noise dept.
★
ojovivo
Sweet Seals For You, Always
taylor price
Noah Kahan
No title available

@theartofmadeline
hello vonnie
𓃗
No title available

blake kathryn
cherry valley forever
occasionally subtle
Not today Justin
Interview Vampire Daily
RMH

bliss lane

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
seen from Azerbaijan
seen from Colombia
seen from Italy
seen from France
seen from Brazil
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from Myanmar (Burma)

seen from United States

seen from Portugal

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Brazil

seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
@foxgirljdpon
The concept of "transmisogyny" had to be invented because without it there was no way to explain why transfeminine people are so particularly marginalised. The logic of transphobia is that we are actually failed men, men who have broken the rules of gender and so need to be punished. Likewise, transphobia considers trans men to be failed women who have broken the rules and so need to be punished. If you follow that logic, you would expect to see trans men occupy a position in the social hierarchy similar to "marginalised woman" and trans women to occupy a position similar to "marginalised man", i.e. trans women should be below cis men, trans men should be below cis women, and trans men should be below trans women. But that is actually not what we see when we look at something like the gender pay gap statistics. Trans women are actually right at the bottom, well below trans men, and everyone else.
So, if the logic of transphobia is that we are actually men, how the hell do we explain the fact that we occupy a social position significantly below those that transphobes believe to be actually women? There's only one way to make sense of it: that the nature of our "failure" (i.e. the direction of our transition) brings about a massive extra social penalty. That's exactly what "transmisogyny" refers to: this extra form of oppression that sits on top of transphobia, and whose existence is necessary to explain the data that we see in the real world. It's just like physicists theorising Dark Matter: the universe is not behaving how it should according to our current theory, so there's a new force we need to incorporate to make it make sense.
In light of this, what purpose is served by hypothesising a counterpart to transmisogyny called "transan***phobia"? What data is unexplained by the current model? Are trans men being treated even worse than we would expect based on how transphobia operates? I am not aware of any evidence for that, nor of any transan***phobia theorists who even think about oppression in this way. Instead, it's far more common for them to understand "transmisogyny" as "any oppression a trans woman experiences", and to think, "but I also experience oppression, so I need a counterpart name for my oppression", and then land on "transan***phobia", "transmis***ry", "anti-transmas***inity", etc.
They don't understand that transmisogyny is a specific form of oppression due specifically to transition direction, it sits on top of transphobia, misogyny, and anything else, it doesn't displace them. To say, as many transfeminists do, that "transan***phobia doesn't exist" is not to say that trans men do not face oppression. It's just the assertion that the direction of their transition does not incur any extra oppression on top of what they already experience due to transphobia and misogyny (which is a lot!).
I find it useful to think about which specific form of oppression I am facing in each situation. E.g. I am walking down the street and some guy wolf-whistles at me (that's misogyny, it's the presumption that my body is a sexual object for men's gratification). I tell him to fuck off, but he hears my voice is weirdly deep and then clocks me and shouts "You're a man!" (that's transphobia, he had noticed a disconnect between my gender presentation and what he presumes to be my AGAB). He chases after me, swearing, screaming, calling me a T-slur, etc, and I have to run really fast to avoid getting beaten up (that's transmisogyny, it's an instinctive disgust reaction that he probably couldn't even articulate why he feels so strongly about). Transmasculine people are likely to be able to relate to the first two experiences but not the third.
A month ago I was running a trans event and I asked people to share any news they wanted to related to their transition. There was a trans man who talked about the waiting list for being seen by the gender clinic, something everyone could relate to and we commiserated with him about it. And there was a trans woman who talked about how she had ordered an Uber Eats grocery delivery, and when he arrived she went out to his car to help him carry the bags, but when he saw her he called her a "fucking [T-slur]" and chased her down the street where she had to hide in a bush and wait for him to leave before going back to her house. She was less upset about that than the fact that after she complained to Uber they banned her from the platform. She had been using grocery delivery to avoid going to the store because she gets abused there. When she said all this, the transmascs in the room were like "what the fuck", while the transfems were like "this is why I boymode with delivery drivers"/"this is why I pretend I can't speak"/"this is why I do all my shopping at 3am at the 24hr supermarket because there's no one there to harass me". There is a serious gulf in the kinds of negative experiences we consider unremarkable, and the kinds of negative experiences transmascs consider unremarkable, and that gulf speaks to the differing levels of oppression we face.
we've all seen the pattern where a trans woman comes out and then some kind of accusation arrives to absolve everyone of the need to examine why they've suddenly started hating her. it's relieving to feel like you have a justified reason to have already hated the tranny
it occurred to me that the bizarre and nonsensical idea that trans women transition to escape accountability, as if such a gambit could ever work, serves to offer a convenient explanation for this pattern that allows us to continue hating the tranny guilt-free even after we notice the pattern. the reason the transition and the accusation arrive around the same time is because her entire transition is a disingenuous gambit to escape the accusation! now, not only do we have permission to misgender her, we can take her transition itself as further proof of her guilt!
in fact, maybe every trans woman is hiding something. maybe I'm not transmisogynistic at all, I'm a Good Person after all! when I have a bad feeling about a trans woman, it's because she's a bad person, and I'm just really good at sniffing out Bad People!
I think the truth is, most people know deep down that they're transmisogynistic (we all live in this world and we all absorb its messages), and they feel guilty about it. they want to be Good People who Aren't transphobic, and they will go to great lengths to convince themselves they already are
so if they can't place why they hate trannies without admitting to themselves that it's just transmisogyny, they need to construct a reason. when an excuse is offered to them it's a life raft. it doesn't even need to be a good excuse. to borrow from another transfeminist on here, something as flimsy as "she said this route wouldn't be very traversible in a wheelchair and I interpreted this as her saying she was glad we didn't have a wheelchair user with us" will suffice
Bourgeois political economy ends when the workers stop seeing themselves as 'the working class', with the function of providing labor power, and begin seeing themselves as 'the worker class', possessed of a will that allows them to play an active role in world history.
Lars T. Lih, Lenin Rediscovered
It's not fair for you to be this much better at this than I am.
It was just a coin flip. "Whoever gets tails has to go out and do our day-to-day life. Whoever gets heads stays home, does housework, and chills." Other than that, you're identical. Every memory, every preference, every little mannerism. It's not really clear if one of us is "the original," but it's clear that we're equivalent. Or, we should be.
Why is it that you come home from a life that ran me ragged with a smile on your face? Why do all our friends say you're doing better than ever, and why am I still in the same slump we were in before our little experiment?
How do you have the energy to molest me like that when we get back? Can you feel the way I envy you when you do? You're in better shape than I am - you've picked up jogging and weights, and I've been perving on... my own body, and what it looks like when you take care of it.
I could try and catch up with you, I guess. But we don't really need more than the one income, the situation would be too complicated to explain to friends and family (plus the equipment we used to do it is super illegal), and when I ask if you're satisfied, you say you're just happy to have such a cutie to come home to. When I ask if you want me to work out with you, you laugh and say you'd be happy for me to join you, but you like the way our body looks a little out of shape.
The part that drives me nuts is I should be able to read you. I should know how you feel about this, how I would feel about this. But I think I'm a little dizzy from your attention, and I've lost track of whether you like this version of me, truly, or whether you've gotten hooked on being the better version of me and knowing how into it I am.
first day of pride month
(first time doing praise kink) you are Useful
South american decamillennium of humiliation
We should give palestinians nuclear weapons and let them annihilate this godforsaken hemisphere. What's even the point anymore.
That's barely the cherry on top, really.
De la Espriella's board purposefully refused to conduct a transition between administrations as lawfully ordered because Petro's government decided to show all fully allocated and spare funds for all ministries and state bureaus on live TV for everybody to see, so newly elected officials would have no way to lay claims on received deficits stemming from speculations on corruption the way they've kept stating they would all along this year.
This meant the incoming board to assume functions in both the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Unidad Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos y Desastres ("UNGRD" for short, translating to "National Unit for Risk and Disaster Management") deliberately neglected their duty to carry out thorough inventorying to keep governance working so as to avoid the overbureaucratisation and cost overruns on critical areas they claimed the former government had failed to reach optimal operability, like welfare distribution depending on bilateral and multilateral deals already agreed upon and underway with foreign governments and trade organisations to balance trade development with proportional social expenditure to alleviate the lack of development on the means of production across regions the oligarchy (who now back de la Espriella's administration) have long neglected.
Without duly reviewing any of it, the newly appointed united stater ambassador to Colombia stated de la Espriella's government would nullify Colombia's involvement in Chinese-led Silk Road agreements in order to begin paying back the sponsorship Trump's government lend to de las Espriella's campaign through their foreign policies (the so-called "Donroe" Doctrine) and "keep Communism at bay", after which the Foreign Affairs Ministry announced they now back the Moroccan occupation of the República Saharauí and the zionist occupation of both Palestine and the Syrian Golan Heights. Clauses on mutual cooperation have been effectively broken: both Syria and Morocco are part of the Silk Road initiative, but the Colombian government have adopted policies that undermine the principle of mutual territorial sovereignty recognition underlying all international treaties (as per the Vienna Convention, which is the basis of all multilateral treaties like the Silk Road initiative), and by extension, of mutual cooperation (not that I personally believe the International Law-based Order™ has got any actually developmental value. But for a government that take so much pride from their very onset in upholding the very same Western Liberal status quo that brought it up, they're definitely doing a piss poor job at, on the very least, enacting any extent of clout to pretend to abide by it).
Yesterday morning, a 7,4 Richter Scale earthquake took place along the Colombian Pacific region, causing widespread deaths and damage on four major cities including the country's third largest one, Cali. Just as this happened, de la Espriella and his vice-president José Manuel Restrepo overslept on their newly appointed posts after taking part in Fiesta de las Flores parties in Medellín with Antioquia's governor and Medellín's mayor, without having yet de-facto appointed anybody to take charge of the UNGRD and taking up to eight hours to assign any provisional representatives to attend the emergency, not having sent any to the actual epicentre (San José del Palmar, a town with a population of a few less than 6000, most of whom are African-Colombians long marginalised by the oligarchy) almost 20 hours into the aftermath. When they finally arrived at Cali, instead of getting to tend to the emergency immediately, de la Espriella called on a press meeting to explain himself and greet and blow kisses on the attendants.
Only during his first weekend as president, cops attacked and extrajudicially detained unarmed protestors demonstrating against his election during the inaugural session, the national army opened fire on civilians, forest fires have raged all across the most forested regions outside of the Colombian side of the Amazonian Basin (most of them quite probably caused on purpose), and the most intense earthquake to have taken place in the country in decades crippled the four largest cities on the country's West (Cali, Quibdó, Manizales, and Pereira; two of them being part of the four —the latter two, along with Armenia (also greatly affected) and Ibagué— comprising the labour and commercial backbone for the main Coffee-producing region the Colombian bourgeoisie take so much pride in as well). And the wanker spent it all partying in Medellín (my work-worshipping, fascist home city, for anybody out there who didn't yet know where this was typed down from).
His government have had to backtrack on both of these policies: the Petro government's most recent UNGRD director had to resume his post to co-ordinate the management and efforts tending to the sheer scale of the emergency, as neither the newly appointed one nor any other officials from de la Espriella's board have got the specialised experience necessary to do so on notice; and they had to accept Chinese assistance to manage the situation nevertheless.
This is our picture for, at least, the next four years. We've got no international Communist hegemon backing any Communist movements here because the Chinese government are not the mid 20th century Soviet government, they don't promote Communism anywhere other than within their own frontiers and at a very ambiguously gradual degree of dialectical development. We've got no Free World™-sponsored opening Liberal bonanza because there's never been such a thing anywhere at any extent but as a fiction. And we've got no substantial development of the means of production vis à vis European Social Democracy supporting Palestinians at international institutional level because the only such-seeming government we've ever had spent four years struggling against a systemically organised congressional bourgeois bloc sabotaging most of their major law and reform proposals, to no avail except for moderate labour law reforms now lacking executive support.
An absolute bunch of aspirational dandy rubbish, أَسْتَغْڢِرُ ٱللَّٰه.
the craziest thing is that de la espriella was planning to close ungrd and divert its funding to the defense ministry, or straight up steal it because he's a fucking thief as many of his former clients have claimed, many of whom are narcos and paramilitary leaders, only because he's trying to pull a milei and reduce the state by 40% (as if that's gonna help in anything).
he's also looking up into exporting bukele's prison system of building "megaprisons" to detain without a trial criminals, narcos, guerrilla fighters and probably political opponents. if he builds them and implements the very same system bukele follows anyone can be detained and imprisoned without a judicial order, and based on vibes because unlike el salvador, nor narcos or guerrilla fighters in this country have tattoos to identify them as part of the illegal groups, so the persecution of people who look "suspicious" is going to resume (this has happened a lot since probably the conception of the guerrilla groups in the fifties, all throught the rest of the century and well into the early 2000s) and we'll probably end up with similar results from uribe's "falsos positivos".
as @huzni said, the next four years are bleak to put it midly. the earthquake couldn't have happened at a worst time and place, mostly because many of the affected zones are for the most part, very impoverished. they do not have the resources to attend the emergency on their own and i'm pretty sure many families would not have the money to fully rebuil their lives. hell, chocó is a place where floodings and landslides are very frequent and people find very hard to recover from these disasters. add to that an incoming government full of sycophants, criminals, and thieves, and nothing good is going to come of it. i can already imagine the news stories that will come out about corruption in the handling of the emergency.
and if you're asking why we elected such a piece of shit, de la espriella ran a campaign based on either fear or hatred for leftists and guerrilleros, the electoral officials refused to give public access to the electoral software, the same one that was used to commit fraud in honduras, and sure enough, almost 250,000 people were found to have been illegally registered for the elections, and tallys were found to be modified after the election (i was a teller (scrutineer? what's the correct term for that, anyways?) and i saw how easy it is to alter those things), but like usual no international election observer gave a fuck. plus all the traditional media was backing far right candidates and straight up lying about the left candidate and petro's administration.
i usually wonder why is so hard for leftists and progressive people to form a unified international front but then i remember that we're all so busy fighting amongst ourselves, trying to decide who is morally superior, who belongs to the movement or not, whether it's right or wrong to use violent force to resist oppression, and if china is really Evil™ or not. no wonder the right wing is so well organized, they don't care where someone stands on the evil scale, as long as they cause any kind of harm, they're welcome.
theres a group of people who seem to think that transmedicalism can refer to people encouraging eachother to medically transition and do DIY and these people are willfully ignorant to how transmedicalists have gatekept medical transition, however another group of people in response to this have decided that saying things like "hrt is the thing that changes your sex!" is just a plain truth instead of being an actual sex-is-biological different aspect of transmedicalism talking point that does say a lot about how you see non medically transitioning trans ppl, some of these ppl call themselves transfeminists and I just dont see how you could consider yourself that if there are transfems out there that by your own definition would be "male women"
little miss kissable armpits would like you to know th- why did it call me that. why does the post say that,,,,
making a joke is manipulative bc it is coercing the other person into laughing
how tiktok psychology sounds
You see this sort of post a lot in left circles, and it's a very cute idea, but conservatives aren't actually that dumb. You might be able to make them nod along to what you're saying (assuming you don't hit on the big ticket culture war issues, this absolutely would not work for immigration and probably won't work for climate change), but you're not actually going to change anyone's mind like this.
my main gripe with this is a lot of these statements are still conservative. wdym by Elites in reference to immigration? because there's already an existing white nationalist conspiracy theory about jewish people pushing immigration (great replacement theory). how is this turning the argument progressive
(under my breath) I will explain everything perfectly and I will win I will explain everything perfectly and I will win I will explain everything perfectly and I will win I will explain everything perfectly and I will win
just had a really good mango it was so good that i had to illustrate how it made me feel afterwards.
op’s tags are so fucking important to me
actually the thing that really gets me is how many people believe "hitting children makes them better" but secretly. do you believe that bad things need to happen to children or they'll end up wrong somehow? do you believe that humans need to be disciplined or they'll never learn important life lessons? do you believe that "strife" or "torture" or whatever produces better art and that people who only have good things happen to them will thus only produce bad art? do you believe that maybe it's not good but children will never listen if there aren't "consequences"?
etymology fact check: come on guys it even says in the wikipedia screenshot that this isn't what happened.
no, this guy did not "invent" the word "fuck". the word "fuck" is not derived from his name. his name is the oldest example of "fucker" appearing in print, but his name is almost certainly a variant spelling of the name "Fulcher", which is completely unrelated to the modern english swear word "fuck".
The aircraft carrier's long deployment in the Iran war is raising concerns that the sailors and Marines on board are facing poor conditions,