Hi! Two things: 1) I appreciate your nuance, and your willingness to talk the argument through, re the asks you’ve been getting on Israel/Palestine. Genuinely kind of refreshing, particularly around here. 2) I noted a post earlier that mentioned oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and I was wondering if you’d be willing to talk more about that kind of issue? One of the things I do when I’m quiet at work (as you might’ve guessed, hi, I’m also a lawyer) is read English & Welsh family court judgments on BAILII (I don’t do family law, thank God) and there seems a bit of a trend for labelling kids with things like ODD. But also Intermittent Explosive Disorder, and labelling usually mothers with things like Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, and other things like that. I worry that these are labels we’re using for people whose main problem is ongoing trauma, and often also abuse and poverty. Obviously you can’t clinically speak to whether these are legitimate, and I don’t have any real question here, but it troubles me.
You do not know what kind of rant demon you are summoning by opening this subject, but I love you for it.
I think your instinct is right on.
A lot of us are now familiar with the potential psychiatric diagnosis of "complex PTSD." Where current definitions of post-traumatic stress disorder focus on a single event taking place to cause the symptoms, with complex PTSD the diagnosis would encompass multiple events, long-term situations, and cumulative stress.
There was a time when I found the DSM's resistance to a diagnosis of "complex PTSD" to be fairly puzzling. It seems pretty readily apparent that long-term exposure to trauma creates a different thing than PTSD. I think the book The Body Keeps the Score is also pretty troubled about this, because what the author uncovered in a whole lot of pathologized people was a whole fucking lot of child abuse.
(Literally this seems to even have been a problem with Sigmund Freud; a current prominent theory says that his whole Oedipal Complex thing was a way to deliberately disregard the evidence of his female patients' sexual abuse.) (Link is to Wikipedia article.)
I also see kids with these absolute parades of diagnoses. IED, ODD, BPD, ADHD, depression, anxiety. Label after label after label. Dig even slightly under the surface, and you find: that child is... being raised by their grandparents! Adopted and abused in the first two years of life! Father in prison! Mom in prison! A morsel of meat being shredded between two vengeful parents in a horrible divorce! Problems suddenly started after a series of suspicious happenings with an older cousin! Constantly on marijuana! Subject to constant verbal abuse by stepmom! Witnessed one parent beating another on the reg! Take your pick.
A truly astonishing amount of the time, I end up feeling very strongly that the child should be diagnosed with "having a completely understandable reaction to genuinely horrible shit." It's hard not to start thinking "wow this all seems fake" when you get a kid with yet another arm-length dissertation of alphabet diagnoses and ONCE AGAIN you find the heinously obvious reasons behind them.
(Same with my adult clients, who have essentially fossilized versions of the same disorders. More likely to see bipolar and borderline, more likely to see schizophrenic.)
Ah, you say, Ryann, but what about the whole neurotransmitter thing? Depression is caused by low neurotransmitters, we've got that kind of cracked.
Actually, there are "huge bodies of evidence" showing that low serotonin in particular has no causal link to depression and that the affect on serotonin might not be (probably isn't?) why antidepressants even fucking work! (Best evidence: SSRIs and SNRIs work on neurotransmitters immediately, but take weeks or months to kick in to be effective against depression. Why?)
For a long time, I hung my hat on schizophrenia, actually. It's like, genetic, right? Surely we know things about schizophrenia. Surely that is real science. Surely that isn't just a response to trauma!
Well, um. You can have genetic and environmental things that predispose you to schizophrenia, but actually, as my therapist informed me, it tends to actually show up when there's a history of trauma.
This has led to me feeling pretty strongly that the DSM's method of diagnosis is wrong from jump.
Metaphor with me for a moment about the DSM and its diagnostic methods.
Now we all know of the diagnosis of Stuffynose, correct? It's when your nose is stuffy. It's an ailment that's pretty common. Most adults experience Stuffynose several times in their lifetime.
There are two main treatments for Stuffynose. The first is antihistamines; the second is decongestants. Doctors are very divided as to the uses of these two medications. Studies show that both of them are more effective than placebo in the treatment of Stuffynose. If antihistamines work, you might have to be on them for the rest of your life. If decongestants work, you're out of luck after a week or two, because they can be dangerous if taken too long. Hopefully that fixes the problem!
What? What's a "cold"? What is "flu"? I've never heard of these things. Yes, Stuffynose can sometimes cause a sore throat or coughing. Stuffynose is related to fevers sometimes, but we think that's just an overactive bodily response...
Yes, Stuffynose can sometimes be fatal.
Listen, the insurance company doesn't cover "surgery" for a "deviated septum" or for "cancer." Likewise, "environmental allergens" aren't something we check for.
Thank god we live in the modern world and we've taken care of a lot of the stigma surrounding Stuffynose!
Me. That's me, w/r/t diagnoses of depression and anxiety and frankly most everything else. It's like personality quizzes. If you divide people by any quality and then make that quality a Category, you've created an Identity, not (not just?) a diagnosis. If everyone who likes candy and reads a lot of books is a Sweetreader, you'll now have a whole lot of people identifying as a Sweetreader and being like "omg trying to pass by the Nerds gummy clusters without buying any... #SweetreaderLife" while the Meatjocks are out there having a cookout, typical #meatjock behavior! Obviously DSM diagnoses are much more specific than my Sweetreader/Meatjock dichotomy but I think the tendency is very much there.
So here's the thing. I don't think the reluctance of the DSM to acknowledge complex PTSD is puzzling anymore. I think there might be some people there who, overtly or subconsciously, recognize that they are playing Barbies with fake words and fake diagnoses and fake concepts, and that if they add complex PTSD, the whole party is over.
The minute you add complex PTSD, you are acknowledging that it isn't the individual person that's sick. It's their circumstances. It's society.
It's not a defiant child, it's not an explosive child, it's not a child with baby bipolar disorder but we can't call it yet so we call it something else: it's a child with developmental challenges and unlearned skills (THANK you Ross Greene PhD and your book The Explosive Child), or it's child abuse.
And currently the whole goddamn burden of identifying and dealing with developmental challenges, unlearned skills, and child abuse is on our schools, which are equipped for like 30% of that list. I think there is an absolute epidemic of unnamed child abuse in this country, some of it based on the absolutely predictable results of the war on drugs constantly depriving children of their parents (either through being high, drug-seeking, going to ineffective rehabs, being jailed, or doing fucking terrible things because of the shit they're in up to their neck or how much brain damage they've inflicted on themselves). The rest is screens and devices being heinously bad for neurological development (children must be SPOKEN TO in order to turn into people in a developmentally appropriate way!!) and constant parental supervision taking away all opportunities to learn self-sufficiency, self-regulation, and problem-solving.
So of course we pay teachers handsomely to help us raise the next generation of good citizens with so many disadvahahahAHAHAHA AGHHHHHH
So I dream of a day that we have a different paradigm for diagnosing mental illness entirely. In the novel I work on occasionally, when I have time and brainspace, Martian culture in particular diagnoses by picking out areas of the brain that are under- and over-active and using direct stimulus (like a far more advanced version of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, a process I have actually undergone myself to unbelievably cool results) they will help the brain strengthen itself.
There is also some good news about antidepressants: the way they work might be in enhancing neuroplasticity, giving the brain more flexibility to heal itself. That's really cool and interesting to me, because it's like -- humans found ways to unlock our own powers of building ourselves and our identities and it fucking?? works???
ok obligatory disclaimer: I am a lawyer not a psychologist and in this post I have done an absolutely abysmal job of staying in my lane. This is not based on any science of which I am an expert and is rife with speculation and frustration at our current paradigms, which are clearly just flat-out inadequate. Thank you so much for opening the doors for me to goosh out my thoughts and feelings.