My religion is whatever Kermit the frog was singing about in rainbow connection
KIROKAZE
Keni

bliss lane

Origami Around
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
almost home

PR's Tumblrdome
noise dept.
Sade Olutola

#extradirty

No title available
No title available

@theartofmadeline
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Show & Tell

oozey mess
todays bird
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
One Nice Bug Per Day
Not today Justin
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Japan

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from Bangladesh
seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from Morocco
seen from Morocco
seen from Morocco
seen from Malaysia

seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
@rainbofiction
My religion is whatever Kermit the frog was singing about in rainbow connection
If you are currently sitting or laying down this moment ask yourself if you are resting or rotting. Change your behavior accordingly
There is no romance in decay when the decaying is easy
You are naught but pawns in my game
I hope some of y'all take this as a sign to rest intentionally too.
if you're "resting" but thinking of all the things you have to do, that's not resting, that's rotting. Even if you haven't done anything all day, give yourself some time to rest and truly relax. When you let yourself relax guilt free, you actually regain energy for your responsibilities.
this post has helped me a number of times since I first saw it. I have realized I was rotting instead of resting, and depending on the circumstance, got up to do something, or settled more comfortably to actually rest.
Thank you.
"rot or rest" sounds like the world's worst game show
I miss when ads were a single click and then theyâre gone. Now every ad has a minimum of three phases where you watch a video, exit the still frame of fake gameplay, and then exit the app download. That doesnât even touch on the ones that forcibly take you to another app after opening a tab in safari without you ever touching the screen.
I hate advertising. I hate that you canât do anything without companies jumping down your throat with mostly bullshit ads. I hate that billboards exist. I hate that every company unanimously decided to make their ads longer and longer. I hate that ad blockers try to charge you money and there are in app purchases to remove ads. I hate that my attention has become commodified. I hate that thereâs nothing I can do about it.
A 2026 peer-reviewed study reveals the ecological consequences of releasing pet goldfish into freshwater lakes, showing they can destabilize
Lots of us already knew that goldfish--a type of carp--wreak havoc when released into ecosystems they aren't native to. This recent study enumerates the specifics of the damage:
"The damage was quick and extensive. The Journal of Animal Ecology study found that water clarity dropped almost instantly in nutrient-rich conditions as goldfish stirred up sediment from the lake bottom. Populations of snails, amphipods, and zooplankton the small invertebrates that are the base of healthy aquatic food webs crashed through direct consumption and habitat destruction. Native fish exhibited declining body condition, an early warning indicator of long-term population health."
Defenders of invasive animals often claim that the introduced species aren't really causing harm, or that they're just accelerating evolution. (There's also the appeal to emotion that the animals didn't choose to be there, and therefore we should leave them alone.) But whether it's goldfish and European starlings in the US, Sitka spruce in Europe, rabbits in Australia, or hippos in Colombia, the facts show that non-native species have a deleterious effect on ecosystems they're introduced to, taking up space and other resources needed by native species.
The article also got me thinking about the irresponsible attitude many people have toward "disposable" pets like inexpensive fish. When I lived on the coast, I had a 60 gallon aquarium with a variety of tropical fish. Before I moved back to Portland, I rehomed all the inhabitants minus the bladder snails (which are thriving in a jar with my marimo moss balls). I very easily could have just walked a hundred yards to the lake behind my coastal home and dropped the platies and cardinal tetras in there; instead I took the time to find them new homes with other people.
I get that people don't want to euthanize unwanted pets, even goldfish. And there aren't as many rescues that take pets that aren't furry or feathered. But the answer is not to dump these animals in the wild and hope they can survive; this is how we end up with lakes full of giant yellow carp, and domestic rabbits spreading diseases to wild rabbit populations. It also leaves a lot of these poor creatures to slow, lingering deaths from exposure or starvation, assuming they don't end up as predator food.
Responsibility toward nature includes properly caring for those we have domesticated or tamed, to include ethical care from beginning to end, and responsible breeding practices. Unfortunately as long as there is a profit to be made, there will be those facilities--and that is the best name for them--that will churn out large quantities of high-demand, inexpensive animals to meet the pet trade without taking any responsibility for where they end up. While an ethical breeder of dogs, for example, will always take back one of the dogs they've bred at any age, you can't just return your goldfish once you realize you can't house a two foot long carp.
Most importantly, I think we need to keep pushing back against the "Well, it doesn't matter if I do it just this one time" mentality. Imagine how many individual people think this when they dump a few aquarium fish into a pond,. Even if not all of these animals survive, odds are that enough will to become established invasive populations. It's a multi-pronged problem, and getting people to change their assumptions and habits sometimes feels like an uphill battle. But studies like this one help to foster change by educating people about the reality of invasive species.
gender essentialism is soooo funny bc it's like "this is what women are like" and you're like "I've met women and many of them, if not the majority, have not been like that" and it's like "well women SHOULD be like that" and you're like "why should women be like that" and its like "because that's what women are like"
uninstall adobe acrobat. it is malware. it has been malware. these aren't opinions: acrobat meets the definition of malware.
it installs a user-login-time "startup" executable that ignores any windows directives to disable it on startup. doing so only removes the even-more-malicious taskbar-icon-creating advertisement-notification-creating process. no matter what you do, the sleeper "updater" process starts when you log in, and runs perpetually
it sends & receives encrypted network traffic both periodically and non-periodically. both are bad, both are suspicious, and a program doing both is more suspicious than the sum of their parts. and to boot: acrobat will polymorphically edit its code after such network activity
this isn't new: it has always done this. now, it does not even do the thing it is meant to: provide a way to interact with documents, which is amongst the very first features computers were built to provide. you can merely open PDFs and read some of their content in the narrow space between the requests for adobe to give them your money, and interface for features you cannot use (because you don't) or do not, have not, and will not ever need
adobe and microsoft would very much like the user's cultural norms around computers to allow for advertisement built into the local software and even operating system itself. the web being 100% advertisements was not enough! sure enough, acrobat will hijack the windows notifications system thing to give you the 2026 equivalent of pop-ups
i don't really know enough about windows software equivalents, so i'll paypal $20 to the first person that reblogs this with a list of 3-5 PDF reader/editor/etc acrobat equivalents that meet the following criteria:
open source, locally-built executables must match checksum of prebuilt distributed executable
no paid features/premium version/subscription/whatever
not a toy hobby project thing, must be windows-users-proof
cheers
Firefox's built-in PDF.js viewer: does everything you could want from a basic viewer, fast enough search, and can now do annotations for filling in forms and such
KDE Okular: is a decent viewer and can also do basic annotations, and is so not-a-toy that you can even download it on the Windows app store.
LibreOffice Draw: I don't ever really like having to open this but if you have to edit a PDF in detail it does work, and doesn't just vomit up a bunch of polygons when you give it text to work with. Better as an authoring tool than an editor.
I've 100% replaced free acrobat with the firefox built-in and it works wonderfully for general office use and research/reading/viewing. It doesn't have robust redaction capabilities, but if you need to fill and sign and highlight a form it's actually much more intuitive than acrobat reader.
I love that the pandemic actually definitively proved a lot of those "hard" questions for us. Masking up reduced cases of the flu to almost nonexistent numbers and we had zero flu deaths for a time. The welfare and social service and unemployment programs helped keep people living paycheck to paycheck out of poverty, and those stimulus checks some folks keep complaining about actually massively benefitted the common man and the economy. Individual personal travel was so extremely restricted on a global scale that we basically have concrete proof that individual restraint in terms of driving cars or travelling means absolutely nothing by comparison because the mass pollution is coming from the fisheries and the corporations with private jets and container ships. Working from home actually has massive benefits for a company like productivity boosts and better mental health of employees while also saving gas
and we're just. Willingly going back to how everything was before. We were shown how to do things better and the people in charge said "that's nice but we just want to get everything 'back to normal' :)"
weâre not willingly going back to how everything was before. we are being forced back into it by members of the ruling class who found out that making things better for almost everyone else made them feel bad.
Let's not forget about any of these things. Let's reblog and schedule this post to pop in in the future to remind us of what we may have forgotten a little.
Do not forget.
the human mind is prone to catastrophizing when left unoccupied. And thatâs why itâs important to always have a little Blorbo to rotate in your head. It acts as a protective charm of sorts to redirect your imagination away from harmful spirals
thoughts without Blorbo: oh my god I was so cringe in seventh grade why did I do that
thoughts with Blorbo: I havenât considered the interactions with bleebus; I must rectify this immediately
It appears that all parties with the exception of Restore are not going to entertain Farageâs media circus.
Count Binface - it is your time. People of Clacton, please do the funniest fucking thing thatâs happened in UK politics for a while.
Shitposting at its finest.
you can jerk off and you can fuck off. you can tell a jerkoff to fuck off. you can jerk off a jerkoff. you can fuck off with a jerkoff. you can fuck with a jerk but you cant jerk with a fuck. you can fuck up but you cant jerk up. a jerkoff aint worth a fuck but a fuck is worth more than a jerk off. in theory
Weediness as a quality of Art?
something i wrote down while I was at work
When I was walking in the town I saw some cool graffiti, and I thought, Hmm. Graffiti is a lot like weeds. It pops up in neglected and overlooked places, and thrives until someone destroys it in routine maintenance.
Like an ecosystem, art is a living system.
I quickly began to think of ways that graffiti and weeds are alike.
It is perceived as worthless or threatening economic incentives.
There are active efforts to destroy or eradicate it, which are eternally futile because of the aliveness of the system.
It appears in areas of active, violent neglect, disruption, and abandonment.
Its absence or presence can be a visual signal of class.
I thought, what are some other "weedy" artforms?
Fanfiction could be a weedy artform.
Huh, I thought. Are there domesticated or cultivated artforms?
It became clear to me that the answer was yes.
There are two types. One type is the crops: those plants that have daily necessity for all people. They are often monocultures, often highly exploitative, but they are a daily part of existence.
In art terms, this is pop culture and mass media: popular music, movies, tv shows.
The other type would be the ornamentals: those that are cultivated because they are perceived to have intrinsic value or beauty. These are the poems, paintings, sculptures, the arts that are seen as more intellectually important and more restricted in who has daily access.
Well, I thought then, are there "wild" artforms? And I thought that the answer once again had to be yes: that's textile arts, woodworking, pottery, basket making, arts that are often considered according to their practical value and not given the same consideration as fine arts. They are often romanticized and thought of as artifacts of the past to be preserved, and sometimes they are brought into cultivation (appreciation as fine arts), but they can lose their context and everyday usefulness. They are considered as threatened by economic incentives and efforts to protect them are perceived as wasteful.
Graffiti and fanfiction are weedy artforms. Are there others?
In addition to the qualities of weediness I listed up above, there is another quality: They get some of what they are from their antagonistic relationship with the mainstream view of what has value. They emerge in a space that is "owned" by another entity and thrive because there is no economical way to destroy them all faster than they can emerge. Likewise, Weeds are inherently (by some definitions) disrupting the intent of a space: they exist in defiance of what that space is "supposed to" be.
Fanfiction could be compared to weeds in an agricultural crop field: they spring up in the monoculture of popular media franchises and become more powerful and compelling than the environment that created them, even though many people will overlook their value.
Graffiti could be considered like lawn weeds: its presence has intense connotations of class, and the extermination campaigns are intense, but lawns that are neglected long enough (just like the walls of an abandoned building) can become places of diversity and thriving.
Weedy art could also be any art you create for yourself without special skill or economic incentive to do so, purely through intrinsic motivation. Many people kill these weeds before they grow into flowers, thinking that a common weed without any cultivation could never produce a beautiful flower, but if you let them grow you are often surprised. Doodles, drawings, anything you create could be weedy art.
Weeds are invincible on the evolutionary timescale, impossible to fully eradicate. They are our friends and have sustained us in many ways throughout human history. I read in a paper once a theory that true monoculture is only an idea in the human mind, never able to be truly realized, because weeds will always emerge and disrupt this false idea of perfection.
Certainly, our ecosystems are held together and sustained with life within this gap between how we imagine the world should be (clean, perfect, without weeds) and how the world really is (weeds! weeds! WEEDS!). Without weeds, the biodiversity in the world around us would crash dramatically.
Is this also true of weedy arts? Is the art we value the least and often actively try to eradicate, necessary for sustaining us as creative human beings?
it's called a ball python because it is a python(đ) that ball(đ )
nothing in the rules says a python can't play basketball
Can I share this plant with you that made me go insane? It's called apios americana and the only common name that makes sense is "groundnut" or maybe "potato bean" but really it doesn't have a common name because of genocide. Because it was a marginal semi-domesticated food even for native American food ways, it wasn't important enough to save. It was barely important enough to name.
Except! Inexplicably, someone brought it to JAPAN! Where they grow it still! So what the fuck! The wikipedia page lists all the reasons it's too hard to farm, then immediately says "oh but they farm it in Japan and it's called America-hodoimo." Why! How does this make sense!
So then a Louisiana professor started trying to breed it and improve the tubers, but he retired and abandoned the project.
Why am I crazy for this plant? Oh yeah, it fixes its own nitrogen and it's allegedly shade tolerant, so I wonder if it could grow under solar panels.
I am boggled by the natural heritage of eastern North america that is totally unknown and ignored.
I've heard of this and seen it, but I've never had any success propagating it. I brought some tubers to my meadow and buried them last fall but I don't see anything sprouting. They might just be hidden from my sight though.
I don't know if I've heard of it being cultivated in Japan!
Yes, it was domesticated, and there were lots of efforts to re-domesticate it a while back. I didn't know what had happened to the project though, it's sad that it was abandoned.
My foraging mentor said that some people can randomly develop a severe sensitivity to it and get really sick when they eat it...but I reckon that's the case with a lot of foods.
Most places I've found Apios americana the population has been rather small and marginal, but there is one spot my best friend and I found when driving around (on a gravel road leading up to somebody's trailer, next to a large wetland/marsh) that was completely overcome with it. It was everywhere, growing in vast mounds over top of other plants. The plant diversity in that marsh fascinated me. One of those little biodiversity hotspots that randomly occur in the landscape.
I tried planting some of the Louisiana professor's tubers this year and I think the squirrels dug them up immediately, which made me feel dumber than a squirrel. That might be what happened with yours.
Three tubers I let them sprout some vine before I planted them, like sweet potato slips, and I covered the planting spot with dead leaves, and those the squirrels didn't get! They're growing successfully, although they're not competing well against the weeds I have. It might be not wet enough for them to thrive because I have a normal lawn and not a swamp.
It's so dope to hear about them just living their best life in someone's wetland ... Vining around like crazy ...
I donât know what exactly peaked with the Madden Giferator, but I do miss it.
the kids are calling them "stone fruits." they start off smallâthink cherries. then they're hooked and they need a quick fix, they get peaches, maybe some nectarines. it's all they can think about. before you know it, they're trying the really hard stuffâapricots, plums. once they taste a mango there's no going back.
perhaps a hot take but even at its most generous i think "if men could get pregnant abortions would be free" is a pretty shallow observation in that it treats the ability to get pregnant as something superfluous to patriarchy. i do take a very socialist view of patriarchy and reproductive autonomy is very much a labor issue. "if (cis perisex) men could get pregnant" is a "what if the moon was made of pudding" issue to me because if cis perisex men could get pregnant, our entire model of society and the production of new workers and also our entire species would be fundamentally different. its not like random happenstance that the people who can get pregnant are treated like property to be controlled, that is literally The Whole Point. you simply cannot separate misogyny and patriarchy from how people's actual bodies function and how they are treated and used by systems of power.
its not a super deep phrase overall. its an attempt to make visible the degree to which (cis)androcentrism shapes what things are viewed as important or normal and at the end of the day "human" in a general sense. which isn't entirely useless on its own, but in that attempt trans and intersex men are harmfully excluded. we can do so much better i promise! this phrase is cathartic for cis women to say and i feel that is largely why it has stuck around for so long and why people who are supposedly pro-trans get so defensive about people criticizing it, or will agree with criticisms and then keep using it.
#I'd reblog this a thousand times if I could#patriarchy's fundamental existence is as a tool of control of (re)production#the means of production of new working force or heirs (depending on class)#trans issues are also inextricable from this dynamic. how we are viewed and treated socially is highly influenced#by our ability to reproduce or lack of it. transphobes even explicitly point this out a lot of the time
^^ THIS is what actual transfeminist materialism can look like btw.
this is also why i believe the patriarchy is binarist in ideology but never truly binary on a system-level. because queer people ("queer" used as expansively as possible") have always existed and will always exist, and as a system of culture and thought it has to account for queer existence in order to properly suppress it and maintain power. which is why any feminist analysis that doesn't take a fundamentally non-binary view of gender, which overlooks queerphobia(s) and focuses entirely on "m > f," is incomplete.