Find license plate readers (LPRs) near you.
i have a suggestion
Why do we need this many cameras IN A PARKING LOT
Not today Justin
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Andulka
Keni
Cosimo Galluzzi
Claire Keane
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
YOU ARE THE REASON
Today's Document
Xuebing Du

#extradirty
occasionally subtle
The Stonewall Inn
RMH
trying on a metaphor
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
d e v o n
NASA
Sweet Seals For You, Always
hello vonnie

seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Jordan
seen from United States

seen from Philippines
seen from Malaysia
seen from Vietnam

seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy
seen from North Macedonia

seen from Pakistan
seen from Iraq
seen from Romania
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Tanzania
@locusnegotium
Find license plate readers (LPRs) near you.
i have a suggestion
Why do we need this many cameras IN A PARKING LOT
So annoying to me when people think citing the actions of FICTIONAL female characters counts as evidence that femininity doesn't hold women back. "Omg, she can run and fight with heels and a dress! What an icon, I can't even walk in heels." She is not real, and therefore her body doesn't follow the same laws that ours do. She will do whatever the writers want her to, because she is ANIMATED. And even if the actor is a real person, the scene is choreographed, rehearsed and edited with CGI. It's fake!
Not only do these types of outfits make the stunts harder to pull off, they can also make them more dangerous. “I actually was put into a fire sequence in a negligee,” Donna Keegan, whose credits include “Independence Day” and “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom,” told me. “Do you know how flammable negligees are? They just kept dousing flame retardant stuff all over it.” “One time, I had to dive through a plate glass window with a spaghetti strap top on and in a miniskirt with Doc Marten boots,” Keegan recalled. “You're not getting candy glass for that kind of piece. No matter what they're going to do, there are shards. ... You come out a porcupine, bleeding everywhere.” Their skin's exposed, and they often don’t have any padding. “Try doing stunts with no pads and no clothing. I have been thrown down marble stairs in a bra and underwear,” Keegan said, remarking that the first time she saw that set, “I looked at that and went, ‘You're kidding me, right?’”
Source: Documentary lauds Hollywood stuntwomen, who do everything men do but in high heels (Sept. 22, 2020)
One of the most sought-after stuntwomen in Hollywood, Ms. [Zoe] Bell crashes through glass, slams into book cases and leaps from tall buildings. She has done stunts on more than 20 films and television series, including "Alias," "Kill Bill" and "Xena: Warrior Princess." Asked if she could accomplish a 22-story spinning fall from a skyscraper for 2004's "Catwoman," Ms. Bell thought for a moment and said, "Yes, I can." To get the chilling fall just right, she did it four times. "It's not until after you've been hit by a car and landed all right that the fear kicks in," she said. Stuntwomen often face greater dangers than their male cohorts. While stuntmen wear pads under their clothing, stuntwomen in action films are often minimally clothed; there is no place to hide padding or protective gear in their bikinis or ball gowns. Doubling for Sharon Stone, Ms. Bell had to do the high fall in "Catwoman" in high heels. "Because that's how women fight and die—in heels," she said, with a slight roll of her eyes.
Source: Fighting and Falling in High Heels (Updated July 23, 2011)
As much as I want to support ethical farming practices I will be buying the cheapest bag of frozen chicken thighs as much as the next frugal/poor person which is why animal welfare needs to be legislated, not left up to the invisible hand of the free market or some bullshit. Invisible hand of the free market finds itself around a lot of throats.
"Invisible hand of the free market finds itself around a lot of throats."
That is such a line.
more leftists should be vegan. veganism and leftism operate on the same beliefs. social justice, no exploitation of labor, autonomy, environmental concern, intersectionality, an equal and just living etc. leftist praxis should include veganism
Indigenously: no.
Animal welfare and animal rights are different things; it is good and normal for humans to be slightly anthropocentric while acknowledging our role within the greater ecosystem. Factory farming should indeed be dismantled- I want all animals harvested for food/leather/fur/bones/organs to have full and rich lives with as little suffering as possible before they're harvested. But it is not anti-leftist to live as a predator within the ecosystem. It is not more wrong for humans to eat salmon than it is for bears and eagles to do so.
i used to work in a vegan restaurant and it had basically all the same labor and management problems as the other restaurants i worked at that served meat. obviously. because it was a business in a capitalist system so obviously theres an economic incentive to pay workers the bare minimum and charge customers the maximum you can get away with.
in fact, the restaurant used the vegan identity and environmentalism as fuel for their marketing in quite cynical ways. at the same time they had a deal with Whole Foods (implicated in prison labor allegations btw) to source ingredients, meaning that there were transcontinentally shipped produce lol. for example we used frozen blueberries that were product of Chile. for a restaurant in the pacific northwest region in the united states of america. there are blueberry farms in oregon, washington, etc. But it’s cheaper to exploit south american farms than get local blueberries i guess. (which still by and large exploit the labor of migrant farmworkers from mexico and south and central america, but i digress)
i was vegetarian at the time and i had a lot of deep conversations with my coworkers and manager and the conclusion i came away with is that veganism is merely a cultural practice and is not inherently “leftist” in any way. if you consider human lives equal to animal lives i think that is not compatible with a clear-sighted materialist analysis of the world we live in. its practically a religious belief. which, like, okay, you can be religious, you can have irrational beliefs, but that’s not what “”””leftism”””” is about. that’s not really what any socialist or communist theory is about. it could be syncretized with socialist theory, but it would always merely be an ill-fitting addendum.
I was going to put this in tags but no.
Cashews that make vegan cheese are extremely dangerous to harvest due to the fact they mist be harvested by hand and the fruit has corrosive enzymes. Most workers end up with scars from chemical burns.
Almond farms were linked to the declining bee population due to the number of bees needed to pollinate the plants. Most bee keepers were lucky to get half their hives back after farms rented them.
We all know about how much of the Amazon rainforest has been destroyed to make way for soy farms.
Agave is a main food source for many bats, but no, harvesting excess honey from bees that over produce it is the problem. If bees regularly have a large surplus of honey they swarm, the hive splits and some leave to start a new hive. Problem is that most bees don't survive this process because it makes them vulnerable to other environmental factors. So encouraging farming and over consumption of agave and stopping the consumption of honey, you're actually harming two different populations of pollinators.
"Vegan leather" is mostly plastic, which breaks down and sheds microplasics. Contributing to the ever growing landfill and contaminated water supply issues we have. Meanwhile cow hide is a natural byproduct from the meat industry, and real leather can last decades if taken care of. A single cow can feed 2 families of 4 for a year, and that leather can go towards making belts, boots, gloves and jackets that last decades.
If you want to actually support ethical food production and animal welfare do your research on where your food comes from. Look into local farms and their practices.
even complete universal access to magical birth control and abortions that weren’t medically invasive would not remove the most significant obstacles to women’s reproductive autonomy. women and girls need to actually have the right to say no, for real, every time. there has to be a cultural context backing up that right; they can’t be standing alone every time they decide sex with a man isn’t worth the risk or isn’t what they want in any sense
we need to grow up in a world where penis in vagina sex isn’t treated as the ultimate way to feel wanted and compete- worth any risk- so that what women feel they want has some chance of actually being what’s best for them. in a world where women truly had the right to say no and all forms of mutually desired, respectful sex was treated as having the same potential for pleasure/bonding/etc, how many would actually choose to have piv specifically when they knew they really didn’t want to get pregnant? objectively, piv makes no sense when you’re the one who can get pregnant, you don’t want to be pregnant, and tons of other ways to relate physically exist. it makes sense that men want piv on demand- they never get pregnant from it. women have to be made to “want it” enough to override knowledge that unwanted pregnancy is a possible and perfectly preventable outcome
the availability of abortion and birth control is crucial, but it is not sufficient. as long as women are not consistently able to make uncoerced decisions about piv, both will frequently serve to “clean up messes” for men, allowing men to take advantage of women without consequences for him. fully expecting her to swallow any potential costs of these interventions. quietly preventing pregnancy while maintaining unfettered access to piv becomes an additional duty women and girls with male partners are expected to perform
“protect trans kids”
wait what about we abolish idea of gender and actually make society to be inclusive of all sorts of self expression without telling people they need to change themselves.. especially children.???
Denying transsexual teens HRT because you have a fetish for seeing them disfigured is medical torture and if you can't understand that then my dick in your ass isn't rape and your severed head in a trashbag isn't murder. You can't consent to the alternative ):
what an interesting response to a trans person saying we should abolish restrictive gender norms that harm everyone. mad at something no one said. lol the literacy crisis in real time.
seek help perhaps. you’ve already replied to multiple posts of mine atp about rape and whatever the fuck else. you are clearly mentally unwell and exhibit an impressive failure of reading comprehension.
anyway, everyone needs to block and report this account. they are replying to every post they can with bullshit about rape and just overall being misogynistic. tale as old as time i suppose!
It really annoys me when people say that trans men have privilege over trans women because “men of minority groups always have privilege over women of the same minority group”. Like okay but that’s cis people. That’s cis men. It’s entirely different for trans people??? Name me one privilege or benefit that trans men get over trans women that doesn’t require the trans man to be stealth.
it’s truly remarkable when you put it this way. but it also begs the question: what is there, if anything, that could prevent this?
feminism has been around for decades, yet educating men has never worked.
the best thing a woman can do is be educated, have her own career and financial independence. and never partner with a male.
it won’t stop all violence against us, but it’ll save millions of us from male partner violence, which is more common than strangers killing or raping us.
The fact that a wealthy, white mother-of-two in California with access to excellent prenatal and birth care, acting as a surrogate for another family in the safest, cleanest, least coercive of all possible surrogacy arrangements, died this week while giving birth really underscores the surrogacy thoughts I've been having recently. Should you be ethically willing or legally able to compel another woman to risk death at worst and major lifetime health consequences at best just so you can have a child that is biologically related to you?
Here’s an article about it.
She died of an amniotic fluid embolism, which is rare but very deadly.
This post gives another example of a surrogate dying and includes this disturbing information:
An article online incorrectly states “the risks of being a surrogate mother are the same as for every pregnancy.” This is not true. Recent studies have shown that surrogate pregnancies are different and are high-risk. Studies show that women pregnant with donor eggs (as in gestational surrogacy) have a more than three-fold risk of developing pregnancy induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia.
W/ the greater risk of hypertension/pre-eclampsia, why? Or rather, is it known why?
Because in a normal pregnancy the baby is >50% related to the mother. In surrogacy, an unrelated egg is used, which means entirely foreign biological material in the woman's body.
Pregnancy is basically a 9 month-long battle between the woman and the embryo; a "healthy" full-term pregnancy can only happen if, essentially, the women's body doesn't realize that the embryo is there, because if it does it will attack it with the woman's immune system as a "foreign body." This is the main reason the placenta exists, to shield the embryo from the woman's immune system (along with nutrient absorption obviously).
The closer the embryo is to the woman, the less likely an immune response will be triggered; this applies to gestational surrogacy, but also relates to things like the sex of the embryo and the embryo's blood type. So, the more genetically different an embryo is from its mother, the higher the overall risk of triggering an immune response, which then increases the likelihood of a smorgasbord of complications given the strain that an immune response causes both the mother and the embryo.
this is just personal observation, but all the people I know who had surrogates (which is only 3 so who really knows), their babies are so so sick all the time. Like months premature, weeks in NICU, multiple hospital stays in infancy, now constantly sick as toddlers, can’t keep weight on, lowest percentiles of height / weight, etc etc. Literally every one of them.
and maybe it’s just a coincidence but maybe you aren’t supposed to implant your eggs in another woman and assume her body will grow a healthy baby for you? not to even talk about what it does to an infant to be forcibly removed from their mother at birth….
This should be obvious to anyone who knows anything about pregnancy/women's healthcare. But because even doctors seem to think that pregnancy is when a woman just incubates a man's offspring for a few months, providing nothing but a chamber in which the baby can grow, they treat it as if it makes no difference where the embryo came from.
Surrogacy is this horrible intersection between modern medicine + capitalism and an almost medieval understanding of pregnancy. Worst of both worlds.
The last week has been so ridiculous even the satirists can’t take it any more
the fucking timestamp
Happy tenth birthday to this post which will apparently haunt my notifications for all eternity.
It’s about Brexit, by the way. The timestamp is a week post-referendum. Newsthump is UK-based and I myself am scottish. And yes, things have 100% got worse since then, but personally I regard the referendum as the point at which we entered the Clownshoes Timeline.
that and the competitive pay they advertise as a plus. so you underpay people unless they work themselves to the bone to outcompete their teammates? got it. fuck you
basic human rights:
food
water
shelter
etc
not basic human rights:
sex
don’t let instagram influencers fool you
i’ve been watching wimbledon recently and one thing that stood out to me was how some of the world’s best athletes (female) don’t look incredibly toned, many have quite a bit of body fat and don’t have much visible muscle definition
and it’s because a bit of body fat is advantageous to women, and trying to emulate the lean and toned look of male bodies, who have different hormones to us, or trying to emulate starved instagram influencers, often comes at the expense of our health
ngl i’ve been feeling a bit like shit recently because even though i go to the gym, i’m not toned, and i struggle with being toned because lowering your body fat % a lot of the time requires eating in a calorie deficit, i.e. depriving yourself of food to some degree
it makes me feel better looking at elite athletes who are so strong and fit and it’s wild how even they don’t look like instagram influencers or even gym influencers
i'm so tired of people excusing the fact that women somehow aren't responsible for patriarchy because they are. Yes, men are the main perpetrators but it only keeps happening because women continue to enable this type of behavior. How many times do you see mothers forcing their daughters/teenage girls to 'cover up' so that their male partner doesn't leave them for their daughter? Or what about all the times women force their toddlers into beauty pagents/dance shows where they're completely aware the main audience for this type of show is older men??? Not even to mention women who force beauty standards on their daughters, like making them shave their legs, put on makeup, extreme diets the moment they hit puberty and begin developing like a human being. There's so much more I could mention but that's at the top of my mind.
Obviously you can't deny that these beauty standards were set by men, but so many women participate and enable them. Stop blaming this on 'female socialization' and 'grooming by the patriarchy'. women today have ENDLESS many resources to learn how to not be abusive towards their daughters. These women have the option to get their daughters into a safer environment but they don't.
“The oppressor would not be so strong if he did not have accomplices among the oppressed.”
Simone de Beauvoir, The Ethics of Ambiguity
Humans have been making uninspired, soulless art and books from way before AI entered the picture, but y'all ain't ready for that conversation
The issue is that they can shit out more of it faster, and at least it used to be human shit
humans are absolutely capable of creating bad art, sure. but ai is *incapable* of making art, ever. and that’s just that.
My mouth fell.
Uganda's oldest and largest licensed coffee exporter contributed their in-country expertise to the coalition to establish "model farms."
Due to where it is typically grown, coffee farms are particularly vulnerable to damage from erosion when rain comes either too intensely or too sparsely. A coalition assembled by the Global Environment Facility set up test farms to help provide local coffee farmers in Uganda with the resources to apply regenerative agricultural techniques to their local farming conditions.
The results have led to better yields, healthier soil that is less prone to erosion, and more stable income for farmers.
“But since we applied mulches and planted drought resistant seedlings, the coffee farms are reliably resilient. My coffee is stronger and more promising, and so is my family.”