no, white baby, racism isn’t a valid trauma response.
will byers stan first human second

No title available
One Nice Bug Per Day
h

tannertan36
official daine visual archive
cherry valley forever
Game of Thrones Daily
YOU ARE THE REASON

izzy's playlists!
Misplaced Lens Cap
Not today Justin
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Cosimo Galluzzi
Xuebing Du
art blog(derogatory)
NASA
The Stonewall Inn

No title available
$LAYYYTER

seen from France
seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from Mexico
seen from Colombia

seen from Germany
seen from Russia

seen from France

seen from Türkiye
seen from Hungary
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from France

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
@lubefairy
no, white baby, racism isn’t a valid trauma response.
OKAY BUT HAVE YOU SEEN THE SKELETON OF A RAIN FROG? [X]
WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU MEAN THEY DON’T HAVE RIBS
HUH
Yeah frogs don’t have ribs. It’s a quick way to identify the bullshit ‘info’post about the ‘correct way’ to hold a frog. They seem to constantly mention hurting their non-existent ribs.
I’m pretty sure the correct way to hold a frog is “tenderly.”
basketball players fight over the basketball because they are hypnotized before each game to believe it is their egg
top 10 jobs for serial killers:
cop
member of any branch of the military (often combined with some of these other jobs)
‘polite family man’
truck driver
nurse (gerontology and neonatal specialties especially)
construction/contracting
doctor (gerontology and surgical specialties especially)
anything in the animal agriculture field (particularly pig farming)
preacher (Protestant evangelical especially)
account
serial killer career path gaining momentum: YouTuber
serial killer career path loosing popularity: butcher
I don’t know why butchers aren’t chasing people around with their butcher knives in bloody aprons anymore but that isn’t a major concern in 2026. Maybe modern hairnets have a soothing effect.
this scene is so fucking funny the english dub of this show is so good
loud warning
Rolling on the floor sobbing and crying and losing my mind at “GET INSIDE THE VAAAAAAAAAAN”
finally. an appropriate name for my ‘time to leave’ alarm.
idk man sometimes i like it when video game writers are allowed to plan a series of events that happen in a specific order and affect each other in turn to become an overarching narrative, and i don’t mind trusting those writers to take me through those events in the order that is emotionally effective. i don’t really care if a game forces me to go through the forest area first before i can attempt the icy area because maybe there’s things that happen in the forest area that inform later scenes in the icy area. maybe we don't need more superficial player choice open world concepts if it comes at the cost of the ability to write a story with actual significant plot events and character development in each section
Everyone's meming this weird deformed raccoon named "Jimothy" but all I wanna know is, is he in pain :(
Like from all the vids I've seen he seems to be behaving normally but at the same time wild animals mask any symptoms of pain or injury since they would be easy targets for predators so they could be in horrible agony and you wouldn't know from just looking.
I just hope this "wholesome" meme everyone's having a good laugh over isn't actually horribly and ignorantly cruel 😭
I did some research on him when he first showed up!
short spine syndrome is known in dogs and it does not seem to cause extreme pain, nor does it shorten an animal's life- but it does present mobility issues and probably causes some postural pain. overall it's more of a static functional disability than a painful deteriorating condition, at least as far as we can tell.
enjoy away!
My question is, is this comparable to human dwarfism? Obviously there are tons of versions of dwarfism, but is short spine syndrome also a human thing?
no, humans can't get short spine syndrome so it's not really related to any of the multiple syndromes that can cause human dwarfism
Dwarfism is a seperate thing entirely and animals can have dwarfism, probably there are or were dwarf raccoons somewhere. Short spine syndrome is different. If he were a dwarf raccoon he'd be called a dwarf raccoon. Although I do wonder why humans can't get short-spine syndrome.
Humans can get “short spine syndrome,” and it is a form of dwarfism. That being said, “dwarf raccoons” are not raccoons with dwarfism. They are a separate species, Procyon pygmaeus, more commonly known as the Pygmy raccoon or Cozumel raccoon.
had an edible and am now explaining goncharov to the party guests
they've invented a minor character named ernesto who's only role is to follow goncharov around and say "nice one boss!" whenever he does anything. im so proud of them
I feel like boiling Ernesto Cagliari's role in the story down to "guy who follows Goncharov around and says nice one, boss!" Is really doing his character a disservice. Yes, he's a very on-the-nose parody of the sorts of nameless henchmen and "right hand men" that you see in other mafia media, but he's also a subversion of the trope who embodies the way that powerful men who surround themselves with yes-men eventually find themselves trapped in an echo chamber where they can't separate their own delusions of grandeur from the real world. The entire carnival chase sequence in Venice ends with Goncharov leading himself into a literal funhouse where he's trapped with an (actually nameless!) assassin and surrounded by distorted mirror Ernestos all equally unable to help him find the exit because all they can do at that point is encourage the boss's fruitless andmisguided efforts. It's only once Ernesto is killed by reality violently reasserting itself in the form of the assassin, and the funhouse mirrors are broken in the ensuing fight that Goncharov even begins to confront the immediate reality his actions have created and the broader reality of those people who live outside his self-important bubble.
Look, it’s a weird hill to die on, especially when I don’t really explain, but children deserve to experience fear, disgust, and discomfort in safe scenarios where they can process those sensations.
Media for children used to be scary and that’s important.
“Since it is so likely that (children) will meet cruel enemies, let them at least have heard of brave knights and heroic courage. Otherwise you are making their destiny not brighter but darker.” ― C.S. Lewis
"Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed."
-- G. K. Chesterton
my mom just had a 7cm brain tumor removed and since she's woken up she's been talking nonstop about this dream she had about going to an art gallery full of colourful paintings by a 'homosexual artist' named klimsdorf who was ethereal and wise, both young and old... at first she was convinced he was a real person but after failing to find him online she's accepted he was a figment of her subconscious mind and is now determined to bring him to life via painting his portrait herself. she's 67 and has never drawn in her life. and now this. blorbo from her tumor
My painting of Sonam’s temple for Avatar Aang. Much of the work I did on this film was developing the style for the ancient flashback sequences!
you know those videos of tortoises getting brushed? yeah
common advice for social anxiety is to tell yourself "people aren't going to think less of you just because you said something a bit daft" but the thing is. sometimes they will. and you just have to learn to be cool with that and to treat it as a dnd random encounter rather than letting it ruin your whole day
recent example. lady at my careers appointment had a post-it with her name on it stuck to the monitor, so i introduced myself by saying "hello, i'm eliot! you must be [name], it's nice to meet you!" and she stared at me as if i was the stupidest person alive and said icily, "yeah, i'm [name]. congratulations, you can read."
in bygone times this would have reduced me to a sort of quivering blancmange. thankfully i am now in a place where i was able to pull back, calmly evaluate this interaction, and say to myself "this woman should probably not be working in a customer-facing job"
important additions!!!!
so much of the "research" on "phones bad" is just statisticians congratulating themselves in a circle
example: I am right now reading an article on "phubbing", which is apparently the term for ignoring people you're with in order to pay attention to your phone. we'll slide right past the claim that this is a normal word people use.
the authors have developed a "phubbing scale" and demonstrated that it has strong correlation with the existing "maladaptive technology use" scale. from this, they conclude the "phubbing scale" is a valid and useful metric.
the "maladaptive technology use" scale, if you go and read that paper, has shown strong correlation with the "problematic smartphone application use" construct.
have you caught the problem yet? nowhere has it been proven that scoring high on any of this is actually bad for you.
imagine someone told you "if the ground is wet it probably rained recently". then you talked to someone about rain and they said "if it rained recently there were probably clouds". yeah okay sounds reasonable. then all three of these people told you their research proves clouds, rain, and wet ground are all signs of demonic possession in giraffes. you'd be like hold up, I think you lost me somewhere
I don’t need a study to know using my phone makes me feel like shit
do different things on your phone then. I'm guessing you haven't written off paper as a technology just because tax forms make you want to cry
It's fair to be skeptical of research into problematic mobile phone usage on the basis that while some studies have shown it to be correlated with anxiety, insomnia, and depression, correlation is not causation and it is difficult to establish a causal relationship when studying this kind of problem. It's also fair to be skeptical of psych research in general due to the problems that are pervasive in the field.
But being not just skeptical but confident that you've debunked all the extant research on the basis that...the dumb statisticians never even bothered to check if this was actually bad for you LMFAO IDIOTS is just plain anti-intellectual though.
> spend 5 years getting a PhD in youth and digital media
> express annoyance with a common failing of academic writing in your field
> get called anti-intellectual
now reading a paper where the researcher:
asked students to volunteer to take a "screen-free challenge" where they didn't use electronic devices in class for a semester
recorded students' views on the challenge at the end of the course, and found that most of the students who participated had positive views while most of the students who didn't participate had negative views
completely ignored that this might just mean "people who thought something was a bad idea didn't do it", and instead concluded "the screen-free challenge leads to more positive views on the learning experience"
I'm getting whiplash from all the looking into the camera I am doing here
Just to clarify, they only recorded the students’ views at the end of the study?? They didn’t ask the students what they expected at the beginning or ask why they participated??
That seems like such a basic step to mitigate your #3!
the thing you have to understand is that "screens bad" research gets published so easily you can basically make every research mistake ever invented and be fine