the best argument for The Vampire Lestat being well written…
…is in all the hate blogs and their operative word of “shouldn’t”. Lestat shouldn’t! Armand shouldn’t! Louis shouldn’t! Daniel shouldn’t! But pretty much never “wouldn’t”. No one can say Lestat *wouldn’t* make fun of Armands sexual trauma. Daniel *wouldn’t* be hateful and conniving in his interviewing. Louis *wouldn’t* cross the line and play pretend with Regina. Armand *wouldn’t* flip on a dime after being rejected. Etc etc etc. Just that they *shouldn’t* and……shouldn’t (but did) is kind of vampires like, Whole Thing ™.
I have seen the absolute best takes written by hate blogs, who completely captured the essence of the story being told, but instead of having a good time, they hate it. And it’s just amazing honestly. Because it’s like. You did it. You got the show exactly. You understand the why.
You just don’t. like. it.
and now you are pretending and philosophizing and humanizing monsters and their different points of view of other monsters. And yeah, that sounds miserable babe but your cognitive dissonance is cracking me UP.















