Controversial ways i'm raising my children
⢠I will parent them in uniquely toxic ways so they each develop a different personality disorder as adults

bliss lane

@theartofmadeline
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

titsay
Cosmic Funnies
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
almost home
Fai_Ryy

No title available
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
đŞź
Cosimo Galluzzi
No title available
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă

ellievsbear
macklin celebrini has autism
hello vonnie
todays bird
Mike Driver
No title available
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Colombia
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Ireland
seen from Kenya
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from Canada
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
@myndopeus
Controversial ways i'm raising my children
⢠I will parent them in uniquely toxic ways so they each develop a different personality disorder as adults
Sorry for us politics posting, but we have until May 22, 2026 to submit public comment to the FCC:
More info from GLAAD:
https://glaad.org/fcc/
They have some good tips about writing a comment and protecting your privacy which, fuck it, I'll just paste here:
Providing an email address is optional. If you have concerns about privacy, you may use your initials or public address in your local area, such as City Hall. Do not use a joke name. It diminishes the commentâs credibility.
Your submission does not need to be long. A single, well-reasoned paragraph is sufficient.
Do not copy/paste a template comment. The FCC values unique perspectives, and an original comment carries significantly more weight in the public record. You can explain why this matters to you without revealing private or sensitive personal information.
Here's what I said:
âFree speech is a fundamental American freedom. I do not need a warning about seeing queer people, much like I do not need a warning about women, veterans, or any other group of people.â
Here's the link to submit your comment by May 22:
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/express?proceeding%5Bname%5D=19-41
"who do you self insert as when you read?"
This is me when I read:
Rewatched x-men (2000) and can I just say magneto's plan (turning all those politicians into mutants) was objectively hilarious. Like can you imagine. Somebody's firing the transgenderization beam into congress
trying to write a fic but i get frustrated bc i dont write like a 50+ years of experience in writing nobel in literature winner writer
"and then they kiss... sloppy style" hmmm but it doesnât sound as good as gabriel garcia marquez does it?
Ao3 Officially Exiting Beta!
They grow up so fast :')
Don't forget to grab your badge!
a proper open-world rpg should have full symmetry of action. if i can do something then any NPC should be able to do it as well, and vice versa. if a questgiver promises me a great reward for fetching some item then i should be able to delegate the fetching to some other NPC by promising them a great reward. and that NPC should be able to do the same thing to yet another NPC
If an evil politician wants me to assassinate his rival, I should be able to hire a bounty hunter who'll hire an assassin who'll send a robot who will release some bugs to kill her.
âsome people donât deserve redemptionâ redemption isnât something thatâs deserved, itâs something someone does. itâs making the choice to change the way you live your life, to be better, to do good things instead of bad things and try to make up for the bad things. and everyone can and should do that, at any time, no matter what theyâve done. we canât change the past, but we can choose what kind of person to be now and in the future. we have the responsibility to do so. it is so completely not about âdeserving.â
In the past fifty years, fantasyâs greatest sin might be its creation of a bland, invariant, faux-Medieval European backdrop. The problem isnât that every fantasy novel is set in the same place: pick a given book, and it probably deviates somehow. The problem is that the texture of this place gets everywhere.
Whatâs texture, specifically? Exactly what Elliot says: material culture. Social space. The textiles people use, the jobs they perform, the crops they harvest, the seasons they expect, even the way they construct their names. Fantasy writing doesnât usually care much about these details, because it doesnât usually care much about the little people â laborers, full-time mothers, sharecroppers, so on. (The last two books of Earthsea represent LeGuinâs remarkable attack on this tendency in her own writing.) So the fantasy writer defaults â fills in the tough details with the easiest available solution, and moves back to the world-saving, vengeance-seeking, intrigue-knotting narrative. Availability heuristics kick in, and we get another world of feudal serfs hunting deer and eating grains, of Western name constructions and Western social assumptions. (Husband and wife is not the universal historical norm for family structure, for instance.)
Defaulting is the root of a great many evils. Defaulting happens when we donât think too much about something we write â a character description, a gender dynamic, a textile on display, the weave of the rug. Absent much thought, automaticity, the brainâs subsconscious autopilot, invokes the easiest available prototype â in the case of a gender dynamic, dad will read the paper, and mom will cut the protagonistâs hair. Or, in the case of worldbuilding, we default to the bland fantasy backdrop we know, and thereby reinforce it. Itâs not done out of malice, but itâs still done.
The only way to fight this is by thinking about the little stuff. So: I was quite wrong. You do need to worldbuild pretty hard. Worldbuild against the grain, and worldbuild to challenge. Think about the little stuff. You donât need to position every rain shadow and align every tectonic plate before you start your short story. But you do need to build a base of historical information that disrupts and overturns your implicit assumptions about how societies âordinarilyâ work, what they âordinarilyâ eat, who they âordinarilyâ sleep with. Remember that your slice of life experience is deeply atypical and selective, filtered through a particular culture with particular norms. If you stick to your easy automatic tendencies, youâll produce sexist, racist writing â because our culture still has sexist, racist tendencies, tendencies we internalize, tendencies we can now even measure and quantify in a laboratory. And youâll produce narrow writing, writing that generalizes a particular historical moment, its flavors and tongues, to a fantasy world that should be much broader and more varied. Donât assume that the world you see around you, its structures and systems, is inevitable.
We... need worldbuilding by Seth Dickinson
Batman animation yayy đđ
no nuance...
yes, I use generative AI as part of my creative process
no, I don't use generative AI as part of my creative process
I should probably define what falls under the umbrella of generative AI here but I kinda don't feel like it, but like. using an image generator to make references. brainstorming by talking with chatgpt. generating images of characters as inspiration. all that kinda jazz counts. as of course does full-on using genAI to make your stuff.
remember that your vote is anonymous, so you don't have to out yourself on one side or the other when you share. I'm just curious what the spread is actually like when there's some anonymity. if you're wondering my own opinion it's in my original tags, but I'm attempting not to be judgemental in this accompanying text.
just remember that if y'all want to see how bad the genAI users get ratioed, you need to reblog it...
Anyone and everyone CAN write. The worldâs most skilled writer didnât start off skilled. The key is that they practice hard by writing a lot.
As long as you write, you are practicing your craft and you are getting better at writing. But you will never get anywhere if you let AI write for you.
to me, correctly using 5+ commas in a single sentence is like perfectly executing a combo in a fighting game. to me.
if you think a sentence needs 5+ commas it should be two sentences
itâs not about what the sentence needs, iâm afraid, nor is it about economy, clarity, or style. itâs about winning, little-theatre-fairy.
people talk about and excerpt the smutty passages from like romantasy booktok hits or whatever and sometimes it's to be "lol look at this embarrassing porn" and other times it's like a self-serious lit person being like "well certainly one can infer that the books' explicit erotic content is much of their appeal đ§" but nobody is willing to do the real work of like actually discussing why these scenes are bad at being pornography and not sexy or titillating at all. i mean i guess clearly they are successfully this for probably literally millions of people so that's not quite the right phrasing. but it's like the reason i don't read this stuff isn't because it was written to be jerkoff material it's because it's lousy jerkoff material. and it's lousy jerkoff material in ways i actually think are somewhat interesting to discuss from a craft perspective such as an abundance of cliche and a tendency for individual character dynamics to disappear once the fucking starts and an overreliance on banal physical description of insert tab A into slot B. but nobody is ready for this conversation because either they think it's embarrassing or morally wrong that romantasy jerkoff material exists or because they have extremely low literary standards for jerkoff material. everybody on earth it seems falls into one of these two categories except, of course, Me And My Mutuals
i was gonna say âwow, theyâre really pushing the came back wrong trope because buffy keeps repeating the exact phraseâ until i googled and realise the phrase âcame back wrongâ literally originates from buffy. this show is like the modern shakespeare
in 2004 a thread started on buffistas.org to discuss tropes used in Buffy and other Whedonverse shows. At the time there were no formal names for most tropes so users assigned them names based on the scenes they were discussing. This thread inspired one of the site members to start the website TVTropes.org
Most of the listings on TVtropes were named after scenes and quotes from Buffy the Vampire Slayer
what learning fandom history is like
(and if it's not btvs, as people in the tags have noted, it's star trek or the x-files)
It's occasionally MST3k, who gave us "nightmare fuel" and "high-octane nightmare fuel"
A comic I did for a roadrunner-themed anthology collected by my local indie comics group, 7000BC.