Roy Mustang & Riza Hawkeye – If I Had My Time (Tide Lines)
Tell me whatever you do You'll keep holding on to every friend You never want to lose Promise me right to the end You'll keep holding on to every chance Our time will come again
Misplaced Lens Cap
Today's Document

shark vs the universe

JVL

Kiana Khansmith
we're not kids anymore.
tumblr dot com
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
YOU ARE THE REASON

if i look back, i am lost

pixel skylines
Monterey Bay Aquarium
d e v o n
Stranger Things
Claire Keane
No title available
macklin celebrini has autism

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Show & Tell

No title available

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from Senegal

seen from Ireland
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Panama
seen from Panama

seen from Panama

seen from United States
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@youchangedmedean
Roy Mustang & Riza Hawkeye – If I Had My Time (Tide Lines)
Tell me whatever you do You'll keep holding on to every friend You never want to lose Promise me right to the end You'll keep holding on to every chance Our time will come again
Cultural Insights of Our Own: Lessons From a Newly Decoded Digital Archive
Interplanetary Journal of Cultural Studies
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 322-340
Abstract
The recently decoded Internet Archive includes the digital artifact called “Archive of Our Own” (AO3) from early third millennium Earth. AO3 is unusually well backed up and therefore is presumed to contain some of the most significant -- perhaps even sacred -- texts of the time. In this paper we present our preliminary analysis of AO3 metadata, including new insights about the literature, gender and sexuality, religion, and scientific understanding of this historical era:
I. LITERATURE. We describe the cultural centrality of figures such as the Winchesters and Reader. We explore how they featured heavily in every dominant literature genre of the era, including Fluff, Angst, Hurt/Comfort, and Oral Sex.
II. GENDER AND SEXUALITY. We review the overwhelming evidence that male-male relationships were the most culturally significant sexual and romantic relationships, but we also show that it was a culture with an unusually broad set of sexual and gender roles. In particular, we highlight the unusual tripartite conceptualization of gender as including alpha, beta, and omega roles; we note the apparent prejudice against betas, illustrated in the prevalence of “no beta we die like men” and similar protest slogans.
III. RELIGION. We describe a newly discovered religious taboo: doves were a common sacrificial animal of the time, but they were forbidden from being eaten.
IV. SCIENCE. Finally, we present new insight about alternate universes. While previous scholars hypothesized that the scientists of Earth may have developed a correct early theory of the multiverse by the late second millennium, our analysis of AO3 presents evidence to the contrary. As late as the early third millennium, prevailing theories postulated highly specific universes, such as a universe in which everyone is in high school, or a universe contained within a coffee shop.
Taken together, these historical insights show that further investigation is warranted into the valuable documents stored within AO3, perhaps even going beyond the metadata to examine the full texts.
Fullmetal Alchemist
This collage of cut card stock, washi paper, origami paper, drawing paper, unryu paper, and art tissue is based on the cover art of Edward and Alphonse Elric from the first volume of Hiromu Arakawa’s Fullmetal Alchemist manga.
I made this collage in celebration of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the publication of the first chapter of Fullmetal Alchemist.
DEAN WINCHESTER in one random episode per day ▸ 051 /364 14.10 NIHILISM
Angel of Thursday
THANK YOU DON’T MIND IF I DO
"A marriage ending isn't a failure at all. I spent eleven years with her. We were so in love that we couldn't image life apart from each other. We got our own place, adopted a dog, and supported each other through school. I thought if tow people loved each other enough the rest would fall into place, except... love isn't everything.
And I didn't want to believe that, but we were sitting in counseling one day, talking about our future and I realized we were describing two completely different lives. Where we'd live, what kind of life we wanted, what made us happy. And it hit me that- I love this woman and this woman loved me. And after eleven years of loss, grief, career changes, we were so deeply in love... but we weren't aligned. And I kept thinking 'We just need to try harder. We can find some compromise to make this work,' because that's what you're supposed to do when you love someone, right?
But the reality was, we had just become different people. Her trade school took her in one direction, my graduate degree in another and trying to force us back into who we were five years ago wasn't coming from a place of love. It was coming from a place of fear. Fear that, if this ended, it meant we wasted eleven years. But sitting there across from her, I realized: That's not how love works.
Those eleven years happened. They were real. The dog, our home, showing up for each other through grad school and trade school. I wouldn't change a single thing because loving someone doesn't mean you're meant to stay with them forever. And letting go doesn't erase what you had. We measure marriage by whether it lasts forever or not, but what if we measured it by whether it mattered?
What if we measured it by the love we gave, the life we built, and the people we became? Because love's job isn't to last forever, it's to help you become fully completely yourself, and sometimes the most loving thing you can do is give each other permission to be yourselves, separately. But the dog doesn't know were' divorced. He just gets two Christmases now."
Pulled this from this guy Preston Rakovsky's Instagram (@prestonrack) because it is a beautiful perspective on love, marriage, and relationships in general.
if you often like or reblog my posts i 100% remember your username and mentally go “oh yes friend” every single time i see you in my notes or on my dash
Thank you for this, Misha
Happy MAMMA MIA! day to those who celebrate
im sobbing. ร็อกกี้ที่รัก 😍😍😍🥰🥰💕❤️🏳️🌈
close enough welcome back destiel
drew this
FMA 25th Anniversary:
Giver taker
Sam found a spell in Golden Time that he used to bring back Eileen. We find out three episodes later in The Trap that the spell was planted by Chuck so that he could give Sam something to lose to make him lose hope, to completely break his spirit.
Dean and Castiel go on a wild goose chase to Purgatory the same episode, looking for a Leviathan blossom for the spell to trap Chuck. but we find out in 17-Unity that there never was any way to trap him, the spell was something Chuck made up for the story. Continuity errors be damned, the only logical conclusion is that he wanted Dean and Castiel go to purgatory.
Chuck wanted Dean and Castiel in Purgatory, where Dean feels his emotions purely and can express himself. Dean prays to Castiel (which Jensen called Dean's confession) then goes to tell Castiel something. If Dean told Cas he loved him, Castiel would have gone to the empty, completely breaking Dean's spirit in a perfect same-episode-parallel to Eileen and Sam.
But he didn't. He didn't because Castiel stopped him.
Castiel broke the narrative, Castiel broke Chuck's narrative, again. And that is why Chuck is so completely pissed at Castiel in Unity.
Do you still want s16?
Yes
No
I've never wanted it
It's complicated
I need England to lose and Harry Kane to explode