here tomorrow, gone today

he/him, cody, 22. 🇨🇦 harry potter fans dni

[urgetocreate]

Tom Thomson (Canadian 1877-1917), Campfire, 1916, Oil on wood, National Gallery of Canada

[kuttenberg-gauntlets]

true love for The Character shows itself when you imagine them suicidal with grief

[lilyflxwers]

ok i absolutely need to know what accents u all have pls reblog and tell me or comment or whatever I must know

[tossawary]

I was thinking about the "Natasha Romanoffs" of M/M romances a while back, and how these stories typically do not care or do not have time for the interiority of these hyper competent, endlessly supportive female best friends. So it goes with the sidekick BFFs in romances for a variety of reasons!

And the phrase, "If these women have ever cried while eating ice cream in a bathtub, the story and their best friend don't seem to care," popped into my head at one point. (Note: No, I don't personally know anyone who has ever done this. I'm using it as the classic stand-in for messy emotional distress here.)

And my point now is that this phrase made me think to myself... Do I believe that Natasha Romanoff has ever sincerely cried in the bathtub while eating ice cream?

Honestly, not really. Seems OOC.

However, I do FULLY believe that Natasha Romanoff at one point sat in the bathtub eating a carton of ice cream, or some equivalent activity, just to try and experience a "Normal Girl Life Thing." And maybe she even tried to cry / cried on command! But she was also fully aware the whole time that this whole activity was, essentially, a conscious performance of a "Normal Girl Life Thing."

And, you know, that's fun to explore too. I like to see characters get to be shameless weepers, but I do like also female characters who say shit like, "I sat in the bathtub and ate ice cream and tried to cry like a Hollywood female protagonist, but idk, I didn't really feel anything." And people can say, "Hey, Natasha, what the fuck?"

[thedreamthieves]

i think one of the worst things the left wing internet ever did was push the idea that oppression is basically a virtue, and being oppressed is a sign of your morality. it has made it like…impossible for some of you to hold the idea that most people are privileged in some ways and oppressed in others. AND a lot of you seem to have it in your mind that terrible people cannot be oppressed, and that oppressed people cannot do terrible things, which is a dangerous rhetoric to hold imo.

[solarprominence]

I maintain that the best summation of my feminist beliefs are that men and women are not fundamentally different. There are a few quantifiable differences if you average out every woman and every man, but they are not qualitative. And most of them are socially constructed, and would be fixed if we started treating men and women the same. Neither is inherently smarter, neither is inherently kinder, neither is inherently more stoic or stronger or angrier or softer. Everyone is obsessed with the differences between women and men, with finding them and creating them and distancing themselves from the "other half". It's fucked up

[muzzlesbian]

While often different in practice, cissexism, transphobia, and homophobia are all rooted in oppositional sexism, which is the belief that female and male are rigid, mutually exclusive categories, each possessing a unique and nonoverlapping set of attributes, aptitudes, abilities, and desires. Oppositional sexists attempt to punish or dismiss those of us who fall outside of gender or sexual norms because our existence threatens the idea that women and men are “opposite” sexes.

Julia Serano, Whipping Girl

[90s-kid-sad-adult]

lie to me

[sconesfortea]

RIP Anthony Stewart Head (1954 - 2026)

[theshitpostcalligrapher]

req'd by @intothetr33s

man what do you know that I don't bout the local baseball boys

text: Let's go Blue Gays!

[nonbinary-wrath-month]

The reason why so many of y'all's feminism sucks is because you still believe deep down in your hearts that there are only two kinds of people in the world: precious, ethereal, fragile dollthings called "women", and violent, lustful, rage-fueled apes called "men". Until you throw that idea away, 3rd-grade-tier "girls rule boys drool, girls are princesses and boys are stinky :(" is as feminist as we'll ever get-- and I hope it's obvious that that's lightyears away from the bare minimum of where we need to be.

[nonbinary-wrath-month]

I don't know how I'm supposed to explain to ostensibly trans-friendly feminists that "women are beautiful soft things made of glass, men are obsessed with violence and sex" is exactly what the patriarchy wants you to believe. Patriarchy wants you to believe that being a woman and/or having a vagina (patriarchy generally believes those two things are synonymous) makes one shatter on impact with reality. It makes you easier to control if you are scared shitless of the other half of the population, and it makes you more compliant with your lot in life if you believe it is in the nature of the other half of the population to rape and kill rather than realise those were choices those individual rapists and murderers made. There is no way to make gender essentialism progressive and feminist, because it is one of patriarchy's tools of subjugation. Stop trying to make it progressive.

And I can scream all of that from the rooftops over and over again, and what I hear in reply is "Trans men really are men because no woman would ever decide to become an inherently evil repugnant rapist ape", and "You're so right. Trans women are women because they too are pretty delicate little objects I can fuck", and "You're non-binary? So are you fucktoy non-binary or sexpest non-binary?", and my patience runs ever thinner.

[quantumshade]

can we stop pretending that anyone assigned female at birth has some mystical connection to womanhood or lesbianism. it’s such a conservative outlook on identity i can’t believe we have to even pretend to entertain it.

[buffysource]

BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER | 1.08 "I Robot, You Jane"

[buffysource]

BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER | 1.08 "I Robot, You Jane"

[devilhoused]

you can’t give lana del rey more than 50 all time classics

[baerensohn]

[orteil42]

given the current climate this pride especially i feel i must mention that i love my trans friends, i stand with trans people in the fight against transphobic legislation and those who would enforce it, and this blog is not a good place for you to be if you do not vibe with that

[godlessondheimite]

In 2026, the chicest thing a gay actor can do is never explicitly come out as gay but also make it abundantly clear that he is. Coming out is too modern. Staying closeted is too old fashioned. But this method merges contemporary freedom with Old Hollywood glamour and allure, and it weeds out the dumbest people who truly don’t get it. I call it the Pascal Method.

[nobodys-odyssey]

Taylor Swift does this

[godlessondheimite]

no she doesn’t

[nobodys-odyssey]

You clearly don't go here or to queer history and signaling, or both, enough to have this conversation and I'm not going to explain it to you. You could have asked questions, you could have done even a modicum of research. You didn't and you made yourself look ignorant. Goodbye.

[ghostapop]

i feel like a lot of fandoms pride themselves on being gayer than the source material but have they considered being less racist and less misogynistic than the source material as well . could be revolutionary