Elevating this from a comment elsewhere, if you think AI can automate the almalgamation of a history/science/technical research function, let alone a good workshop floor or skilled tradesman properly, you're absolutely dreaming, and clearly incompetent.
For example, the manager who signed off on my redundancy, when at the final meeting I pointed out that I would work out my full three months notice, rather than leaving immediately, because I wanted to tidy up various projects and data and archive it in a manner that if any of my (now massively over subscribed) remaining colleagues had time to pick it up, it was in a good format for that. Said manager wasn't even aware I was compiling a 300+ year long national landslide fatalities database, that I was nearly finished, and about to publish, but wouldn't make it before I left, despite it being the most scientifically _useful_ thing I've ever done in my Entire Career (I did get a preliminary report out, but I still had a century of locations to do, which is the most _intensive_ non automatable thing. No AI can do it, most people younger than me don't have the odd mix of historical language research, geological and geomorphology skills to translate archival newspaper language into evidence you can use to track down a landslide within a few tens to hundreds of metres, or even to a kilometer or so, that killed someone a century ago in a forested landscape in the southern alps by the descriptions, travel times and placenames of the time. (we tried that, and I had to fix everything the younger workers did (not their fault, they just don't have the skill or experience yet).
I can't put what I do into things and AI can understand, when I look at the coroner's report in a scanned newspaper covered in stains and blurred words, with some goldfield worker's descriptions of a traumatic fatality of his mate in a tiny tributary of a creek on the side of a valley in the West Coast or Otago, whose name has changed 3 times in the ensuing 150 years, or a traumatised quake or storm survivor from East Cape in the 1930s describing where his mates had been taken in the debris flow to a reporter who miss-spells the Maori name for the very specific bit of the river where it happens. But I can do that. I can look at a hundred year old innacurate transcription, and look at the shape of the hills and the lost farm house boundaries or creek names and say 'He died about there, or maybe a bit higher up slope, within half a k from here.' Automate that, you bastards.
Plus when I said 'Oh, and what do I do with the <multi million dollar> set of laboratory machines that go Ping, (some of which are the only capability of their sort in the southern hemisphere'), they looked confused, so I said something along the lines of 'Well, you've fired the only two people trained to use, maintain and calibrate it, our remaining colleagues don't have that training, are oversubscribed with the extra work of the other people we've lost, so by the time you find, hire, train and fund people, you may as well scrap it all now and buy new'.
And they looked at me and said 'We didn't think of that'. Which should be their entire Job. And one of them said to me 'we're just following orders'....
You can't replace that. You can replace a human, but you can train them, but not always. Some skills are lost, because the technology or experience that made them, isn't here any more and I can't quite put my finger on how to give what's in my head accurately to your head, let alone a machine that can't think.
romaincrisis
baratheonpilled
discoholicmusic
prguitarman
andulkaphoto
areudirty
dededos
