will byers stan first human second
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
wallacepolsom
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Origami Around
⁂
if i look back, i am lost
izzy's playlists!
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Jules of Nature
Monterey Bay Aquarium
★
trying on a metaphor
taylor price
pixel skylines
noise dept.
h
macklin celebrini has autism
#extradirty
seen from Malaysia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia
seen from Uruguay
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
seen from Oman
seen from Panama
seen from T1
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
@cinnamorollssoftears
is it healthy to project fantasies and trauma onto your kintypes? no
did jack kelly go into foster care at 14, getting adopted by medda, getting lead through the trauma and everything a normal 14 year old needs to deal with? yea
Reblog this to give the person you reblogged from a heart shaped cookie
compromise
kiss meee kiss me with your eyeesss closseddd
rb if you love mike faist bc i sure do
In 2022….
On April 10th 92sies turns 30
March 29th will be 10 years since the Broadway opening
October 11th will be 8 years since the tour began
And sometime in February it’ll be 5 years since Livesies was released in theaters
requested by unfashionably-late
one of my favourite ways to engage with any given fandom is exclusively via the content shared by one mutual. I don’t know Anything about the source material but by god you’re right, my friend, your otp is literally the pinnacle of all shipping. your fave character is the best character ever. I love you and trust that all of your opinions are completely and objectively correct on this subject
Hey students, here’s a pro tip: do not write an email to your prof while you’re seriously sick.
Signed, a person who somehow came up with “dear hello, I am sick and not sure if I’ll be alive to come tomorrow and I’m sorry, best slutantions, [name]”.
I mean, if someone wrote that to me, I’d probably believe they were sick.
“Slutantions” has me crying laughing
i once emailed my professor with a migraine. a mistake.
“I amsick will not to choir because i have a heache. i Hope its very and i am so sorry
love,
blue”
the subject line was “OW”
THE SUBJECT LINE IS THE BEST PART JSJFJSJDJS JUST IMAGINE GETTING AN EMAIL WITH NO CONTEXT OTHER THAN “OW”
As someone who has taught college, please send those emails because 1) We WILL believe that; no one would write that on purpose and 2) we need a laugh sometimes.
On the other side of this, once after getting taken to the ER by ambulance, I got an email from the professor whose class I’d passed out in, and the message had no text, just the subject line “you good?”
Reblogging for the last addition
Claritin makes me weird, but I have allergies so there’s about a month and a half block of time where I’m taking Claritin and am just weird most of the time.
Anyway, my last year of college, I got the flu or something in late March and was also taking Mucinex. I told my professor I couldn’t come to class one day by email except I couldnt think of what to say, so my medicated ass decided to make a Fry meme. I think it said something like “Not sure if I can go to class with a head the size of Texas, bottom text.” I didn’t think until the next day that it probably wasn’t socially-acceptable to tell your philosophy professor you weren’t coming to class via Tumblr style memes. When i got back to class, i found that she’d printed it out and taped it to the classroom bulletin board.
Oh shit you guys i turned on my WinXP laptop that I used to use back then.
IT WAS ON THE DESKTOP. THIS IS WHAT I SENT.
It’s even worse than i remember it
I laugh myself hoarse every time this post comes around, so here it is again.
send me a 🌼 and I'll name three things I like about you
hey folks, I’m gonna introduce you to two very important fandom terms and they are watsonian and doylist
they come (obviously) from the sherlock holmes fandom, and they are two different ways of explaining something in a story. say I’m a fan and I notice that, in the original books, watson’s war wound is sometimes in his leg and sometimes in his shoulder. the watsonian explanation is how watson (that is, a person within the story) might explain it; the doylist explanation is how sir arthur conan doyle (a person in real life) would have explained it.
sherlock explains the migrating war wound by making the shoulder wound real and the limp psychosomatic. the guy ritchie films explain it by having the leg wound sustained in battle before the events of the film and the shoulder wound happen onscreen. the doylist explanation, of course, is that acd forgot where the wound was.
this is very important when we’re discussing stuff like headcanons and word-of-god. I see this when people offer watsonian explanations for something, and then a doylist will say something like “it’s just because the author wrote it that way,” and I see it when a person is criticizing bad writing/storytelling (for example, the fact that quiet in metal gear solid v is running around the whole game in a bikini and ripped tights) and someone comes back with “but there’s an in-story reason why that happens!” (that reason being she breathes through her skin).
there’s nothing wrong with either explanation, and really I think you need both to understand and analyze a text. a person coming up with a watsonian explanation has likely not forgotten that the author had real-life reasons for writing something that way, and a person with a doylist interpretation is likely not ignoring the in-universe justification for that thing.
but it’s very difficult (and imo often useless, though there are exceptions) to try to argue one kind of explanation with the other kind. wetblanketing someone’s headcanon with “or it could just be bad writing” is obnoxious; dismissing someone’s criticism with “but have you considered this in-universe explanation” is ignoring the point of the criticism. understanding where someone is coming from is important when making an argument; acting like your argument is better because you’re being doylist when they’re being watsonian or vice versa is not.
it’s been 5 million years but this thing still gets notes with like “can someone explain this to me in a shorter, easier way” so here it is:
watsonian: the enchantress cursed the eleven-year-old prince from beauty and the beast and all of his servants because fairies don’t understand why humans would think that’s insane and unfair. I am using in-universe evidence to explain why the character might think or act a certain way, as if belle and the prince and the enchantress are real people.
doylist: the writers didn’t realize that the prince would have been eleven when he was cursed until it was too late to change it, and the servants are also cursed because talking furniture is funny and allows for unique character design. I am explaining this plot point based on an outside knowledge of how writing works and how writers think.
I had a friend once who thought only Jews could learn or understand Hebrew, like it was physically impossible for gentiles to learn. I think maybe we should let more xtians think that.
U know the story about the angel that punches the fetus right before the mother goes into labor and it makes them forget the Torah (bc fetuses know the Torah in the womb) what if only gentile fetuses got punched. What if Jewish babies could speak fluent biblical Hebrew from birth.
sorry to make this about My People or whatever but this reminds me of that time some guy just couldn't comprehend that i couldn't speak fluent cantonese despite being half chinese
"i can't speak canto"
"but you're chinese"
"half chinese, and raised without having been taught it consistently"
"but you're chinese. shouldn't you be able to speak canto"
"that's not how knowing languages works"
"but you're chinese"
this is in a part of the world where most chinese are canto speakers btw
This has happened to me with people being baffled by the fact that I don’t speak Hebrew. Why are people like this sgccvvhvhhf
I’m so sorry this feels like awful news but this post is about supernatural
I assumed it wasn't about newsies but honestly didn't care enough to not make that reference
