2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
occasionally subtle
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Product Placement

titsay
Mike Driver
The Stonewall Inn
h

izzy's playlists!
noise dept.

pixel skylines

Andulka
EXPECTATIONS
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

oozey mess
KIROKAZE

gracie abrams

@theartofmadeline
Cosimo Galluzzi

seen from Italy
seen from Ecuador
seen from Kenya
seen from Israel
seen from Austria

seen from Türkiye

seen from Mexico
seen from Chile

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Chile

seen from Burkina Faso

seen from Portugal
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Russia
@placebosazucarados
Been watching HxH lately
it will forever me tragic to me that the Barbie movie had a genuinely beautiful done and profound message about the experience of being human in the context of patriarchy and choosing to love being human even with all its hardships, choosing to love being human when being human means being a woman and Barbie being an everyman (relatable to everyone) for the human experience, through an explicitly gendered experience as a woman.
and no one ever talked about it because everyone was far more interested in the far less well done, far less deep, far weaker storyline about the stupid reverse patriarchy shit with the Kens and the Facebook meme baby's first feminism speech
We could have gotten insight into the rest of the Barbies choosing to stay in their bubble of supremacy too and how it can work with the reverse patriarchy narrative of how some men who become aware of the ways patriarchy hurts them end up doubling down instead of unpacking it! Instead we're supposed to believe that they developed lifelong internalized misogyny over the course of like two days and then snapped out of it thanks to a couple of tweets from 2010 just pointing out the fact that misogyny exists.
my big issue with the film is that i was fully willing to go along with a silly "he's just ken" wish fulfillment in which the man character is a passive supportive sidekick for the woman main character who drives the plot. i was ready for that! i was not expecting this movie to be super duper feminist!
but they CHOSE to make the kens explicitly oppressed, and CHOSE to make that a central factor in the plot, and then tried to make the kens an allegory for cis men under patriarchy & toxic masculinity which makes no sense in the story THEY wrote. Ken's major problem was never patriarchy! it was the barbiarchy! its fucking absurd to try to use ken as a lesson on how men are hurt by patriarchy when the movie itself set up that Ken's problems started with Barbieland's social structure. Barbie is never expected to take any responsibility for anything that happened! they wanted both to have the ken/barbie dynamic be used for an explicitly feminist allegory about patriarchy but ALSO to have their silly wish fulfillment barbiarchy that is never challenged, which makes that entire part of the plot messy as hell. we are essentially expected to forget everything about how Barbieland functions and all the differences between Barbieland and the real world, in order for the Barbies and Kens to just be exactly the same as real life cis women and men. which made me as a viewer feel annoyed because they just completely threw out the worldbuilding for this universe in order to play out a VERY basic explanation of feminism.
the thing is, the Kens are actually quite similar to the cis women the movie was marketed towards (seeking wish fulfillment and catharsis by reversing the dynamics they are oppressed under, rather than taking a stance against oppression itself). the real life patriarchy is to the Kens what Barbieland is to the cis women in the audience; both are power fantasies, heavy on the fantasy. the Kens think patriarchy is mostly about horses and Barbieland is mostly about pink and dancing and girls nights. once you start to press deeper on either fantasy, it becomes clear how unsustainable these fantasies are for actually challenging oppression; they do not encourage the people fantasizing to develop a political consciousness, to think in terms of systems, to take a stance against oppression itself. but the movie decided to try to make this fantasy deep and feminist, which made it messy because actually trying to engage with the world they've built makes it clear how little they actually thought about what they were saying.
the only real feminist value present is "women shouldn't be treated badly" but not because people shouldn't be treated badly, and not because oppressed groups need to be protected, but just because there is something innate about women that makes it bad when they are treated badly. its shallow feminism not just in the sense that its not going deep into theory, but in that the movie's feminism (at least in these parts) feels primarily about emotionally appealing to white cis women and getting them to spend money and write thinkpieces on how good the movie (and by association, Mattel) is.
i know some people were genuinely affected by the big speech given at the end about how women are expected to be so many things at once. and like. if you needed the Barbie movie to verbalize that to you, i'm glad you had that. but 1) if we are in a place in society where people are getting their baby's first feminism from a movie whose feminism is pretty shallow and messy and corporate, that shouldn't lead us to celebrate the movie, it should be a kick in the pants, and 2) this movie does very little to actually encourage the viewer to develop a deeper understanding of feminism, to see the expectations put on women in the context of patriarchy as a system of power, anything. because this part of the film's feminism is so messy and mostly about selling the movie to white cis women, it doesn't really have a coherent message about patriarchy other than that its bad and women have it rough and that's not good. okay! that's not even really a feminist point, its almost pre-feminist; that women have it rough is the very starting point of developing a feminist political consciousness, it shouldn't be the big takeaway. and this came out in 2024, not 1946, so i get kind of annoyed when people act like a film making a more coherent and slightly deeper feminist point couldn't have possibly been made.
& again its a fucking shame because there IS genuinely moving story in the Barbie movie about how being human is very much defined by suffering but also by beauty, and the choice to embrace humanity and the suffering and inevitable death, because being human and being alive is worth it, and to send that message (which is broadly applicable to all people) through the lens of choosing to be a woman under patriarchy, because there is still beauty in that life. and again. no one fucking talks about it. the part of this movie that actually has some feminist meat on its bones gets ignored, while everyone (whether pro- or anti-feminist) fixated on the very thin, shallow parts of the movie's attempts at feminism. i just feel like its an example of how cultural / pop feminism gets propped up and promoted and discussed and centered What Feminism Is, when that form of feminism doesn't actually encourage critical political thinking about patriarchy and only encourages gender essentialism female nationalism and endless discourse that allows media companies to profit.
and to go back to the beginning. i didn't even go into this movie being like "oh this big budget film about Barbie made by fucking Mattel better have a super profound feminist message about the need for an anti-patriarchal socialist uprising!" i was fully prepared to enjoy the silly pink wish fulfillment movie. they chose to have this movie try to Do A Feminism and everyone and their mother couldn't stop praising this movie for that (or hating on this movie for that!), and no one seemed HALF as interested in the actually deep, moving parts of this movie as the shallow, messy parts, and it just drove me insane.
had a fascinating english class that resulted in the notes header “the forcefeminization of victor frankenstein”
what the people want, the people get
you see
my professor’s take is that mary shelley is feminizing victor throughout the novel, as a way of flipping gender roles and putting a male character through female experiences.
evidence as explained:
victor is creating life. he is putting his health at risk (spends two years with little sleep or socialization) to bring life forth into this world
his illness after he is shocked by the creature coming to life is akin to both ‘hysteria’ and postpartum depression
he pretty much swoons, let’s be honest
henry clerval, a man who has been characterized as manly and heroic, has to chase after damsel-in-distress victor and care for him as he convalesces
afterward, he hides what he did and went through, for fear that others will label him crazy and emotional and not believe him. sound familiar?
Victor in general is more emotional than the other characters and is constantly tempering his reactions to not be seen as irrational
the book does not otherwise have central female characters
Also, Shelley’s mother died in childbirth. It’s interesting, then, that Shelley presents the creation of life as something horrific and damaging. She parallels Victor with her mother.
in conclusion, Frankenstein (1818) by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley is one of the first examples of mpreg in English literature
More from my beautiful mind
willows
When you are brutally losing at chess implore your opponent to look inwards its called the little pony gambit
literally the worst way of ending a series is “all the survivors are happily straight married with tons and tons of babies!”
people still getting mad at this post i made in 2014 so I will add here. in 2026. that the point of this post isn’t “happy endings bad” its when the story’s only way to imagine a happy ending is a heterosexual nuclear family for everyone.
ACCIDENTALLY LEFT MY MACERATED APPLE SYRUP ON THE STOVE AND IT CARAMELIZED I GUESS?
it was super thick and dark and golden and bubbly so i took it off the heat. happy accident.
tastes delicious so good. idk what to do with it though
thank you for your recommendation! with brief consideration, it has been disregarded.
i'm sorry i didn't respond to your DM for 23 days. the number on the notification icon got really big and i began having irrational anxious thoughts such as "what if people are in there trying to contact me"
Guys maybe someday I'll finish and post fanfiction again. That was a fun time. When I was doing that.
This has been my main argument against "AI" from the very beginning.
OpenAI scraped the entire web. All of which had been a labor of love from humans. Wikipedia is the backbone of a lot of LLMs, and that was volunteer human labor. They stole it and now they're selling it back to us.
And worse, they're trying to destroy the free sources that they stole from. It's destruction of human knowledge on an unprecedented scale. The burning of the library of Alexandria has nothing on this.
I drew dickkory but this time with chalk (everyone is shocked)
PEOPLE GO OUTSIDE AND DRAW WITH CHALK ITS SO MUCH FUN‼️‼️‼️
for years, the game Project Zomboid has pissed me off because approximately half of the female zombies i kill and loot have a "strapless bra" in their inventories. i believe this is casually misogynistic (in a negligent way, not a malevolent one) because most normal women in real life wear strapless bras maybe 4 times in their entire lives, generally to rare events like weddings or prom, and at almost no other time. ie, i will never just be hanging out in my house in a tshirt and jeans with a strapless bra on. never. so i am making this poll to email to the devs when i submit my second complaint about the strapless bra loot table drop rate. you can assist me by voting and reblogging. i added a bunch of options just for fun but the bra/no bra/strapless bra are the big three.
if YOU were turned into a zombie right now, and I caved your head in with a shovel, what kind of bra would i find on your corpse?
WOMEN: what kind of bra or chest undergarment are you wearing RIGHT NOW?
no bra, nothing under my shirt, or entirely topless
"NORMAL" bra: cups, shoulder straps, rib band, underwire or no underwire
STRAPLESS bra
sports bra
binder
bralette or similar item
binding tape, ace bandage or wrap
nipple tape or pasties
compression shirt or bodysuit
tank top/undershirt/bodysuit/leotard of some kind but no "bra" per se
i am not a woman but it's important that i get to participate
i dont have a torso, i am the Fresno Nightcrawler but i want my vote to be count
i am only half serious about this, but i am going to email the devs anyway. politely. because it does bother me. vote Fresno Nightcrawler for “none of the above”
op disabled reblogs but I think the point still stands
Languages tend to peak at their word for butterfly. Never seen 2 that are the same, either. Papillon. Mariposa. Borboleta. Fluture. Vlinder. Schmetterling. Pillangó. Babochka. Farfalla. Sommerfugl. Perhonen. Farasha. Titali. Chōchō. Nabi. Húdié. Buom buom. Great job guys, i really mean it.