is it okay to love someone more when theyre hundreds of miles away
yes
no
nuance
you know the shtick. reblog for a bigger sample size please
đ

Kaledo Art
almost home
Three Goblin Art
h
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
YOU ARE THE REASON

shark vs the universe

#extradirty

â
Fai_Ryy
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Cosimo Galluzzi

Love Begins
Misplaced Lens Cap

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
No title available
wallacepolsom

oozey mess

seen from Brazil

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Palestinian Territories

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United States
seen from T1

seen from Poland
seen from Brazil
@kiwi-green-tea
is it okay to love someone more when theyre hundreds of miles away
yes
no
nuance
you know the shtick. reblog for a bigger sample size please
Iâm paying to force seven thousand strangers to see a photo of my late husband having fun with his dog. Tumblr Blaze is totally worth it. XD
iâm going to be really honest with you guys i think the tendency to read the absolute worst possible intentions into every action you donât agree with is getting too automatic and itâs eating you from the inside out
"lock in" is probably one of the most important phrases to enter the public lexicon in the 2020s
The Peak of the Monahven, The Throat Of The World | Skyrim Special Edition
Started using the phrase âthatâs cilantro to meâ to refer to the presence of a story element that completely ruins a piece of media for me, disproportionate to its actual badness.
Your Blorbo had to eat the last food you ate (not a leftover, but the exact same food that you ate; for instance, if the last food you ate was Jajangmyeon, theyâd have to eat a fresh bowl of Jajangmyeon too). Would they be happy about it?
Yes
No
Every poll on this blog is about fictional characters only. This request was sent to us and we made a poll in response to it. Send any Blorbo-related question you want to our inbox and weâll make a poll on which people can vote with their own Blorbos in minds
not fully related but thats also y when i see yall on here like âawww i wish we had purple people or people with horns or people with neon green eyesâŚ.đâ im like. yall cant even handle black peopleâŚyall cant even handle caring about people like 5 shades darker than youâŚ.u want the world to be âwhimsicalâ or whatever yet ur completely fine with white supremacy đ evil ass individuals u cant handle a cyclops or a fairy u cant even handle hip hop!!!!
You can begin this process at any time, regardless of how old you have become.
Whiterun
Concept art for The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Art by Ray Lederer
I DIDN'T EVEN HAVE TO UNMUTE,
Captions:
Gaston: "Everyone knows her father's a lunatic. He was in there tonight, raving-"
Fast placed music plays as the scene changes.
Gaston: "Whoa! Slow down Maurice."
is this anything
@ominous-signs do these count?
damn...
I never really understood why everyone was hating so hard on Excel. I've always loved making spreadsheets.
I have, however, also been using Open Office and later Libre Office exclusively since Windows XP.
Now, as I am forced to use the Microsoft Office programs at work, I understand. I understand.
I am considering Excel an actively hostile program.
Whoever designed this motherfucker was really thinking "mh, where do I put this to make sure no user could possibly reasonably guess to find it there and how do I make the interface the most user unfriendly thing possible?" and then putting that same energy into the Microsoft FAQ that's supposed to explain to you where to find the shit you can't find on your own.
I just don't understand how this is a thing. This shitty excuse for a program costs money and is infinitely worse than any free program I have ever used, including the ones I deinstalled and replaced with Open Office and Libre Office in my "finding a program that works and is free" phase.
Ryland Grace and his popularity as a character feels like such an important step in repairing the cultural tsunami left by the long running trope of every genius character needing to be an insufferable asshole to everyone in a ten mile radios about it.
Conversely, Eva Stratt is doing wonders for repairing and inspiring a appreciation for commanding women with dubious moral convictions who are fully willing to bend laws for the greater good without hesitation.
And together they are doing brilliant things by not kissing or hooking up even once.
The rule could have heavy impacts towards trans people across society.
Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"
The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointeeânot a career expert or peer reviewerâto ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people existâthrough its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processesâcould be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to âsupport the notion that sex is mutableâ and have its federal funding blocked.
Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitationâhospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."
THIS IS OPEN TO COMMENT UNTIL JULY 13, 2026
This is all very bad and horrible, but I want to be clear that itâs worse and more sweeping than just eliminating trans research.
This torches everything. And I do mean everything.
A very abbreviated list of its ramifications include (but are not limited to):
ending funding for ALL DEI related initiatives
allowing the government to terminate grants at any point for any reason
preventing researchers from publishing, going to conferences, and being part of academic societies
requiring that topics must support the presidentâs agenda.
What this means, and if anything Iâm under selling it, is the death of science and research in America. It allows the government to restrict any topic they please at a whims notice, putting officials who have no background in the topic in charge of deciding funding continuity. It controls what gets researched and if/how researchers are allowed to share their discoveries. There are no books to burn if the government never allows them to be written. This is fascism plain and simple.
Please, if you only ever write one public comment, this is the one to do.
Bringing back this guide to writing an effective public comment. This gives you the basics you need to know, what you need to include, a basic outline you can follow, etc.
Public comments are not a vote, it is a chance for you to say "here is an issue with this law I think you need to address" and provide justification for legal challenges if it goes forward:
"Comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; âif an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ËŽ"
But also, if possible, don't stop at writing a comment. Don't stop at calling your representatives. You should ideally be talking to people in your community about this and organizing resistance on-the-ground; there is a good chance people are already doing that even if you aren't hearing about it.
Some added 101-level context from someone (me) whoâs worked in federal grantmaking for 20 years and is literally certified on this document - this is a document that governs all federal grantmaking. Itâs been around for over a decade and is a mega-document that combine multiple previous smaller documents that have been around for ages. It is updated every few years and generally the updates are minor - a notable change in the previous update was raising the small procurement threshold from $10,000 to $15,000 for example. Deeply dry boring minutiae that no one outside of federal grantmakers need concern themselves with. It was also federal GUIDELINES, which means there was flexibility.
This yearâs is different. They are now federal REQUIREMENTS, which means thereâs no flexibility. As was said previously, the 400 pages are not singularly devoted to being absolute shitheads to trans people. Theres a lot of stuff in there, some of which is the standard dry boring grants stuff, some of which is the horrible ideological warfare outlined above.
This document is issued by the OMB, the Office of Management and Budget, which is currently lead by fucking Russell Vought, the principal architect of Project 2025. This is how theyâre going to implement all the horrible shit in there that wasnât covered by Executive Order. Russell Vought is actively coming for my job, my marriage, and my kid, and most of my friends lost their jobs last year because of him. He is the fucking arch villain behind the heinous shit the current regime is doing.
So yes, please comment. You donât have to read all 400 pages before doing so, itâs dry and dense as fuck, but I thought this information might be helpful. Also, while there is a public comment period, this isnât voted on by Congress. The OMB just fucking issues it. Pressuring your elected officials into publicly saying âhey what the fuck are you doing hereâ is good, though.
Please note the comment period is open through JULY 13th, not JUNE 13th. I saw a lot of relogs yesterday saying "last day!" and I just want to say it is very much not too late.
As of today, 7/8/26, we have five days for public commentary on this to go through. I am begging y'all: if you care about independent science in the country that produces the most global science funding in the world, please leave a comment.
Taylor swift had an ice contractor called Steven J. Demetriou at her wedding and had Adam Sandler officiated the wedding Adam Sandler being a major Zionist on the same level as Gal Gadot
Are you all ready to stop pretending she is progressive yet
Yeah heâs a massive Zionist like attacked bds attacked anti Zionist celebrities I think he donated 400 PlayStations to Israeli colonisers when they attacked Lebanon in 2006
American leftist will be like âi fully dismantled American propagandaâ
And then still believe their founding fathers wanting independence for freedom and not because rich people in the colony didnât wanna pay tax
It's worse than that. The Stamp Act was enacted so the British forces could patrol Native territories to keep settlers from committing violence against them. We of the Thirteen Original Colonies didn't much like being told we couldn't attack the Native Americans with impunity
Important addition