Today's Document

oozey mess
we're not kids anymore.

#extradirty

Love Begins
Cosimo Galluzzi

JVL

if i look back, i am lost
tumblr dot com
No title available
h
occasionally subtle

izzy's playlists!

pixel skylines
Not today Justin
No title available
Three Goblin Art
Sweet Seals For You, Always

No title available
ojovivo

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from Indonesia

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Korea

seen from Singapore

seen from Barbados

seen from Japan
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Nigeria
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Chile
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@alonsimo
trans pride flag color picked from trans pride flag
i made up Star Trek to trick you guys
so now I'm gay for nothing?
now youre gay for nothing.
For all its faults Tumblr has truly ruined all other social media for me because my friends all have Instagram and are all trying to get me on Instagram more but every time I open Instagram there are like fifteen things screaming for my attention and when I get over myself long enough to start scrolling it's like. Where is my chronological dash. Where is the following-only option. Who are these people. Why are there so many videos. Everyone is screaming at me. And then before I know it I'm thirty minutes into scrolling and I haven't seen a single thing that I actually care about. At least on Tumblr when I see stuff I don't care about I know someone I follow has found a new interest.
pride month!!!
Is that a miette?
Pride for you! Pride for a thousand years!!
you COME OUT to miette? you come out to her as queer? oh! oh! pride for mother! pride for mother for One Thousand Years!!!!
tbh a lot of my advice boils down to “hey you know that terrible horrible looming thing you’re doing your best to avoid and distract and escape as much as possible but no matter what you do it just keeps looming and looming and ruining your life”
“just, fuckign, run straight at it screaming.”
i needed this as a background
(some guy on the internet voice) it's so unrealistic and forced when women win fights against men in stories. of course, when a young boy defeats a huge man I'm cheering and screaming because it is so badass, and when a frail old man defeats a cocky young warrior I feel nothing but satisfaction. I love these power fantasies about easily dispatching people who underestimate you, a thing I desire despite the fact that I will likely never have the skill to achieve it in real life, but I'm pretty sure women don't have that same desire, and even if they do, they shouldn't get to see it in media. because it's so unrealistic, you see. I mean I'm smart enough to know I can't take down a big man in a fight but the women, you know, they'll get ideas. I could probably do it if I trained hard enough, but the women??? for some reason I can't see it happening, and who can say why that is.
You listen to music regularly? Why? Have you even tried quitting? Could you quit? You get music stuck in your head? Wow. You're so ruined and music brained. I bet you make your partners listen to music with you when you have sex. Music addiction has really ruined a whole generation. You know it's not realistic to expect reverb in real life, right? You're probably so desensitized that you don't even feel anything anymore when you hear a bird singing that it wants some fuck.
I don't have a problem with people listening to music per se, but I do have a problem with the music industry exploiting & mistreating artists.
Personally, I abstain from all music in order to keep my hands clean but really music should just be illegal outright to protect musicians from abuse.
holy shit this person in the notes
Wang and Lai (2014)
i love writing out numbers and then putting them in parentheses like "one (1)" even when i dont need to i think its funny
oh hell yes an open askbox. builds a nest in it
Aw man I can't remove that bc of the migratory blogger treaty act of 1918. very well.
I love rebloging. It’s the adult equivalent of showing everyone the cool rock I just found.
the cambrian period was like 10 years ago
the cambrarin period was like 3 years ago
the cambrian period is TOMORROW!!!
“Ghosts are real” I can see how you could believe that
“Ghosts aren’t real” it’s very fair and rational that you believe that
“Ghosts aren’t real anymore” I’m about to hear a poem or very sad story
“Ghosts aren’t real yet” the fuck are you going to do
i love the idea of tags "passing peer review" when they get appended to a post by a later reblog, but i'm also spiraling thinking about what actual tag peer-review would look like
come with me on this terrible journey
you see a funny post, let's say it's a picture of a bird in a silly pose. you append the tags: "#me when i smoke weed" and hit post
the post is sent to tumblr's Managing Editor for Bird Posts, who is probably an expert in bird posting. the editor reviews your tags to see if they are sufficiently related to Bird Posts to be included on this bird post. if not, your tags are rejected and you will have to apply them to some other post. let's say for the sake of this spiral that the Managing Editor for Bird Posts thinks your tags are funny and a good fit for the Bird Posts community
the Managing Editor for Bird Posts DMs a few other people in the bird posting community to ask them to review your tags. most of them say 'no, i don't have the time, ask somebody else' because they are busy making bird posts. after a month, your tags land in the lap of two or three people (let's say you get two) who have both the time and the inclination to review your post. they are probably grad students. the Managing Editor for Bird Posts says, "you have two weeks to review this post."
the bird posters - your actual peers - review your tags. one of them thinks, "that's pretty funny." they tell the Managing Editor for Bird Posts that your tags should be accepted as-is. the other reviewer - it's always Reviewer #2 - looks at your tags and raises an eyebrow. they have never smoked weed, so they do some research. how do people who have smoked a weed act? do they make a silly pose? how do they talk about smoking weed? this is taking a long time, so they ask for an extension on the review, which the Managing Editor grants. after a month, they send a response back to the Managing Editor for Bird Posts saying, "these tags could be a valuable contribution to the Bird Posting community, however based on a long list of publications which I will include in the references, the authors should reframe the tags into the passive voice and utilize more precise weed-smoking terminology for better cross-disciplinary reach. I recommend to accept these tags with major revisions."
The Managing Editor for Bird Posts looks at these reviews, compiles them, and sends them back to you anonymized. You are given two weeks to incorporate the changes to your tags and resubmit.
You really want to post your funny weed joke, so you do some additional research into proper weed-smoking terminology. You modify your tags to say, "#me when i'm zooted out of my gourd". You write a six-page document explaining exactly how you responded to every one of Reviewer #2's criticisms, being extremely deferential and showing much gratitude for their pointing out all your mistakes. It takes you way more than two weeks to do this, so you have to message the Managing Editor for Bird Posts and humbly ask for an extension. Finally, you resubmit your new, funnier tags and your Response to Reviewers to the editor.
The editor again skims the documents before passing them along to the original reviewers to re-review. Reviewer #1, who had no problems with your original tags, raises their eyebrows at how persnickety Reviewer #2 was being, then once again recommend your tags be posted as-is. Reviewer #2 reads both your response and your new tags in detail. They are mostly mollified. They send back a response to the editor saying, "The new tags are much improved. I have one small additional edit, which is to remove the apostrophe in "i'm" for greater relatability. Otherwise, I recommend acceptance." The Managing Editor for Bird Posts again passes these reviews on to you.
You remove the apostrophe and resubmit a third time. The Managing Editor for Bird Posts accepts your tags. They are then sent off to the proofreading and typesetting department of tumblr, who somehow manage to find something wrong with every single word you've written. You accept all their changes because you're very tired.
Four months after you wrote your tags on the funny bird post, your reblog is posted with the funnier tags that Reviewer #2 pushed you to draft, "#me when im zooted out of my gourd."
Your funny post receives 30 likes and 5 reblogs and then sinks into obscurity forever.
so, little vent under the cut
shot in the HEAD. and you're to blame. You are not good. At dart game