🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈

late for dinner late again late for dinner late again late for dinner late again late for dinner

[cilchley]

Jason just fucking dying after the priest tells him to ‘Go on…and live’ is honestly such a power move

[bee--sun-deactivated20200119]

do you regret?

id do it again id like to believe that id do it again and again and again and-

what would i do if i had not loved you?

[authentic-tm-deactivated2021020]

To New Beginnings!!

[coolskeletonmemes]

[killerkitty707]

“Yoink” is the opposite of “Yeet”

[wierdrocks]

But it’s just as fast

[viewtiful-kim-deactivated202105]

The Lord yeeteth and the Lord yoinketh away

[artlgbt]

Keith Haring, Altarpiece: The Life of Christ

[oi0u98ygth-deactivated20260120]

uhh reblog this w your sign and wether or not your phone screen is cracked

[powerfulwizard]

antis: straight woman have done nothing for gay rights

me, a johnlock and destial shi

[xemeterydr]

I head cannon that after Ivy’s baby was born Nadia was the best aunt ever, like she’d visit all the time, babysit, play house and other games with the child. She’d play hide and go seek and be like the Cool Aunt™ and would be loving and accepting to her niece/nephew. She’d always tell stories about her and Jason when they were younger and about how good of a brother he was to her. How her and ivy were friends as children and how even through she was jealous of her in high school they made up and become the best of friends. And over all just help ivy with the teenage Mom thing and always being there for them because ivy and her child are family to her.

(Don’t forget dressing up as Santa for Christmas and bringing the best gifts)

[illegallybrunnette]

This is a cute AU but Ivy definitely had an abortion

[plain-jane-fatass]

Fair! I also personally think Ivy would have gotten an abortion if she could but she’s religious so maybe not? I don’t know I think it’s interesting to think about

[homodistribution]

Definitely don't think she did, mainly because of the, "how do I make sense of what I've gained and what I've lost" line, like I get the feeling that after Jason's death she sort of felt like the child was a part of him she gained? But that's just how I feel about it!

[deansissues]

Dear Jason,

Please find enclosed this very thick package that came for you yesterday-

Peter from the other side of the building:

[sweet-bitsy]

Why are they dissing him

[ivyrobinson]

brandon uranowitz is just as talented as christian borle and andrew rannells and it’s about damn time you guys started appreciating him!!!

[yiddish-american]

pixel art!

[dustandashes1812]

[unlikeliest-lovers-blog]

honestly i’m like genuinely curious now. if you hc marvin as a bottom can you like,,, give me some reasoning other than the “while i put the steak in” line?????

[homodistribution]

This is actually something I've thought a lot about and I'll say one thing first: I think fandoms debating gay people's positions is getting kind of old? Like, saying if you are a top or a bottom can be funny and if you personally identify or like a term then that's cool but as a person who used to discuss the positions of characters and such often I'm just kind of tired of seeing these debates when there is so much more depth to this musical. There are different really interesting things I've noticed every now and then in the musical that never get brought up, but this topic is persistent when it's so obsolete.

That being said, yeah there is the steak line, there is the line about him having painting of dicks (only in the revival) there is him looking at Whizzer under the sheets, there is the fact that it is heavily implied that they both have hiv which doesn't necessarily mean they switched but very well could. Other than that I just don't like the idea that because Marvin is the more masculine one (even if it was toxic at the beginning) that that means he can't bottom or wouldn't bottom.

Furthermore, the story is about a man overcoming his internalized homophobia, toxic masculinity, and becoming sexually liberated. Not to say a top can't be that way, but it doesn't seem consistent with the theme of the story to have Marvin be sexually stagnant.

Putting Marvin and Whizzer in these boxes is exactly what we are supposed to *stop doing by the second act!* In the second act we see Whizzer be allowed to be more masculine because he is a man and that part of him was being stifled and Marvin allow himself to be more feminine because it's part of who he is. That's one of the points of the story, that neither of them are stuck in one role.

[crunchbuttsteak]

Capital classes: I wonder why “eat the rich” and guillotine jokes are so popular among millennials?

Also Capitalists:

[advanced-procrastination]

EAT

THE

RICH

[ventrue]

good god

[peppylilspitfuck]

They want you to come in early, leave late, and take a paycut, but they don’t even wanna be there.

[homodistribution]

For those saying this is, "obviously satire," it may be, but a simple google search shows that the little writting on the bottom left corner that says Giggles & Grins © is actually the name of a few different stores and companies, most notably (because they own the website gigglesandgrins and as such seem more like they own the brand) an indoor play space seller. This cartoony design matches their child friendly aesthetic too.

If it isn't them it still doesn't make sense why a satire piece would have a copyright symbol and a store name on the bottom, unless they just thought that was a funny detail to add. Sounds unlikely to me.

[roykent6]

honestly any post comparing the flaws of two characters in Falsettos (i.e. Mendel and Marvin) isn’t controversial or revolutionary, and it completely misses the point of the show, which isn’t that one character’s actions are worse than another’s, it’s that people can be deeply flawed and act terribly, but still have the ability to grow and change, and also be worthy of love and redemption. but go off, I guess.