"I'm a socialist, I just oppose every real world socialist project" has to be right up there with "I support palestine, I just oppose every concrete action palestinians take towards liberation" as laughable political standpoints

⁂

oozey mess

Janaina Medeiros

#extradirty
One Nice Bug Per Day
hello vonnie

Origami Around
KIROKAZE
Keni
art blog(derogatory)
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Xuebing Du

Andulka

Discoholic 🪩

★
AnasAbdin
ojovivo

No title available
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from Poland

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Russia

seen from Cambodia
seen from Germany
seen from Philippines
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Russia

seen from South Korea

seen from Nepal

seen from United States
@artofthepossible1871
"I'm a socialist, I just oppose every real world socialist project" has to be right up there with "I support palestine, I just oppose every concrete action palestinians take towards liberation" as laughable political standpoints
Note to self: According to 2nd/3rd hand information about the Old World (thusly simplified), grain promotes patriarchy and rice promotes matriarchy.
This becomes particularly curious when one considers the population numbers of rice-producing reigions, and what historians are able to extrapolate for their historical population numbers.
I learned a very long time ago that I could post in English on the Anglo internet about my experience as a sexual minority in the #middleeastandnorthafrica region. I could vent about every slight or slur, every indiscretion, all the doors that might not have closed in my face had I not been who I am. But that all it would do is earn me a seat at a table half the world away, a seat that I would lose the second I said “but my people are still human. But we are Arab women before we are queer women. But we are muslim before we are trans women. But we are imperialised subjects of the periphery before we are bisexuals. But we are ‘combat-aged males’ before we are gay men and boys.” A seat that I could only keep if I show a willingness to betray my people. And I will not. I do not want it. The price is too steep and the value too low.
I have come to know now that this western voraciousness for our stories was never an impulse born out of empathy; it has always been little more than a gathering of intel, of reasons to hate us and to justify the destruction of our bodies and the pillaging of our lands and the looting of our resources. So I no longer see the utility in being one more primary source for the proverbial NYT opinion editorial manufacturing consent for the latest campaign of imperial slaughter in my backyard on account of our inherent backwardness.
off topic maybe but the reason human trafficking conspiracy theories are so far removed from reality is actual human trafficking operates in a way that is more socially acceptable than most want to acknowledge. there is an overlap of "human trafficking victim" and "adult or child whose wellbeing is more likely to be disregarded by law enforcement and peers alike"
Got it in one.
reading a historical romance novel and reflecting on the way these stories often present woke nobility for the contemporary reader. a big thing is servants. you can’t not have servants in those times but many modern readers think “but I would never have servants. it would be so weird to have servants” and in order to make the protagonists of the story more relatable they are actually friends with the servants. but flip your perspective and think of it from the side of the servants. wouldn’t it be so awful if your boss was always trying to be friends with you. a really common thing you’ll see is the woke baronet having tea in the kitchen with the servants bc he’s not like other baronets. but what if your boss wanted to hang out and talk during your lunch break every day. not so charming when you think about it that way
there's a scene in RWBY which i feel we don't appreciate enough.
namely, the confrontation between RWBY and Salem in volume 7.
i loved the scene. i did not fully appreciate the scene until 5 min ago.
like, salem is going for max intimidation here. and then this little fucking seventeen-year-old nuisance out intimidates her with "we don't need to kill you to stop you. and we will stop you."
salem's immediate response? a yo-mama comment. zero hesitation. instant psychic damage.
it's just. so funny. immortal woman beefing with a seventeen-year-old. immortal woman dealing out a "yo mama" card so good it instantly triggers a breakdown.
recalling a twenty year old experiment
Twenty years ago, a sociologist of science called Harry Collins tried out an experiment. He had been researching the community of physicists who worked on gravity waves for the preceding two decades, trying to get insight into standards of proof and how experimental results were reconciled and interpreted. In furtherance of this project, he had been attending gravity waves conferences, where he was a familiar figure and had lots of friends in the community (because he talked to lots of people, physicists often sought him out to get gossip and news on what other labs were doing and seeing). The experiment was a sort of Turing test – one group of physicists came up with a list of half a dozen questions about gravity waves, and then sent them by email to both Collins and a physicist, with instructions just to answer them from general knowledge rather than looking anything up. A jury of other physicists were then given the job of deciding which set of answers had come from Collins, and which from the physicist. And all but one of the judges identified the sociologist as the physicist. Although extremely funny, this wasn’t actually meant as a practical joke; it was meant to test a serious hypothesis about expertise. Harry Collins theorised that there was a thing called “interactional expertise” (basically the ability to hold a sensible and useful conversation about a subject) which was distinct from “contributory expertise” (he didn’t actually even know enough maths to do gravity wave physics). Deep interaction with a knowledge base and literature could provide one, but it wasn’t the same thing as actually working within the field.
Callin it "Poster's Expertise"
The parachute study is actually a wonderful piece of art because it demonstrates so succinctly the kind of situation where randomized controlled trials are not the gold standard of evidence, and in fact reach misleading conclusions.
Because you can't recruit people to willingly jump out of mid-flight passenger planes for science, you redesign the study to engineer a scenario where the risk to the control group is minimsed. The plane is landed.
And then, because you've removed the main reason to use a parachute, you find that parachutes have "no effect" on mortality or injury.
The constraints of performing an ethical RCT guarantee this result. A result that we obviously know is dangerously wrong to extrapolate to the real-life uses of parachutes.
Now here's the thing: The people insisting that "evidence-based medicine" says we need RCTs of trans healthcare know this is what they're doing. It's extremely well established that you can abuse these "standards" to engineer incorrect results.
SEGM and their ilk are doing this on purpose because they know it's an effective way to dress up science denial in a veneer of scientific rigor.
Re:Zero analysis - Subaru’s Femininity & Genderqueerness
Natsuki Subaru’s expression of femininity within Re:Zero is almost always either fetishized or hated, in both cases usually trivialized, reduced to “Tappei’s fetish” more often than not. It’s a heavily misunderstood topic that definitely deserves more clarification. Yes, crossdressing has always been a hobby of Subaru’s, but it’s always been much more than that, since it is an expression of his femininity, a part of himself. He had always struggled with it and it spiraled into heavy gender issues, which made a heavy impact in how he wants to be seen.
It is important to mention that Tappei gives a great deal of importance to the names of his characters, them being a big part of their identity, as shown through the relevance of Sin Archbishops, Witches, etc. being named after stars, how they relate to their place in the world and their characteristics, but also shown through Gluttony’s power, in how having your name stolen means having your identity forgotten by the world.
Tappei purposefully chose “Subaru”, yes, in big part due to lore related reasons for sure, especially since it is the name of a star cluster, but it is also explicitly a gender neutral name, being used for both boys and girls. This is even explicitly brought up in the “My Fair Bad Lady” Side Story, and even further grounded in the Mimagau IF, where every genderbent character had their name altered except for Subaru and Roswaal (who had been a woman before).
Early life
As early as LN 1, Subaru refers to his preschooler self being “quite cute”, having long hair and often mistaken for a girl, something he seems to think fondly of, saying that the passage of time is “cruel” and “unforgiving”. The phrasing directly ties in cuteness with his girly appearance, which further correlates that appearance with something he misses, along with the positive attention he had gathered. It is possible to point out the first occasion in which Subaru learnt that it's only if he’s seen that he exists.
His physical appearance is pre-school is brought up once again in LN 19, where he brings up that he had been called “Princess of the Ice”, an obviously feminine title addressed to the self who had still been often confused for a girl, being called once again “adorable”, supporting the implication that it’s something that he misses.
This is even further supported by another mention of his preschooler self, or rather, the end of his “adorable self”, calling himself “as pretty as a flower”. He does not look down upon his preschooler self once again, never saying anything negative about it— He rather says that period of his life had ended once he had his long hair cut, the manifestation of his femininity. He hadn’t wanted to be mistaken for a girl anymore, and yet he had cried a lot when he had his hair cut. After all, that long hair was part of him. Long hair is a very smart allegory for femininity, intrinsically being closely associated with it by today’s society’s standards, so having his hair, a part of his body, cut is a metaphor for him choosing to reject his feminine side, a part of his identity.
“But if he liked being feminine, why did he cut his hair?” The reason is very simple: Femininity was not what was expected of a man. Subaru’s been specifically someone who lives for external validation and acceptance, and societal gender expectations didn’t allow for a boy to have long hair. While young it would be considered cute, as he grew up, it would be considered weird, and Subaru did not want that, wanting to present himself as masculine, to become a “real man”, as per those expectations.
Hence why he also said that “nowadays, he would only feel comfortable as long as the back of his head felt jarring to the touch”, very interesting wording as “comfortable”, a positive adjective, is a direct antonym for “jarring”, a negative one. Calling the back of his hair, now short, “jarring to the touch”, even further suggests that he misses that long hair, which had been established to be an allegory for his femininity. He found comfort in something he does not like, which perfectly encapsulates his issue: In favor of expectations of being a man, he had literally cut off a part of himself. This is a topic that will be discussed later in the analysis.
Another reason would be that he grew up under Kenichi’s shadow, and being his “father’s son” had instilled a sense of superiority in him. In regards to Tappei’s method of writing, the wording used is extremely important, so it is crucial to notice that it’s not “child” that is used, but “son”. The same applies for his father. It’s not “Kenichi”, but “that man”, to the point that “Kenichi” and “man” are synonymous.
This will be brought up again later, but the point here is that “son” is a male noun, and it’s part of the identity and expectations Subaru tried his hardest to fit in the entirety of his childhood, especially when Kenichi is brought up— The personification of masculinity. Being “that man’s son” did not allow for femininity.
High School life
Long before he had gotten into high school, being “that man’s son” had become a curse to Subaru. So, with a new environment, he wanted to become something else entirely in a new world that did not see him as such… Literally.
He had taken up the part of himself he had cut off in his early childhood, the part of himself that had not been rejected, the part of himself that used to attract positive attention and validation in early youth. He wanted to escape being “that man’s son” to such a degree that he took up his femininity once more, presenting himself as a girl.
It is something he had genuinely enjoyed, and finally felt like he could enjoy school life after struggling to not stand out, to not get the attention and validation he was taught to crave throughout the entirety of middle school after the realization that he is nothing special, and out of shame, did not want that to be noticed.
It is, ironically, his high school life he rarely speaks about even in the “Parent and Child” chapter, and it’s not unintentional— It’s only that part that gets quickly glossed over, treated as something unimportant in spite of him claiming in various side stories that it had been extremely traumatizing to the point of having been a major catalyst behind dropping out. Every time he almost talks about it, he stops himself from doing so and consciously blocks the memory.
What we know is that he had enjoyed school life presenting himself as a girl for three days since the high school entrance ceremony, and on the third day, his voice had outed him as a boy, ruining everything and making him promise to himself he would never crossdress again (though it was broken). It is exactly this part that gets painfully obscured, refusing to talk about it whatsoever.
All of the context clues we have would be found in the “Natsuki Subaru’s Splendid Steward Life” SS, where he had been tricked to wear a maid outfit for an entire day. It was very interesting to read Subaru’s reaction to Emilia seeing him dressed up femininely, his inner thoughts spiraling from “Was the world out to get him?” to “He wanted to die”, “To move was death, to speak was death” and calling that situation a “fatal wound” that couldn’t be avoided.
Subaru was stated to hate wordings such as “it hurt so bad they could die” or anything of the sort that involved death, considering it an insult to the actual pain of death and death itself, something he had actually endured multiple times. And yet, he goes out of his way to compare this seemingly trivial situation to death FOUR times.
To continue, his feelings and expression were stated to start dying by the second until Emilia’s reply that did not bash him for the act of expressing his femininity in itself, but rather that the dress itself simply did not suit him, which shocked him. His immediate question was to make sure he wasn’t going to be labeled a pervert and yelled at, which I can only assume that something similar had happened in high school, judging by his reaction. Though taking into consideration his inability to reveal what happened, it’s likely something worse had occurred, especially since afterwards, he had been treated like thin air by his peers.
But in essence, the world had not responded with love to his femininity, but with rejection and disdain. The self he had considered the most pure and innocent, cut off before being tainted, was deemed unacceptable. His entirety had been rejected by society from the world, ending up thinking that maybe he shouldn’t have existed at all.
The most interesting bit about his reaction, to me, however, was his high school experience being tied together in the same line of dialogue as “Now I’ll never get to be a bride! Emilia-tan, please say we can be married!”, breaking down into tears when he questioned Emilia about it.
If you didn’t know, that line is a direct reference to the famous painting “I cannot be a bride anymore” by Yuko Tatsushima (1999), a very haunting piece of art depicting a woman in pain with a haunted and shocked look, considering herself undesirable as a bride after having her virginity, considered the groom’s prize to be taken, stolen away before marriage. It is not the first time Tappei linked Subaru to this specific painting, having done so once before in the Arc 2 WN when he had found out Emilia had changed his clothes while he slept with the implication that she had seen his naked body.
Any relevant details regarding his high school life had been relegated to side stories and Q&As and not the “Parent and Child” chapter itself considering that the whole thing was a confession to his father, and it is very likely that he did not want Kenichi to know about any of it, making this part of the chapter not 100% reliable. It is safe to assume that this event that had been blocked from his memory played a huge part in Subaru ending up stopping going to school, describing it as feeling exceptionally at ease, his school days being painful, along with wanting his parents to stop loving him, so he could be “set free”.
Appearance
In the Arc 4 WN version of the “Parent and Child” chapter, Subaru had called himself “effeminate”, even going as far as calling himself a “creature” that did not deserve to be “Kenichi’s son”, openly believing that being feminine is in his nature to the point he couldn’t call himself a man (let alone a human. Another word for “human” would be “man”, so I think it makes up for very interesting wordplay here).
In a Q&A with Tappei, he had been asked what exactly made Subaru great at wearing women’s clothing, to which Tappei replied that his gestures perfectly replicated the ideal beauty standards for a japanese woman, even bringing up the proverb for them in Japanese culture: “She is beautiful who stands charmingly like a chinese peony, sits gorgeously like a moutan peony, and walks elegantly like a lily.” Suggesting that he was not only feminine in appearance, but also in gestures. Ironically, he effortlessly fulfilled the (beauty) expectations of a woman, but struggled meeting those of a man.
To support this, just a glance at his physique had Ram convinced that he would perfectly fit into Frederica’s clothes, normal men’s clothing not fitting him at all and needing modifications. His fingers had been described as slender multiple times, an adjective usually meant for female characters’ hands, and his face had also been described as being “suitable for makeup” on multiple occasions as well.
Behavior
Subaru often displays traditionally feminine hobbies, such as sewing, embroidery and makeup, having fun designing dresses and/or decorating them, putting an emphasis on cuteness and beauty, even in IFs. His go-to patterns seem to be flower motifs, often associated with femininity.
His behavior is explicitly detached from masculinity, being quickly accepted among his female co-workers in Sloth IF for being different from all the other men and explicitly using the word “feminine” to describe him. (excuse the font…)
In the same manner, he’s accustomed to affixing feminine words to himself as a way of description, calling himself “motherly”, a “dancer girl”, “heroine” or a “girl in a knitting circle”. And naturally fitting in roles that would normally belong to women.
Struggles with traditional gender roles
The world of Re:Zero is patriarchal society where men are expected to be strong and reliable, with women relegated to support them. Multiple characters were shown to struggle in this kind of society in regards to their gender, such as Ferris, who, despite his appearance who had been described to “scream ‘girl’ at you”, at his core would rather prefer to be a masculine man, bemoaning his inability to serve as Crusch’s knight in the conventional sense, and disliking Subaru for being “weak” therefore “unmanly”, seeing the traits he sees in himself being reflected in Subaru, or Crusch, who had thrown away her femininity in order to take up the sword and her family.
To get back to the main point, in the world of Re:Zero, Subaru falls within stereotypically feminine roles, especially in the roles of being a support when he wishes to define himself as someone who “protects” or “attacks”, a traditionally masculine role, completely unsuited to him. This, ironically, is shown with his Authorities, who shape themselves after the user’s nature.
Sloth: For Petelgeuse, it’s very strong; A danger. But for Subaru, he can only summon one, it’s very weak, and when used offensively, it has major consequences. But when used in moments of comfort when his own hands can’t reach, such as patting Joseph or wiping Beatrice’s tears, there was no considerable setback.
Greed: For Regulus, his Authority was so powerful and self-serving, it put him as one of the strongest characters in the story, someone not even Reinhard would be able to defeat by himself. Yet, for Subaru, it has no offensive potential, being an incredibly supportive ability instead, being able to take and share emotional, mental or physical burden from and to consenting allies, allowing Subaru to detect their location and their emotional states. With a big enough number, he could even make a near invincible army as long as he keeps himself awake, and on the other side of the coin, it has no use when he’s by himself.
To further highlight this, his love interest, Emilia, is the total opposite, easily performing typically masculine roles. She is one of the heavy-hitters of the camp, the leader of it and someone naturally gifted in combat who is capable of protecting others with her power, all the while being confident in her own femininity.
He’s the one being saved (stereotypically feminine) when he wants to be the one who saves (stereotypically masculine), even if it’s something unsuited to him and something that actively destroys him. This is best portrayed through his acts of heroism and his obsession with saving everyone. Though this is largely attributed to his crippling fear of loss, this can be also analyzed from a gender perspective.
Being a hero largely involves masculine attributes, and so it is an identity Subaru wants to confidently define himself by, even though it is something that actively harms him in the long run, slowly, but surely, killing his heart. Heroism is largely portrayed through a negative lens in Re:Zero, Tappei outright stating that Greed IF Subaru had become a “hero” who is capable of saving everything after losing his own heart, Arc 4 Subaru actively struggling with the identity of a hero Rem had given him throughout the events and at times even considering it a curse.
Tappei himself portrays heroism as a masculine activity for him, putting Subaru’s identity as Natsumi in anti-thesis with Subaru’s identity as a hero.
Natsumi Schwartz, personification of Subaru’s femininity
As an introduction, “Natsumi Schwartz” is the name Subaru’s female identity goes under, a result of Subaru pushing away all of his femininity under the existence of one alter ego that embodies it. After all, he has a complex about it due to it being rejected by society, but it is not something he himself dislikes.
Studying the etymology of the name, “Natsumi” is solely written in katakana (ナツミ) so there is no fixed or traditional meaning, but a common and possible meaning for it would be “Beautiful Summer”, and the last name “Schwartz” is “Black” in german, originally a nickname for someone with black hair.
Together, it could be read as “Beautiful Black Summer”, which is an interesting play of words since black is closely associated with darkness, while summer is associated with light. Summer can also be associated with warmth and freedom, which could track to his femininity being used as an outlet to escape expectations whenever they get too suffocating.
Natsumi even behaves in an uninhibited manner that’s unlike the behavior Subaru normally displays, further portraying the feeling of “freedom’, to the point Otto remarked that Subaru might not even respond to his real name anymore while having such a good time as Natsumi in the “The Three Idiots Set Out! The Cursed Goddess Statue Episode” post-Arc 4 SS.
The “Beautiful” part tracks to Natsumi being incredibly beautiful, followed by Subaru’s belief that “Beauty can be made”, a desire for Subaru to imagine himself as most beautiful while embracing his femininity, normally considering himself to be physically unattractive.
Crossdressing is Subaru’s hobby, but it is not just a hobby– Natsumi is a very real identity for Subaru and taken extremely seriously by him, just like the identity of a hero he keeps holding onto. He puts his everything into it, because he loves being Natsumi, a persona born from his rejected femininity. Unlike the identity of being “that man’s son” or the identity of being “Rem’s Hero” where his femininity wasn’t allowed, the identity of Natsumi Schwartz allows him to fully embrace it as he could freely disregard and hide the parts of him that expected masculinity. He even went through the extra effort to train his voice to sound like a woman’s.
What also differentiates “Natsumi Schwartz” from the other two is that it is the only identity out of the three that Subaru created himself and effortlessly embraced without having to suffer for it. “Natsuki Kenichi’s son” was an identity imposed by societal expectations that slowly crushed him as he grew up, and “Rem’s Hero” was an identity imposed by Rem that gave him something to like about himself at the cost of his own sanity. The two of them are products of what other people wanted from Subaru, while Natsumi is something Subaru is perfectly comfortable with as it is his own creation and born from a part of him that existed from the very start, something that doesn’t require him to spill blood and/or tears for, its only downside being that it is very susceptible to rejection by the outside world.
This gets further exemplified by Subaru excusing that he “did not have time to change back” when asked by multiple people why he hadn’t, even though the other two guys who had crossdressed with him had plenty of time to do so. Even later when leaving for Chaosflame, he excused keeping up the identity by having to hide his real name.
Natsumi Schwartz even ends up taking the role of being Subaru’s idealized self. She’s beautiful, confident, self-reliant and intelligent, things he fully believes he’s not. Subaru feels confident as Natsumi, but it’s not actual confidence— It’s trust in the ideal self he created for himself, trust in the parts of himself he always rejected, channeled through this persona.
And yet, he wouldn’t acknowledge that Natsumi is all of these things he envisions as “ideal” simply because what Natsumi is made up of is also what Subaru is made up of, as she was born out of the feminine traits he tried to cut out of himself, those same traits that were once terribly rejected by those around him, as they did not fit their idea of who and what Subaru should be.
In truth, he does like being feminine, he likes being beautiful, he likes makeup, he likes dressing up, he likes having long hair, but he does not allow this part of him to surface unless it’s through Natsumi, the manifestation of everything that he’s taught he shouldn’t be.
Thank you for reading!!!
The Undersiders streaming Minecraft after Taylor’s identity reveal instead of Tay turning herself in. They aren’t gonna go to war with Tagg, they’re just gonna become so likable that he gets kicked out of the Bay. So obviously the first thing they do is stream the biggest game at the time. Like how AOC streamed Among Us.
Alec has been playing since it was called Cave Game, so he spends a lot of time explaining how it works and all that. Brian keeps asking “okay but what do you do?” And Alec has to explain that it’s a goddamn sandbox game and you can do whatever the fuck you want. Brian ends up just collecting resources and giving them away to whoever needs them because he needs a goal and likes the feeling of being able to provide even in Minecraft.
Lisa has more fun than she expects, but really she gets more enjoyment out of the streaming aspect. Because for Lisa, having thousands of live viewers in her chat ripe for mass manipulation is like being a kid in a candy store.
Rachel wouldn’t play, but if she did, she’d lag out the world by breeding too many wolves. Alec would try to kill the wolves to reduce lag, and Rachel would then try to kill Alec in real life.
Taylor would accidentally invent the most efficient and game breaking farms just by dicking around and trying to optimize her base. Over a decade down the line Minecraft players will still be using farms and methods based off of her playthrough.
Aisha similarly would innovate new technologies in Minecraft that would become classic staples, but her contributions would all be traps and griefing methods designed to cause as much chaos and despair as possible.
The streams get super popular obviously and eventually Tagg is kicked out of Brockton for being an aggressive jackass. You could either go with the PRT leaving Brockton in entirety, or just replacing Tagg with a more passive director.
Here's an idea about why kids are so anxious and depressed all the time...the environments kids are in most of the time are very stressful and don't fulfill their needs for play, rest, proper variety of foods, positive social opportunities, and freedom from fear pain punishment etc
materialist-scumbag
THE TICK THAT DREW THE MAP OF THE WEST June 28, 2026
So the longhorn was a garbage animal. Stringy, mean, half-feral, descended from Spanish cattle that had gone loose in the brush country for a couple centuries and bred for survival rather than meat. In Texas after the war it was worth maybe three or four dollars a head, because there were millions of them and nobody to eat them. The local market was Texans, and Texas was broke. Up in Chicago or New York the same animal was worth thirty, forty dollars, because the Union had spent four years eating its way through the eastern cattle supply and the cities were short on beef.
That spread is the whole engine of the cattle drive. You don't need a tick to explain why a man would walk a cow a thousand miles to multiply its value by ten. The arithmetic does it.
What the tick explains is the SHAPE.
Because the thing about the longhorn nobody in the romance mentions is that it was a carrier. Centuries in the brush had given it a shaky immune truce with Babesia bigemina, a protozoan that lived in its blood and rode around on a tick that dropped off into the grass wherever the herd went.
The longhorn itself looked fine. Walked fine, sold fine, butchered fine. But the cattle it walked past, the fat improved Midwestern stock that had never met the parasite, those animals would start pissing blood and die at a rate that touched nine in ten. The Texans, reasonably, refused to believe their healthy-looking cattle were doing it. They took it to the Supreme Court in 1877 and won, on the entirely correct observation that their cows weren't sick. The cows weren't sick. The cows were Typhoid Mary.
(The disease disappeared every winter, too, north of a certain latitude, which baffled everybody for thirty years until somebody worked out that the tick just froze to death up there, no vector, no disease, the whole thing seasonal in a way that made it look like a moral judgment on Texas cattle specifically. It wasn't anybody's leading hypothesis that an insect was committing the murders. The leading hypothesis for a while was that the longhorns were poisoning the grass.)
So now run the two facts together. The cow is worth ten times more up north. The cow kills every other cow it passes on the way up north. What do you get?
You get a line.
You get a bunch of lines, actually. Quarantine lines, drawn and redrawn by Missouri and Kansas legislatures and eventually by the federal government, declaring that Texas cattle could not cross at all, or could only cross in winter when the tick was dead, or could only cross by rail if they were going straight to slaughter and never touched dirt that a local cow might later stand on. Missouri shut its border. Farmers formed Vigilance Committees (which is a polite nineteenth-century way of saying armed men) and turned the herds back at gunpoint. Kansas banned Texas cattle outright in 1885. And every one of those legal and shotgun-enforced lines was a wall the drive had to find a gate in.
The gate was the railhead.
This is the part that rewires the map. The famous cattle town (Abilene, Dodge City, Wichita, Ellsworth, the whole gunfighter pantheon) is not a town that grew up around ranching or water or gold or a river crossing. It's a point where the trail coming up out of the quarantine zone touched a railroad that could take the cow east to the slaughterhouse without it walking through anybody's protected pasture.
Abilene gets invented basically from scratch in 1867 by a man named Joseph McCoy who looked at the map, found a spot on the Kansas Pacific that was far enough WEST that the trail in from Texas could swing around the settled farm country and its quarantine, and built stockyards there. The town is a loading dock. The cowboy at the end of the trail, in the saloon, shooting the place up: he is a longshoreman who has just finished a shift, and the shift was getting the cargo to the one point where it could legally change from hooves to wheels.
And the cargo had to keep moving west precisely because the tick kept the settled east closed. As Kansas farmers spread and the quarantine line marched west with them, the railhead had to march west too. Abilene to Ellsworth to Wichita to Dodge, each town flaring up and dying back as the line of legal infection-free transfer slid across the state. The towns weren't competing on amenities. They were competing on being the current solvent point in a chemistry problem about where a tick could and couldn't survive the trip.
(Dodge City lasts longest because it's furthest out, last to get caught by the advancing farms, sitting out where the quarantine couldn't reach it yet. Its whole mythological career (Wyatt Earp, Boot Hill, the Long Branch) is a few years long and happens because of an agricultural-settlement frontier creeping toward it at the speed of homesteading. When the farms arrive, the party's over. The party was always a function of the farms not having arrived.)
So the geography of the Wild West, which towns exist and why they're where they are and why they boom for five years and empty out and why the trail bends where it bends, is not topography and not destiny and not the romance of open range.
It's the intersection of a price differential and a quarantine map. The price differential said go north. The quarantine map, drawn by the tick, said you may only go north HERE, and HERE, and now not there anymore, here. The cow drew the route and the parasite drew the borders and the men with the guns were just enforcing a public-health regime they didn't know was a public-health regime.
And it all gets zeroed out, eventually, the same way these things always do, not by a hero but by a logistics upgrade. They build the Kansas City stockyards and the packing plants, and then the rail net gets dense enough that the cow doesn't have to walk to the train at all, the train comes to the cow. Refrigerated cars mean you slaughter in Chicago and ship the meat instead of the animal. The long drive, the trail town, the whole apparatus that existed only to get a tick-bearing animal across a quarantine line to a loading point, it just stops being necessary, and the gunfighter towns settle down into being ordinary Kansas, dry and flat and law-abiding, within about a decade of their own legend.
The cattle tick itself they finally beat in 1943, dipping every cow in the South in arsenic for forty years to break the lifecycle. Nobody made a movie about the dipping vats.
Same as it ever was.
new ebbits! new site!
this is probably my favourite comic of all time jsyk
can someone explain this to me?
Sure thing! For convenience I’ll refer to the guy with his arms in his pockets as SG (shorter guy) and the one on the computer as TG (taller guy).
In the first panel, SG sees TG playing on the computer and is disappointed. SG puts a lot of value in the idea of “making things,” specifically “art,” and thinks TG is just wasting their time
So he asks them if they wouldn’t rather be “making something” instead of just playing games and listening to music, implying that TG isn’t doing anything worthwhile or creative with their time
But TG replies that “interpreting is generative,” meaning that even if they spend their time just doing fun stuff, the mere act of enjoying something is creating an experience and an interpretation. Talking about something, dancing to music or sharing a piece of art with your friends IS “making something,” and each of those can be worthwhile and artistic.
SG leaves, complaining he “can’t be an auteur of [interpretation].” Auteur is a movie term that refers to a filmmaker with artistic control and vision enough to be considered essentially the singular creator of the resulting work of art. Turns out, SG doesn’t just want to “make things,” he wants to make things he and others see as “important.” He wants to make art not for the sake of art, but for the sake of being recognized and praised for his art.
This comic really speaks to elitism within the artistic community, the idea that art needs to meet certain standards to be considered art. SG’s viewpoint is really traditionalist, that art need to be “approved” and validated in order to be considered “really art;” while TG recognizes that art can be as little as just talking about what you love.
TLDR: Art is for everyone, not just some sort of social “artistic elite.”
ooh i love the explanation
Rebloging for that in depth and not even a little snarky explanation. 10/10
that post about “you get bandits when you cut soldiers loose without pay” reminds me of the Thirty Years War, because one could say that beneath all the religious schisms and diplomatic jockeying, the heart of the thirty years war was “what happens when you have a state with just enough capacity to raise massive armies but without enough financial capacity to actually pay those armies” and the answer is that the line between professional armies and roving gangs of bandits disappears and every time you try to raise an army it just becomes another independently acting wildfire devouring the countryside. No matter how bad things get, every day I wake up and thank my lucky stars that I do not live in 17th century Europe. Or 17th century China. Or the 17th century Americas. Or basically anywhere in the 17th century.
While I have no idea how Re:Zero is going to look like when it ends, I'm willing to bet that at least half the literature of post-Royal Selection Lugunica comes from Subaru and the women in his life writing love poems, or the like, to each other.
At least for Beatrice, she will never be alone because everyone that studies said poems will make the pilgrimage to ask her if they really were like that, and she'll tell them that they were even worse in fact.
the thing about Tangled is that this is a story geared towards little girls (even if it's "fun for the whole family," it's a disney princess movie, it's geared towards little girls), and it says, "here is a girl who is naive and doesn't know anything about the 'Real World' or how to navigate it safely and correctly. now pay close attention: the good guys are the ones who help her grow and explore new things while still respecting her own perspective and feelings, not making her feel stupid. the bad guys are the ones who tell her that she is too weak/immature/naive to do the things she wants to do, because she is fragile and needs protecting." and I watched this when I was nine years old and it resonated deep in a part of me that I couldn't articulate with words yet.
if I see one more "why age verification is bad" post that doesn't even bother to mention that locking young people out of huge sections of the public sphere - literally the stated goal and primary impact of this shit - is wrong in and of itself I will simply start hitting people with bricks
yes yes biometric data privacy blah blah adults can hypothetically by harmed by this too. what about the immediate and deliberate and not at all hypothetical harm to youth. why are you acting like a potential data leak about what your face looks like, which if it ever happened would at least be generally recognised as a problem, is a more serious issue than cutting millions of people off from information and community and public expression which is happening right now in the open with large scale support
it's got the stench of fucking "banned books week" on it. thousands of adults congratulating themselves for reading books literally no one is trying to stop them from reading while doing nothing to improve access for the young people who are the ones actually having those books made off-limits to them.