Show & Tell
One Nice Bug Per Day
Kiana Khansmith
Claire Keane
Sweet Seals For You, Always
hello vonnie
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
h
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
izzy's playlists!
AnasAbdin
No title available
tannertan36
ellievsbear
Love Begins
dirt enthusiast
No title available
No title available
Kaledo Art
Not today Justin
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Spain
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@eli-ruins-everything
This is exactly how UNARMED Black people are profiled and killed by cops. This is further proof that the white people who call the cops just to fuck with Black people do it on purpose
ffs, they look like boys coming home from school; it sucks that black people are constantly assumed to be criminals when a lot of them are the same struggling working people everyone else is.
*Sighs loudly* FUCK YOU BECKY!
I’m so tired of self righteous nosy ass people. Stalking ass
This has to stop.
just once I want to see a good post critiquing makeup culture that doesn’t turn out to be made by some janky radfem blog
oh hey!! I’m not a janky radfem I can do it myself!
makeup culture is wack and normalizes a ludicrously high bar as the bare minimum women can do. I saw a “lazy"makeup tutorial the other day that listed 22 separate goddamn products. you’re supposed to buy and know how to use 22 different things on your face just for the privilege of being considered lazy and that’s uuuuuuh what’s the word? bullshit.
Really, five products could work, even 3. Just frame the face, eyes, lips, and you’re done.
0 products also works great
because I’m gonna be real here, the idea that 22 products is a minimum sucks but it’s really upsetting that any amount of makeup is the bare minimum at all
I would really just suggest some powder foundation, concealer, mascara and lipgloss/lipstick, or tbh just mascara works too, but that’s up to you
I’m sorry if I didn’t express this clearly enough in the original post but I’m not really looking for more concise makeup regiments. my intention was to point out how it’s Bad that makeup is considered a bare minimum at all, regardless of individual feelings on the matter
no face should be “required” to have “a minimum” of makeup. makeup has no health benefits and does nothing but fill the pockets of companies that prey on women and our insecurities.
makeup should not be seen as hygiene because it isnt. get that shit out of your head.
this post: makeup culture is ridiculous and 22 products should not be considered a minimum requirement for someones face. no one should have to do that
the notes: so like……. what youre saying is……. we need to make the minimum about 5 or 6 instead… i gotcha
Really the only makeup you need is eyeliner but that’s just my personal opinion
okay
where did we lose you
why are people like this
This entire post basically sums up what it’s like posting on tumblr. You make a point and everyone proceeds to ignore that point.
Russia:
All of us:
Miyazaki Monday:
Howl’s Moving Castle (2004)
Screenwriter: Hayao Miyazaki
uh huh. i was wondering if anyone is in the market for a new copypasta
“Souls needing to come into our family for ancestral or karmic reasons”???
What fucking cult is this lady part of? Even some of the worst religions out there don’t preach that bullshit.
Well, you know, some bathroom graffiti offers insight.
Red marker handwriting on a bathroom wall. Text reads:
“Boss made a dollar Granddad made a dime But that was a poem From a simpler time.
Boss made a thousand Gave pa a cent But that penny paid the mortgage Or at least it paid the rent
Now Boss makes a million And gives us jack Smugly blames the workers For the labor that he lacks.”
And the words of the prophets are written on the subway walls and tenement halls.
see if you can get a bingo for the cdc saying it’s Really Encouraging News if you die
Seen a few people say it elsewhere already but saying ‘its only bad if you have 4 or more comorbitities’ is like saying ‘oh don’t worry you’re only at risk if you have a medical history’
Calling this eugenics seemed dramatic at first glance but I’m struggling to see it any other way at this point.
Just an utterly failed state, letting this rip into the entire population for what? Q1 profits?? As if there won’t be another varient in a couple months even more vax resistant killing all the people who just got ‘comorbitities'from omicron? Fuck this country
I have 12 of these and I’m a fairly typical person wtf
16 and I think we should be legally allowed to beat these ableist fuckers with bats 💖
I’m at 21 jesus fucking christ
Visual impairment?? Visual impairment is a comorbidity for covid?? Are y’all… are y’all with good eyes SEEING the viruses or smth
Has anyone else realized how stupid and brainwashing those “morality debates” were in like middle and high school?
It was always something along the lines of “would you steal an expensive medicine to save a dying family member?” Or “would you steal food to feed your starving family?”
Like fuck yeah, I would! And you’d always get the teacher and even a few students being like “but that’s stealing and stealing is wrong.”
Bitch, more wrong than letting someone die?! One is a loss of life and the other is a loss of money. If I have to explain to you why a life is more important than money, please don’t interact with me in any capacity ever.
I think churches should let homeless people sleep inside them on the pews at night so they at least have a roof over their heads.
Every christian I’ve ever said that to: “Well we can’t do that because they would leave a big mess and we can’t afford a security guard to make sure they don’t steal or break anything.”
Me: “Well that’s extremely elitist and judgmental. Would you at least consider asking members of your congregation to volunteer to make, package, and distribute hot meals for them? Or maybe set up a day/time every week for homeless people to come in and receive at least basic first aid if needed? Maybe ask the people who run your daycare if they would tutor some of the homeless children who aren’t able to go to school?”
Them: “That’s just too much to ask of our congregation. Do you understand?”
Me: “What I understand is that you only follow the parts of your religion that benefit you or give you a false sense of superiority. EITHER PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH OR STOP PREACHING IT!!! That being said, how about you use the money you pressure your congregation into giving you to actually help the people you claim to pray for instead of spending it all on shiny gold decor and stained glass?”
Them: “Now you’re just being rude so I’m done talking to you.”
please stop reblogging sylvia plath poetry
For ppl asking why she’s an anti black, anti Semite. She has used the n word and compared her depression to the holocaust
Even not counting her poetry her private journals are full of disgusting, overblown antisemitism. She didn’t just use Jewish people for her metaphors, she outright hated them irl and yet decided to use their suffering for her own gain
here’s a source with some quotes
okay, I’m Jewish and I appreciate this sentiment. and if someone wants to cut out Sylvia Plath, go for it, I get it.
But. by this logic we’d also need to stop reblogging TS Eliot, Oscar Wilde, and Shakespeare quotes. Virginia Woolf wrote anti-semetic things in her private journals, too. If you only want to read classic poets who liked Jews and black people, that’s fine, but like. good luck? Sylvia Plath isn’t an exception.
idk. Tumblr’s attitude of “consume nothing problematic” just doesn’t work if you’re part of a group that most culture-creators over the last few centuries have hated by default. For people actually in those groups, it’s not like the only two choices are 1) worship authors who hate you or 2) completely cut the majority of literature out of your life. You learn to read critically and acknowledge flaws where you find them.
anyway, as a Jewish woman, I would much rather see a version of this post that said “please read Sylvia Plath poetry critically because she’s anti black and antisemetic” than just “stop reblogging Sylvia Plath poetry.”
IMO, reblog Sylvia Plath all you want, just not unthinkingly.
I’m reblogging this now because I’m seeing anti-Virginia Woolf discourse lately due to the antisemitism in her journals and like… as a Jewish person who loves Virginia Woolf’s writing and an English teacher who knows that pretty much every writer of the classics is Problematic just…chill pls
The point isn’t to never consume media that isn’t ideologically pure. That’s never the point. Were that the goal, we would NEVER be able to consume any media. Nothing is ever ideologically pure, especially as time goes on and our social consciousness expands.
We should be telling people instead, “Be critical as you read this person’s work. They held bigoted views. Understand how that is reflected in their work, and be mindful of it. Be critical, be thoughtful”
Compelling others to not engage with something at ALL on ideological grounds is in the same vein as burning books. We should be compelling others to be critical and mindful, not narrow and willfully ignorant.
“Understand how it is reflected in their work, and be mindful of it.”
Booom ! No one literature is pure and it is not logical to think one medium is pure. You cannot cancel everything. On the same hand also realize that it is up to you to read and consume their writings or media if you see fit without judgement if you do not support their views about blacks, minorities, etc.
don’t choke on the boot !
due to increased productivity, they produced the same amount of work in 25 hours as the normal 40 hours week, but capitalists still complain because they weren’t “passionate” enough anymore
“passion for the work” = enslavement of mind, body, & soul. anything less than total enslavement will never be enough for them.
If there’s one college assignment I had to do which I could force on all college students, it’d be this paper I had to write for a Research Methods class. It was later in the semester, and the professor gave us a very straightforward assignment: you need to find a news article which reports on the results of an academic study, read the actual study, and then explain in detail why the article did not properly represent the study’s findings.
Not only was having to do that a really useful exercise in terms of figuring out how misinformation gets passed around, but talking with a class of 25 other students who all had to do the same thing for 25 different articles makes you realize that the majority of all “studies show…” news articles misrepresent the studies they’re based on
bonus round, somewhat related:
i had a cs systems professor who taught a graduate class
where they had all the students try to replicate a paper in their field
that’s it. just one lil paper
and… whew boy… the number of papers that just straight up did not replicate… the number of papers where people had made some stupid programming error and thus unintentionally misrepresented their results… the number of papers where there were no factual inaccuracies, but like, once you worked through it & the graphs, it became real obvious that data was being presented misleadingly, trying to sweep the rug over obvious drawbacks to their methodology, etc
like “trendier” subfields were more prone to this kind of bullshit but. afaict no discipline came out unscathed. good times
STRONGLY ENDORSED
Ahahaha. Here you go:
See how there’s no overlap?
^ YES. And in case that didn’t get through to OP, I added my own edits:
Re-reblogging this to find it later
fuck yes
WAIT A MINUTE
Wake up babe, new theology just dropped.
