Generational edit I’m posting here so I never ever lose it
Cosimo Galluzzi
Noah Kahan
No title available

@theartofmadeline

Kiana Khansmith

Product Placement
Color Me Curious
Not today Justin
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
Interview Vampire Daily
The Stonewall Inn

izzy's playlists!
todays bird

blake kathryn

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Sweet Seals For You, Always
$LAYYYTER
No title available
Fai_Ryy

shark vs the universe
seen from Uruguay
seen from Pakistan
seen from Philippines

seen from Estonia
seen from Uruguay

seen from Singapore
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
seen from Israel

seen from T1

seen from Israel

seen from Canada
seen from Palestinian Territories
seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
@lackadaisicalnereid
Generational edit I’m posting here so I never ever lose it
Absolutely insane lines to just drop in the middle of an academic text btw. Feeling so normal about this.
[ A Critical History of English Literature, Vol. 1, Prof. David Daiches, first published in 1960 ]
[ID: “The tragedy of Hamlet, as in some degree of Othello, is that moral outrage demands action when no action can be of any use. In a sense, we can say that the ghost was at fault in appearing to Hamlet in the first place and setting him-for what might be called purely selfish reasons--a task which, even if accom-plished, could do no possible good. When Hamlet's whole nature was outraged by his mother's behavior and then by the news of his father's murder, he naturally felt that something must be done. But what? What could be done that would make any diference-any difference at all to the things that really mattered? Would a dagger through Claudius' ribs restore Hamlet's shattered universe? Would it restore his earlier idealized image of his mother or remove the "blister" that had been set on his innocent love? This is a tragedy of moral frustration. What are you going to do about past crimes which have shattered your preconceptions about the nature of life? There is nothing you can ever do about the past, except forget it. And yet, of course, Hamlet could not forget. Revenge is no real help-what sort of action, then, is of help? None that is directed toward undoing the past: only purposive action directed toward the future can ever help. And that is at least one explanation of Hamlet's long delay in carrying out the ghost's command: he wanted action that would undo the past, and no action could do that, revenge least of all, for that would only re-enact the past.
The punishment can never fit the crime, for it can never undo it.” End ID.]
every narrator is unreliable bc ontological truth is non-existent and therefore unattainable
The fact is that David Lynch treats the subject of evil better than just about anybody else making movies today—better and also differently. His movies aren’t anti-moral, but they are definitely anti-formulaic. Evil-ridden though his filmic world is, please notice that responsibility for evil never in his films devolves easily onto greedy corporations or corrupt politicians or faceless serial kooks. Lynch is not interested in the devolution of responsibility, and he’s not interested in moral judgments of characters. Rather, he’s interested in the psychic spaces in which people are capable of evil. He is interested in Darkness. And Darkness, in David Lynch’s movies, always wears more than one face. Recall, for example, how Blue Velvet’s Frank Booth is both Frank Booth and “the Well-Dressed Man.” How Eraserhead's whole postapocalyptic world of demonic conceptions and teratoid offspring and summary decapitations is evil… yet how it’s “poor” Henry Spencer who ends up a baby-killer. How in both TV’s Twin Peaks and cinema’s Fire Walk with Me, “Bob” is also Leland Palmer, how they are, “spiritually,” both two and one. The Elephant Man’s sideshow barker is evil in his exploitation of Merrick, but so too is good old kindly Dr. Treeves—and Lynch very carefully has Treeves admit this aloud. And if Wild at Heart’s coherence suffered because its myriad villains seemed fuzzy and interchangeable, it was because they were all basically the same thing, i.e. they were all in the service of the same force or spirit. Characters are not themselves evil in Lynch movies—evil wears them. This point is worth emphasizing. Lynch’s movies are not about monsters (i.e. people whose intrinsic natures are evil) but about hauntings, about evil as environment, possibility, force. This helps explain Lynch’s constant deployment of noirish lighting and eerie sound-carpets and grotesque figurants: in his movies’ world, a kind of ambient spiritual antimatter hangs just overhead. It also explains why Lynch’s villains seem not merely wicked or sick but ecstatic, transported: they are, literally, possessed. Think here of Dennis Hopper’s exultant “I’LL FUCK ANYTHING THAT MOVES” in Blue Velvet, or of the incredible scene in Wild at Heart when Diane Ladd smears her face with lipstick until it’s devil-red and then screams at herself in the mirror, or of Bob’s look of total demonic ebullience in Fire Walk with Me when Laura discovers him at her dresser going through her diary and just about dies of fright. The bad guys in Lynch movies are always exultant, orgasmic, most fully present at their evilest moments, and this in turn is because they are not only actuated by evil but literally inspired: they have yielded themselves up to a Darkness way bigger than any one person. And if these villains are, at their worst moments, riveting for both the camera and the audience, it’s not because Lynch is “endorsing” or “romanticizing” evil but because he’s diagnosing it—diagnosing it without the comfortable carapace of disapproval and with an open acknowledgment of the fact that one reason why evil is so powerful is that it’s hideously vital and robust and usually impossible to look away from.
-David Foster Wallace, "The Theme of Evil in the Films of David Lynch"
The best part of Dune is when Kynes, the ecologist, tells the Fremen that they can establish a water cycle and bring standing freshwater back to Arrakis with judicious planting of melons and the Fremen are like, "That sounds so awesome, how long will that take?" and Kynes says, "Oh, 500 years or so, lol" but the Fremen are really excited and Kynes gets a glimpse at what can be achieved at the intersection of ecology and religion. He realises that the Fremen's fake religion was engineered to maximise spice production and that the same is true for Arrakis' ecology: sandworms die in water so the Guild wrecked the water cycle so sandworms could produce spice across the whole planet. Kynes feels bad for the Fremen, so he figures out the sandworm life cycle and behavioural ecology (knowledge integral to the industry of the entire Universe) just so he can shave off a hundred and fifty years off his predicted timeline, and the Fremen basically make him a saint and start managing Arrakis to be more comfortable for them AND provide territory for worms to produce enough spice pay off the Spacing Guild, which is really the ideal scenario for everyone concerned, but then that inbred Jedi, Paul Atreides, shows up and ruins everything forever.
genAI companies are now buying up rare and antique books so they can scan them and use them to train their AI. then they're destroying the books afterward.
AI companies are quietly obtaining rare books, ingesting their contents, and then destroying them -- even if they're exceedingly rare.
they've had to face settlements against stealing from current authors, so they'll just go for the old books now. they're also doing this so they have the only copies of rare books.
they're taking water, power, natural resources for their data centers. they steal. they're book burning, essentially. i'm just so angry, i'm at a loss right now.
DS9 Textposts pt 121-???
“If I had time travel I’d kill Hitler” “If I had time travel I’d stop my favourite politician getting assassinated” you’re all thinking way too small. If I had time travel I’d stop Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin from dying on the moon due to Soviet sabotage, kicking off the Great Nuclear War and devastating half of the planet.
Good Job.
#this post gets me every time
It’s from two days ago fam how many times could there have been
do you think no one else has time travel
Happy one month anniversary to this post that has not allowed me a single day of fucking peace since I made it.
#surprise reblog!!
STOP IT’S BEEN MONTHS. MONTHS!
YOU CAN STOP.
wow if only you had a time machine
Honestly having reached a billion notes I think it’s safe to say that in the Year of our lord 2041, this is the most popular tumblr post out there.
I’m killing your parents before you’re born
Still here, why’d you hesitate @derinthescarletpescatarian
Your mum’s ability to hold up under active gunfire was really hot. I’m your dad now.
Isn’t that the plot of Terminator
Where do you think the plot for Terminator came from?
This is such a classic trainwreck post that has the vibes of a 2014 screenshot posted to Pinterest and then the last addition is just last Tuesday I can’t even
Imagine how I feel
Finding out AI companies are chewing through - literally, they’re pulping and burning them as they go - millions of books often including 1/1s and old texts that cannot be reprinted
Meanwhile there’s always some dipshit telling me AI is the future and we’ve got to just let companies erase human history and literature so they can train their abomination machines to pretend to think like people because a judge said it’s fine
AI companies are buying and scanning printed books for training data, raising copyright and cultural preservation concerns as rare volumes a
Beyond his art, Neal Adams is rightfully remembered as an eternal champion of creators’ rights and for the part he & his work played in the Comics Code revision of ‘71 but his contribution to John Stewart’s creation is – I think – a rather underrated aspect of his career, especially as it’s such a great reminder of the kind of person he was. Taken from an interview conducted and transcribed by Allen W. Wright over at the Green Arrow: Bold Archer fansite, here’s Neal discussing John’s beginnings (x).
Emily Wilson has inadvertently created a fascinating new way to categorize basically any visual media ever made
There are no sex scenes, and all the food looks horrible.
Yeah okay Ill reblog that!
Not a scholar at first, but the guy who wrote Jaws hated that people used it to justify hating sharks so much he dedicated the rest of his life to shark research and advocacy.
The woman who popularized gender reveals wishes she hadn't, afaik.
(afaik- the woman who popularized gender reveals did so because she had a long history of miscarriages. The reveal was a celebration of the fact that one of her pregnancies had gotten far enough that there WAS a physical sex to reveal. It was never intended to be like... *gestures at modern gender reveals* all that. That same kid later came out as trans and yes, the family had a second gender reveal for that lol.)
This whole thread is so beautiful to me that I can explain it
The man who invented the K-Cup coffee pod almost 20 years ago says he regrets doing so and can't understand the popularity of the products t
L. David Mech, who popularised the idea that there were 'alpha' and 'beta' wolves in his 1970 book The Wolf, has spent the rest of his career trying to debunk this. (The original studies were done on captive wolves, and thus didn't simulate an accurate model of wolf pack dynamics.)
The idea that wolf packs are led by a merciless dictator, or alpha wolf, comes from old studies of captive wolves. In the wild, wolf packs a
In the wild, researchers have found that most wolf packs are simply families, led by a breeding pair, and bloody duels for supremacy are rare.
“What would be the value of calling a human father the alpha male?” says L. David Mech, a senior research scientist at the U.S. Geological Survey, who has studied wolf packs in the wild for decades. “He’s just the father of the family. And that’s exactly the way it is with wolves.”
Persona (1966), Mulholland Drive (2001), and the lesbian doubles
If THE modern translator of the OG Odyssey text wrote this about my film adaptation I’d kill myself
Emily Wilson you’re goated
imo max and silver’s first meeting is perfectly written because it succinctly demonstrates in episode ONE how similarly they’ve been taught to move through the world, the tricks they have at their disposal. and it foreshadows why they make such great partners when their interests are aligned. max says well what is this piece of paper to you? you can’t lie to me and call it worthless because i’ve been watching you, i’m observing everyone all the time – just like silver was watching the cook earlier. this shared survival skill of theirs is the only reason either of them even know the thing they’re holding is valuable. silver responds with hostility when he threatens to report her to noonan for being a thief because that kind of threat would work on most people. max is not most people. she threatens to tell flint that silver is a thief in turn. so hostility doesn’t work and leaves them at an impasse. as the scene goes on max turns on her considerable charm (lying) (“pleasure should be shared equally!”) and silver does the exact same thing when he says, (lying) look, this whole thing is a terrible idea, and i’m just concerned about your well-being, and this tactic again falls flat for both of them. so all that’s left is for them to work together on equal terms with no pretense do you like mirrors i heard you liked mirrors so i put mirrors in your mirrors
I think Emily Wilson just killed Christopher nolan
The article, for those who want to read (and you def should it’s great)
As they say at the awards shows, I was humbled to learn that Christopher Nolan has read at least the first line of my...