Heated Rivalry doesn't take place in the NHL and there are differences
Elitists who think you need to know heaps about hockey are wrong! We don't see any changes to the rulebook, afaik, but we DO know the CBA is different. Article 16.9, which says that only ELCs have to share rooms, isn't in the MLH's CBA, because Shane continues sharing with Hayden even after he's spent his first three years in the league.
If Article 16.9 is different, what else could be different? Are there changes to the rulebook? We don't know, and that means it's free real estate! I personally think the MLH has jailbreak goals, because I love the whimsy of it. I also think the worst team in the league should get a wooden spoon because that's hilarious. It should be a physical spoon. (Both of these in borrowing from other leagues/sports.)
End elitism! If the rules are different, maybe we have a more sensible playoff format and Boston and Montreal CAN face each other in the finals! If the Western Conference is a pillow fight it doesn't belong in the playoffs anyway, get good lmao. I say go full anarchy and have the playoffs determined by league standings, not division/conference standings.
Anyway all HR writers should write the hockey they want for the plot. I love you, go forth and make the shampoo at the rink cheap if you want (Article 34 of the 2012 CBA says it has to be "professional quality" and the towels have to be "high quality"). Structure the playoffs however you want. Do you want to get rid of the rule about checks to the head for drama reasons? Go forth and have your characters relive 2010, the year they had so many awful checks to the head that they brought in rule 48 the next year! The league is your oyster.




















