It's been so long since I was inspired to do fanart! The second image is a PNG so he can jump around your screen or be taken for a walk!

Andulka

ellievsbear
sheepfilms
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
ā
untitled

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£
taylor price
No title available

@theartofmadeline

izzy's playlists!
hello vonnie
todays bird

Product Placement
ojovivo

No title available

No title available

if i look back, i am lost
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
The Stonewall Inn

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Panama

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from Nicaragua
seen from United States
seen from Israel
seen from United States

seen from Morocco
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
@saraten
It's been so long since I was inspired to do fanart! The second image is a PNG so he can jump around your screen or be taken for a walk!
this might be because Iām a family law lawyer and also an old crone who remembers when marriage equality wasnāt a thingĀ (as in, marriage equality only became nation-wideĀ two months before I went to law school), but I have Strong Feelings about the right to marry and all the legal benefits that come with it
like Iām all for living in sin until someone says they donāt want to get married because itās ~too permanent~ and in the same breath start talking about having kids or buying a house with their significant other. then I turn into a 90-year-old passive-aggressive church grandma who keeps pointedly asking when the wedding is.Ā āyes, a divorce is very sad and stressful, but so is BEING HOMELESS BECAUSE YOUāRE NOT ENTITLED TO EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF MARITAL PROPERTY, CAROLINE!ā
āoh, he thinks a piece of paper shouldnāt define your relationship? ASK HIM HOW HE FEELS ABOUT BEING ON YOUR BABYāS BIRTH CERTIFICATE, PATRICIA.ā
āoh, sure, itās all fun and games until your estranged parents are making medical decisions for you and inheriting all your property, TIMOTHY.ā
so, Iāve gotten this question and similar ones before, and I want to use it to go into what marriage actually is.
so, in law, there are a couple of legal assumptions made when someone is a close family member, like a parent. the assumptions are that this person knows you well enough to make decisions on your behalf in an emergency, supports or is supported by you financially, and, most importantly, that they are emotionally significant to you in a way that makes them different from a total stranger or a good friend. immigration law, for example, prioritizes families over people immigrating for jobs alone, because not getting a job doesnāt have the same emotional weight as never seeing your mom again.
the difference is that you donāt get to choose your family (outside of adoption and, uh, legally thatās not a bilateral decision). you do get to choose your spouse. the fact that you chose them is why they get priority for things like inheritance and immigration, even over your parents or your siblings or your grandma.
how does the government know that this particular person is someone you want to have as part of your family? you fill out a form and you tell them.
what happens if you donāt want them in your family anymore, and donāt want those assumptions made about them? you fill out a different form and you tell the government that.
the thing I think thatās hard for people to wrap their heads around ā whether youāre a starry-eyed romantic or a pragmatic bitch like me ā is that marriage isnāt an announcement of how much you love someone. thatās what a facebook status update is for. you do not need to be in love, or sexually/romantically monogamous, or be religious, or any of the other things people associate with marriage, in order to be married.
itās a legal decision. it is choosing to get certain benefits (like taxes, because itās assumed youāre financially supporting each other) in exchange for certain responsibilities (because itās assumed youāre supporting each other, it stops mattering exactly who bought what after you got married, so divorce splits the whole pool of stuff even if one person bought like 75% of it).
you donāt get the one without the other, and you donāt get either if you donāt affirmatively say thatās what you want to have happen. it doesnāt happen automatically, or in every romantic relationship no matter how serious, because the choice is the point.
and, to be clear: if you do not want, or do not care about, the legal rights and responsibilities of being married, you should not get married. itās a fucking legal contract that has serious legal implications! itās not something you should be doing for funsies!
tl;dr: if you want all the shit that comes with a marriage, good and bad, you need to tell the government thatās what you want. if you donāt want it, then you donāt need to do it, but you need to also be aware of what youāre potentially losing (in exchange for what youāre keeping). that should be an informed decision, not one you make for emotional reasons like āI just want everyone to know Iām only having sex with this person foreverā or āour love is so pure it transcends legal boundaries.ā
Is there any option other than marriage for telling the government you want this person to be part of your family? Like, can you draw up some kind of homebrew contract?
Short answer: No. If there was, queer people would have done it already.
Long answer: Thatās a little like asking ācan you become a citizen via contract rather than going through the immigration and naturalization process?ā Marriage is a legal status: you either are or you arenāt. Can you cobble together very specific stuff, like advanced healthcare directives and wills and whatnot? Yes, absolutely. But anything that requires you to be legally married as a status cannot be contracted away: you canāt file taxes jointly or sponsor someone for a green card or get someoneās Social Security benefits if they die if youāre not married to that person.
Now, to be clear: some things that often require marriage do not always require marriage. For example, usually you need to be married to have someone unrelated to you be on your health insurance, but my jobās specific health insurance plan allows coverage for domestic partners, which they define as a single person who has cohabitated with you for six months or more and is in a committed relationship with you. So even though my fiancĆ© and I are not married yet, heās been on my health insurance for the past year and a half, because we hit the six month mark of living together right around when I had to re-enroll in my health insurance for the year.
But if weād gotten married sooner, heād have been able to get on my health insurance right away (getting married is a qualifying event that lets someone get on a health insurance plan outside of the enrollment period), but since heās just a cohabitating partner, we had to wait six months for him to get on my insurance. And if heād moved in with me a month later, weād have to wait a whole year before he could enroll with me on my health insurance. Even though itās allowed, it still doesnāt have the same standing as a marriage.
I guess technically adult adoption is an option, in that it is what queer people did for a while in lieu of marriage, but itās a bad idea for a lot of reasons (not least of which being that you can divorce a spouse but you canāt undo an adoption).
this, THIS is why QPR make me so fucking nervous. iām not trying to shit on your beautiful poly aroace love affair, iām asking you HOW WILL THIS RELATIONSHIP HOLD UP IN COURT. cause, news flash: it wonāt.
if you have shared bank accounts and a house and a kid with someone who isnāt married to you, they can wipe you out ā legally speaking ā and you have no recourse. none. you will never see your kid again, unless youāre lucky and contributed half their DNA.
if they have a car accident and end up in hospital, you donāt have a legal right to see them. if theyāre in a coma, their parents can pull the plug and adopt that child and you can do nothing.
queers wanted marriage equality not to Be Like Teh Hets, but because it is the most legal protection you can ever have against that bad stuff that comes (and it comes for everyone).
if you donāt have that stuff, if youāre relying on your partners to do the right thing forever and be perfect people and never have a business collapse or a messy family situation or an accident or even to get sick ⦠youāre being really, really naĆÆve.
Pre-legal-gay-marriage, I sawĀ this happen. Ā I was on a parenting board and one day a woman weād posted with for years told us her partner and one of their children had died in a car accident. Ā And because sheĀ wasnāt the biological parent of the surviving child ā the child sheād been a parent to since conception ā her exās parents took custody and took the child away and kept her from seeing that child. Ā Ever.
Because hereās the thing: children are not property. Ā Specifically, in estate law, children are not, and cannot beĀ āReal Property.ā Ā You cannot bequeath them like furniture, books, and bank accounts. Ā Ā
āBut my will states who I want as guardian!ā Ā You say. Welp. Ā That statement is, in law, only a (strong) suggestion. Ā A judge still still have to rule on guardianship of your minor child, and you cannot, from the grave, dictate where they end up. Ā
Again: Children are not real property. If you are not their biological or legal parent, the state can remove them from your custody and hand them to someone more closely related, or not related at all but merely less gay, less queer, lessĀ āinappropriateā by your stateās legal standards.
The woman I knew back then was on good term with her not-quite-in-laws. Or thought she was. Ā Because as soon as her partner died, their tune changed 100%, they found anti-gay legal support, and they took that womanās child from her. Ā Forever.Ā
Thatās not my onlyĀ āmy outlaws are great and fine with us and its okay weāre not legally marriedā story, but itās probably the most heartbreaking. Ā Though the image of a man who has just lost his partner of 25 years watching his ex-outlaws take ½ of his chairs, ½ of his pillows, ½ of his sheets, ½ of his napkins, ½ of his towels, ½ of his dishes, ½ of his booksā¦.. is pretty fucking close. Ā After they made him sit behindĀ āthe familyā at his partnerās funeral.
My mother was a lifelong Republican, a very conservative Catholic. The thing that pushed her over on legalizing gay marriage was stories about people being in the hospital and their partner of 20 years not being allowed to see them, because they werenāt legally married. She thought that was wrong and unfair.Ā
Also a reminderĀ āget marriedā does not meanĀ āhave a wedding.ā You can file the paperwork and get married in a courthouse or office. There doesnāt even need to be a ceremony, you just have to sign some papers. (Bonus: you get access to the legal privileges of marriage as well as the protections, AND you get to stick it to the billion dollarĀ āwedding industryā that preys on us all.)
#this is also why marriage equality for disabled people is super important
Literally any other colour wouldāve been a better choice guys.
Iād like to point out that the colour red has more positive than negative meanings.
im sorry but this reply absolutely killed me
red can mean whatever the heck you want it to mean, that is never going to change that this straight up looks like they DRAGGED A BLOODY BODY ACROSS THE FUCKING FLOOR š
Hi fun fact, colors do have meaning and there is a legit thing called color theory. Red does has more positive connotations than negative like the @mintymaiden said. Red is associated with more love, lust, passion than blood and death just like the chart shows you but If you want, hereās a link for you to check it out yourself. Also, check out āThe Designerās Dictionary of Colorā by Sean Adams. Have fun learning something
Xoxo
-Designer
What isColor Theory? Color theory is a term used to describe the collection of rules and guidelines regarding the use of color in art and de
I think yāall are missing the point here.
You can theorize to Nebraska and back but that doesnāt change my immediate reaction which is that someone is literally dragging a corpse around
I like that the presumption here is that āNo One On Tumblr Has Heard of Color Theory, Let Me Explain in Depthā rather than simply acknowledging that the VISUAL EFFECTS of this particular color choice, applied in the manner it was, can still amount to āthis is a hospital and that looks like bloodā
like, color theory doesnāt exist in a vacuum. If your design of choice for Blood Red Paint is asymmetric splatters and sploches against the wall, or in this case, a snail trail on the hallwayās floor, an infographic wonāt override the viewersā instinct.
this post is the perfect summation of tumblrās reading comprehension and critical thought abilities
Reblogging because thereās a lot of new people on here and you need some context for the jokes.
Help a newcomer, reblog Childrenās Hospital Colour Theory
making a tree topper
Please take pictures
photo!
i learned of āBox bedsā ā cabinets with beds in them and, sometimes, lockable doors ā were used for privacy and safety in parts of rural medieval Europe before individual bedrooms were common. They became fashionable even in homes with bedrooms and remained in use in Scotland into the 1900s (x)
I donāt want a swimming pool, I want a box bed/nook bed
Ohhhhhhh man this unlocks Primal Instinct
Nest!!!! Cozy!!!!!
Hang on, why do people keep saying it's Hayden in the suit? Why would it be Hayden? Prowse was fucking huge, Hayden doesn't have the physical proportions for the Vader suit. He's also not a suit actor, and you're much better off using a suit actor for suit acting. It's like how famous movie actors are not necessarily good voice actors; different acting skillset.
Showbiz aside. Narratively it's kind of funny.
His original suit is Anakin sized. He faces off with Obi-Wan after 10 years.
Vader to suit technician: Make me taller.
Technician: wonderful idea and we can update your prosthetics, maybe make you look more realistic, more human.
Vader force chokes him. Turns to second tech: MAKE ME TALLER
tech: yep can do!
A brief appreciation of Peter Falk in Columbo, by Joe Dator in The New Yorker
Random socializing tip: Tell people when theyāve had a positive impact on your life!
e.g.:Ā āHey, remember when I asked you for advice on X? That was really helpful, I tried it and now (insert what has improved)ā
āYou kept gushing about (insert series/book/movie/recipe) and made it sound really appealing, so I checked it out and I really liked it!ā
āThank you for letting me vent recently, telling you what bothered me really helped me to work through it / helped me see it from another perspective / gave me the courage to address it with the person I was talking about.ā
It helps people see their own strong points, it deepens your relationships, it makes the people in your life feel appreciated and special and it can give you warm fuzzy feelings!
Win/win all around!
More inadvisable ways to introduce a new player character mid-dungeon, bait and switch edition:
A new character with almost but not quite identical stats and appearance comes hurrying up to the party, insisting that youāre the real [name], and the [name] everyone knew was an imposter; when informed that they died just before you arrived, cryptically remark that this isnāt the first time theyāve pulled that trick Ā
A character who nobody recognises speaks up from the partyās midst, acting like they expect to be familiar to the party; if questioned, claim that youāre the deceased characterās personal assistant, and that youāve been here the entire time, then digress into a rant about how nobody every notices the help Ā
Following the next encounter, the party discovers a large, ornate treasure chest, which proves to contain nothing but your character, bound and gagged; once released, any complaint regarding the lack of gold and jewels should naturally be met with dramatic indignation at the implication that youāre not treasure enough Ā
The target the party has been sent to slay unexpectedly greets them warmly, explaining thereās been an awful misunderstanding: youāre not the true master of the dungeon, youāve just been mistaken for the prophesied Lord of Evil, and youād very much like to make your exit before the monsters figure it out Ā
[Spellcaster only] Your original character is revealed upon death to be a fraud with no magical powers, who had merely been impersonating a member of their ostensible character class; any spell effects you seemed to produce in fact originated from a heretofore-unsuspected accomplice: your horse
SIMONE ROCHA Fall/Winter RTW 2022 (part 3) if you want to support this blog consider donating to: ko-fi.com/fashionrunways
btw⦠important PSA: cutting off the mold on the surface of food does nothing. you can only see the spores on the surface, but mold itself has spread and grown roots into the food. by the time you can actually *see* the spores, that piece of food is completely full of it. youre still eating mold.Ā
many of which are poisonous and have been shown to cause cancer. youre not even supposed to sniff it, because that can get spores into your lungs. like if you look up the health and safety guidelines for mold they barely stop short of telling you to put on a hazmat suit.Ā
like produce is okay as long as you cut around it at least an inch, but cooked foods? you gonna die. stop eating mold peopleĀ
does that include bread
Hereās the USDA mold chart
VERY IMPORTANT INFO FRIENDOS!!!!!!!!!!!!
āWhatās anyone going to need Home Ec for anyway?ā
Please do not shame people for this. Food waste is a horrible source of anxiety and guilt among the poor and those that grew up poor. It's a horrible habit to break and lack of education doesn't help.
automatic sliding doors are so butch. i am charmed and romanced by the experience of them every time. it just senses my presence and opens up..... like wow i am really being taken care of rn š³
automatic sliding doors see me in the grocery store with my silly little femme outfit on and say do you need any help with those groceries princess šŖš
femmes are getting it where we can in these trying times
actually automatic doors are cringe because i cant open them for femmes. every time the machine takes this from me i want to bullcharge it. but alas, it would simply open, owning me severely...
okay see this is the dialogue we SHOULD be having. fucked up, robots r stealing jobs from hardworking lesbians everywhere ...... itās so sad, ālikeā if you agree
Oh but you just need to borrow some dad joke energy, bow and say to them "Allow me" and wave your hand in front of the automatic doors so they open. You can still be chivalrous and feel like a Jedi.
itās been long enough iām making an executive decision that we all need to go reread the tgi fridays infinite mozzarella sticks article
still just as good as i remember it
This is genuinely one of the greatest pieces of journalism Iāve ever read. Please read it.
Dating Disney: Beauty and the Beast
Beauty and the Beast features my favorite love story and my favorite Disney Princess, so it holds a very special spot in my heart. So, itās worth looking into the film to decide when the Movie is supposed to be set.
During the opening musical number āBelleā, Belle is telling the Baker about the book sheās been reading. Sheās clearly describing Jack and the Beanstalk, the earliest version being the tale of āJack Spriggins and the Enchanted Beanā in 1734. But she also deliberately mentions an ogre, not a giant. Near as I could find, the only version with an ogre was written by Joseph Jacobs in 1890, making Belle nearly contemporary to modernity. Belleās excitement over the book is likely a sign that this is a new story.
During the same musical number, we see a sign depicting a tobacco pipe, but unlike with the Calabash pipe from the Little Mermaid movie. I could place it to possibly be a Billiard type, but the exact era of creation escapes me. However, tobacco pipes have been around as long as Tobacco has been introduced to European trade, starting in the 16th century.
The history of colored printing goes as far back as the 16th century, and there are illustrations from the early 1700s with an impressive variety of color that help establish a stronger time period. The book also shows the words Le Prince Charmant or Prince Charming. Prince Charming started being used in 1697 in Charles Perraultās version of Sleeping Beauty, although there, Prince Charming was not a name. Rather, Perrault stated that the Prince was charmed by her words. The first story to use Prince Charming as a name is the Tale of Pretty Goldilocks. It was written at some point in the 17th Century by Madame dāAulnoy, but in her version the hero was named Avenant. It wasnāt until 1889 when Andrew Lang retold the story that Avenant was dubbed as Charming. One year later in 1890, Oscar Wilde used the term āPrince Charmingā sarcastically in his novel āThe Picture of Dorian Grayā, meaning that the term had gotten its more modern meaning by this point in time.
Gastonās musket is a Blunderbuss, which was invented in the early 1600ā²s and remained popular through the 18th century before falling out of fashion in the middle of the 19th century. However, considering Belle states that this is a backwards town and Gaston is an old-fashioned, Primeval man, itās possible heās using a largely outdated weapon.
While there are no street lamps in the city, we can see in the background lanterns on the sides of buildings, which might allude to the movie taking place before the invention of gas lamps. However, gas lamps were invented in 1809, and if the version of Jack and the Beanstalk is from 1890, then by all accounts the town should have gas lamps. What this amounting evidence is leading me to believe is that the film is directly following the plot of the original fairy tale.
In the story, Beautyās father is a merchant who loses his fortune due to a storm destroying his cargo. Theyāre forced to live on a farm until the merchant stumbles upon the Beastās castle and kick starts the plot. In the opening song, Belle says āevery morningās just the same, since the morning that we came, to this poor, provincial town.ā This could mean that she grew up in a much more modern, urban, and progressive town. Possibly even Paris. But that after Maurice suffered severe financial trouble, he was forced to move them to the small, backwards town that was practically living an entire century behind the rest of France, which is why sheās so bored and unimpressed by the little town. It helps explain why sheās so eager to want to get out of this town and see the world. She wants to be part of the modern world again.
Interestingly, I can support this theory with background information. According to some of my research, Belleās village was based on the little town of Riquewihr, France, which still looks like it did in the 16th century to this day. So the idea that Belleās little village lacks so many modern elements could be a nod to the architecture of this sleepy French village that has remained largely untouched by the march of time. Hence why it looks more like something out of the 1700s despite the many elements from the 1800s being present.
During the song āBe Our Guestā, Lumiere dances with a match stick. Match sticks were invented in 1805. Assuming the film still takes place in the 1890s, this would be concurrent with the other evidence weāve seen thus far. Later in the same song, the silverware makes an Eiffel tower, which was constructed in 1889. Since Jack and the Beanstalk was written after that, it still fits within the suspected time frame.
During the climax of the battle, Cogsworth is wearing military garments reflective of Napoleonic styles. Napoleon was coronated in 1804 until 1814, had a brief return to power in 1815, and eventually died in 1821. So this is also congruent to the established time period.
In the Youtube Video āFashion Expert Fact Checks Belle from Beauty and the Beastās Costumesā by Glamour, April Calahan, a Fashion Historian from the Fashion Institute of Technology directly noted that Belleās yellow gown lacks the shape of a proper 18th century dress, and more closely resembles the shape of 19th century dresses, fitting into the evidence thatās been mounting in support of a late 19th century setting.
As a part of his primary costume, Lefou wears a waistcoat and tailcoats, which came into vogue in the 1800s, namely from the 1840s through the 1850s.
But if the film is set in the 1800s, how can the Beast still be a prince after the French Revolution? Well something worth noting is that when he finds out that Belle isnāt coming to dinner, the Beast storms through the halls to her room as Cogsworth calls after him as āYour Eminenceā and āYour Graceā. The address of āYour Eminenceā is reserved for Cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church, and is an ecclesiastical style of address. āYour Graceā is noticeably an English style of address, but itās being used by Cogsworth who is British, so I can chalk that up to just part of his culture. Although it was used for British monarchs, it fell out of use during the reign of King Henry VIII (1509-1547) and after that, the use of āYour Graceā became used to address archbishops and non-royal Dukes and Duchesses. Now clearly the Beast is not a cardinal or a bishop, especially if he is looking for the love of a woman to make him human, since itās forbidden for Catholic priests to marry. So clearly that is not what is meant here. But the other answer actually does hold a bit of weight. Beastās father was in fact, a Duke. So how is the Beast a prince? Heās not. Not entirely. See, thereās more than one kind of Prince in French nobility. Thereās a Prince du Sang, or a Prince by Blood. Effectively, the Crown Prince, the sons of ruling monarchs. But the title is also given to lords in charge of a Principality, one of the smallest territorial sizes. The Beastās principality probably only extends to having power over the little unnamed village. And with it being after the revolution, Beast might not even have the proper use of his title anymore. Heās effectively a rich kid in a fancy house with no real authority or power. Heās just old money from a by-gone era of human history. But if Beastās address of āYour Graceā is accurate, that would mean that heās a non-royal Duke, meaning he would not likely have been executed during the Revolution, as his family would have essentially been governors or senators than actual monarchs. They just had jurisdiction over a small piece of the Kingdom of France and reported back to and obeyed the orders of their King. Thus, he would not have been important enough to be killed or chased out of power by the townsfolk.
CONCLUSION
The movie is set between the late autumn and early-to-mid winter of 1890. Although the snow is gone when Belle returns to the village, the trees are still bare, signaling that it may just be unseasonably warm, though it could be the very early spring of 1891 between the receding of the snow and the blossoming of new spring foliage. Between the books, clothing, and references made, my conclusion is that Belle is a very modern girl living in a backwards little town stuck in the past, thus why a village in 1890 looks so completely lacking in modern technology despite the era. The Prince is nothing more than a fancy title as the son of a Duke, and he likely has very little if any actual government authority. Essentially, Belle married into wealth, not power, and will never be a proper queen, and Iām not sure if the wife of a lord ruling a principality is a princess or not, but I suspect the answer is no. Making Belle, like Mulan, a Disney Princess who did not marry royalty, was not born royalty, and thus, cannot be called a Disney Princess. Sheās definitely a noblewoman, but sheās not royal by any means.
SETTING: Riquewihr, France
KINGDOM: The French Republic (France)
YEAR: Autumn, 1890 - Spring, 1891
PERIOD: The Third Republic (1870-1940)
LANGUAGE: French
This would also explain why no one in the town seems to care that their regent hasnāt been seen in years.Ā
iām losing my mind at the concept that Belle will very likely live to see the first World War, barring other catastrophe.
Belle is 17 years old at the beginning of the film. If the film takes place in 1890, sheāll only be 41 years old when Duke Ferdinand is shot some 800 miles away. The Beast is barely four years older than Belle. Heāll be 45.Ā
According to the Encyclopedia Britannica (by way of Wikipedia), ācostly battles on the Western Front forced France to conscript men up to the age of 45.ā Itās not impossible that The Beast sees combat during WWI. Trench warfare, gas warfare, no manās land, all the horrors of front line at the dawn of the 20th century. Itās entirely possible that Belle signs up with the Red Cross as a nurse, maybe utilizing a mechanical aptitude inherited from her father to aid in the war effort.
When Germany invades Poland, Belle and The Beast will be 56 and 60, respectively. In the spring of the following year, the Nazis invades France. They occupy castles and large estates across France, to use as both bases of operation and as strongholds to hoard stolen wealth (in the form of gold and art) and political hostages.
Would Belle and the Beast fight off Nazi invaders from their home? Theyāve defended it before, but is there enough magic left in those old walls to mount a defense? Or would they flee their chateau, go underground, and use what remaining assets they have to aid LaĀ RĆ©sistance?
Do they have children, and if so whatās become of them in this time of war?
Listen, what Iām getting at here is that since theyāre both Disney properties, thereās an entirely justifiable team up between Beauty and the Beast and Captain America.
Came for the analysis, rebligged for that last sentence.
What I expected from the title: discussion of Belle and the Beastās relationship dynamics
What I got: Beast ends up as a Howling Commando