He keeps bringing up the context and I wonder how many people are aware of the point he was trying to make but don’t care because calling him “human pet guy” is much more effective at making him go away than trying to bully him for being a monarchist or any of the other shit he has going on.
Wasnt the context like him defending ppl who walk their partners on leashes bc if the person consented to being a pet then other ppl should treat them like any other pet…. Like im pretty sure the context did not make it better and he ended up like describing in detail exactly how he’d go about aquiring/owning a human thus revealing his own fetish?
I used to be a part of a terrible podcast and I actually managed to snag him for an interview one time. He’s convinced the pyramids arent real, he got really mad at me for pointing out that bystanders are inherently involved in a kink scene performed in public, and he does legitimately believe that chainmail would be effective against bullets.
That is not what I said, you are misrepresenting my views. I never claimed that the pyramids didn’t exist. YOU claimed that they were extremely COMMON because they were EASY TO MAKE, then I challenged you to make one, and YOU COULDN’T. I asked you to put your metaphorical money where your figurative mouth was, YOU backed down.
Please leave.
No. If YOU have a problem, YOU should leave. Also, if you want to know how to respond to posts, a good start would be to reblog them from the people you actually have a dispute with, not reblogs thereof, you coward.
no but can we talk about the implication of the level of mutilation this fucker goes into detail with the human pet? Like I don’t normally add shit to posts but HOLY SHIT.
