Rene Gerin
French, 1862-1895
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

@theartofmadeline
almost home

ellievsbear
icyghini twinkie
cherry valley forever
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

pixel skylines

bliss lane
RMH
Misplaced Lens Cap
Keni
Fai_Ryy
No title available
h
Cosimo Galluzzi

#extradirty
sheepfilms

No title available
KIROKAZE
seen from Palestinian Territories
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Mexico
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
@theproperlady
Rene Gerin
French, 1862-1895
Your ai icon is not real. You can't venerate it because it's not holy. The rules of iconography is that it has to be made by a prayerful Christian. It HAS to reflect Heaven and the Holy Spirit which is something ai can never understand as it's not alive.
Your ai generated junk is disrespectful to monks, nuns, and other iconographers who dedicate hours, days, maybe even months to their work which is a centuries long tradition. Plus, it's probably also disrespectful to those being depicted in the junk.
Keep your ai out of devotion.
These kids are super dope, actually, and I'm praying that their faith inspires their parents
I know a lot of times we can complain about priests or the Mass if it's not the way we want it to be, but I think it's really important that we all acknowledge how privileged and lucky we are to be able to go to Mass at all. There are people being killed right now for being Catholic. Many of us get to go to Mass (daily Mass in many cases!) in relative peace without much concern of our safety. It's okay to prefer one form of Mass to the other, or to have qualms with the way a priest does something during the Mass, but I think we all need to take a step back sometimes and see how lucky we really are.
I was curious, because I kept seeing people who are defending the SSPX say that they 'repeatedly asked for dialogue' with Pope Leo. I know that several months ago they announced they would be doing this, ghat the Vatican told them they better not, and then lo-and-behold they did it anyways. The conflicting information comes from faithful Catholics and non-Catholic news sources that say that Pope Leo had tried to continue the dialogue between the Holy See and the SSPX, and that the SSPX denied that dialogue, because they wanted to ordain bishops without the approval of the Pope.
So a few points to put out for people on the SSPX side of things:
The Holy See warned the SSPX back in February that this would happen if they continued on with their plans. There was no "Pope Leo refused to talk to us or say anything" like I've been seeing SSPX sympathizers saying. They were warned that they actions would cause schism months before Pope Leo sent the personal letter. Don't be fooled.
As well, it has been against Catholic teaching since at LEAST 1983. It appears to also have been part of the 1917 code, lest anyone say that the SSPX don't follow the current Code of Canon law, as promulgated by the Catholic Church. It reads: Can. 1387— Both the Bishop who, without a pontifical mandate, consecrates a person a Bishop, and the one who receives the consecration from him, incur a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See.
(Taken directly from the Vatican website which has the Code on it.)
There is more I could say on the matter but I wanted to be clear in this. Unless you deny the authority of the current Magisterium, the authority of Pope Leo, the argument cannot be made that the SSPX are in any way in the right on this. They are in direct disobedience to the Church, even if Pope Leo had NEVER sent that personal letter, because they never intended to get approval before "consecrating" bishops. This is an act of selfishness and pride on the part of the SSPX clerics, and they are actively deluding lay adherents and lay sympathizers, acting like they are a sick dog that's been kicked. It is NOT traditional to disobey the Holy See or the Code of Canon Law. The Vatican did nothing out of the ordinary to warrant a dissent in will, as would be appropriate if the Vatican or the Pope had done something evil or against Church teaching.
HILARY DUFF A fan made a crochet animated Lizzie McGuire doll and gave it to Hilary at her show in Austin, Texas!
Once again, I’m appalled by what people wear to Mass. Men and women both, and kids - just poor decisions.
It also would be nice if some of those same people learned how to control their kids during Mass.
I don’t know why I took you in after your mother and father died, but it wasn’t out of charity. I think it was because, of all my numerous relations, you were the one that showed real… spirit.
♡ if you are reading this, i hope good things and blessings come your way ♡
Disney: Model Sheet, Sleeping Beauty
Catholic academia 🕯🪶
Message me for moodboard requests 🕊
ぼんやり眺めていた
Holy card depicting Our Lady of Sorrows - artist and date unknown.
Vajdahunyad Castle , Budapest
Someone said this to me when I said I was adopted
I've had this said to me in several forms many times over my life.
This is one of the things that turned me from pro-choice to being against abortion. I'm adopted from a very impoverished part of a country and, with the context surrounding my birth, every pro-choicer has justified my death in one way or another because of multiple factors. Being poor, disabled, and born of out wedlock? Yeah no, better off dead than my current circumstance where I have a supportive family, healthcare that saved my life, and a stable job that I enjoy. Lol!!!!
I can't stress enough how damaging it is to hear this argument.
"What if it's disabled?" You say this to an autistic woman. I am married, deeply loved and in love, and have a healthy son. My father is autistic. My brother is an autistic game designer, who married a lawyer-in-training with only one arm. You dare imply that our lives are not worth living?
My brother's prenatal tests suggested potential Downs Syndrome. Same with my son. Abortion was presented as an option in both cases, and denied furiously. Neither were born with Downs. Not that that would have mattered, as they would have been loved anyway, but the tests were wrong. The excuse of potential disability was used to try to murder my brother and my son. How many have been taken by the same, Downs or not?!
But better off dead to avoid potential difficulties than happy and fulfilled and loved in life, huh? Make no mistake, that's what this argument is saying.