[sacredlitany]

Genuinely why do perisex people defend the term ‘ micropenis ’ as a valid insult. Like — that is a genuine medical term used for intersex folk ( obviously, not all variants are the same, but you get what I mean )

“ BUT THIS IS ABOUT MEN! ” i am going to hold you by the hand when I say this… men can be intersex. your hate for men in general is an issue you need to unpack.

*Psst, cismen can also have micropenises - it isn’t just intersex people*

[myirlnameiscloud]

B-but people with micropenises are my emotional support minority to bully!! 🥺🥺 B-but it's funny that their penises are small!! 🥺🥺 B-but I only make fun of BAD people by calling their penises small!! 🥺🥺 I have good reason to make fun of people with micropenises!! 🥺🥺 It's not intersexism if it's funny!! 🥺🥺 It's sooo funny because their penises are small!! 🥺🥺 Guys it's sooo funny come on!! 🥺🥺

[giggle-bones]

Not every intersex person with a vagina was AFAB. I feel like people should maybe comprehend that. Ive seen a lot of hate for people saying "You can have a vagina and be transfem" and regardless of how you feel about afab transfem stuff it doesnt matter because you do not have to have been AFAB to have a vagina.

Like no... even with "male-leaning" genitalia on the ambiguous genitalia scale you can still have a vagina. Thats literally just the hole, usually itd be blind in those cases aka, not leading to like a uterus. But it is very much still there.

I need perisex trans & cis people to genuinely just take a step back and learn anything at all before they start enforcing arbitrary rules onto us that dont make any sense. We really gotta teach you guys to not use AGAB as shorthand for the sex traits that someone does or does not have, because really it means jackshit.

(Also if you call caring about intersex trans people "whataboutism" i will eat your BONES! caring about a discriminated against large part of your community and how they fit in is not whataboutism.)

[loveridden1999]

male directors will make torture porn of girls and women for shock value and call it "showing the harsh realities of sex work". they'll show women getting forced into sex work, abused, assaulted, and trafficked over & over again with no further commentary and i am supposed to believe that it is necessary for the narrative, if not empowering. right right

[clytemnestraaa]

the idea that kink is somehow safe from critique and prejudice or harm is so fucking funny. ah yes bodies, desire, and power, three things that have famously never been utilized in harmful ways. great news everyone yes we are all existing in complex systems of oppression and violence BUT!!!!!! it’s on pause when we are horny

[visceralvampire13]

every time perisex people talk on intersex people's business i die a little.

and dare i say people do this because they don't see intersex people as an actual marginalized group with systems set in place to kill and maim us and instead see us as "haha funny girl with dick / man with boobs disorder"

[chemical-accident]

How is it still so hard for people to accept that homosexuals are actually homosexual and that we can't just upgrade into the politically correct "hearts not parts" sexuality just because they decided that sex shouldn't matter? It's like they completely forgot why this community even exists.

I get that the majority of them are at best bisexual and can't actually relate to lesbians (and lesbians have always been a minority so it becomes very obvious why they suddenly forgot about us when there's a flood of non lesbians claiming that label and correcting us with their tumblr wisdom on what our community looked like and the history they never actually experienced) even then they just can't deal with us having boundaries and it's so weird.

They pretend to be progressive but act like every other creep who sees lesbians as a challenge because he thinks we're just playing hard to get. It's like they're trying to solve a riddle.

"ok fine you said lesbians aren't attracted to men but what about dick? Is that negotiable? What if I just told you I'm not a man and you pretend my dick is a strap? Can we meet somewhere in the middle? Come on you said no men and I just told you I'm not a man anymore, so where's the problem? What's wrong with you? Why do you hate me? Do you want me to die??"

"Ew are you attracted to genitals? Do you see people as walking genitals you freak?'

"Why is it so important if someone has a dick? What if you meet someone you like, would you reject them when you realize they have this really unimportant body part that you have some weird hangups over? Maybe you should work on that because that's not normal"

"nobody cares about your weird genital fetish, we don't need to know what you do in the bedroom, stop shoving it down our throats and keep it to yourself"

I'm genuinely concerned for young lesbians who will find online communities, read this manipulative homophobic bullshit and believe that there is something wrong with them for having boundaries and not being attracted to the opposite sex.

[hoanblr]

No one is forcing you to be attracted to someone's genitals, if you have preferences that is your own preference.

Talking about young lesbians like you are not actively harming young transgender people, one of the most OPPRESSED queer groups in this society is ironic.

[ruuling]

thinking its interesting how a "progressive" and "liberal" movement has no interest in putting high social and legislative pressure on aggressive/violent men to be more accommodating to and safer for GNC/gay/trans identified males, but instead focuses completely on pressuring women to give up the private, safe spaces we fought so fucking hard for for over 100 years to protect ours bodies and minds.

so basically the message of trans rights activists is, in fact, bioessentialist. violent conservative men cannot be changed, there is no way for society to train men to be less violent towards GNC males, therefore the women of society must care for the rejected males.

[hoanblr]

"...private safe places ghat we fought so fucking hard for over 100 years to protect our bodies and minds" the patriarchy allowed same-sex spaces to continue creating gender division, same-sex spaces are already prevalent in misogynistic theocracies used to exclude women.

even further, you show your lack of knowledge ofnwhat bioessentialism is. bioessentialism is defining a person's values, morals, and behavior based on their gender, race, or other identifying part of their identity.

GNC/gay/transgender men are not safe in this society because of rhetoric pushed by people like you. We will never be safe because of people like you, pushing for the villaniziation of our transgender siblings. As if transgenderism (without medical transitioning) did not exist in indigenous societies before the European colonizers came.

it is the illusion of a choice, the illusion that you "fought for privacy", when that privacy never existed. it has ever, and will always, be used to force you into a belief system that we all claim to want to dismantle.

[ruuling]

[hoanblr]

This can be easily flipped into "society believes a woman who says he is a man over a man who says that he is not", does that now mean that transgender men hold systemic power over cisgender men? Stop using transgender women to push your own misogynistic rhetoric. What is even more ironic is most modern societies that hold systemic power (like European countries/European stemming countries) do not "believe" transgender people and are at a constant oppression cycle against transgender people. Gender is a construct that has been acknowledged to change for centuries before European colonizers destroyed the world.

[sluttynurse]

if you're viewed as a conventionally attractive woman you're punished bc you need to be knocked down a peg for thinking you had any inherent value and if you're viewed as unattractive you're punished for daring to exist without permission but that's how it is innit there's no winning when the system was designed to make you lose in the first place! 🤣

[imdrinkingmiso]

rage bait works on me because I was never meant to have a phone or see a screen of any kind

[gokusclit]

Saw someone on insta say it’s misogynistic to make fun of love island watchers

[pinketine]

I think a lot of you understand oppression as "how many people are mean to you online" and not like. A systemic thing that affects all facets of one's life.

[thesituation]

SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!!!!!!!! SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[justrunningawayyy]

This is easily a false reason to shave body hair because I have never heard a single man say that his body hair is uncomfortable...

[hoanblr]

hi, this is completely a viable reason to want to shave your body hair!

personally, i feel extremely uncomfortable with my body hair (for context, i am a cisgender man), and when i see my own body hair i have an uncomfortable feeling to the point of anxiety.

please be more aware and less close minded.

[thesituation]

i’ll believe it when men and women have an even 50-50 split of shaving rates. until then, sorry!

[hoanblr]

believe what...? that people shave...? how are you explaining how someone else should feel about THEIR body? do you hear how misogynistic that is, even more so ableist.

you are not being feminist, you are trying to control other people's bodies and dictating how they should percieve their bodies. the reblogged made a claim that they had never heard a man say he felt uncomfortable with his body hair, i proved that wrong.

many men in east asia alike also shave.

shaving as a standard is patriarchal correct, but shaving itself is not patriarchal. it is a standard, but someone having that quality does not make them inherently subiding to the patriarchy.

a standard is to have long hair, is it wrong to not cut your hair? a standard is to have clear skin, is it wrong to clean your face and have a specific routine to obtain clearer skin?

"sorry!" for what? claiming to want to dismantle the patriarchy, yet upholding it with a progressive label?

oh, because perpetuating ableism and ignoring standards in other countries is so feminist.

and to even push further, no rate will ever fully be "50/50" when considering a worldwide statistic. especially for shaving, when considering cultural expectations and social norms. you sound ignorant.

you are pushing a harmful rhetoric, and trying to label it with feminism.

"i'll believe it-" believe WHAT. that people have boundaries or personal comfort? you completely ignore men who DO shave, and try to push that only women shave. many asian men shave.

you cannot "believe" someone's personal comfort, it is not for YOU to believe, it is a fact about OURSELF.

do queer people also need to "show" that they are queer for you to believe them?

so why do people who have personal comfort issues, many of those being neurodivergent, have to do the same?

you cannot speak about feminism, when you push ableist rhetoric and only use information regarding white men.

[gokusclit]

whenever ppl r like feminism is abt a women’s right to CHOOSE what she wants every choice a woman makes is FEMINIST I have to laugh bc how do u think the feminists got us this far do u think there weren’t women back then who were like noooo i love being with my husband who beats me and has all rights to my body and finances you bitches are crazy! Of course there were and they were left tf behind like

[do-not-u-dare]

I think it’s ridiculous that the general standard for “androgyny” includes flat chests and short hair btw. think we should talk about that

[byjove]

I do hate when politicians do something shady and ask for privacy. You are a public figure. You are not some guy who had a video randomly go viral or an actor trying to make a living and have some semblance of a life outside. You are a politician. You mudslung, campaigned, fearmongered and lied your way to the top. This was a choice you made, you wanted to make decisions for us. And noe you’re begging for privacy while your 85 year old body gives out on you during your term in congress or your wife divorces you for cheating on her or you got a DUI in your new sports car? Nuh uh uhhhhhh.