surely the conses wont quence
peer reviewed
tumblr dot com
DEAR READER
dirt enthusiast
styofa doing anything
Peter Solarz
No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
No title available
I'd rather be in outer space šø
Not today Justin
will byers stan first human second

Kiana Khansmith

if i look back, i am lost

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£

ā

romaā
NASA

izzy's playlists!
Today's Document
Show & Tell

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Romania
seen from Portugal

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Chile

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from France

seen from United States
@mayblossomblooms
surely the conses wont quence
peer reviewed
we fucked up
in case it's not clear to everyone, OPs can't even see tags unless they're on a post reblogged directly from them, even if nobody's added comments in the reblogs chain.
a post can have 500 reblogs, half of them with tags, but unless every single post is being shared directly from the original, the OP is probably going to think that nobody's saying anything
get ready for tumblr to feel like a ghost town, even when it's not
big shout out to tumblr for being the first major site in like two years to implement an ill-advised "feature" nobody wants, likes or respects that doesn't involve AI
with love. you have to fact check shit. yes you. you still have to fact check shit. a lot of people are great at fact checking stuff they donāt want to be true, but somehow are still absolute ass at fact checking stuff thatās rhetorically convenient to them. even people my age, who I KNOW grew up doing internet/bibliography literacy workshops, and being warned not to believe anything that isnāt reliably sourced, people who DO harp on fact checking conservative output or whatever, are still kneejerk sharing unsourced shit that is partially or wholly untrue or misleading, because it suits whatever narrative theyāre pursuing in that moment, without even a ātake this with a grain of saltā. fact check!!!!!! look at the sources!!!!! yes itās a drag!!! do it!!!!!
Hnngh. The Audible "hack" is making the rounds again, with people claiming you can use your Audible credit to listen to a book and then return it "for free." While I am the first among many to say "fuck Amazon and we should gullotine Jeff Bezos," I need you all to know it's not Amazon refunding you.
It's the authors.
They take that out of our royalties. And that's after they take 80% of our royalties on sales we do make.
(Note: Also, do not assume that your credit is worth the price listing that Amazon shows. Amazon does not pay us the cost of the listing. ((WHICH THEY PICK, we cannot set our own prices on audiobooks and then that forces us to use the Amazon price for the rest of the market!!)) What we get is 20% of the credit's value, so my book might appear on Audible for $20-30. However, if you received an Amazon credit for one of those $4.99 deals, I'd get 20% of $4.99. Yes, it's fucked, it's all fucked. Yes, other audio retailers do the exact same thing. This is one of the reasons authors don't make half as much money as people think they do.)
This became such a big issue that they had to make it impossible to return books after a certain point without talking to a customer service representative, because people were using Kindle/Audible and Amazon's return policy "like a library," and some authors (myself included) were getting royalty checks that showed negative income.
At this point, I don't even know if the Audible "hack" still works (Amazon has made changes to protect authors from this kind of thing at a glacial pace), but I need you to know it's not Amazon that's refunding you. This isn't a fun little "fuck Amazon" thing. The way Amazon has it set up, it's directly fucking the authors over.
So, yeah. Obviously, if you download something and can't get into it, or if something pops up on the author's side that makes you not want to support them anymore, yeah, process that return. Yeet the bitch. But please don't use it "like a library."
It's really harrowing to see your predicted income based on sales and then find out you're getting one-tenth of that because of refunds. And it's not even because people didn't like your book. They're just using the wrong place like a library and fucking over your algorithm as well, because once you get too many returns, you stop getting promoted.
Try using a library. You can access places like @queerliblib for FREE provided you have a US library account that you've hooked up to Libby. It's a little bit of work, but once you've got a card number, you're golden.
Just, y'know, throwing it out there because I don't think people realize this is how it works. You're not taking something back to Walmart, and Walmart is eating the refund before dumping the item in the garbage. Amazon takes the refund, turns to the author, and takes it off our plates.
Note: this does not affect Kindle Unlimited. Flip through the end pages to give the author maximum pages read, and then return that bad boy so the author can get paid. But also, please, maybe think about switching to a Kobo+ account instead. It offers the same subscription-based membership without demanding exclusivity, so authors aren't locked into just Amazon the way they are with KU. (Royalty rates are roughly the same, but it's a better deal in terms of allowing broader market access.)
This has been a rambling and exhausted PSA from your local peddler of weres.
^^^^^^^
(one note on our memberships: you donāt need to have another existing library card in libby! It works even if weāre your only one!)
Oh nice! I remember needing to use my original card to sign up, but maybe I'm remembering wrong! This is excellent news!
If I remeber correctly, you've said Kobo paid okay royalties. Is that still true?
(Also i've been thinking about starting Kobo+ but if they are similar to KU, maybe i'll stick w ordinary kobo)
The pay is comparable to Kindle. Most online retailers offer about the same.
Where Kindle Unlimited becomes a real pain in the ass is their demand for exclusivity, which means books currently in Kindle Unlimited cannot be sold anywhere else or distributed to libraries while the KU contract is still in effect.
Kobo+ pays similar rates, but it has the advantage of not forcing an exclusivity contract, which means you can still push your work to a broader market and retain library access.
It's a better deal for authors if you use Kobo+ purely from that regard.
if you lose your train of thought while talking to someone its because they reloaded the quicksave after killing you midsentence
Lion, failed
Zebra, failed
Chimpanzee, failed
Sponge, success
Hummingbird, failed
see when people try and nitpick me because i call my dog "my dog" when it's technically "the family dog".......well first of all i still call my brother "my brother" and not "the family boy". although maybe that should change. second of all sorry i'm still thinking about the family boy. btw i fell asleep while making this post last night and i think you can tell
Very tenuous link to one of my favourite tweets
napping with my friend the hammer #myhammer
āIāll just rest my eyesā is the biggest lie youāre going straight to snorkmimimi land
āIām going to sleepā is the biggest lie Iām going to stare at my ceiling for the next three hours
i think the gaylors have traumatized the wlw community more than we realize what do you mean sabrina carpenter made out with a sexy alien lady at the vmas and i'm the only person thinking hey maybe she's bi
@chaotically-gay
Thoughts?
yes actually, SO many
Iām like 90% sure sheās not queer, because:
1. She just leans into the queer community and its aspects because (online especially) being queer has become a trend?? Itās kind of romanticized and all the negative aspects (ex. homophobia) are ignored because being queer gets more traction.
2. Sheās stated in her songs āgod forgot my gay awakeningā and her cover of āGood Luck, Babeā lacked so much of the emotion of someone who relates to the song, which is why so many people prefer the original. (I know itās not concrete proof to go off of a cover of a song but letās be real here, itās the straightest cover iāve ever heard because she doesnāt have the experience to create that emotion)
3. As far as I know, sheās never stated sheās queer or likes women or anything of the sort. All of her songs, nonsense outroās, etc. are about men, and the only times sheās done anything relating to being queer are a) kissing Jenna Ortega in her āTasteā music video (in the video, Jenna thought she was kissing Sabrinaās ex), b) kissing a female alien at the VMAs, and c) arresting women at her short n sweet tour
4. if she did like women, with the amount of speculation going around itās likely sheād just come out and say it. Especially since so many people think she is queer, itās unlikely to change much in her fan base and their attitude towards her. The only thing itād mean is that she gets to be more open about who sheās attracted to.
yeah idrk how to close this off but thereās just a lot of proof showing itās super unlikely that sheās queer
"the only queer things she's done is make out with women and say she's attracted to women"
the reading comprehension on this website makes me want to kill myself sometimes i think
oh no I understand that you think she's faking being queer for attention, I just have brain cells so I know that's fucking biphobic as hell
doctor prescribes a joint and a cup of coffee on the porch while listening to the morning birdsong
bilbo baggins
every time I do a web search, right at the top I have AI info dumping on me
just give me the top result please
Swear in your search request. I know it sounds ridiculous, but the most effective way I've found of it not doing the AI summary is just to add "fucking" go my search.
Holy shit
You're welcome! I can't claim credit to have come up with it, but very happy to spread it around š