enemies-to-lovers is about power, actually
I think a lot of people misunderstand why enemies to lovers is so popular. Itâs quickly become one of the most pervasive tropes in many novels. Is it the banter, the tension? Thatâs definitely part of it. But if that were true, then friends-to-lovers and literally any romance with good dialogue and characterization would scratch the same itch. For some, it does, but for manyâŠenemies-to-lovers just hits different.Â
My theory is that it isnât actually about love, not really. I think it fulfils a fantasy that no other trope can provide: the fantasy of being seen as an equal.Â
Think about what specifically makes someone an enemy in fiction. Itâs not just someone the MC dislikes, itâs someone who can affect them in tangible ways, maybe even have the power to ruin them, challenge their worldview, expose their weaknesses, etc. The relationship begins with conflict because the characters are fundamentally opposed in some way. It doesnât matter why, but theyâre fighting. There is a struggle for dominance.Â
I would argue that the most impactful enemies-to-lovers moments are never the romantic moments, theyâre the scenes where power shifts. They BOTH lose: theyâre forced into a position that would have horrified them at the beginning of the story. They end up needing (or wanting) each other.Â
Thatâs why I think people are often disappointed when a supposed enemies-to-lovers story turns out to be a milquetoast attempt where theyâre just kinda mean to each other for a few pages, and then immediately start making out. Whereâs the risk, the actual threat? If the characters arenât capable of genuinely affecting one another, then the relationship isnât actually transforming in a satisfying way. The appeal is in the fact that they have power over each other, because the eventual trust they build requires real surrender.
Because hereâs the thing about enemies; they pay attention, and usually more attention than anyone else. They notice weaknesses because theyâre actively looking for them, they notice strengths because they need to account for them. They notice habits, blind spots, ambitions, fears.Â
They study the MC with a level of scrutiny that borders (and later crosses) intimate, but unlike friends (or supporting characters in the MCâs corner) theyâre not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, they donât overlook flaws out of affection. Which is exactly what makes the eventual romance so satisfying. It feels earned.Â
Itâs easy to imagine being loved by someone who sees the best version of you, but itâs an entirely different thing to be loved by someone who has seen you at your worst. Thatâs why this dynamic often feels more convincing than romances where the characters are immediately into each other.
I imagine there are many who go through life feeling misunderstood, or worse, that the people who love them only love the polished, perfect version they present to the world, almost like impostor syndrome. But what if there was someone who couldnât be fooled by this carefully constructed image?Â
When someone more powerful chooses someone, maybe the fantasy is protection. When itâs someone less powerful, the fantasy might be admiration. But if thereâs someone intelligent and observant enough to see the MC as an equal, the fantasy there is the most intense and honest validation.Â
Which means enemies to lovers was never about turning hate/annoyance into love, it was about turning power into vulnerability â which is a terrifying loss of power, which THEN leads to intimacy.Â
