If River's dataghost became a JARVIS-style companion.
occasionally subtle
$LAYYYTER

PR's Tumblrdome
Fai_Ryy

oozey mess
todays bird
𓃗
Show & Tell
KIROKAZE

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Cosmic Funnies
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Mike Driver
d e v o n
★
ojovivo
Cosimo Galluzzi
Today's Document

No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
seen from Ireland
seen from Singapore
seen from Germany
seen from Singapore

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ukraine
seen from Italy

seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Türkiye

seen from Bulgaria

seen from Lithuania
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from T1

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
@raindrops-on-rainbows
If River's dataghost became a JARVIS-style companion.
BECAUSE I CARE ABOUT HER. A LOT MORE THAN I'M SUPPOSED TO.
MY BABIES
The common refrain of "transmascs will shit themselves when they realise that T is making them look like a man, not an androgynous femboy twink" has always bothered me for two reasons. The more minor reason is that "man (on T)" and "androgynous femboy twink" are pretty obviously not mutually exclusive categories. There are a ton of men (cis and trans) with normal T levels who are androgynes, femboys, and/or twinks. There are people who may not end up looking like that when they are on T, but it is still within the realm of possible outcomes, and if it's what one wants to look like, there are things one can do to get closer to one's goal.
The more major reason I am bothered by this refrain, though, is the fact that people who say "why do transmascs always want to look like androgynous femboy twinks?" use this demeaning tone that indicates they have a low opinion of transmascs, androgynous people, femboys, and twinks. It is said as if transmascs are too stupid to know even the basic facts of what they're doing with their bodies, and as if wanting to be an androgynous, feminine, or visibly queer man/masc is inherently a bad and absurd thing to desire. The principle of "some people say 'twink' when they really mean 'fag'" is on full display here. It becomes more obvious when it's paired with overt transmedicalism, e.g., "Why do these trender wannabe twinks feel the need to tell everybody that they're trans?", or "'Transmascs' who want to be feminine twinks are basically not even trans". I can only conclude from statements like these that they think being a "real man" means not being a feminine twink, and that it is unacceptable and undesirable (for a man/masc) to be visibly queer and/or GNC. Otherwise, this would not be said with such derision. Needless to say, it is not the hill pro-trans people should ever be dying on.
"Twink" usually just means "conventionally attractive, young, and slim", anyway.
That's just regular beauty standards. Most people would like to fit their society's beauty standards.
My cis bro was more than a little heartbroken that he grew up to be 6'5", stocky, and bald, rather than looking like a kpop star. Every cis dude I know who goes bald has some serious feelings about it.
Transmascs are just getting judged for having the same dysphoria and complicated feelings cis folks have about being attractive, getting older, and how their true self fits with society's perception of them.
joining the war on pigeons on the side of pigeons
love love love this
so.....is there anything with which the lion does concern himself ?
the four children who wandered into His world through the back of a wardrobe
Me thinking why a whale (big) would eat krill (small) and then I remembered rice (yum)
so few people appreciate the wisdom I have to offer.........
i know most leftists agree that everybody should have a right to food, water, shelter, and healthcare but i think a vitally important fifth pillar is privacy. people should not be compelled to be tracked, monitored, or to share personal space with others to access their other essential rights
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" is and always has been fascist rhetoric everyone.
River Song edit by me
Song: “Stealing the Keys to the Time Machine” - Waitress
i love this guy
Give a man a leaf and he will eat it. Teach a man to leaf and he will go away
posts that could have also been in a newspaper in 1910 on a slow day
Say you break your ankle. You could know everything there is to know intellectually about the injury. Even with this vast knowledge, you will still experience physical pain.
Now take this logic and apply it to things like ADHD, autism, clinical depression, and other less visible/divergent disabilities. You cannot think your way out of feeling.
That is to say: you are not a bad, lazy, or selfish person for struggling, even if you know why you are struggling.
Genuinely, thank you so much for this.
I've accepted the fact I'll never be allowed into the US if they go through my socials so here's an acab meme.