DEAR READER

Discoholic 🪩

JBB: An Artblog!
cherry valley forever
ojovivo
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
we're not kids anymore.
AnasAbdin
Cosmic Funnies
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
KIROKAZE
almost home

Origami Around

No title available
dirt enthusiast
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

Janaina Medeiros
styofa doing anything
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Kaledo Art
seen from Germany

seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Portugal
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@iceemoon
@ perfectunion
Official Post of Massachusetts
https://working-mass.com/2024/10/16/question-3-company-unionism-sells-app-workers-short/
This deserves a critical eye, the union was not organized by drivers but rather by an independent third party which is closely partnered with Uber and Lyft (more info on IDG in the link above). It's also worth calling into question why Uber and Lyft did not oppose question 3 when it was on the ballot.
This question passed in Massachusetts in 2024 with basically no opposition, because on the surface it looks like a positive measure for workers rights, but any measure which would improve the conditions of the working class will always be opposed by any means possible by the capitalists. It is actively in their worst interests as the ruling class for the proletariat to take even a modicum of pressure of the boot off their neck.
Working class power will not come from a ballot measure or from begging your representatives, it will come from within the working class to recognize their collective potential to make demands on their terms
Female Dwarves - With or without beards?
With beards
Without beard
Child Dwarves - With or without beards?
With beards
Without beards
Baby Dwarves - With or without beards?
With beards
Without beards
They shed their baby beards to make room for their adult beards. Like with baby teeth.
can this fucking wizard stop texting me ive already blocked him 3 times but he keeps making new crystal ball lines to contact me about wizard ween. get the fucking hint man
BACK OFF MAN
frank reynolds is rolling with the lgbt
Please pray that the Lord restores my Gindr chats!
awww the like button turns into a rainbow when you press it! that's so cute...hey staff what's with all the trans women you keep nuking?
i think we should be ridiculing them more for this. you don't get to try and go all "queer website" when your staff likes to go on nuking sprees targeting the trans fem users
would be remiss not to mention that the rainbow notably straight up just removed the trans flag colors from it. like they’re gone. it’s the progress flag minus the trans flag colors.
that’s not the whole flag, now is it
hey staff what the fuck
hey staff don't you think you're being too on-the-nose
HEY STAFF DONT YOU THINK YOU'RE BEING TOO ON-THE-NOSE
the thing no one tells you about being in your thirties is that's when your friends start dying
Rather than distinctly male or female, the human brain is much more like the heart, kidneys and lungs – basically the same no matter the sex of the body it's in.
rb to make a biological essentialist mad <3
“This collapse is a telltale sign of a problem known as publication bias. Small, early studies which found a significant sex difference were likelier to get published than research finding no male-female brain difference.”
the notes on this are toxic - to help clear up any misunderstanding, here’s the actual science paper:
With the explosion of neuroimaging, differences between male and female brains have been exhaustively analyzed. Here we synthesize three dec
in short: brains are brains
a critique that always irks me a little is when people say a fictional gay male relationship is actually being written as a lesbian relationship, like first of all what does that even mean and second of all a good chunk of the time it seems like people are only saying that because the men are emotionally vulnerable with each other
many out there, even among my fellow lgbtqs, seem to hold a “hotcock” view of gay relationships
when willow is behind me and not in my line of sight: i miss her...
you guys do realise walking doesn't actually move you anywhere right? it just destroys you entirely and places a perfect copy of you right in front of where you were standing
COOP! AGENT DALE COOPER! I NEED YOU TO GO TO A PLACE CALLED SILENT HILL. ITS A LONG STORY I’LL FILL YOU IN AS YOU GET HERE BUT COOP SOME VERY STRANGE STUFF IS HAPPENING. NOW IM NOT SURE HOW I GOT HERE MYSELF BUT IM SEEING WEIRD THINGS THAT CORRELATE TO MY DAILY LIFE. THEYRE SAYING SOMEONE IS WAITING FOR ME IN OUR SPECIAL PLACE. I HAVE NO CLUE WHAT THIS MEANS AND I DONT THINK THEY WILL BE TOO HAPPY ABOUT THIS DOWN IN WASHINGTON.
instead of job there should be big bed
One time i got sucked up by a ufo im not joking
what happebned
On god they were being super mean to me like they were flicking my head and shit the grey aliens were flicking my head and punching my nose and giving me noogies and shoving me and shit....
society if marx wrote origin of the family instead of engels
im still thinking about this but im bad at putting my thoughts into words lol
i do wonder what marxs fully fledged ideas on morgans anciety wouldve been, because his notes on the book, as little as they were (90 something pages but it was largely copying from the original text directly), show deviation from engels' conclusion about the construction of gender
bc engels saw it purely as an economic force which created gender (not his exact words bc, well, it was the 1800s and they didnt really have gender theory). but rather marx's notes imply he saw the seeds of patriarchy as something which started to emerge prior to civilization, and contained the dialectical approach that we both act on and are acted on by social forces. meaning it could not have solely been the creation of economy which created the patriarchy.
and i think marx's analysis would have been oppositional to radfem theory. unfortunately engels' analysis leaves room for radfems to call themselves marxist, by conflating engels' and marx's ideas as one and the same
and dgmw i think radfems would still pretend to be marxist even if marx had written whatever it was he was planning, but it would be a lot easier to point out the contradictions in radfem logic as inherently anti marxist. not that we need more of marx's writings to be able to create a marxist feminism (which is also transfeminist btw if done correctly), since obviously marxist feminism already exists
but rather i just wonder what more there would have been to pull from