
Product Placement

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Claire Keane

ellievsbear
đ
No title available

bliss lane
Doug Jones
tumblr dot com
â
Color Me Curious
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Interview Vampire Daily
Cosimo Galluzzi
almost home

PR's Tumblrdome
untitled
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
todays bird

Kiana Khansmith

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from Italy
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Japan
seen from Netherlands
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
@mere-peripheral
So, I have allergies that I'm getting better at avoiding , though for reasons I can't avoid them completely right now (and they're relatively minor, so that doesn't severely affect me as much as it could.) My question is more that my mom has allergies/intolerance to a lot of stuff, and it often causes flare ups for her to eat those foods. But she "cheats" a lot and then uses the pain it causes to justify various things. She's gotten better, but is it actually my fault for not telling her not to?
Nothing your mother does is your fault. You can try telling her not to do those things, but you not telling her does not make her ignoring her own issues your fault.
My parents knows all the common triggers for their/our condition and they still do them all cause itâs âeasierâ to remain within the status quo of suffering than take responsibility for themselves. For a long time I had guilt over getting better and getting treatment for all the things they just accepts as being part of our life, until my therapist pointed out that my parents are willing to engage repeatedly in harmful self destructive behavior to validate their means of acting out.
You can tell your mom everything youâve learned, you can help inform her or to get help if she wants it, but itâs not your fault that she cheats and indulges in things she shouldnât have, even knowing they will cause her pain.
Your mother is her own person and she obviously knows things are causing her problems, yet still actively chooses to do them, there could be any number of reasons for why she chooses to do this. But it is not your fault, and youâre not responsible for managing her life on top of your own, okay?
Thank you so much for answering. Especially considering all the shit youâre going through.
I only just followed you but been looking at your blog for a while and wish I could send you spoons.
Or humorous skeletons.
Happy Pride Month Eleanor Roosevelt was queer, the Little Mermaid is a gay love story, James Dean liked men, Emily Dickinson was a lesbian, Nikola Tesla was asexual, Freddie Mercury was bisexual & British Indian, and black trans women pioneered the gay rights movement.
Florence Nightingale was a lesbian, Leonardo da Vinci was gay, Michelangelo too, Jane Austen liked women, Hatshepsut was not cisgender, and Alexander the Great was a power bottom
Honestly just reblogging for that last one
Probably not historically backed but fuck yes
Eleanor Roosevelt wrote love letters to Lorena Hickok
Love letters Hans Christian Anderson wrote to Edvard Collin contain elements that appeared in The Little Mermaid, which he was writing at the same time
Several people who knew James Dean have talked about his relationships with menÂ
Letters and poems allude to a romance between Emily Dickinson and at least two womenÂ
Nikola Tesla was adverse to touch. He said he fell in love with one women but never touched her and didnât want to get marriedÂ
Freddie Mercury is well known for his attraction to men but was also linked to several women, including Barbara Valentin whom he lived with shortly before he died. Friends have talked about being invited into their bed and walking in on them having sex (documentary Freddie Mercury: The Great Pretender)Â
Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera are two of the best-known activists who fought in the Stonewall riots
Florence Nightingale refused 4 marriage proposals and her letters and memoir suggest a love for womenÂ
Leonardo da Vinci never married or fathered children, was once brought up on sodomy charges, and a sketch in one of his notebooks is 2 penises walking toward a hole labeled with the nickname of his apprenticeÂ
Condivi said that Michelangelo often spoke exclusively of masculine love
Jane Austin never married and wrote about sharing a bed with women (Jane Austen At Home: A Biography by Lucy Worsley)
Hatshepsut took the male title Pharaoh (instead of Queen Regent) and is depicted in art from the time the same way a male Pharaoh would have been
âAlexander was only defeated onceâŠand that was by Hephaestionâs thighs.â is a 2,000 year old quote
I want to hire you to follow me around and defend my honor with meticulous research
More Weird Shit I Found in the Woodsâą.
Geometrically-challenged child cultists should have stuck with the triangles.
Is this real life Dipper Pines?
âoh look. Another mysterious stone path in the woods. 3 guesses where this leads.â
(at the end of the path)
âListen. I know everyone wants to summon a demon at summer camp. I get it, I really do! But if youâre gonna try that shit just⊠put some effort into it. I mean look at this shit. ITâs justâŠItâs not even symmetrical. And look at this egg thing. Itâs wildly disproportionate to the rest of it. It sucks! It objectively sucks! If I were a demon and I saw this, I would actually be offended. Try harder, kids. Try harder.â
@captioned-vines
someone should add one of those vintage âyou triedâ star memes in the shape of this
Like this?
Why does this person look and sound so much like a cartoon character???
a witch cursed me to be this way
itâs been two years⊠why is this video still going around?
Lesbians that complain about bi women dating men instead of them are officially the ânice guysâ of biphobia.
âWhy would she date a smelly BOY when she could date me instead? Iâd treat her so much better than any man could! I donât understand what she could possibly see in a MAN!â
if u say this shit, imma leave u for a man immediately. the first one on sight. period.
The same applies to gay men that complain about bi men dating women instead of them.
Concept: an RPG setting including a nation that overthrew the vile Sorcerer-Kings several generations ago after a thousand years of subjugation and instituted a modified form of anarcho-syndicalism, but, well, by then the Aesthetic had become a part of their culture - and radical reform of political institutions is one thing, but some things are more stubborn!
Architecture consists primarily of storm-lashed spires of obsidian and (ethically sourced!) bone, the interior of which are mostly filled with comfortably appointed apartments, including heavy soundproof window-covers to muffle the frequent thunder.
Fashion tends toward voluminous hooded cloaks, which are eminently practical, given the near-constant grimy drizzle. Fashion also tends toward an excess of thick leather belts and chunky metal buckles, the latter typically fashioned to resemble skulls and leering demonic faces; these are less practical, though as a result few denizens ever find themselves without a handy spot to secure a tool or pouch.
The languages spoken much resemble those of neighbouring nations, though most of the men (and a growing number of women) practice a trick of speaking with a booming sepulchral echo that non-natives can never seem to get the hang of. Many elders also work on perfecting their shrill cackles in their free time.
People carry âskeleton donorâ cards indicating their consent to have their remains reanimated after death. Animated skeletons require no luxuries and dislike idleness, but theyâre required to take every third day off anyway; most of them spend those days staging elaborate pantomimes and engaging in musical duels with whatever instruments they can get their phalanges on that require neither breath nor skin.
The harbour is patrolled by a tame leviathan that in all honesty would probably just run away if anyone ever mounted a serious assault, but thus far nobody has been willing to test that theory. It quite enjoys having its gills scritched, a predilection that often unnerves visiting mariners.
Every Winter Solstice a volunteer puts on the spiky armour and the ridiculous hat and runs through the streets while village children chase after her and hit her with sticks, and a grand time is had by all.
PSA
theres a new product by verzion called âhumâ that allows your parents to track your car and places you go, if your parents are controlling like mine please check under your steering wheel to make sure that they havent installed this
here is what it looks like installed:
you can read more about it here, and here-Â this excerpt sums up what information Hum will send:Â
âa carâs owner will be able to get notified on their phone when the vehicle leaves a pre-determined area or drives faster than a set speed⊠[Hum] will enable location tracking and a driving log, which measures travel times, engine idle times, and average speeds.âÂ
People in abusive relationships, please check your cars.
DO NOT TRY TO UNPLUG IT BY YOURSELF!
To add to this nightmare, Iâve just heard of a thing called ForceField where people get to monitor and block internet sites that youâre going on if they donât approve.
It tells the user what sites/apps youâre going on, for how long youâre on them, and WHERE YOU ARE ON AN UPDATING MAP.
So you know if youâre in an abusive household and use sites like tumblr to escape and talk to friends, you could be cut off from that.
They say âitâs not spywareâ but it sure sounds controlling and creepy to me.
signalboost
God. Fuck. Thatâs scary.
Life 360 is another tracker. My parents have used it on me, not allowing me to delete it from my phone, and sometimes even demanding selfies to prove I was where the map said. (As if Iâd go anywhere without my phone)
SpectorPro is another one. Afaik it canât track location, but it takes screenshots roughly every 20sec to allow the installer to watch a video of your computer activity. It also tracks all keystrokes, so passwords arenât safe, and records any website you visit + the duration. Itâs incredibly creepy and a huge violation of privacy, and was one of the cornerstones of my abuse as a kid.
even if youâre not in an abusive relationship/family, please spread this because you might have just saved someoneâs life
My parents had a product called Qustodio on my phone and computer for a while, which they used to block me from talking with friends. And it has the ability to hide itself so you donât know itâs installed. Be careful.
You know why Harry Potter is amazing? 99% of fan theories, headcanons and meta could be canon because Harry is about as observant as a brick wall. Did Slytherins come back to fight in the Battle of Hogwarts? Did Draco Malfoy enjoy crossdressing? Was Hermione transgender? Who knows, certainly not Harry
Harry didnât notice Hermione time traveling around him for a whole year or his own teacherâs hand writing
The glass is just gone I donât know maybe that just happens with snakes sometimes.Â
ok so since the Russo brothers confirmed that animals and plants and the like all died in the snap,,,,,,, that means dogs died too,,,,, and lemme tell ya if ANYTHING happened to my dog earth wouldnât even NEED the avengers Iâd mcfucking d e s t r o y thanos myself because NO ONE FUCKING MESSES WITH MY DOG NOT EVEN A CRUSTY ASS RAISIN WITH A ROCK COLLECTION
Me, after watching my cat turn to dust: :)
Every single (living) Avenger, getting tf out of my way: How is she holding that many knives
Grumpy old man hillbilly Legolas is the best Legolas
I'm watching BNHA and I forgot how much people yell in anime.
Do you think you can (/are allowed to) enjoy something that 1. was created by a piece of scumbag, and 2. has a lot of things in it which really are very problematic, in lack of a less overused word?
I think so much depends on a) when you were first exposed to a thing, b) how regularly you have been exposed to it after that first time, and c) whether youâre trying to pretend the thing has no issues.
I mean, youâre really asking two different things here. âDo you think you can enjoy something that was created by a terrible person?â Absolutely. For one thing, we donât all have a complete Rolodex of Every Bad Thing Anyone Has Ever Done. I have read and watched and loved and treasured things made by people who I later found out were awful; their awfulness clearly did not render the thing completely unenjoyable to the ignorant.
âCan you continue to enjoy something that was created by a terrible person?â Yes, although that takes a little more awareness, I think, of whatâs going on, and itâs going to be very, very personal, and very, very situational. Joss Whedon cheated on his wife and abused his power over young actresses and was kind of a terrible person. But Buffy was still incredibly important to me as a teen, and if it comes on the TV, Iâll get through about ten minutes of most* episodes before I forget what I know and only remember what I feel, and what I feel is nostalgia and joy and yes, enjoyment. I donât get to erase what he did. I will think long and hard before I do things that put more money in his personal pockets. But I can still enjoy some of his work.
(*Most: the episodes that clearly show certain tendencies were hard to watch before I realized how personal they were for him. I canât deal anymore. I just canât.)
âCan you enjoy something that has a lot of problematic elements?â Absolutely. Part of this is really going to be when you were first exposed. I know a lot of the things I read, watched, and loved as a kid are super-problematic by todayâs standards, and Iâm careful to review them before I recommend them to other people, but my love doesnât necessarily die because I learn more. Obviously, this is subjective: Revenge of the Nerds was absolutely tainted for me by the rapey aspects of the carnival, which went completely over my head as a child, while I can still handle Real Genius despite some of the casual sexism. How problematic is too problematic is completely individual.
âAre you allowed to enjoy something that has problematic elements?â Everything has problematic elements. Everything. If we canât see them yet, weâll see them in ten years, and maybe weâll be horrified, but it will also be a sign that the world is getting better. Are people going to interrogate your enjoyment of certain things? Yeah. Thereâs a reason my friends who still love Enderâs Game mostly preface that love with âI know OSC is a bigot, but this book was so important to me when I was eleven,â or something of the sort. Thereâs stuff I donât discuss enjoying because I donât want to have the conversation. But unless itâs hurting other people, of course youâre allowed to enjoy it. You get to enjoy anything you want.
Sigh. Gotta love how OS is a Bigoted Cad comes up every timeâŠ.
I have friends who adore him as a person. I have friends to whom he was a mentor and a huge cheerleader when they were getting into the business.
I have a baby sister who is gay. I have a baby sister who is, like me, more nebulously queerâGoth Betty Page and I have spent our entire lives trying to figure our shit outâbut Young James Dean is gay, period. She is a lesbian. She loves women. She is also, out of the three of us, the most invested in the idea of the traditional family. She was the first (and so far, only) of us to get married, to a woman.
Orson Scott Card put his own, personal money toward making same-sex marriage illegal in the state of California, where YJD lives. He does not live in California. He lives in a country where States Rights are a thing, and where the people of California should be allowed to make their own choices about things. But he decided that no, the morality of Utah mattered more than the preferences of California, and put his own, personal money toward the cause of destroying my baby sisterâs marriage.
So yeah. OSC is a bigot. And he has, through his direct financial choices, hurt a lot of people I care about. For many members of the QUILTBAG community, whether they are, like YJD, absolutely gay, or are, like me and GBP, interested in being allowed to love who we love who we love without censure, supporting him either financially or otherwise is a very difficult thing to do.
The thing I find so incredibly sad, and angering, about OSC is that he told us, in his fiction, over and over, that he was going to grow up to be a hardened, cruel bigot, and why.
One of the themes that appears constantly in OSCâs work is that an older man, who is invested in the protection of society, abuses younger men, boys, occasionally girls, or people in general, because it is natural for young people to want freedom, but that freedom will destroy society. The older people must be cruel to shape the younger people into what they need to be. It turns up in Enderâs Game. Itâs in Wyrms. Itâs in Hartâs Hope, where a sympathetic man has to rape a 12 year old girl in order to prevent a successful rebellion against a truly evil king from collapsing, and later a father must allow his baby son to be murdered by the sonâs mother in order to save the world. Itâs in the one whose name I forget where aliens are eating people and one man volunteers to treat the people like sheep to be shorn, taking body parts as the aliens demand, in order to keep them all alive. Itâs in âUnaccompanied Sonataâ.
And over and over, the young people who wanted freedom grow up to be the ones who make the terrible choices. This is most obvious in âUnaccompanied Sonataâ, where the people who enforce that artists are not allowed to consume anyone elseâs art and cannot continue to create if they do are the artists who, after consuming the art of others, couldnât obey the law to stop creating art. After being repeatedly tortured to force them to comply, after having their ability to make art stripped from them, they eventually become the enforcers of the law.
Card is quite probably a closeted gay man in denial. I say this not because I believe this is true of homophobes in general, but because:
- his writing about gay boys and men was, up until about 15 years ago, deeply sympathetic, but still writing from the perspective that it was wrong. In âHomecomingâ he writes about the struggle of a gay man who came from a society where homosexuality was completely accepted, into a small band of 10 survivors where every man and every woman must reproduce within their assigned couples for the salvation of the human race, and how he has to make himself have sex with a woman he cares about as a friend, but does not love and is not attracted to. In âTreasonâ, a man impersonating a woman falls in love with the main character, who is physiologically intersex but identifies as male but is impersonating a woman, and while that man is a villain, the main character talks about how sweet and gentle the personâs songs are and how he is almost seduced. There is a lot of homoerotic affection shown between boys as well.
- More importantly, his stated reason for why heâs against gay marriage was that men are so much more naturally sympathetic to and understanding of other men, no man would marry a woman if he had the option to marry a man instead, and thus the human race would die out.
I mean, Iâm sorry, wut?
No straight person is capable of coming up with this logic. The nastiest and most misogynistic of het incels still understand why men, no matter how much they donât like women, would prefer to marry them than to marry other men. The only kind of person whoâs capable of believing that the only thing stopping men from marrying other men exclusively, never marrying women, is the law, is someone who is gay but so ignorant about what it means to be gay that they have convinced themselves that their feelings are natural and normal and everyone has them, but that for the protection of society itself and the future of the human race such feelings must be repressed.
So Card has been telling us all along that he is sympathetic to the feelings of gay men, that he perfectly understands why a man would want to marry a man, but he believes â because this is what heâs been taught â that gay love is a selfish indulgence that will destroy humanity. And as an older man and a pillar of the community, it is his duty to torture and, if necessary, destroy, younger people (or really any people) who donât understand this necessity and selfishly want the freedom to marry the people they genuinely love. Because thatâs what older men do. They abuse the young and the non-conforming to save humanity, even though they have compassion for the young and non-conforming because once upon a time, that was what they were, too.
So this was a man who was capable of writing about non-conformists and rejects from society â and homosexuals â with incredible compassion and empathy. But it didnât change anything. Heâs been telling us from the beginning that he believes that itâs the role of older men to force conformity or obedience on the young and non-conforming, through violence if necessary, because that is what will Save The World. Humanity depends on older men performing this role. No matter how much compassion they feel, they must be harsh and cruel or we will all die.
Imagine believing that. Imagine believing, your whole life, that itâs your destiny to grow up to be someone who crushes the dreams of the young, because the young canât be allowed to fulfill their dreams or else humanity goes extinct. Imagine loving men, but believing that your love for men, if expressed, would destroy the world, and that itâs your vital and important role as an adult to prevent men from expressing their love for each other, even though you know exactly what it feels like to wish you could express love for a man.
I feel very sorry for OSC. I also hate him, because he could have been so much better of a person than he is, and his worldview is both sickening and demonstrably untrue. Heâs allowed his Mormon programming to overcome his empathy because he has been taught to believe that it is necessary for fathers to abuse their sons. Heâs gone on record as being an abuse victim whose father was violent⊠but his writing demonstrates that his coping mechanism was to believe that his father only did it out of love and the need to protect the world. I feel so sad for the little boy he must have been once, and the young man whose writing I loved, but I despise the man he is now for not being able to break free of that programming, of not recognizing that you donât need to torture the world to save it, and in fact thatâs generally the opposite of helpful.
loss jpeg pride flag
i know im the op but i hate this post and there isnt even an image with it
you made a mistake in saying that
i regret making this post, die
@mere-peripheral
My boyfriend wonât stop talking to me about whether or not I would eat PokĂ©mon steaks. We think maybe Mr. Mime steaks would have white meat and ooze a purple liquid. I feel like youâre the only one qualified to tell us more
listen the ONLY part of a mr mime thats edible are the red spots, and thats ONLY after being properly cooked - if you bite into any part of their body while its still raw youll suffer near immediate food poisoning
luckily, just like red kidney beans, the potential toxins are easily to remove provided you take the right steps
once theyve been safely removed from their inedible surroundings, the larger red spheres are ready to begin working with - its worth noting that the smaller spots on the hands and cheeks also fall into this category, but theyre almost always too small to be considered harvesting by most professionalsÂ
youll want to start by cutting away any flesh thats still directly touching the pale parts; when in doubt, a wider cut is always preferred. better safe than sorry ! one benefit of working with mr mimes is that, along with many others in their typing, their bodies are held together with physic energy and thus dont require deboning
the next part is going to require boiling in a large pressure cooker- some may find it a challenge to to find a pot big enough to host all the parts, so cooking them individually is fine. remember to follow the instructions to the letter
after theyve been removed and dried, an easy way to text if theyre safe to eat is to cut them in half and check the spongy center - a darkened purple core means theyve been boiled long enough, while any lighter, greenish tints means you probably needed a bit more time
once theyre out of the danger range, you can now safely use them in variety of dishes ! their almost mushroom-like texture means they absorb flavors well, and pictured above is one of my personal favorites
THIS guy though, you can just pop em into your mouth whole. its fine
Shuri, kicking down TâChallaâs door at 3am: I have a.. stop screaming itâs me. I have a new update for your suit.
The veil is thin here. Itâs thin everywhere. Of course itâs fucking thin. Who ever heard of a thick veil? That shitâs lightweight, even sheer.
Like, shit, Agatha. Thereâs a reason they donât call it âthe down comforter between worldsâ.
Paris, France
âCommunism, homosexuality and chocolate breadâ