me to die, well that's not surprising. Vegans don't care about humans very much, especially disabled humans, in my experience.
I don't care about your solution if it means I have to die. I think it's reasonable to get angry when someone says they don't care if you die and they want to control what you do with your own body!
Any amount of disagreement you would label "throwing a tantrum" so why should anyone call you anything but evidence of veganism being a cult??? Them's cult tactics! If it quacks like a duck it's a duck!
you need to be more normal about fwb. no, fwb don’t strip you of your dignity. they are not unhealthy. sexual relationships are not bad. it’s not weird to want them and not romance. friends can fuck. you don’t have to be involved romantically to be intimate with someone. that includes all sorts of physical touch because you are also not normal about platonic non-sexual touch. it’s not weird if friends cuddle, sleep in one bed, hold hands or kiss. friends can be affectionate with each other. it doesn’t mean they are romantically attracted to each other. nor does it mean they will ever be in a romantic relationship. you need to be more normal about touch and sex in general.
This has been my main argument against "AI" from the very beginning.
OpenAI scraped the entire web. All of which had been a labor of love from humans. Wikipedia is the backbone of a lot of LLMs, and that was volunteer human labor. They stole it and now they're selling it back to us.
And worse, they're trying to destroy the free sources that they stole from. It's destruction of human knowledge on an unprecedented scale. The burning of the library of Alexandria has nothing on this.
good art doesnt exist. you can't make it.
you're free now.
Do you ever have those dreams that give you false memories? I just had a really funny one about Tomodachi: living the dream.
So basically the mii would be under the blanket jacking off (wild sentence already, I know) and then be like "I'm cumming... I'm cumming-!" Then the eyes would open really wide and they'd go "TO [topic]?!" And be stressed and embarrassed about having busted it to "smorking bunts" or "Trump's neck folds" or whatever random topic they picked out of the ether. And this dream was so vivid that I felt like I had seen SEVERAL videos of this happening. On rare occasions they'd say they were getting off to another mii. One specific short video I remember was an elon musk mii getting off to Squidward. And another one was a Hatsune Miku mii jorkin it to yaoi. They'd range from kinda embarrassed to absolutely devastated. It was especially silly to see a straight male mii get all "WE WILL NEVER SPEAK OF THIS AGAIN" to cumming at the thought of boobs. Like bro you're. You're so fine. What are you, Catholic?
It felt so much like a real memory that I wouldn't have even questioned it if it hadn't been sexual. I woke up almost certain I'd be able to find it but knowing that I simply couldn't because there'd be no way. Anyways, I hope the text I highlighted in this post to be accurate to the game singed your eyebrows clean off and may this email never find you
It IS true that being on here gives you a tumblr accent. This morning my mother asked me something and i replied "i don't know i've never heard these words in that order" and she nearly choked laughing. It wasn't even that funny
at my old job i had a coworker who was tired and made a coffee with like 6 or 8 shots of espresso and i just casually went up to them like “are you trying to meet god?” and not only was this absolutely hilarious to them but they brought it up in future conversations they thought it was so funny but to me this was just as casual as saying “woah that’s a lot of coffee”
Being funny on Tumblr and then going to be funny in real life is like traveling to a foreign country and baby the currency exchange rate is biased in your favor
"People are not property!" - *loud cheering*
"This includes prisoners! They are not suddenly property of the state when they're convicted!" - *a little less cheering*
"And that includes children who are not their parents' property!" - *almost no cheering*
"What? I thought we said people aren't property?"
actually creators can be wrong about their characters sometimes. for example sometimes a creator thinks their character has blue eyes
G-G the book - G-G on Facebook - G-G on Twitter
I have you right where I want you
The prologue to her story
Get HQ files for print here
daisuke bucklesby tho 💓💘💗💞💖💓💘
sylvio dufresne: *lighting a cigarette* when i went on my first adventure you weren't even born yet isn't that weird
wealwell, so horny he's standing on his head: can yuo put that out on me