wow this blog fucking sucks ass
im deleting it soon bye
art blog(derogatory)
dirt enthusiast
Stranger Things

#extradirty

⁂
Misplaced Lens Cap

Origami Around
No title available
Xuebing Du
wallacepolsom
Sade Olutola

Andulka

No title available

shark vs the universe
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

izzy's playlists!
h

JVL
occasionally subtle
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Oman

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Sweden

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@massivelycolorfultaco
wow this blog fucking sucks ass
im deleting it soon bye
A Men’s Rights Activist is a person who advocates for the rights and welfare of men. Feminism is not a substitute for Men’s Rights activism because Feminism’s majority focus is on women’s rights and welfare. And feminists majority believe that it is women who are lacking equal rights to men, and/or that men have more privileges than women.
A movement that assumes that men already have all their rights, have far more privileges than they deserve, or have it better than women will not prioritize men’s advocacy, or consider men’s perspective. You can have whatever criticisms of MRAs you want, but the idea that men don’t need their own movement because feminism already covers it is not true.
The idea that “feminism just means equality” is not true; feminism is a political/ideological movement that comes with specific ideas and principles that not everyone will agree with. It’s the same thing as saying chocolate ice cream and vanilla ice cream are the same thing because they’re both ice cream.
To be fair, a lot of feminists simply define feminism as equality, so while the whole movement does not have men's rights in mind, a lot of individual feminists do.
Wow, what a perfect example of the straw man fallacy.
once u accept “men are trash” as a universal immutable truth u can never be let down again. there is no “he’s different” like i PROMISE you he is not.
once you accept ‘men are trash’ as a universal immutable truth you are an oppressive fucking asshole, no exceptions.
actually men aren’t oppressed you can unclench your asshole now
the ‘men are oppressed’ argument is a very vast grey area and i honestly don’t know enough to have a strong opinion on it, but why bring it up? i said your bs was oppressive, which it is, but i never said men as a whole were oppressed? you really must think highly of yourself to assume that just you spouting your shite on tumblr is enough to make someone assume they were oppressed.
Dionysus is not the god of rave and parties, but just Orgies??
I’m asking this because even though that’s something many people say, I’ve not found g that makes him the patron of parties. Wikipedia and theoi.com doesn’t list that:
Moreover, I’ve looked into some hymns and myths of Dionysus, all he seems to do is orgies, wandering around spreading the knowledge of wine and punishing people who don’t wanna get drunk. Only that kind of parties where everyone has batshit crazy sex. Uhhh….
If anyone was in charge of parties and celebrations, it was the Apollo and the Muses. They appear a lot as party gods - singing dancing making everyone happy during weddings/victory celebrations and occasions like that.
It’s really strange for me because I keep seeing those party aesthetics applied to Dionysus but in reality he was not at all in charge of it. Dionysus is only about orgies. Apollo and Muses are the ones that preside over all other kinds of parties.
Hey man, saw that you stood up to those intactivists and just wanted to say thank you!! As a circumcised guy I find it crazy that people want to say im mutilated just because i had a useless piece of skin cut off... and I cant remember it so no trauma!! haha
Same here. Some of them honestly come across as drama queens about it. Ha.
people can die because of botched circumcision, as well as the practice being fucking disgusting to begin with.
If you don’t like it, you can choose not to have the procedure done on any of your potential children. Simple.
i assume this means you support fgm too then? bc they are literally the exact same thing and people can die from both. sure, you met one fucking guy who didn’t, big whoop, tell that to the parents with dead kids.
FGM and male circumcision cannot be compared. They are drastically different.
in what way?
For male circumcision to be equivalent to FGM, the entire tip of the male’s penis would need to be cut off.
do you mean the head or the foreskin? regardless, why the actual fuck are you happy with people needlessly cutting off the most sensitive part of the body?
This is going to sound weird but would anyone like to help me with an English paper over pm?
I’m not looking for anyone to check it or anything like that, it’s an argumentative paper and I would want someone to argue against so that way I can get a feel for the argument (I’m way better at countering than I am actually making a huge claim). The paper is about if hate speech should be illegal or not and if you’re willing to debate with me with it then you can pick either side as long as you make it clear. It doesn’t need to be extreme either, you can be in the middle if you want.
Honestly treat it like tumblr discourse without the insults. It’s not like the paper is going to be the conversation but I would rather not get people getting out their anger out on me while claiming they’re helping my dumb ass. It’s an informal way to get ideas and possibly sources for a paper and if anyone’s willing I would really appreciate it.
hate speech should not be illegal because there is no rigid definition of hate speech, therefore ‘hate speech’ could be something like expressing distrust to a dictatorship. in a less dystopian society, hate speech should still be legal because you could be very easily framed.
You know OP wanted to practice in PM’s right?
Out of respect for OP, I won’t engage with your dumbass arguement for why hate speech should be legal.
seems unecessarily agressive but ok
Six word story. In fifteen seconds.
there once was a tall man.
This is going to sound weird but would anyone like to help me with an English paper over pm?
I’m not looking for anyone to check it or anything like that, it’s an argumentative paper and I would want someone to argue against so that way I can get a feel for the argument (I’m way better at countering than I am actually making a huge claim). The paper is about if hate speech should be illegal or not and if you’re willing to debate with me with it then you can pick either side as long as you make it clear. It doesn’t need to be extreme either, you can be in the middle if you want.
Honestly treat it like tumblr discourse without the insults. It’s not like the paper is going to be the conversation but I would rather not get people getting out their anger out on me while claiming they’re helping my dumb ass. It’s an informal way to get ideas and possibly sources for a paper and if anyone’s willing I would really appreciate it.
hate speech should not be illegal because there is no rigid definition of hate speech, therefore ‘hate speech’ could be something like expressing distrust to a dictatorship. in a less dystopian society, hate speech should still be legal because you could be very easily framed.
i can’t be the only one who hates the new version?
you are. you are the only one
Hey man, saw that you stood up to those intactivists and just wanted to say thank you!! As a circumcised guy I find it crazy that people want to say im mutilated just because i had a useless piece of skin cut off... and I cant remember it so no trauma!! haha
Same here. Some of them honestly come across as drama queens about it. Ha.
people can die because of botched circumcision, as well as the practice being fucking disgusting to begin with.
If you don’t like it, you can choose not to have the procedure done on any of your potential children. Simple.
i assume this means you support fgm too then? bc they are literally the exact same thing and people can die from both. sure, you met one fucking guy who didn’t, big whoop, tell that to the parents with dead kids.
FGM and male circumcision cannot be compared. They are drastically different.
in what way?
i can’t be the only one who hates the new version?
Hey man, saw that you stood up to those intactivists and just wanted to say thank you!! As a circumcised guy I find it crazy that people want to say im mutilated just because i had a useless piece of skin cut off... and I cant remember it so no trauma!! haha
Same here. Some of them honestly come across as drama queens about it. Ha.
people can die because of botched circumcision, as well as the practice being fucking disgusting to begin with.
If you don’t like it, you can choose not to have the procedure done on any of your potential children. Simple.
i assume this means you support fgm too then? bc they are literally the exact same thing and people can die from both. sure, you met one fucking guy who didn’t, big whoop, tell that to the parents with dead kids.
Circumcision Apologist Arguments Debunked
1. “I like my circumcised dick.”
Translation: “I happen to be okay with the fact that I had my penis mutilated without my consent as an infant and therefore expect all other men to feel the same way.”
2. “God says that all baby boys should be circumcised.”
Translation: “I refuse to acknowledge that the Bible and the Quran were written thousands of years ago in times of prejudice and violence and that therefore many of their verses are incompatible with a peaceful, egalitarian society. I value a god who most likely does not exist over the bodily integrity of infants.”
3. “Women prefer circumcised men.”
Translation: “I will go on and on about how women don’t exist for the sexual pleasure of men and then treat men as if they exist for the sexual pleasure of women. I assume that all men are heterosexual and must therefore be prepared to please whatever women they may have sex with from birth.”
4. “Cleaning a foreskin is too much effort.”
Translation: “I see men as incapable of learning how to clean themselves. Strangely enough, I do not apply the idea of cutting off a body part instead of learning how to clean it to any other body parts.”
5. “Circumcision prevents diseases.”
Translation: “I refuse to acknowledge the countless scientific studies that prove this is not the case because I want an excuse to mutilate babies’ genitals.”
No amount of shared hardship or marginalization makes men have empathy for women or see them as fully human.
Working class and poor men rape working class poor women.
Colonized men rape colonized women.
Men of color rape women of color.
Homeless men rape homeless women.
Refugee men rape refugee women.
No matter how bad women have it, men sharing that same harship will always be there to make sure they make it worse.
O_O Please seek a therapist. This isn’t normal. This isn’t woke.
In the 1960′s Legally a woman couldn’t
Open a bank account or get a credit card without signed permission from her father or hr husband.
Serve on a jury - because it might inconvenience the family not to have the woman at home being her husband’s helpmate.
Obtain any form of birth control without her husband’s permission. You had to be married, and your hub and had to agree to postpone having children.
Get an Ivy League education. Ivy League schools were men’s colleges ntil the 70′s and 80′s. When they opened their doors to women it was agree that women went there for their MRS. Degee.
Experience equality in the workplace: Kennedy’s Commission on the Status of Women produced a report in 1963 that revealed, among other things, that women earned 59 cents for every dollar that men earned and were kept out of the more lucrative professional positions.
Keep her job if she was pregnant.Until the Pregnancy Discrimination Act in 1978, women were regularly fired from their workplace for being pregnant.
Refuse to have sex with her husband.The mid 70s saw most states recognize marital rape and in 1993 it became criminalized in all 50 states. Nevertheless, marital rape is still often treated differently to other forms of rape in some states even today.
Get a divorce with some degree of ease.Before the No Fault Divorce law in 1969, spouses had to show the faults of the other party, such as adultery, and could easily be overturned by recrimination.
Have a legal abortion in most states.The Roe v. Wade case in 1973 protected a woman’s right to abortion until viability.
Take legal action against workplace sexual harassment. According to The Week, the first time a court recognized office sexual harassment as grounds for legal action was in 1977.
Play college sports Title IX of the Education Amendments of protects people from discrimination based on sex in education programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance It was nt until this statute that colleges had teams for women’s sports
Apply for men’s Jobs The EEOC rules that sex-segregated help wanted ads in newspapers are illegal. This ruling is upheld in 1973 by the Supreme Court, opening the way for women to apply for higher-paying jobs hitherto open only to men.
This is why we needed feminism - this is why we know that feminism works
I just want to reiterate this stuff, because I legit get the feeling there are a lot of younger women for whom it hasn’t really sunk in what it is today’s GOP is actively trying to return to.
Did you go to a good college? Shame on you, you took a college placement that could have gone to a man who deserves and needs it to support or prepare for his wife & children. But if you really must attend college, well, some men like that, you can still get married if you focus on finding the right man.
Got a job? Why? A man could be doing that job. You should be at home caring for a family. You shouldn’t be taking that job away from a man who needs it (see college, above). You definitely don’t have a career – you’ll be pregnant and raising children soon, so no need to worry about promoting you.
This shit was within living memory. I’M A MILLENIAL and my mother was in the second class that allowed women at an Ivy League school. Men who are alive today either personally remember shit like this or have parents/family who have raised them into thinking this was the way America functioned back in the blissful Good Old Days. There are literally dudes in the GOP old enough to remember when it was like this and yearn for those days to return.
When people talk about resisting conservativism and the GOP, we’re not just talking about whether the wage gap is a myth or not. We’re talking about whether women even have the fundamental right to exist as individuals, to run their own households and compete for jobs and be considered on an equal footing with men in any arena at all in the first place.
I was a child in the 1960s, a teenager in the 1970s, a young adult in the 1980s. This is what it was like: When I was growing up, it was considered unfortunate if a girl was good at sports. Girls were not allowed in Little League. Girls’ teams didn’t exist in high school, except at all-girls’ high schools. Boys played sports, and girls were the cheerleaders. People used to ask me as a child what I wanted to be when I grew up. I said I wanted to be a brain surgeon or the first woman justice on the Supreme Court. Everyone told me it was impossible–those just weren’t realistic goals for a girl–the latter, especially, because you couldn’t trust women to judge fairly and rationally, after all. In the 1960s and 1970s, all women were identified by their marital status, even in arrest reports and obituaries. In elementary school, my science teacher referred to Pierre Curie as DOCTOR Curie and Marie Curie as MRS. Curie…because, as he put it, “she was just his wife.” (Both had doctorates and both were Nobel prize winners, so you would think that both would be accorded respect.) Companies could and did require women to wear dresses and skirts. Failure to do could and did get women fired. And it was legal. It was also legal to fire women for getting married or getting pregnant. The rationale was that a woman who was married or who had a child had no business working; that was what her husband was for. Aetna Insurance, the biggest insurance company in America, fired women for all of the above. A man could rape his wife. Legally. I can remember being twelve years old and reading about legal experts actually debating whether or not a man could actually be said to coerce his wife into having sex. This was a serious debate in 1974. The debate about marital rape came up in my law school, too, in 1984. Could a woman be raped by her husband? The guys all said no–a woman got married, so she was consenting to sex at all times. So I turned it around. I asked them if, since a man had gotten married, that meant that his wife could shove a dildo or a stick or something up his ass any time she wanted to for HER sexual pleasure. (Hey, I thought it was reasonable. If one gender was legally entitled to force sex on the other, then obviously the reverse should also be true.) The male law students didn’t like the idea. Interestingly, they commented that being treated like that would make them feel like a woman. My reaction was, “Thank you for proving my point…” The concept of date rape, when first proposed, was considered laughable. If a woman went out on a date, the argument of legal experts ran, sexual consent was implied. Even more sickening was the fact that in some states–even in the early 1980s–a man could rape his daughter…and it was no worse than a misdemeanor. Women taking self-defense classes in the 1970s and 1980s were frequently described in books and on TV as “cute.” The implication was that it was absurd for a woman to attempt to defend herself, but wasn’t it just adorable for her to try? I was expressly forbidden to take computer classes in junior and senior years of high school–1978-79 and 1979-80–because, as the principal told me, “Only boys have to know that kind of thing. You girls are going to get married, and you won’t use it.” When I was in college–from 1980 to 1984–there were no womens’ studies. The idea hadn’t occurred in many places because the presumption was that there was nothing TO study. My history professor–a man who had a doctorate in history–informed me quite seriously that women had never produced a noted painter, sculptor, composer, architect or scientist because…wait for it…womens’ brains were too small. (He was very surprised when I came up with a list of fifty women gifted in the arts and science, most of whom he had never heard of before.) When Walter Mondale picked Geraldine Ferraro as a running mate in 1984, the press hailed it as a disaster. What would happen, they asked fearfully, if Mondale died and Ferraro became president? What if an international crisis arose and she was menstruating? She could push the nuclear button in a fit of PMS! It would be the end of the WORLD!! …No, they WEREN’T kidding. On the surface, things are very different now than they were when I was a child, a teen and a young adult. But I’m afraid that people now do not realize what it was like then. I’ve read a lot of posts from young women who say that they are not feminists. If the only exposure to feminism they have is the work of extremists, I cannot blame them overmuch. I wish that I could tell them what feminism was like when it was new–when the dream of legal equality was just a dream, and hadn’t even begun to come true. When “woman’s work” was a sneer–and an overt putdown. When people tut-tutted over bright and athletic girls with the words, “Really, it’s a shame she’s not a boy.” That lack of feminism wasn’t all men opening doors and picking up checks. A lot of it was an attitude of patronizing contempt that hasn’t entirely died out, but which has become less publicly acceptable. I wish I could make them feel what it was like…when grown men were called “men” and grown women were “girls.”
Know your history.
So this, too, is what they mean saying “make America great again” and/or the good old days.
REBLOG FOREVER.
I am 70. I remember all those things. I was a student nurse from 64 to 67 and we were not permitted to “finish” a bed bath on a male or insert a catheter in a male. Seeing male genitals might cause us “harm” or upset our delicate sensibilities. Imagine when we graduated and were “thrown” to the wolves. Imagine if you were a male patient who had to be the first to be “practiced” on by a graduate nurse. (Ha!) At the school I attended no student nurse could be married. Only one school in my city (Atlanta) would even admit married women and Male Nurses weren’t even thought of. What man would want to be a nurse when he could be a Doctor. In all my training I only remember 3 or 4 Women who were Doctor’s and a very few, (less than 5 or 6) female interns or residents (and this was a teaching hospital) and most of those were OB/Gyns and one was a pediatrician.
When I graduated and was going to get married I wanted to go on birth control pills. You needed to be on them for a least one cycle before they were effective. I won’t go into what hoops I had to jump through to get a prescription from my Dr. (a man, natch) but when i went to the drug store to get the prescription filled I ended up having to get my future husband to “accompany” me so the pharmacist “interview” him and see if it was okay with him for me to be on the pill.
Even when we went to get a marriage license I had to get my Father’s signature and we had to go before a Judge because I was not yet 21 (I was 20 and 9 months).
I could go on and on, getting a credit card in MY name, etc., but I will tell you that WE MUST RESIST.
The number of people I know who romanticize gender inequality is frankly terrifying. A world never existed in which the lives of women were simplified by benevolent men who saw to her every want and need. That was not a thing. A world never existed in which women were all ladies, men were all gentlemen, & everything was some great big cishet fairytale. Feminists aren’t a bunch of upstarts who want to destroy a perfectly wholesome and non-harmful system. Just…look at history. Look at the posts above. We. Must. Resist..
There is no such thing as cisgender
If you believe that cisgender is a real thing you are anti feminist
You do not know anything about feminism and and you have no speaking rights
correct me if i’m wrong, but isn’t cisgender just people who aren’t trans?
there where more like this but it was just too much, and they’re laughing at this, people are laughing at domestic violence and attempted murder, publicly celebrating it even just because the victims are male? this is awful.