Listen & Question. It's not the enemy

[opalescentfem-deactivated202604]

I think something a lot of you on here need to learn is that agreeing with someone on one point does not mean you agree with them on their entire ideology, and that’s okay.

[femsolid]

The systematic "you're ugly/fat/old/you look like a man" insult towards women means one thing: I view women as sex objects, therefore telling a woman that she's unfuckable is the worst thing I can say to her.

This automatic insult can come from both men and women, and what they mean is: you have no reason to exist. It's like saying: "kill yourself". And they expect us to interpret it like that. They expect us to take it very seriously, very personally, to be devastated to hear that we're not attractive and therefore failing at being the only thing we're good for: a sex object.

So when someone immediately insults a woman's appearance in some way, you can automatically understand it to mean that they view women as sex objects and it has nothing to do with the woman's actual appearance.

[woodlandftm]

You know the people that are absolutely horrible to be around and have maybe even abused others, but then they decide Jesus has saved them snd they’re a born again Christian now?

Gender transition is that for leftist men. Both groups treat it like a rebirth. The fact that I’ve heard TIMs defend the shitty behavior of other TIMs by saying they were just acting out and were frustrated because they haven’t discovered their true self or started estrogen. The defense of Jax from TADC, which I refuse to watch, I’ve seen more than enough posts about that stupid show. The people who had a 4chan “phase” who refuse to be accountable for any past (is it really past?) bigotries or people they hurt.

It really is just abusive shitty person -> born again Christian, pink gender flavored.

[liberate-women-now]

Just wanted to inform you all that the Wikipedia page about gender critical feminism has been renamed to "Trans-exclusionary radical feminism." The proposing party said using "gender-critical" was like calling Nazism "Jewish-critical socialism" and another called it akin to calling Scientific Racism "Race Realism."

This is just a small example of what happens when we let scrotes control the narrative; they change terms, definitions, quietly erase facts, and eventually they slowly rewrite history. These small changes (including within academic work and on websites such as Wikipedia) add up and can ultimately influence or change people's opinion. I HIGHLY encourage radfems on this website to join Wikipedia, learn its policies and guidelines, and start making good faith edits so we can restructure the biased cesspit it currently is.

If you are interested in editing and want tips or help, reach out to me! I would also love if another person could collaborate with me!

[horsebacteria]

[transfobia]

This lasagna recipe is remarkable but OP is a terf

[bubbtub]

Every time women adapt in order to overcome the strength disparity between us and men as a way to defend ourselves in a worst case scenario or avoid danger altogether... That adaptation comes to be seen as a sign of cowardice by men.

Poison being a "woman's weapon" in a disparaging sense. Self defense laws expecting people to act in ways that are only really accessible to men and women who choose to strike at a later time being demonized. Gossiping to turn the community against him and seek refuge that way (plus making sure no other woman is blindsided by his behavior) being seen as trashy.

More modernly, leaving someone over text being considered a terrible and inconsiderate thing. I remember this being a plot point in so many cartoons and tv series for tweens growing up. It's so insidious to brainwash girls into believing they owe someone, usually a guy, a "dignified breakup" when that has so often gotten women killed. I dunno, men trying to socially punish women for not playing their honor games when they've never acted honorably towards us has been pissing me off as of late.

[11thfempachi]

Men are like "i can barely afford to survive. Time for a baby"

[horsebacteria]

when you think about it, it’s icky when short hair, long hair, or certain clothes get called ‘gender affirming.’

that framing says long hair = girl, short hair = boy, dresses = girl, pants = boy. that’s just a sexist stereotype, the same one feminism has spent decades trying to dismantle.

[g1rluninterruptedd]

i saw a post about this a few years ago but i was thinking about how “rule 34- if it exists there’s porn of it” is truly the closest males have ever gotten to recognizing how their disgusting sexual depravity stops at nothing. not even kids shows are spared. i’m tired of the way pornography and sex have infiltrated everything. and i’m tired of women and girls being expected to accommodate this foolishness and just accept it as normal.

[radfem-alt-clothes]

I thin most feminists, including in radfem spaces, feel the need to show themselves as oppressed for reasons other than being a woman. I'm not just a woman, I'm a gay woman. Or I'm a WOC. Or I'm autistic or disabled or jewish or ugly or poor this or that and like... a straight, white, young, rich and smoking hot woman is still oppressed because shocker! She's still a woman. I know a lot of radfems like to complain about oppression olympics in "queer" spaces but the second its in feminist ones, it's not an issue? Yeah, intersectionalism and all that but I think theres a difference between that and saying that your oppression is more real because you have it coming from multiple angles. All women are oppressed. You don't need to be hyper oppressed in order to have a view.

[scifi0lver]

Biologists are correcting certain prejudices actively promoted by the transgender lobby.

Link to the article here.

Does anyone have the link to that post explaining how the term "assigned at birth" was originally coined and used by and for intersex people (or people with DSD) before it was completely appropriated by the trans lobby, to the point that the people it was originally about have largely been forgotten?

I reblogged it a few months ago, but I can't seem to find it anymore.

[its-terf-or-nothin]

Here’s the post: https://www.tumblr.com/plaidandpleather/810952557977567232/what-i-hate-is-that-the-intersex-community-is?source=share

[gnomebutch]

befriending men is like wowww you’re so nice and we share so much in common but also there’s a solid 70% chance you jerkoff to rape porn and view me as inherently inferior sigh

[cabbagefem]

‘Gender affirming care’ is a marketing term for the cosmetic surgery industry

[myke-litoris]

An afghan womyn shows us how the world looks through the veil she is forced to wear 💔 I pray she along with all other afghan womyn will get to experience the day she can walk outside and feel the wind in her hair, see the movements of the wind in the grass without mesh to block her view, hear the birdsong without heavy fabric over her ears, smell the fresh air and feel the sunlight on her skin and talk to another womyn about the beauty of the world, all without fear of violence or worse.

This is sex based oppression distilled to its purest form. Some call it “gender apartheid” but frankly even that downplays the severity of the situation for afghan womyn. I don’t even have the language to describe it in only a few words, if that language even exists yet

— source—

Found From sufi495 on twitter: (translated to English):

“This is her Instagram account. She risks her life and films from inside Afghanistan, speaking in English to convey the suffering of women living in Afghanistan to the entire world. https://www.instagram.com/behind.chadari”

93K Followers, 34 Following, 76 Posts - See Instagram photos and videos from Behind Chadari | Zahra Abbasi (@behind.chadari)

[lovelycranium]

I actually find it interesting that they approach this from the perspective of the victim of sexual assault, not the perpetrator. Let me put it this way: "Imagine you're a teacher and you want a relationship with your student. You can consensually role play this with your partner!" or "Perhaps you were a babysitter and had feelings for a child, now you can explore those fantasies while your partner pretends to be the child!"

Anyway, good take, Paula! Nice job

[g1rluninterruptedd]

“but it’s a part of kweer culture” okay?. women are allowed to see drag performances that cross the line and say something about it. and no, i don’t give a shit what the males in makeup have to say, men don’t get to tell women how to feel, the fuck? 💀 if a man walks on the stage making fun of “fishy pussy” or “saggy titties”, i don’t get why women aren’t allowed to say “oh, i think that was in poor taste.”

i’m sorry but i feel like a lot of yalls “pro women” and “feminist” feelings jump out the window the second a man in makeup and nail polish says something lolz.

[dj-hyperbaedel]

It's funny when terfs think THEY'RE the main target of misogyny in drag performances, and it tickles me that they think it's trans women doing that

[doingitatmybirthdaydinner]

neither terfs nor trans women were mentioned a single time in the original post. only the words “women” and “men” were used. do you have a rebuttal to her main point, which is that women have a right to criticize actions they perceive as misogynistic, regardless of the cultural context of those actions, and there is no type of man who is above criticism? do you? or do you just want to make up something that the op never said, and then refute that because it’s easier than refuting her actual statement?

[youren0tfunny]

Also, the target of misogyny is women. "Terfs" are women. So yes, they are the target. Like, what point was that reblog attempting to make?

"Women dare to centre themselves in feminist discussion!" Oh, the horror. I gasp.

Not to mention, the original post didn't say anything about tims directly. Sure, you can infer it from the last line, but tims aren't the focus here, just regular misogynistic men doing drag. But if you're connecting the dots, good for you, I guess.