#extradirty
blake kathryn
⁂
Kiana Khansmith
No title available
DEAR READER
izzy's playlists!
dirt enthusiast
ojovivo
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Three Goblin Art
★
Monterey Bay Aquarium
sheepfilms
noise dept.
No title available
No title available
wallacepolsom
Aqua Utopia｜海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Jules of Nature
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Honduras
seen from India
seen from Philippines
@irssmnbfei
Honestly
Art of the swindle
Art of the hold up
At of the rip off
Fuck this guy
Yeah okay, Trump likes to use tariffs as a political/economics tool. I think it has been very clearly established, that he's going to do this everytime he wants sonething. So can all the other world leaders get around to figuring out a response to that other than just playing along?
Jonathan Van Ness is a fucking hack!
Everyone's beards are getting shaved, everyone's hair is getting cut, they only make each subject more conservative looking, more conformist, less individual...
Tan France will try to compromise, keep some individuality alive, while curtailing their worst impulses.
Jonathan will be like "Individual thought detected. Initiate homogenizing protocol."
"some reason" :^)
Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima If you can GUARANTEE that nothing even APPROACHING those could EVER happen under ANY circumstances Then I will fold to Nuclear Power
Three Mile Island
NO ONE DIED
Fukushima
NO ONE DIED
Chernobyl
essentially a human-made accident through gross mismanagement and neglect, that physically can't happen with other reactor types (in part because they all have containment buildings now). so yes we can guarantee that nothing even approaching chernobyl will ever happen with modern reactors.
even so chernobyl still killed fewer people than the German Atomausstieg has through increased air pollution because of additional coal being burnt
welcome to team uranium!
False dichotomy, the prefered alternative to nuclear (by greens) is renewables, not coal.
That’s like telling a communist how bad feudalism was in defense of capitalism.
“Yes, I agree, let’s not do either of those, let’s do my thing.”
why is everything on the top of mangadex a romance series with a little bit of nsfw. dont you guys read extreme violence killing fighting strong boys manga?
i think its meant to be the most popular new series (not sure how far back it counts) so i guess it really just reflects the users of the site
but yes WHY are they all like? why arent you guys reading what I like (Which is obviously objectively the best manga)
i do get annoyed about how often its just some super horny thing with nothing going like this though:
OK as long as they aren’t calling me out!
I wonder if there are campaigns out there hyping up some of these titles so they become “popular” immediately. a number of these look like they may as well be porn, but like if you want to see porn why not go find good porn rather than reading a lame manga with boobs in it.
Yeah i get having a little nsfw in your romance manga to put some tension in there (or i guess just for the fun of it) but i dont really get those series that are just whole chapters of nothing but building up to seeing a bra or something. or that stuff thats just basically hentai with the most explicit bits cut.
from the creators side ive always assumed they must be able to make more money by running in an actual magazine or something, but i dont get why people dont just read straight up porn if they want to see people fucking. like what is the point of WORLDS END HAREM? whats the appeal?
if you want to see lots of naked people in your manga you should just read baki the grappler
It's for the wank bank.
Porn manga is 2 pages of introduction and then 15 pages of sex. Useful if you're reading it onehanded if you catch my drift but not if you're trying to replay it in your head later.
That's where the sort of sage-who's-clothes-melt stuff comes in, it gives you a scenario you can play around with.
The farmers won
THANK FUCK
More proof that capitalism means corporations and government are in cahoots with each other, not that capitalism means small government.
Okay, how many arrests were made and what percentage of the company has been nationalized as a punishment?
AKA why the electoral college has gotta go.
though looking at the comments the folks who live in the red part think this is why the electoral college has got to stay. because they like getting 3.5 votes per capita.
Tyranny of the few is a pretty sweet deal if you belong to the few.
“Why should the coast’s vote count more?” BECAUSE THAT’S WHERE THE PEOPLE ARE AND THIS IS SUPPOSEDLY A DEMOCRACY.
A Map Of Where The People Live
Yeah. From what I remember of history class, the Founders weren’t down with a monarchy but they weren’t exactly thrilled with The Poors™ having too much power, either. Hence, this shit.
The conservatives know this is the only way they win elections.
Yeah, population-dense coastal cities like New York and Hollywood are…”The Poors”………..and all those rural areas in the middle are The Rich.
Okay.
Think of this as Affirmative Action but for voting. If you don’t have this, you get mob rule, where the big bad majority overpowers the minority voters. Does that make you want to keep the EC now?
Cool, so this whole eat the rich mentality, right? When the rich completely fuck over the rust belt, decimate the bread basket, and totally fuck over the bible belt…they’ll be all that’s left for sustenance.
Most of you wouldn’t be able to tell the difference from a cow and a steer yet you honestly think you’d be able to put people in place who can take care of the men and women who have made such a thing their lives.
Case in point, Hillary, who completely fucking ignored those red areas to pay lip service to the yellow. That whole “fucking over the little guy” you lot are so apt to call out our government on, that’s what you’re advocating.
The entire point is that each state has its own cultural standards, and a ton of people living in a few cities have a vastly different culture than the people living in more rural states.
The idea was to protect against a few states’ cultures being forced on the rest of the union.
Don’t like guns and hunting? Alright, then live in a state with similar cultural values. Don’t take over the federal government and force everyone else to live the same way.
That’s literally the point behind the electoral college. It’s because the US is literally a Union between 50 semi-sovereign states. The federal government was supposed to only be involved in a very few issues regarding inter-state conflict, with everything else being decided on a state-by-state basis, because each state has its own culture.
How people don’t understand this basic fact about the founding of the US is beyond me.
@chumguzzle That’s a good reason for state governments, not for the EC. The Trump/Clinton election was about 50:50, it could have ended either way and EC or not, all americans would have had to obey the federal law under that president. It doesn’t take away power from the federal level, it just influences who’s going to hold that power. @everyone else. Now if you’re republican, just say “I like the EC because it makes my party win” If you’re democrat, just say “I don’t like the EC because it makes my party lose” Everyone who actually has an opinion on the EC itself, don’t even say the words “conservative”, “liberal”, “left”, “right”, “democrat” or “republican”. The result of an elections system is not relevant to how good an election system is. If you have no opinion about it in the abstract, you have no opinion about it.
This shit is great, get out the way.
Love it
https://youtu.be/wJGST0XNAIg
Yeah let’s all felate the walking q-tip for shoving a girl for no reason. Seems reasonable, since the asshole is in a stupid costume
Dude is an asshole, but the rope is also there for a reason.
Who do you blame? The Tiger? Or the unfit parent dangling a newborn over the enclosure?
Yup blame the soldier and not the entitled spoiled brat who thinks getting her picture or video taken gives her the right to stand there.
Its not like it is common knowledge not to stand in the way of these guys.
If you do not move, they will move you and not think twice about it!
Why do so many of you morons cry to defend people that don’t deserve it? She clearly broke the rules for a “cute selfie” and the soldier punished her for it. End of story. She’s not a victim
Dude-you pull that sh*t at the tomb of the unknown soldier and they will buttstroke the hell out of your dumb ass.
And you think that’s a good thing? That you can get beaten up for taking a selfie in front of a tomb? Or that a soldier runs you over for stepping over the rope? I know walking around her would ruin the spectacle of stoic marching, but this could have ended worse than it did, if she was particularly frail for example, or so staggered by surprise that she fell (maybe onto something). This isn’t a soldier doing important safety of the nation things, he’s putting on a show, demonstrating his discipline and marching. Would you defend a dancer, kicking someone out of the way, so he can move properly?
The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier represents all the men and women who died defending my freedom.
They don’t just buttstroke you either. They yell at you first, then if your smarmy asshole and don’t do what they tell you to you get butt stroked. and considering the overall lack of discipline and respect a lot of people have today? Yeah I kind of do think that it’s a good thing. The world operates by rules, you break them you pay the consequences, and too many people have forgotten that actions have consequences these days.
And to answer your question, moral consistency. If you’re going to be dumb jump up in front of a dancer and they kick you in the side of the head, you shouldn’t have been being a dumb ass up on stage. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
didn't mean, that the dancer kicks you by accident, because you jumped into his way, but that he kicks you out of the way on purpose, so that he can do his move. The guard didn't accidentally run into her either after all. And the rules are subject to change, if we find them unfit in any way we can change them. Is disrespecting a symbol reason for bodily injury? By state employees no less. Isn't that basically coporial punishment? We're not in the dark age anymore
This article’s title is rather misleading. They aren’t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that. They aren’t encouraging anything.
The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation. Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.
Source: https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth
I don’t think a single other person read that headline and thought they were “encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.” That’s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and I’m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, that’s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and it’s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting it’s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasn’t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate “fact checkers” you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didn’t think this needed to be explained but here goes.
First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?
Like for example it hasn’t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldn’t make it past a few weeks and he’s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasn’t the policy back then.
“will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early” No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option it’s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If it’s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of life…but it’s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all.
The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, they’re not talking about babies that died in the womb. They’re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHS… a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before they’re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.
So what happens once those babies are born and they’re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? I’m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because they’re not babies they’re just living organ donations that haven’t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead baby…well can you come by and pick up your two year old… that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely they’ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. I’ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder.
They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.
Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think there’s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they don’t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. It’s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitch…and we’re in need of organs right now…maybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will be…fucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people can’t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.
I think you’re coming at this from the wrong angle. The two options for the baby here aren’t life or slaugther house. But death or slaugther house.
This is to be used instead of an abortion. Now you have the options of either killing the baby, or killing the baby and get some medical use out of it.
And I’m sure, if you change your mind after carrying the little thing around for 9 months. You can withdraw from the agreement. So it’s like an abortion with a second chance.
CANTON, OH—Noting the deep and genuine mutual fondness that fans of pornographic Japanese imagery have displayed in the site’s comments, posts, and private messages, sources confirmed Wednesday that popular hentai message board YourHentaiWorld was home to a surprisingly close-knit and supportive user community. “Initially, I expected everyone would just recommend their favorite prepubescent catgirl manga, incest dating games, or good old tentacle sex videos, but I couldn’t help noticing they knew each other extremely well,” said 28-year-old shoe salesman and forum newcomer Adam Cantrell, who was surprised to find numerous discussion pages showcasing member artwork, organizing in-person meet ups, and simply catching up with other users’ daily lives. “They seem to genuinely care about me, too—my inbox blew up with welcome messages when I joined, and when I linked to an amateur bara comic, I got almost as many ‘Thank you’ PMs as upvotes. Once, I forgot to post for a week and FilthyBoyKagayaku even started a thread to ask if anyone knew me IRL and could check if I was doing okay.” As of press time, Cantrell was misting up while watching dozens of users offer aid and comfort to the original poster of the thread, “Need Help: Full-Package Futanari Not Doing It For Me Since Wife’s Cancer Diagnosis.”
Has the onion switched to reporting reality now?
if you lightskin you cant say n*gga no more. sorry black culture
But ain’t you…
ayo my neighbor you seen me censor mysef? aight den
@compoyo
*sweats nervously*
Wow…. this is lightskinphobia
Wait wait wait
So if you’re mixed or a light skin black person you can’t say the word? Even if you have the heritage in your blood, you can’t say it cause of your skin?
And I don’t mean a great great great grandma had a mixed baby and you’re 1/16th black. I mean you have current, by blood black heritage. One of your parents is black, or you for whatever reason have less melanin than your parents who are both black.
Is that what this post is saying?
If you have a white parent and you say nigga around me I’m beating your ass
Barack Obama square up
It’s not all doom and gloom, all lightskins are hereby formally invited to square dance practice on tuesday. There’ll be meatloaf and potato salad.
meirl
My opinion, at times, can be very problematic so I try to keep them to myself the best I can.
God beware an honest exchange of ideas might happen...
is germany okay
oh scheiße
“Franz!! Did you ram the fucking step ladder into the ceiling again?!” “No, I swear, it was… … it was … … why don’t I just save us all some time and quit?”
