hällø hållœ wêlçōmė tø mÿ čævę

kaos_sparrow on twitter. i go by many names, 30

[windcalling]

binghe: sobbing about his sex life again

mobei-jun:

[thelioninmybed]

Witch Hat Atelier, but instead of being about a cute little witch who lives in the mountains, it's about a middle-aged alcoholic tormented by a relationship he can't remembe-

FUCK post cancelled

[sadomarxist]

[ruckuscauser]

[fforsythiaaa]

Once when I was in undergrad, someone described something as “problematic” in class and our professor was like, “That’s cool, but ‘problematic’ doesn’t really mean anything. It means that the thing you’re describing has a problem, and in and of itself that’s not bad. Art, especially, should always have problems, or else it’s not interesting and not art, either. It sounds like you’re trying to say that this is bad, but you don’t want to say ‘bad.’ Is that right?”

So from then on whenever one of us called something problematic, he would make us talk it out until we could name the “bad” thing we were hinting at. In this particular class, 7/10 it was some type of oppression, and the remainder was like, “I’m uncomfortable because this is very new/confusing/pushing boundaries that made me feel safe.”

Once we stopped calling things “problematic” and stopping at that, class got way more interesting and... we all had to say, like, “that’s racist” or “that’s misogynistic” or “ew capitalism gross” out loud, which a lot of us had never done in a classroom before. Or we had to be like, “Uhhh... I’m not sure what’s so bad?” and confront our own beliefs and that was maybe even more useful.

Anyway. Whenever I see the word problematic, I can’t help but think of this professor being like, “Good starting point, now let’s get specific.” I think when we have to commit to saying “that’s ___” it requires a lot more careful thought about the truth and impact and complexities of whatever we’re claiming. Sometimes there really is some bullshit afoot, and also sometimes it’s art, and it should be full of problems, because that’s what art is.

[wonderstruck]

If you see this you’re legally obligated to reblog and tag with the book you’re currently reading

[demonlike-judge-of-fire]

these two are the cutest couple ever but it cracks me up every time that they Cannot be monogamous. incredible pair but if they dont have their chosen third they canonically just dont feel ok being together

[art-of-a-space-duck]

A little doodle I made at work that I decided to turn into a full picture.

[imgdist0000]

drawing people i see in the city (51/?)

[disarmd]

i get the vibe that people are reading less fic these days. confirm/deny?

in terms of reading fanfiction in the last six+ months...

i have been reading less fic lately for various reasons

i have been reading less fic and i'll tell you right now it's because of AI

i would like to read more but i'm in a fic reading slump

i never read all that much fic (less than one story per week)

i almost never read fic (less than once a month)

i read the same amount of fic as ever

i have been reading more fic lately

nuance/bald/i'll tell you in comments

Remaining time: 5 days 1 hour

"because of AI" i mean because of the number of fics that are written using AI.

[windcalling]

The thing about the ORV movie is that it waters down or simplifies a lot that book fans care about, but I’m also not sure how intelligible it is to people who HAVEN’T read the book

Still fun tho! Reminded me about how enjoyable ORV is!

[damndorothea]

i saw this somewhere else but reply / tag what you did today so everyone can see that we all did something different today

[escuerzoresucitado]

[churlsgonewild]

[json-derulo]

earlier I was coming back up from skating and one of the starstruck little kids from across the hall asked me, “how are you allowed to drive on the inside?” (referring to the fact that I carefully skate in the hallway and elevator, because swapping shoes on and off for the one-block commute to and from the park is a massive pain in the ass), and I swear to god the dialogue options that flashed up on my heads-up display were

[] Nothing in the lease explicitly says I can’t, and all uncodified rules are merely suggestions

[] I’m probably not, but the only people in this building who are fast enough to actually stop me are the maintenance guys who are all charmed by my kind green eyes and adorable dog

[x] I ate all my vegetables and did my homework so my mom said I’m allowed to do whatever I want

[peppermoths]

does anyone want to see a really good picture of my kitty cat

[peppermoths]

[cheddar-baby]

not a cat, first off

[cheddar-baby]

snale

[not-freyja]

Can everyone who makes video content do a Deaf bitch a favor? Watch your shit with the captions on and the sound off, and then do another round of editing to fix things including but not limited to:

Captions cover the spot on the screen you put the information I need

The dialogue is captioned but not the song you have playing that the dialogue is responding to

You only captioned the person on the screen, not the person off screen who is also talking

No captioning of critical sound effects (alarms, bells, dogs barking, etc)

Speakers are not labelled at moments where it is not clear on the screen who is talking.

Captions cover the spot on the screen that you put the information I need!

Other d/Deaf people welcome to add.

This post brought to you by the fifth video tutorial I could not follow because the bad, auto-generated captions covered what I was trying to watch today.

[srdcovka]

WHAT

[windcalling]

[ID: Tweet from @DiscussingFilm: ‘THE PEASANT’ has begun filming. The film combines medieval knights with feudal India and follows a shepherd as he pursues revenge against mercenaries who ravaged his community.

Directed by & starring Dev Patel. ]

[my-dailydreams]