h
sheepfilms

No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
NASA

if i look back, i am lost
YOU ARE THE REASON
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
𓃗
ojovivo

tannertan36
★

Origami Around
occasionally subtle
noise dept.

roma★

Kiana Khansmith
Mike Driver

izzy's playlists!
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Belarus

seen from Malaysia

seen from Peru
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from India

seen from South Korea
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Saudi Arabia
@and-use-the-snail-fork
⚪️ afab (assigned female at birth)
⚪️ amab (assigned male at birth)
🔘 acab (assigned catboy after banishment)
Taika Waititi as Blackbeard / Edward Teach in Our Flag Means Death, s1e5
My GIF masterlist
What I want for Pride Month
@bogeymangrandy I’m sorry - I know it’s prolly bad Tumblr etiquette to address a reply in a whole new post, but this is kind of too big an answer to address in the space a reply offers.
So the weird, shitty unchecked racist stuff isn’t JUST contained to episode 5. In episode 3, Izzy says Ed “was a wild dog, and we dealt with him like one.” It’s to set up the “doggy heaven” line, which is doing some heavy lifting in terms of conveying to Izzy exactly how much Ed trusted and confided in Stede, but referring to a MOC as a dog, especially a wild one, is still fucking gross, and, worse, it’s only part of a pattern of racist sentiments. In episode 6, Izzy tells Ed “I thought you were Roach” - that old “they all look alike to me” chestnut. Thanks, I fucking loathe it.
But episode 5 is particularly packed with troublingly racist bullshit, and carries with it connotations for the wider season.
The most straight-forward is when Stede tells Izzy that Blackbeard “credited you with a lot of his skills,” and then “you taught him everything he knows.” If it’s meant to be read as true, it’s attributing all the talent, skill, and brilliance of a MOC to some white dude. But even if it’s meant to be read as Stede flattering Izzy to get what he wants out of him (which I think it is - the whole thing with the fog in season 1 episode 4 kind of hinges on Ed having knowledge and skills that Izzy does not), it’s still not great because it means Stede thinks stroking some mediocre white guy’s ego is worth more than Ed’s reputation, which means he learned nothing from the tavern scene in season 1 episode 10 where he similarly disparages Ed’s reputation for the gratification of his white compatriots.
Similarly, consider him shouting “those fucking barbarians!” after the mostly POC (and Pete) crew rip his red coat, and compare to “You savages!” in season 1 episode 2 when Stede thinks the indigenous people who have captured him have roasted Wellington and Hornberry on a spit. But at least in season 1 Stede gets rightfully called out for being a racist. Season 2 has yet to push back.
Then, there’s the portrayal of retributive justice (the idea that, for justice to be served, a transgressor has to be punished). We start the episode with Ed in his penitence onesie and cat bell. And there is that whole Biblical connotation of sackcloth as an expression of humility, but it also calls to mind the ill-fitted and low-quality material of prison uniforms, with the cat bell as a low-tech ankle monitor, uncomfortably tight and alerting everyone to his position at all times. I’ve seen his non-pology framed as a corporate “apology” and I do think that’s mostly what they’re going for here, but there’s also an element of the preformative penitence that prisoners are forced to undergo during parole hearings. This is Ed being punished for his Kraken-era transgressions.
Now compare to how Izzy, a white dude, has been offered rehabilitative justice this season - never had to grovel, never had to debase himself, never even had to offer a single word of apology for any of the dire shit he inflicted on the crew in season 1, but was nonetheless given the unconditional support and resources he needed to transform into essentially a completely different person.
It’s not just the races of the people upon whom these different modes of justice are being implemented that is significant - it’s also the races of the aggrieved parties in how they respond to the “justice” imparted by the retributive model, because we also see two direct, individual applications of retributive justice in the episode; Ed offering Lucius to push him overboard, and Fang describing how he brutalized Ed’s body after Jim knocked him unconscious. With Lucius, we see that he experiences a momentary thrill of vengeance, but almost immediately it flares out, and he’s still just as traumatized as before, and perhaps even more obsessed with Ed. Clearly, for him, a white dude, this primitive, Hamurabian form of justice does not give him closure. With Fang, a MOC, it’s the exact opposite - Ed terrorized him, he beat Ed up, and now they’re sweet.
In isolation, this wouldn’t read as implying that white people are more “civilized” and “evolved” than POC - except all the other POC that Kraken!Ed tormented are also seemingly fine now. Jim and Archie are immediately laughing and joking about torture after the non-pology, and Frenchie is debuting a new fancy cat flag and pointing out that “at least he’s wearing the sack” when Lucius starts freaking out about Blackbeard being back. There’s also a running through-line across several episodes about the supremacy of white, colonial values and civility, but I’ll get back to that in just a moment.
Because now we have to talk about the matter of the curse. Because, again, we’re seeing a break-down across racial lines. Team Curse is Jim, Archie, Olu, Frenchie, Roach, and token white guy Pete (the Swede having abandoned the crew for his new paramore, Buttons having transmogrified, Lucius busy being traumatized elsewhere, and Wee John just MIA). Team “Curses aren’t real” is Izzy and Stede. So this isn’t like season 1 where everyone is just kinda hilariously science illiterate and superstitious (like with the “not a mermaid” conversation) - instead, we’ve got a group of superstitious POC vs. the rational, enlightened White Dudes. And the White Dudes are unequivocally correct. Peanuts ARE a serious allergen (and a legume, not a bean). Yeast is what causes bread to rise, not fairies. Ergo curses AREN’T real, and the crew are being irrational. So when Stede relents at the end and agrees to give up his suit, it’s not him conceding that there is validity to his POC crew’s worldview - it’s a white dude condescending to the poor, simple-minded, uncivilized folk even though he’s for sure in the right. Isn’t that just SO magnanimous of him? Isn’t it awfully white of him?
And given that the White view is the Right view in episode 5, we have to start interrogating the other places where that idea shows up. In episode 1, we hear a white priest bloviating about how "The natural condition of humanity is base and vile. It is the obligation of people of standing, such as yourselves, to elevate the common human rabble through the sacred transaction of matrimony.” Normally (and at the time when I first watched it) I would clock this as CRITICAL of the tendency of predominantly white cultures to be self-congratulatory of how THEIR ceremonies are so much more CIVILIZED than those of the savage - as though they invented the concepts of commitment and monogamy, and as though those concepts are inherently better than the alternatives. But then we have Ed, a MOC, issuing an objection - not to the specific union, but to the concept of a nice, white wedding in general, followed by a raid that Jim later comments on: “Is it just me or was the wedding thing a bit over the line?”
And, consider, in season 1 episode 3, Jim drops this line on Olu when he points out that Jim killed one of Jackie’s husbands: “We live in a state of nature.” So the “natural condition” is intrinsically tied up with that hyper-violent pirate lifestyle, and if even one of the practitioners thereof is clocking it as “a bit over the line” - does it not follow that the bloviating priest was RIGHT? That the white man sure DOES have that burden to take up, doesn’t he?
Which is exactly what Ricky is proposing in his little speech in episode 6: "It's up to us fine gentlemen to stand up against this modern piracy and stay vigilant". And we KNOW that Ricky is full of shit. We KNOW that he’s backing up his racist agenda with a self-serving, revisionist narrative. But maybe it would be better if he also didn’t, maybe, have a point? I guess what I’m saying is that I really miss the days when a racist got a knife through the hand or their ship burned down and it was something to be celebrated, and that I’m not loving the idea this season that maybe the racists are kind of in the right.
How OFMD Characters Would Fare When It's Their Night to Cook - An Exhaustive List No One Asked For
Inspired by this poll.
*Note: I have both worked professionally in kitchens and do most of the cooking in my home. My opinions are infallible and correct, deal with it.
Stede - Disaster. Goes in with his classic overconfidence. Thinks he doesn't need a recipe because he's been eating all his life, he knows what good food is supposed to taste like! Has no concept of cleaning as he goes so at the end of the night there's an apocalyptic load of dishes in the sink.
Ed - Different kind of disaster. Gets hyperfocused on trying to recreate one recipe he vaguely remembers, stresses when he doesn't have the right ingredients. Results actually aren't too bad but because it doesn't align with his vision he self-sabotages while serving, warning everyone it's probably shit while also making it very clear he will start crying if anyone agrees with him.
Jim - Goes in with confidence because it's just food, how hard can it be? Realizes quickly that it's way harder than they thought but refuses to admit they're in over their head and ask for help. Foulest language you've ever heard emerging from the kitchen for over an hour before they emerge with something that they sling wordlessly onto the table and storm off to throw knives.
Ed's Kraken tattoo redesign?!
Just noticed they did a pretty big redesign of Ed's upper arm octopus... that I haven't seen anyone comment on.
it's hard to say for certain because I haven’t been able to get a better image from season 1, but while they switched up the tentacles a bit, at least the skull part looks like it could be a somewhat plausible cover-up of / addition to the original sweet octopus head that Ed might have had done as the Kraken... (even though it doesn't look fresh 🤫)
What's everyone's interpretation?
You can catch a glimpse of the skull while Ed is getting tortured in s02e06, so it isn't just some weird gravy basket exclusive symbolism
i swear that the feeling of spotting something noone in the fandom has commented before on is the same feeling that academics die for (by staying at uni. or maybe they just simply hate themselves idk) XD
irritating as fuck when people get mad at Black people existing in premodern historical fiction/fantasy media. like first of all, you're racist. and second of all, you are acting as though Black people didn't exist in premodern Europe which is simply false. especially when we're talking about the Mediterranean, like what the fuck do you people think is along the southern half of the Mediterranean Ocean?? everyone's on boats, there are GOING to be interactions with Black people in Northern Africa, and there are GOING to be Black people in Mediterranean Europe. stop being stupid. your imagined homogeneous white European past is not historical reality, get over it you massive losers
….North Africans aren’t black though? they’re Arabs and Berbers. there’s a whole Sahara desert between North Africa and black people.
there were absolutely black people in medieval Europe; mostly because of East African slaves being traded up through the Levant and into Venice and Genoa. you’re making a correct statement. but your argument is wrong.
nope! 1) people can and did travel and we in fact have quite a bit of medieval Arabic literature from North Africa that includes Black people (see, for instance, Rachel Schine's recent book Black Knights: Arabic Epic and the Making of Medieval Race). 2) you seem to have forgotten about the existence of Ethiopia, which has one of the oldest Christian communities in the world, and which was a major node on the trade networks between Rome and India, and is also a place where Black people are and historically have been. 3) we have both archaelogical and written evidence of Black people in early medieval England, in medieval Scandinavia, in monasteries, and certainly in the south of Europe/Mediterranean like al-Andalus, the Roman Empire, the Byzantine Empire, etc., who were NOT, in fact, all slaves. 4) bringing up the FICTIONAL Arthurian romance character Feirefiz in the tags as an example of medieval Europeans not knowing what Black people are is just frankly laughable. like, are you gonna argue that we should also take the King of Tars as representative of what real people knew about Black people? or can you, perhaps, understand that fiction is not representative of reality? like obviously white European medieval FICTIONAL ROMANCES are going to have terrible racial politics for the most part, but that doesn't mean they didn't know what Black people were???? Premodern Critical Race Studies is a vibrant field, from which more and more scholarship emerges every year, and which I think you should do some reading in before showing your ignorance on here.
this romanticised little robot holding a brush 🤣 the "little robot" aside, it should be depicted stealing the human painter's canvas and in the next step displaying it and selling as its own work
stede was struggling emotionally with doing harm to the lemon that ed drew a face on a couple of days ago so he had to hand ed the knife and while ed was slicing he tried making stede feel better with a whole narrative abt how the lemon had lived a full life and decided it was time to surrender itself to the cycle of nature and by the time they show up at the potluck they are hours deep into a conversation that the rest of the crew now has to be subjected to as well about how all the different fruits might conceptualize the afterlife
"There's no thought crimes and no thought heroisms" is honestly such a good piece of life advice.
You could be having the most fucked up problematic thoughts 24/7 but if you treat people with kindness, the good you do is the only thing that matters. But if you have only the purest thoughts and all the correct beliefs, it doesn't matter one bit if you spend most of your time being an asshole to people.
#fandom needs this one
God there really is a Terry Pratchett quote for everything
Another philosophical banger from the author that brought us personal is not the same as important.
The Catalan Discworld edition is the best edition ever and you won't change my mind...
LOOK HOW PRETTY THEY ARE!!!
Happy 25th of May everyone
When are you guys going to realize that Ed's line in season 1 "I don't have any friends" was just him being a little dramatic and also devastated from the situation in that scene? Even excluding Jack and Izzy from the discussion (if we must), he clearly defines Anne and Mary as his friends!
Does he, though?
The thing is, it comes up twice. It's not just in s1e6 when Ed is so upset (though his meaning is perfectly clear, I don't just think it's him being dramatic - he doesn't think he has anyone he can actually trust with secrets like how he killed his dad). Jack also very explicitly does not consider Ed a friend (he's genuinely shocked and laughs at Ed for calling Stede his friend. "Pirates don't have friends, we're all just in various stages of fucking each other over!"). I don't think this is just a case of Ed being dramatic because it's reinforced for us over and over that piracy is not a culture where you get to have friends.
As for Anne and Mary...yeah, mate, honestly I don't think he'd consider them his friends, either. Don't get me wrong, he likes them! They have a history together and they enjoy each other's company. But it's along the same lines as Calico Jack, still. They are not confidantes for Ed. They are people he has a history with and whose company he enjoys, but their relationship isn't one of friendship - it's emotionally stunted, unavailable, more focused on getting a rise out of Ed than anything else. Like Jack, they have ulterior motives that completely ignore Ed's comfort and wants, instead trying to manipulate him and Stede for their own entertainment. They do not treat each other like friends and I think it's a hell of an assumption to say Ed would define them as his friends.
I don't think there's any reason to take Ed's statement that he doesn't have friends as him just being dramatic, and given that it's reinforced in s2e8, I can't imagine it was meant to be taken that way. Maybe in some other profession, Ed would have considered all the people he worked with his friends, but it's not the case in this one, and that's very much the point.
My trap card has been activated.
So Calico Jack as a character exists to serve exactly four functions.
First Function: Give insight into Ed's backstory. We know quite a bit about what Stede was doing, now we have to figure out what Ed was up to between the childhood flashbacks and now. Enter Calico.
Second function: To put having sex with Ed on the table as an option for Stede during that piss scene
Third Function: To do a love triangle and create drama which lures Ed away from Stede so he can make the big sacrifice by running back at the end of the episode. Jack needs to come in and do this specifically because no character so far has been introduced with the emotional sway over Ed to pull this off.
and finally, the one relevant to this conversation: To establish that Ed was telling the truth when he says he doesn't have any friends.
Jack is there to be the exception that proves the rule. Jack introduces himself as a friend in the opening scene. he behaves in a best bros way through out the whole episode. He establishes that he was Ed's main confidant during the Hornigold era. That they bonded through shared adversity, that he knows things about Ed that even Stede doesn't know, that he's saved Ed's life, presumably at at least some risk to himself the way they talk about it. They craft this bestie for Ed specifically to have him say at the end of the episode "What do you mean he's your friend, what kind of pirate has a friend, we're all just in various stages of fucking each other over" and prove Ed right.
Now, do I, known Calico Jack apologist, think that Jack does think of them as friends and just doesn't like to admit it? yes I do. Do I think that that changes how Ed feels about their relationship? absolutely not. Ed defines friends as someone you can be emotionally open and vulnerable with. A safe space to be yourself.
Izzy does not fit that description
Jack does not fit that description
And Anne and Mary certainly do not fit that description
but basically, this is the whole point of Jack. Piracy is loanly and rough and makes you into kind of an asshole because you're not allowed to have friends. It's why he's there. to specifically look Anon and ever viewer in the face and say "Ed was not lying two episodes ago, pirates don't have friends" because if anyone was Ed's friend it's Jack and he specifically disowns that title.
i always think of ed’s claim in 1.06 that he doesn’t actually have any friends to be true in the same way as his claim that he hasn’t personally killed anyone since murdering his father—both statements are, technically, not actually strictly true, not in the way most people would define “friend” or “personally committing murder,” but both statements are true for how ed as a character thinks and feels. in a way, he is melodramatically exaggerating in the bathtub scene, but the exaggeration is really just ed revealing very vulnerable and very real emotions, ones that he crucially hasn’t shared with anyone else, ever.
most people would consider lighting a ship on fire while the crew’s trapped inside to be killing people, but for ed it’s important that he makes that distinction because he has very complicated and trauma-informed feelings around violence, and yet he is immersed in a career and a culture that necessitates violence. this personal rule that he always outsources the big job is how he copes w the necessity of committing violence—he gives himself a line he won’t cross. which is weird, for a pirate, and especially for fuckin blackbeard. that’s why the specifics of ed’s confession dont rlly matter: yes, technically ed has been directly responsible for people’s deaths in the years since murdering his dad. but ed is not really confessing to not being a murderer, he’s confessing to being hung up on the fact that he is a murderer. he’s confessing to having feelings that conflict with his blackbeard persona. he’s confessing to being a very scared, very vulnerable person under all the leather and bravado
similarly, when it comes to friendship, the fact is that ed does have relationships that most people would consider friendships. not particularly healthy friendships, and definitely not friendships that are rich in emotional intimacy, but he has people he likes hanging out with and who he’s excited to run into unexpectedly. he has people he can shoot the shit with, so long as the shit doesn’t get too deep or too personal. for most people, ed’s definition of “friend” is their definition of “best friend,” but that doesn’t actually make ed’s claim that he has no friends any less true. this statement comes right on the heels of tearfully confessing to stede that he killed his own dad, that he hasn’t killed anyone since, that he believes he’s a bad person. the point of “i don’t have any friends” isn’t that ed is forgetting about jack, annie, or mary in this moment, the point is that there is nobody in the world who knows those things about ed—the patricide, the complicated feelings around violence, the belief that he’s a bad person—and still likes him. those are ed’s deepest insecurities, and there is nobody in the world who he feels safe to confide those feelings to. that’s lonely.
i find it so fascinating that in 2.04, ed seems to contradict himself a bit—after the disastrous dinner party, stede says “a lot of your friends are very troubled,” and ed doesn’t protest stede’s assertion that annie and mary are his friends. he simply states that all his friends are pirates, hence why they’re so troubled. i find this fascinating bc i don’t actually think this is ed contradicting himself, i think this is ed and stede both using the word “friend” to describe a different relationship than the one ed was describing in the 1.06 bathtub scene.
stede is ed’s friend, going by the 1.06 definition of friend and not the 2.04 definition. stede is a person who knows ed’s vulnerabilities and secrets, knows ed better than anyone else in the world, and likes ed not despite these facts, but who accepts these facts as simply another facet to ed. and it’s crazy to me how in this scene in 2.04 after the party, after a whole episode of ed being snarky and angry at stede, they know each other well enough to both be on the same page about what stede means when he says “friends.” ed knows this isn’t stede poking holes in his confession, this isn’t stede trying to catch ed in a lie. he knows that stede knows that the friendship he has with annie and mary—secret handshakes and smoking weed and intentionally riling him up for their own amusement—is a different sort of friendship than what he and stede were talking about when ed was curled up in stede’s bathtub, coming down from a PTSD flashback. the fact that they both know this, that there’s and understanding that is going unspoken, is why stede is ed’s only friend in the 1.06 sense of the word.
making silly stuff