I recently watched your top fails of 2021 video and I feel the need to say something. about the Cawthon thing. Harassment, Death Threats and doxing are absolutely unaccaptable, so putting that on the list is entirely reasonable. However I take issue with the idea that people should not judge others for their political beliefs. If you can't judge someone for the way they think the world should be run, what can you judge them for?
I've gotten a lot of questions like this, but I'll answer this one because it seems much more like it was asked in good faith.
We are all sinners living in a sinful world, trying our best to navigate it and do what's best for ourselves and the ones we love. We often don't have all the information about circumstances and we especially can't read hearts and minds.
So with that in mind, I present two pieces of advice from two very admirable people;
"Therefore by their fruits you will know them." Jesus Christ
"Look for the helpers." Mr. Rogers
Words and rhetoric are all fine and dandy, but in the end you gotta look at what people actually do. Personally, I would rather have a whiny d**khead actually get the job done rather than a nice person who doesn't do the job at all or does it half-a**ed. Of course, ideally I'd like to have a nice person who gets the job done, but in my experience those are the exception rather than the rule.
I look at all the actions that Scott has taken, how many people he has helped and inspired, and I genuinely believe he was never trying to hurt anyone. If you look at his response, it seems that rhetoric is a much less important factor than actions to Scott. He said he avoided donating to politicians who talk up a big game about supporting LGBT but whose policies he believed would actually do more harm to LGBT. To wit, Scott believes that the LGBT community is going to be hurt more by incompetent and/or disingenuous advocates rather than the actively hateful opponents. Is Scott correct? Maybe, maybe not, and that debate can certainly be had. However, in the end Scott made a judgement call based on the information he had and it was a decision made because Scott didn't want to hurt the LGBT community.
I often see many people who make questionable or harmful decisions but in the end are just trying to do what they believe is right. I don't agree with many of the people who voted for Biden to be president, but I understand many of the reasons why they did. I think they're wrong, especially when we look at many of the negative effects of his presidency that many opponents of his warned about. People voted for Biden because they thought he was the best foot forward for the country and many are coming to the notion that they may have made a mistake. (And no, I highly discourage unhelpful actions of "neener neenering" or "I told you so-ing" these people like children.)
In the end, I try to believe people who disagree with me are MISGUIDED, not EVIL.
90% of the people I associate with online? Friends and colleagues? We do not agree politically. Are you suggesting I should judge them constantly? Shout from the rooftops that they're wrong and engage them in political debate until one of us budges? I and many others I've seen have tried that before and all it's ever done is make us perpetually miserable and irritable. It's not mentally healthy.
I think we should actively look for the people who are genuinely trying to understand and help and we should disengage with the ones who don't want to change and want to just ideologically beat others into submission, passively or actively. I try (and tbh don't always succeed in) not to throw the pearls of my time to swine who don't engage in good faith and just want to be right.