(As a heads up, this addition is talking seriously about trauma responses, so it may be a departure from the haha funny joke tone of the above.)
All I can think about with this is how "people pleasing" is often a manifestation of the "fawn" strategy of responding to danger — one of the four F's along with fight, flight, and freeze. (Some articles also add "flop" and "friend" to the list, but I don't know much about those yet.)
Ideally, we can access all of the strategies, but if we grew up in danger, neglect, or under threat of abandonment (and I use those terms a bit loosely), or even spent prolonged periods in that state as an adult, it's common to end up "stuck" in one or two possible responses* (such as fawn, as above, instead of setting boundaries/willingly engaging in conflict, which is more in line with "fight") and to reach for that response more readily and in situations where others might not perceive danger.
This is, when acutely in the situation causing the pattern, a smart strategy. It's reaching for the thing that works best in the particular circumstances you find yourself in, even if it only works partially. It's doing the absolute best you can with the tools you have to hand. And if that self-protection strategy lingers once out of the situation (and, let's be real, if you're still in it to any degree) then that makes perfect sense, too, doesn't it? Because it's what worked before.
So, my response to the meme above is to ask: Where is this self-disgust (to the point of vomiting) coming from? What would be different if the "I" in the meme could be gentle with themselves for what may very well be a lingering trauma response? (A response that they are clearly on the way to untangling, since they know they HAVE the option to set boundaries/fight back — though knowing an option is acceptable and being able to exercise it consistently are two different steps in the process.)
If you're the "I" in the picture (and here I am also addressing myself): you were doing your best. You're still doing your best. I firmly believe that. You don't deserve that derision, and neither does your past self.
*I don't subscribe to everything said in this article, especially the pathologizing and gendered language used, but it's a good for an overview of the four types, which is why I link it.