could you imagine if it happened this pride month

★
ojovivo

blake kathryn
Monterey Bay Aquarium
dirt enthusiast

Andulka
occasionally subtle
Sade Olutola
One Nice Bug Per Day
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

@theartofmadeline
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
h

PR's Tumblrdome
will byers stan first human second
todays bird
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Origami Around
Show & Tell

JBB: An Artblog!

seen from Malaysia

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Finland
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Lithuania
seen from Austria
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
@grayarchon
could you imagine if it happened this pride month
The year is 2018. Your bills are on autopay. You just got paid and you still have $1200 from the last check. When you want something, you buy it without moving money around. Your credit cards are paid off. You and your friends have 2 international trips planned and paid for this year. Your parents are in great health and you’re able to help if they need anything. You love your job. Your desired creative career is falling into place and you get to take your little cousins to Six Flags and Universal Studios over the Summer. Your relationships are healthy and supportive. All of the toxic energy from the past 6 years is gone. You going to concerts, eating good across the states and your crib has art and warmth throughout. 2018 is going to be so good to you.
reblogging this for that 2018 good luck
Bringing this back for 2026 because I think we all really need this.
The Invisible Pressure: Asexuality, Relationships, and Consent
There is an insidious, quiet violence that asexual people, particularly sex-repulsed aces, are subjected to in relationships. It’s not loud. It doesn’t always look like abuse. Sometimes, it’s dressed up in the language of “compromise”. Sometimes, it’s even endorsed by therapists and relationship “experts.”
But at the root of it is this one idea: That sex is the cornerstone of every valid relationship. That if you don’t want sex, something is wrong with you. That your partner is entitled to sex. That you, as an asexual person, owe it to them because that’s “just how relationships work.”
Asexual people are constantly navigating a world that tells us our love is incomplete unless it includes sex. That our boundaries are just hurdles to be negotiated. And that if we’re not careful, we’ll be the one accused of being selfish or withholding.
And the truth is, this pressure doesn’t only happen in unhealthy relationships. It can exist even in good ones. Even in the ones where your partner is kind and respectful and never once demands anything of you. Even when your partner is loving, patient, supportive—the ideal partner. The pressure doesn’t just vanish because the person next to you is good. Because the pressure isn’t coming from them: it’s coming from the world around you.
So even in the safest relationships, we still carry that fear. That if we say no too often, too permanently, we’ll eventually be left behind—not because our partner is cruel, but because we were never what society told them to want. And that’s what makes the pressure so hard to name, so hard to fight. So easy to internalize.
Then, even the most well-meaning conversations about consent often fail us. Why? Because while people are taught to respect a “no” in the moment, there’s still the underlying assumption that “no” is temporary. That eventually, we’ll change our minds. That if someone is patient, kind, persistent enough—we’ll come around. But some of us don’t. Some of us never want sex. Not now. Not later. Not eventually. And the idea that permanent or indefinite boundaries are abnormal is what pushes so many asexual people into violating their own comfort to meet someone else’s expectations.
It’s a form of slow coercion, cloaked in the language of compromise.
And when asexual people bring this into therapy—when we try to advocate for ourselves—we’re often met with therapists who have internalized the same cultural script. A script that says “sex is a need and part of a healthy relationship”. We’re encouraged to meet halfway.
But “halfway” always seems to mean giving up your boundaries to preserve the relationship.
Where is the room for our needs? For the idea that sex is not an automatic default but a choice, one that should never be coerced—whether overtly or through guilt, shame, or the threat of abandonment?
Too often, asexual people are pressured into saying yes to things we don’t want. Not because we’re comfortable with it. Not because our desires have changed. But because we’re terrified of being left. Because we’ve been taught that we’re the broken one. That we’re the reason the relationship is “failing.”
We are not broken. We are not selfish. And sex is not the sole measure of love, intimacy, or commitment. A relationship without sex is still a real relationship.
Consent only means something when it includes the possibility of permanent, indefinite boundaries. If “no” isn’t allowed to be forever, it was never truly respected to begin with.
....but.... why?
To quote Cave Johnson: "Science isn't about why, it's about WHY NOT!"
I want a knife gun.
For an updated Ides of March
The Ides of March: Reloaded
brutus is back and this time….. he doesn’t need the whole senate
March
TOMORROW IS HALLOWEEN!!!
WHAT THE FUCK IT’S CHRISTMAS EVE WHY DID SOMEONE REBLOG THIS
TOMORROW IS HALLOWEEN!!!
TOMORROW IS HALLOWEEN!!!
🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃
TOMORROW IS HALLOWEEN!!!
🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃
TOMORROW IS HALLOWEEN
🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃
TOMMORROW IS HALLOWEEN
🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃
ITS THE FUCKING MIDDLE OF SEPTEMBER
TOMORROW IS HALLOWEEN
asking about something I've noticed specifically with YouTubers
the th- in "thank" is pronounced with a
unvoiced th /θ/ ("bath")
voiced th /ð/ ("bathe")
reblog with your answer and region, if you're comfortable sharing!
unvoiced, southern California
i registered to vote for the first time ( i feel old) now that im an adult but my state has closed primary elections which i was wondering if you have an opinion about. my initial thought was that its bad because i had to register democrat (rather than my states green party which represents my beliefs more) just so i could vote between democrat candidates, which feels like being pressured into supporting the weird pseudo two party system we have. but then i looked it up and apparently a reason for this is so that people from opposing parties wont purposefully mess up the votes just so that their preferred candidates have an easier time winning, and i think that makes sense too. but is that actually the reason theyve closed it or is it just to force us dem/republican?? cause it feels strange
Okay, look. I respect the fact that you're a young person, and I appreciate that you have not only registered to vote, but plan to vote in the primaries, so I don't want to lecture you too much. That said: I am taking you out for coffee, I am sitting you down, I am looking into your eyes, and I am urgently telling you the following:
The Green Party is a scam. It is a scam. It has existed for decades in American politics as an empty shell corporation weaponizing the good intentions of young people like yourself, because all it theoretically stands for "it's good to save the planet maybe." Which is not something that any non-insane person seriously disagrees with, but there is no world in which that cause is actually furthered by registering/voting Green (you mentioned that you did vote for Democrats, which -- good, but listen to me here, youngun, okay?) It ran Jill Stein in 2016 to siphon more votes from HRC, and this election it plans to run Cornel West, a pro-Russian tankie who positively equated Bernie and Trump, as another spoiler candidate. It does not stand for "protecting the planet" or America in any real way. It has never elected a single senator or congressman, let alone a president. It stands for empty performance/grievance political theater by those people who feel too morally superior to vote for/affiliate with Democrats, often because the internet has told them that it's not Cool or Hip or Progressive enough.
If your main priority is climate/the environment, you're doing the right thing by registering as a Democrat and voting for Democrats. (Also: the adjectival form is Democratic. It is the Democratic party and Democratic candidates, otherwise you sound like the Fox News host who wrote a book literally entitled "The Democrat Party Hates America.") They are the only major party who has in fact passed major climate legislation and have made environmental justice a central tenet of their platform. As opposed to the Republicans, whose Project 2025, along with the rest of its nightmare fascist prescriptions, openly pledges to completely wreck existing climate protections and forbid any new ones, just because we weren't all dying fast enough under their death-cult rule already. That's the main logical fallacy I don't get among both the Online Leftists and the American electorate in general: "the Democrats aren't doing quite enough as I'd like, so I'll enable the active wrecking ball insane lunatics to get in power and ruin even the progress we HAVE managed to make!" Like. How does that even make sense?
On a federal level, the Greens have contributed nothing whatsoever of tangible value to American or international climate policy/legislation, environmental justice, or anything else, because as noted, they don't have any elected candidates and mostly focus on drawing voters away from Democrats. There might be plenty of good candidates on the local or city level, which -- great! Vote away for Greens if they're available, or the only other option is a Republican! But on the federal/primary level, please understand: once again, they are a scam. There is no point in affiliating yourself with them. You're welcome to register Green and vote Democratic, if that makes you feel better or if you prefer having another label next to your name, but once again, I'm telling you in my position as a salty Tumblr elder that they have done nothing but harm to the causes they claim to care about, because "environment" is such a nebulous priority and has demonstrably been hijacked to stop the American government entity, i.e. the Democrats, that is actually working to improve on it.
As for your question: nobody is "forcing" or "pressuring" you to vote in primaries. By your own admission, you made a conscious choice to register as a Democrat in order to vote for Democratic candidates. If you were just a regular registered voter of whatever party affiliation, you would vote in the general election for whatever candidate the primary process produced. But if you are sufficiently vested and committed to that process that you would like to have a say in who is running under that party label, it is not unreasonable that you would register as a member of that party. Nobody has twisted your arm behind your back and made you do so; you are taking a considerable level of initiative on your own. Likewise, open primaries can be both a good and bad thing. This falls under the "the political system we have is flawed, but we can't magically pretend it doesn't exist and act according to our own fantasyland versions of reality" thing that I keep saying over and over. So yes, if you want a role in shaping the Democratic candidates who emerge from a Democratic primary process, you will usually register as a Democrat, and nobody has forced you to do that. It's that simple.
Likewise as a general programming note: I'm trying to cut back on politics a bit right now, because I don't have the spoons/bandwidth/mental health to deal with it. I apologize. So if you've sent me a politics-related ask recently and haven't received a response, I'm not deliberately or maliciously ignoring you; I just am not able to handle it as much as usual and will have to put it on pause. However, I feel as if this is important enough to be worth saying, so, yeah.
To amplify this:
There can only ever be two significant national parties in the US at a time. This is because we have a winner-take-all system, where the guy who gets 51% of the vote is treated the same as the guy who gets 89% of the vote. Smarter people than me have mathematically proven that a system like that will always turn into 2 parties. Other countries with multiple viable parties have things like ranked choice voting, where you pick your first choice, your second choice, and so on. Then if your first choice doesn't get enough votes, your second choice gets counted, so your vote for, for example, Ralph Nader of the Green Party would not have ended up drawing votes away from Al Gore the Democrat and resulted in George W. Bush the Republican being elected.
It's not likely that the US will adopt ranked choice voting anytime soon, since it's in the interest of the existing political parties not to do it. And as long as we don't have it, there are two parties, and voting for a Green candidate in a national election is throwing away your vote. Which, it's your vote, you have the right to throw it away, but right now one party is flawed but believes in democracy, and the other one is going full on fascist. We are literally fighting to keep Nazis out of power.
I didn't sign up with a political party when I was your age because I wanted to maintain the mental fiction that I was independent. In fact, because I have always favored minority rights, in my lifetime I could only ever be a Democrat, and I have no time machines to go back and vote for Abe Lincoln. My life began with an incredibly shitty and corrupt Republican president in power, and they have only gotten worse over time.
The only thing that joining a party does is to give you some right to pick that party's candidate. That's it. In majority red states, many people who vote for Democrats sign up as Republicans so they can try to get less terrible local Republican candidates because in their state, the Republican will win. Same thing in majority blue states, the other way around. So there is some degree of calculation in deciding what party to sign with, but you definitely should sign with one or the other so you have some say over what candidate ends up on the ballot. Even if you then choose to vote Green, you've still had your say about who became the candidate for the national-level big party, because one of the two national level big parties is going to win. (And because Republicans are currently dominated by a fascist faction, and non-fascist Republicans are being forced out of office, please don't vote for Greens at a national level. They won't win, you're sending the wrong message to the Democrats -- basically when you say "you're not far left enough for me" they hear "I'll never be good enough for you so I should pander to the people in the middle" -- and, for the immediate future at least, you're not helping the fight against fascism.)
When you vote for a Democrat and you're a leftist, you can pressure them to move further to the left. "I voted for you and I am very disappointed in your decision to authorize drone strikes" kind of thing. You cannot pressure Republicans to move left. You can barely stop them from skidding all the way to the right.
If you dislike this, work toward getting ranked-choice voting implemented in your state. If all of them have it, then we can have legit national third parties. But until then, all voting Green does is tell Democrats that they can never capture the votes of the far left, so they should move to the middle instead. Don't tell them that! Tell them that if you see them making reasonable efforts to become more progressive, you see that progress and you reward them with votes, then keep up the pressure.
All this, and also…
Thank you for voting! If we want to have a democracy, maintaining it is important. Part of that maintenance is voting, so thank you!
Please consider paying attention to your LOCAL races, because:
1. Your vote counts for more there. Races are sometimes decided by just a handful of votes at the local level.
2. Local races are important for schools, zoning etc. Want apartments? Affordable housing? Bike lanes? Transit? Local races!
Also…? Local races are good for seeing how your actions can impact politics beyond voting. Yay you’re voting! But, you can push some politicians in the direction you want them to go(or convince someone good to run?) and this can be easier with local races.
(Alternatively, if you discover that a particular politician is an entirely corrupt asshole, exposing that can possibly be easier at the local level)
Recruiting good candidates is hard. You aren’t ever going to match a candidate 100% unless that candidate is you. Maybe you could run for something? Worst case scenario you lose but know more people and understand more about how your local community does politics.
Ted Lasso: All right, guys, listen up. The things in the world originate only because of their relation to other things. That means they have no essence or existence of their own. Their true nature is that they are “śūnya" or "empty”.
Coach Beard: Emptiness isn’t their true nature, either.
Ted Lasso: Say what now?
Coach Beard: Emptiness isn’t truer than the false natures of the things that are empty.
Ted Lasso: Now how the hell does that work?
Coach Beard: Emptiness did not arise independently, either. Its existence is also dependent upon its relation to other things. If there was nothing to be empty, then there would be no emptiness.
Dani Rojas [excitedly, like a little kid with a new toy]: if all things are empty, then emptiness itself must be empty, too!
Ted Lasso: now that right there is what we call “insight beyond insight” back in Kansas
Higgins: Er, wouldn’t that make nirvana empty as well? And if it’s empty, doesn’t that mean there’s no reason to try to achieve it?
Jan Maas [unfiltered Dutchman]: Thoughts like those are why you’re still stuck in samsara.
funniest thing about the “reddit migration” is that I haven’t seen a single post shitting on anyone coming from Reddit. when twitter started bleeding users everyone was firing rent-lowering posts but with redditors skittering about we’ve left the doors open and put out food bowls
Tags were too good to ignore.
Sometimes u just gotta make yourself a quesadilla and move the fuck on
The worst part about this post??? People saying “with cheese!” Bitch cheese is literally in the word if it had no cheese it would be a dilla
Where that New England Gothic post
my personal favorite
Found another idiotic accounting mistake from my predecessor that I have to fix and I was like "WILL THE SPECTER OF THAT MAN'S INCOMPETENCE EVER CEASE TO HAUNT ME" and my coworker was like "Why do you talk like that"
Who the fuck is Jon Sims
*opens the groupchat at breakfast to backread like its the morning paper*
NEWS FROM BULLSHIT CITY:
Your Friends had a Weird Discussion About Marbles
Best @dril tweet
So long suckers!
Blocked. blocked. blocked.
If your grave doesn’t say “rest in peace”
Food $200
If the zoo bans me for hollering at the animals
I’m not owned!
Issuing correction on a previous post of mine
Another day volunteering at the Betsy Ross museum
Jail isn’t real
Different tweet/ will put in tags
Dude living downstairs has been loudly rapping for like 10 minutes, then suddenly did a high pitched scream, and now its silent down there
he got raptured
it's a wrap