PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Andulka
★
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Cosmic Funnies
cherry valley forever
No title available
Stranger Things
Aqua Utopia｜海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
ellievsbear
Cosimo Galluzzi
EXPECTATIONS
trying on a metaphor
sheepfilms
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
gracie abrams
Origami Around
𓃗
The Stonewall Inn
untitled
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Canada
seen from T1
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Taiwan
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from France
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from Malaysia
seen from Chile
seen from Iraq
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@plarnston
Its crazy that the United States military was teaching Special Forces guys how to build their own bombs from scratch during the Vietnam War and now you can just download the entire thing on Wikipedia because of a FOIA request
Way more legit than Ragnar Benson.
maybe the 'nonbinary to binary trans pipeline' is less of an example of how being nonbinary is a phase and more of an example of how nonbinary people are pushed to be binary in order to be taken seriously, even by supposed trans allies.
yes, there are people who realize they're binary trans after thinking they're nonbinary, but I dare say those people are the minority, and a lot of us are just forced to come out as binary trans instead so people will stop treating us like a lite edition of our AGAB. it's another form of being closeted.
By the way it's like. Really fucked how society's thoughts on epilepsy is just "get over it." Seizures can cause permanent brain damage. Seizures can kill people. Seizures hurt like hell. Allow me to reiterate that seizures can kill people. And you're just gonna casually put flashing lights, a common trigger for seizures in your advertisement, in your animation meme, in your edit, on your billboards, without even thinking about putting a simple disclaimer? That's unbelievable. Your little anime edit could deadass cost a life and you're not gonna put a warning because it's "inconvenient" or "people like that shouldn't be on the internet" (ableist) (the problem exists outside the internet also). Or you'll give insufficient ones like putting it in the captions or only giving like one second before the flashing lights appear, meaning that the trigger's already in motion before anyone who needs the warning can read it and save themselves from literal physical danger.
We need to start commenting under other people's posts about how to properly warn for flashing lights and eyestrain. We need to be emailing and calling companies about their possibly triggering advertisements that could induce seizures. We need to stop tolerating ableism and start speaking up for the more vulnerable.
Also, stop putting epilepsy warnings. That's like saying "warning: schizophrenia" on a post including unreality or "warning: dyslexia" on a post with a typing quirk. First off, the disability mentioned isn't the only group of people that this could trigger. Second, it doesn't truly get the message across and instead makes it worse for those with the disability-- scrolling through the epilepsy tag on Tumblr should get you to view the content of other epileptic people, but no, you just get a bunch of flashing lights and eyestrain, even though you could instead tag for, oh I dunno, flashing lights and eyestrain.
Anyways this Disability Pride, and for every month that comes after, think about epileptic people and others who are triggered by flashing lights/eyestrain. Happy pride to those who experience seizures too frequently due to the unaccommodating and ableist societies we live in!
been off of 7OH (kratom derived opioid) for a week and realize that it's either opioids or a wheelchair. i tried going out with my friends twice this week and i kept having to sit down, got dizzy and wobbly, my knees creak, threaten to give out on me (they have in the past), and my back and neck were in searing pain the whole time. i still don't have an answer as to what has caused all this, but it sucks to be in pain all the time.
comments welcome
here's two articles about how JK Rowling just posted on X an upskirt photo of Freda Wallace, a transgender woman, after deadnaming her and misgendering her repeatedly online.
The wealthy author escalated a social media spat that resulted in posting a photo from a 2023 event at the Institute of Economic Affairs in
Rowling posted the picture taken from below because the trans woman, she said, was "refusing to debate me."
Thank you for posting without the fucking destiel meme
So in summation; Rowling demanded access to a woman’s time and when she couldn’t get it she retaliated by posting an upskirt image of her and called her fat, and some of her fans even went “I think I can see her genitals”.
She literally went “debate me! Debate me!” Over and over like the grifter she is and when she couldn’t get what she wanted and when “no” wasn’t enough she resorted to retaliatory sex-pestery, posting an image of somebody’s body with intention to shame and embarrass and spawn more waspish tittering from her internet followers.
Rowling is trash and this is disgraceful behavior, in case anyone has forgotten.
She had also claimed Freda "deserved" this sexual harassment because of what she was wearing... You know... The same excuse used over and over to try and justify rape.
J K Rowling committed a sex crime against a trans woman (specifically, violating the Sexual Offences Act 2003)
(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) A intentionally shares a photograph or film which shows, or appears to show, another person (B) in an intimate state, (b) B does not consent to the sharing of the photograph or film, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
(2) A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) A intentionally shares a photograph or film which shows, or appears to show, another person (B) in an intimate state, (b) A does so with the intention of causing B alarm, distress or humiliation, and (c) B does not consent to the sharing of the photograph or film.
i am 229 lbs of pure sex appeal
affirmations:
- it’s fun to be awake & in an upright position
- consciousness is a gift
- i CAN do this anymore
peach piss and fart cakes
first time drawing this amazing woman i love her so much
Did you attend religious classes (Sunday school, confirmation, shul, yeshiva, etc.) as a child?
* yes, regularly
* yes, frequently
* yes, occasionally
* once or twice
* never
* it’s complicated
* see results
Did you attend religious classes (Sunday school, confirmation, shul, yeshiva, etc.) as a child?
yes, regularly
yes, frequently
yes, occasionally
once or twice
never
it’s complicated
see results
it seemed apparent when i said that you shouldn't use having brain damage as a shorthand to mean something else (like "bigot") that i was not asking for alternative ways to insult people. i don't want to associate brain damage with insults, quite frankly, and overlooking the point to come up with different ways to insult people is unnecessary. even if you manage to insult people without being ableist, i don't only mean insults. brain damage shouldn't be an insult. it also shouldn't be a joke. it shouldn't be used to dismiss or demean people or for speculation. the only time it's appropriate to talk about is when you're actually talking about real brain damage. and not the made up idea of what brain damage might be based on an even more made up idea about the centrality of the brain and mind in relation to someone's moral character or personhood. introspecting about why we use these words the way we do is much more valuable than the 10th person saying 'just call them a bitch'.
pliny actually talks about glacier freeze gatorade in natural history
the fact that pro-monarchy arguments have degenerated, over the past few centuries, from “the king rules by divine right and is accountable to nobody but god”, to “uhm the royals generate a lot of income from tourism” will never stop being extremely funny to me
the monarchs… bad. but the castles? oh, the castles are positively lush with rats… 👅
Delete this account immediately.
Can anyone explain wtf is going on here especially a Korean speaker
someone on reddit explained 😭
That is one of the most astronomical fuck up translations I have ever seen.
Remember! When companies lay off all their staff because AI is cheaper, this sort of shit is what you can leverage for a better contract when they are inevitably forced to hire everyone back :)
Access to gender-affirming care (GAC) varied across gender identity when comparing trans men to AFAB nonbinary individuals (Table 2.5). For example, both groups highly desired top surgery; however, trans men were significantly more likely to have already undergone the procedure (32%) compared to AFAB nonbinary individuals (10%). Both groups also showed interest in hysterectomies, though access again differed, as 10% of trans men had undergone a hysterectomy, while only 2% of AFAB nonbinary individuals had. Overall, this indicates that while transgender men and AFAB nonbinary individuals often seek similar forms of care, nonbinary individuals experience a larger gap between desiring a procedure and receiving it, possibly due to systemic barriers or variations in how medical providers approach nonbinary transition-related care.
When comparing across gender, some similarities exist between transgender women and AMAB nonbinary individuals in their desires for certain procedures (Table 2.7). For instance, both groups wanted laser hair removal at high prevalences (54% of trans women and 58% of AMAB nonbinary individuals). However, transgender women were far more likely to have undergone the procedure (40%) compared to AMAB nonbinary individuals (15%), suggesting a greater gap between desire and access. In contrast, desires for surgical procedures diverge between trans women and AMAB nonbinary respondents. Trans women wanted vaginoplasty at much higher prevalences than AMAB nonbinary individuals (48% vs. 17%), and a substantially larger percentage of trans women already had the procedure (11% vs. 1%). These findings highlight that gender-affirming needs are not uniform across gender identity.
from the USTS 2022 Health & Wellness report, pages 47 & 49
^ also from the 2022 USTS. & from the 2015 USTS:
Seventy-eight percent (78%) of respondents wanted to receive hormone therapy at some point in their life, but only 49% of respondents have ever received it. Ninety-two percent (92%) of those who have ever received hormone therapy were currently still receiving it, representing 44% of all respondents. A large majority of transgender men and women (95%) have wanted hormone therapy, compared to 49% of non-binary respondents. Transgender men and women were about five times more likely to have ever had hormone therapy (71%) than non-binary respondents (13%)
& note that all of this comes from 2022 (& 2015), so does not represent the full impact of more recent anti-trans legal attacks.
For these questions, respondents could choose one option between:
Had it but not for gender identity/ transition
Have had it
Want it some day
Not sure if I want this
Do not want this
The charts above only seem to consider "desire it" or "have had it" as far as I can tell, so we do not know the difference in how many nonbinary people were unsure vs how many binary people. It seems like a sizeable amount of people of both assignments selected "unsure" for many options. The numbers below reflect the average between both trans wo/men and nonbinary respondents of either AGAB:
Respondents were asked a series of questions about whether they had received or wanted to have specific surgical and other procedures, separate from gender-affirming hormone therapy. Respondents selected if they wanted to receive questions about procedures or surgeries for those assigned female at birth (such as chest surgery or metoidioplasty) or questions about procedures or surgeries for those assigned male at birth (such as breast augmentation or vaginoplasty). Respondents who indicated they were born with a variation in physical sex characteristics or described themselves as intersex were able to select either set of questions or a third option that included questions about both types of procedures and surgeries. Eighty-four percent (84%) of respondents indicated that they desired one or more transition-related procedures or surgeries, separate from gender-affirming hormone therapy. Thirty-one percent (31%) reported receiving one or more of these procedures or surgeries.
On top of that, there's also the fact that just asking a question like "do you want vaginoplasty" can remove a lot of important nuance. Penis-preserving vaginoplasty is much harder to get & many people don't even know its an option; treating all vaginoplastys as basically the same (or phallo/meta for that matter) might mean losing sight of such differences. Similarly, nulloplasty/nullification surgery was not mentioned, and neither was penectomy for those assigned male (whereas someone with a vagina seeking nullification could at leas select "vaginectomy"). Similarly, nullification surgery suffers from a lack of awareness amongst those who might benefit, and far more difficulty in finding information and a surgeon and getting it paid for.
