Im that sleepy bitch

i'm pretty inconsistent with what i post

[lianedegrenade]

the detached brutality of all these “women need to have more babies” thinkpieces man

[lianedegrenade]

split your body wide open for the stock market

[abominablecreation]

benedict “please do not go” bridgerton vs sophie “move out of your house, you’re fucking up my work environment” baek

[probuccalfat]

one time i told a group of lesbian and bi women that i have never watched wicked and they were shocked, gagged, gooped, “but you’re queer. you like pussy. how have you not seen wicked?” yeah. well. i like pussy, not musicals?

[probuccalfat]

i’m this exact post. all this just to fuck women.

[probuccalfat]

“are you going to the lucy dacus concert?” no. i listen to gucci mane.

[veil-of-exordia]

[geyfrog]

The first rule of cable management is "out of sight, out of mind"

[geyfrog]

The second rule of cable management is that all true art is provocative. If zero people want to kill you over it, it's not good art.

[gigglepuffpixie]

S'ghetti Closet

[nyxwoven]

[behindnightmaresanddreams]

[shipsa-hoy]

Everybody needs to see this

[wlwarhammer]

Bridgerton men get told to shut the fuck up for the first time in their lives and start imagining themselves in a wedding dress

[baeckerei]

bridgerton is so scary. one by one the siblings are fetched away off into "their happy ending" only to turn into non-characters bearing innumerable children in the background of someone elses story. its like a zombie movie

[garbagequeer]

you really do have to hand it to bridgerton sometimes

[bonebais]

this is a drawing about how i love my cat

[snottyshawty]

Better Call Saul main storyline:

The Mike Ehrmantraut subplot:

[slwtawn]

it's showtime, folks!

edit: hi everyone, this is now available as a print!

[ratinthevoid]

???? in WHAT

[tendie-defender]

[sistersorrow]

The later this gets posted, the funnier it gets

[sweetlambeyed]

listen. To me. I am the owner of the one and only 24k gold lajesse. Me. Me alone

[bloobluebloo]

At the end, I think what ultimately frustrated me with the approach AoI and TotK took with its story telling was just this idea that everyone already knows Ganondorf is evil. Ardi knows he’s evil, but she follows him because it is Gerudo law. Surprise, he stabs her in the back and then she reaffirms he is evil and decides to cut ties with him. So why even follow him in the first place? In the first five minutes both Rauru and Sonia say with absolute certainty that Ganondorf is the reason the Gerudo have not joined Hyrule. When Ganondorf swears fealty, Rauru claims he is “aware of Ganondorf’s evil nature” and will keep him close. He also says, again with absolute certainty, that he knows Ganondorf is behind the attack on Hyrule even though Ganondorf threw Ardi under the bus and said he took care of the “rogue Gerudo forces”. When Sonia gets led away by puppet Zelda, both Sonia and Zelda know that it is a puppet and essentially spring Ganondorf’s trap. Rauru follows Ganondorf away from the castle not out of a desire to assist his “allied commander”, but because he suspects that Ganondorf is up to something. So, what benefit of the doubt were Rauru and Sonia trying to give Ganondorf exactly if they already decided he was evil? What was the purpose of making him an allied commander? To simply keep him close? Keep him on a leash? What was the plan going forward when it came to Ganondorf? How can one claim that Ganondorf manipulated anyone if everyone already knows that everything bad and strange that is happening is because of him? 

[fagknowledge]

Walter wide was many things but it is extremely funny how he neglected his own flesh and blood teenage son in order to be an even worse father to a wholly different guy

[chicaneryatelier]

Gascon telling one of his stories