🪼
art blog(derogatory)
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Cosmic Funnies
pixel skylines
The Bright Sessions
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Keni
Show & Tell
Jimmy Eat World
ojovivo
YOU ARE THE REASON
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
blake kathryn
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Phantogram Three
Today's Document
Game Changer & Make Some Noise
hello vonnie
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Guernsey
seen from Bahrain
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Canada
seen from New Zealand
seen from Germany
seen from TĂĽrkiye
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
@antiquatedantipathy
Thought Project: Relapse [pt 1] [pt 2] [pt 3] [pt 4] [pt 5]
Final Installment of Thought Project: Relapse is available here.
All those not paying for Patreon can still readily access this on ko-fi here: https://ko-fi.com/s/7042f546b1
Note: All proceeds from this item on ko-fi go to fundraise for those suffering in Gaza. Please consider paying more or donating directly to  https://www.unrwa.org/ if you can afford it.
There’s a certain folkloric idea that if you die at sea, your soul is sort of. Inextricably stuck in the sea. Because your body is irretrievable, your soul is also irretrievable, down out of the reach of the gods who look at the surface of the world. In Norse mythology, they said that the souls of sailors who died at sea are caught in the sea-goddess Rán’s net and dragged into her domain, a distinct and separate afterlife alongside Hel and Valhalla. Davy Jones Locker. The funayūrei. A lot of cultures agree that once sea has a hold on you, even when your body has rotted and dwindled and been made food for crabs, it still won’t let you go.
Do you think we’re going to wind up saying the same thing about astronauts.
you may have noticed that my blog is disorganized and thematically incoherent and my tag game is weaker by the day. this is commentary on the chaos of modern existence
we need more fucked up deancas and we should start with the fact that cas is often eerily reminiscent of john winchester
dark hair, 5-o’-clock shadow, bright blue eyes, big coat. intense and single-minded. military background, trouble adjusting to civilian life. randomly disappears and reappears as he wants to. emotionally distant, except when he’s not. genuine praise from him sets off fireworks in the reward section of dean’s brain. and so on
dean wouldn’t call a man “daddy” with a gun to his head but sometimes when cas tells him to get on your knees in that sorta mean way, dean reflexively responds yessir. and really what’s the difference
You omit the Oxford comma and those last two items in the list start lookin kinda gay. Like why are you two standing so close together
Sam, Dean and Cas
dean in his little Mint Condition outfit being attacked by a chainsaw ♥
I actually do think it’s better for abusers and abusive characters to realize the harm their past actions caused and seek to do better than be literally or metaphorically executed for their crimes
I think it’s better for abusers and abusive characters to realize the harm their past actions caused and seek to do better than be literally or metaphorically executed for their crimes.
I think it’s better for abusers and abusive characters to realize the harm their past actions caused and seek to do better than be literally or metaphorically executed for their crimes.
Reading comprehension test:
1. Does OP mention an obligation on victims to forgive abusers who have learned from their past actions?
2. Does OP mention any work on the part of victims to educate their abusers?
3. Is there any mention of “redemption” or “forgiveness” at all in this post?
Something about how society cares more about punishing the wicked than about making the world a better place, and how many people really struggle to shake that.
the fact that "eco" and "ethical" are two separate concerns in the global north, and that "eco" is a much more popular concern, with many "eco" products being made in actual sweatshops, is a big part of why i am The Joker
if you think this is an exaggeration or splitting hairs where it doesn't matter:
i used to work at a Local Organic Produce store that's popular with the lefties in my city who are interested in food justice. i quit for a lot of reasons, mostly the boss, but something i will always remember is one of our suppliers coming in to drop off produce, being told her check wasn't ready, and her laughing and responding it didn't matter -- even a low bank account was more than enough to pay the migrants who picked her produce. i am not filling in any blanks here. she said this.
after quitting, this was a common story i told people about my time there. some then became annoyed at me, acting like i was a wokescold trying to undermine the store's "eco" mission with unrelated "ethical" concerns. but, like -- if food justice isn't for the people making food, who the fuck is it for?
like, don't get me wrong. my contention here is that the things go hand in hand, and that something which is unethical isn't actually eco. after all, humans are a part of the fucking ecosystem, and if a product can only be made by unsustainably exploiting humans, then it's unsustainable. doesn't matter which chemicals were used in making it, or whether or not animals were factory farmed.
they *cannot* be separated. a product cannot be either eco or ethical — it must be both. a product that is made through human suffering cannot be eco for the reasons you said; a product that causes human suffering by contributing to the destruction of the ecosystem cannot be ethical. it must be both and we must insist on both
when another man asks you on a date and you’re a supposedly straight man would you say “sorry man i’m straight” or would you say “ITS A AA FEDeral inVESTIGATION” and then trip over a table
Alternate timeline in which all Greek and Latin roots are swapped:
catastrophe -> contraverse cephalopod -> capitoped chlorophyll -> viridofolia democracy -> populimpery homicide -> anthropoctony homosexual -> equigamic kilometer -> millimensure interregnum -> mesarchy magnanimous -> megapsychic manuscript -> chirography motorcycle -> ergatorote microscope -> parvovisor oxygen -> acidofex polyamory -> multierasty television -> remotoscope universe -> monostrophe
i’m an angel. i can stop anytime i want.
#Cas also thinks this way about his urges around dean lol#give that angel internalised homophobia or whatever#make him tortured and in love hehe via @jasmineintheforest
for sale: Baby Shoes Stylish Infant Boy Girl Unisex First Walker Shoes Toddler Walking Crib Shoes Lightweight Non-Slip Sneakers For 6 9 12 18 24 Months Baby Shoes New With Tags New In Box Excellent Condition Never Worn
i would kill for the confidence of novelists who write genius-poet characters and then actually write samples of the “genius” poetry in the book. if i were a novelist writing a genius-poet i’d just be like “trust me, the poetry’s real good.”
my notifications are once again devolving into a spirited debate about the ethics of actions that could potentially make someone uncomfortable, and at risk of sounding like someone about to get a lot of irate anons I think we're frankly giving way too to much moral weight to hypothetical discomfort
the thing about discomfort is that it's an extremely nebulous category that can be triggered by virtually anything and that's far too broad a category to have any inherent moral quality to it. like. my mom was mad uncomfortable when I stopped shaving. that didn't mean I was doing violence against my mom it just meant she needed to get over herself. many such cases it must be said.
there's not a single example I could give that's better than this
I FOUND IT. this THIS photo. nun footwear and women’s hooker shoes. this is all you need to see to understand supernatural and women.
never take for granted the moments when you’re not nauseous
