Chainsaw man is just like no, estrogen would not save her, but only because she's beyond saving. she should still take it.
ojovivo

No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
No title available

roma★
art blog(derogatory)
todays bird
macklin celebrini has autism
🪼
No title available
NASA
almost home
Stranger Things
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Noah Kahan
Game of Thrones Daily
Xuebing Du

blake kathryn
Jules of Nature
noise dept.

seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Argentina
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Greece

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Russia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@orceus213
Chainsaw man is just like no, estrogen would not save her, but only because she's beyond saving. she should still take it.
Fee, fie, foe- FUCK THERES A TINY BRITISH MAN IN MY HOUSE! GET HIM OUT! GET HIM OUT!
Where's the post about how being an expert or just acutely interested in something, can skew your perception about what is common and not common knowledge.
According to a friend, most people don't know the fried egg jellyfish exists.
There. Now you do.
reading a historical romance novel and reflecting on the way these stories often present woke nobility for the contemporary reader. a big thing is servants. you can’t not have servants in those times but many modern readers think “but I would never have servants. it would be so weird to have servants” and in order to make the protagonists of the story more relatable they are actually friends with the servants. but flip your perspective and think of it from the side of the servants. wouldn’t it be so awful if your boss was always trying to be friends with you. a really common thing you’ll see is the woke baronet having tea in the kitchen with the servants bc he’s not like other baronets. but what if your boss wanted to hang out and talk during your lunch break every day. not so charming when you think about it that way
one of my favorite parts of anna karenina addressed this. as i remember it, a landowner (levin?) basically had a midlife crisis and started working the fields. the farmhands were pretty confused and annoyed at this relatively weak, ineffective guy playacting as a farmhand. he was in the way, had no idea what he was doing, didn't understand their micro culture (esp. things like what they liked to talk about and what they found funny) and most of all, he was...THEIR BOSS.
this is why I get annoyed by people being like "why is the noble heroine in this 19th-century novel lonely? why does she say she's all alone? her maid is there! ugh! so dehumanizing!!!!"
she is the maid's BOSS
they are not FRIENDS
the maid probably does not DESIRE her friendship
the servants are not your confidants in this scenario. IRL, the notion of the Loyal Family Retainer was most common in sentimental literature for the employing class (which btw was like upper-working-class on up, although the lower you go, the more work the family would be doing alongside them) and sometimes weaponized by them to try and get extra emotional or physical labor out of domestic workers
did emotional intimacy develop sometimes? absolutely- and it was often encouraged for upper-class 19th-century children in the US and UK, who could spend a lot of time with their nanny and in the servants' sphere in general. was classism a factor? 100%.
but it's not dehumanizing to be like "my employee is not my BFF"
Need a game that's actually built around tanking as the main combat style. Not a game where you can, strictly speaking, build a character as a tank.
A game where the systems are built from the ground up assuming that you, the player, will be putting yourself in front of world-ending threats, standing up straight, and blocking the enemy.
Not dodge-rolling, not skipping around going "tee hee hee i'm a lil guy you can't hit", blocking.
And not as a disappointing alternative to a damage build!
Need the CLANG of the enemy's attacks against armor, need clear sound and UI design that communicates "here's how much damage you DIDN'T take, you absolute badass", need a little gaggle of frail party members trembling in fear behind me as the extreme aura farming of walking up to a dragon and putting my entire shield in its mouth inspires them to fight on.
Also the player character should be a huge woman who's into women.
#last edition important too#between battles should be a lesbian dating sim
Bonding more strongly with your polycule of cute DPS and healers makes your brave words of encouragement in battle act as a stronger performance multiplier, increasing attack and spellcasting speeds. Blocking a really big attack makes them go "I have to do my best too, she's counting on me!!" and unleash extra strong spells so you'll be proud of them.
Its very important that your character laughs when She blocks that big hit, not only is she willing to defend her polycule with her life, but she relishes the thrill of being the bastion that she is.
Also, she does carry a sword or something but not because she realy needs it, it's solely for the purpose of taunting her enemies by tapping it against the rim of her shield to draw aggro.
Hear me out: skill tree where you use a huge sword to block instead, like death knights in WoW or similar two-hander tank classes. Still none of that dodging nonsense of course, dodging is just letting the attack hit something else than you.
Like there are a lot of ways to tank here:
Extreme Stamina Tanking: You take the damage unblocked and then survive it anyway because you've just got THAT much willpower. You can go to negative HP and still be standing.
The vampire tank: You're not dying because you're draining the enemy's life force
The Classic Knight
The Low HP High Parry tank: There is no fucking way you should be surviving and yet. AND YET.
Like if you're doing a Tanking Game you've gotta include a variety of ways to tank
asking for
myself, i refuse to feel guilt over pleasures
will there be cut scenes or similar where the damage is brutal, the battle barely won, and the healing, whilst tender and carefully applied, is slow and arduous?
to the point where it is uncertain, for a heartbeat, if the discomfort caused by the initial application will itself be the killing stroke?
"screen time screen time screen time screeeeEEEEEEEE" before the smartphone, kids were so bored they'd play with explosives, vandalize local infrastructure and harass old people for entertainment.
fund libraries. fund makerspaces. fund youth sports. enable kids to actually go places without having to ask someone to drive them everywhere. excessive reliance on digital spaces is a symptom of having nothing else to do.
This is the 85 year old creator of Roger Rabbit:
I actually have a pretty weird relationship to The Lion King 2. I've watched it one (1) time and it was the day my father died. So it's a bit emotionally fraught.
The order of events was that my father died and then, as a consequence, I watched The Lion King 2, but after posting it occurs to me that this sounds a bit like
Susie wants a statue in Castle Town with her flexing and Kris and Ralsei hanging off her biceps. cool
SHHHHHHHHĤHHHHH!!!!!! don't let her find out!!!!!!!!!!!!!
personally I am of the opinion that vegans who are like “the way our food system currently works under capitalism on a large scale is exceptionally cruel to all animals including humans and is not sustainable, so I’m doing what I can to make the most ethical choices available to me about what I eat and encourage others to do the same” are generally very reasonable people who I agree with in spades. but vegans who seem to think human beings are not themselves animals who are ultimately also part of the food chain but instead some kind of other paternalistic higher entity that can never engage in ethical and sustainable hunting practices (and especially the fringe I’ve seen who think other carnivorous animal predators are also evil and need to be eliminated) are people I regard as foolish at best if not actively anti-indigenous and racist
Here's a thing about how Tumblr works:
When an account is deactivated, it normally does not affect images in their posts, in reblogs and such. So ancient posts can live on, with images intact.
However if the user is terminated with prejudice (aka "nuked"), ALL their uploaded images are removed. (This was presumably designed for spammers and such)
So if you see a post like this:
This doesn't mean the image itself violated any rule! Yes, this is a misleading error message.
Tumblr has terminated-with-prejudice many transfems, and every time I see people reblogging their their posts going "what's wrong with this post, Tumblr? It was just a INNOCUOUS THING!"
The tl;dr is that if the user is deactivated, the "this image was removed..." error is misleading. Everything they uploaded was removed, regardless of content.
(and yes Tumblr should stop banning transfems. They have already been sued about this, and lost)
amazing things happening in late series columbo episodes
For all that the 1800s etiquette guides are--obviously--derangedly sexist from a modern perspective? They're also mindblowing in how casually they will assert things that MODERN DAY CONSERVATIVES would scream and cry and shit their pants about.
"People back then always married young it's natural!!!" Every single 1800s guide I've ever met casually mentions that, of course, you really shouldn't get married before you're at least 20, and waiting until 25 is usually better.
Or, like. Okay here's a long segment:
Just firmly going "it is crazy sexist to blame The Wife for overspending when thirty seconds of asking questions will immediately establish that her husband was outright lying to her about how much money they had. Talk to your wife like a normal person."
Or--okay, here. A section on being honest and not writing love letters in secret, because that's usually a good sign that there's something untoward going on....
....except that he then immediately acknowledges that sometimes, the reason you're hiding this from your parents is that your parents suck. That there are parents who frankly have not earned the right to approve or disapprove of your partner.
(I realize the phrasing there sounds a lot less strong than my summary, but--trust me on this. When you're familiar with the narrative voice of these kinds of books, this passage is downright radical. The mere acknowledgement that if you treat your kids badly, it's your own damn fault when they don't talk to you? I've genuinely never seen that before in this genre. Don't freak out over "properly trained", either. It's just a linguistic shift--at the time, "training" was used the way we would say "raising" a child today. )
Also, please do not listen to how people talk about cover letters on this site. Cover letters are important, and in many industries you can be damn sure they'll be read. And no, they're not 'fanfic about working in your office', or just re-stating the resume contents in a fancier guise. If you treat them like that, then of course they're not doing much for you. That makes you sound like a syncophantic windbag, and it's not doing anything else to help.
I was trained in the dark arts of the cover letter by my mother, who is a hiring manager. And her training has paid off: I've been consistently told my cover letters are excellent. Let me pass on the wisdom.
The job of a cover letter is to give a prospective employer strictly more information than is on the resume. This is where you take the resume contents and put them into context. You look at the job requirements (you are looking at the job requirements before applying, right?) and look at your resume and ask the question (in your head) "why would a person think this candidate would be good for this job?" and your cover letter is the answer to that question. If you don't answer that question, the hiring manager is going to have to do it themselves, and you have way more information to work with than they do.
This is especially important if you're moving from one industry to another, because then the relevant connections aren't obvious. It's also very important if you're overqualified, because then you can use the letter to say "I know it looks like this job would be too entry-level for me, but I'm interested to pursue it for reasons x, y, and z". You can also use this space to explain away something that might otherwise be disqualifying, like job-hopping or a long break in employment. The tone to strike here is always matter-of-fact and constrained to topic - don't go into detail about health stuff or personal tragedy, just tell them what they need to hear: that this period of your resume was affected by [bad thing] but that it's now in the past and you're looking forward to the next chapter. Remember, one of the things they're trying to learn is whether you'd be content in this role, or whether you'd be miserable and leave after 2 months, which would force them to do all the work of hiring again. You're trying to establish that you will fit right in and not cause problems. Knowing what drew you to this job in particular (and don't just say 'money', that's true for everyone) helps with that.
And the other mistake? Everyone writes cover letters that are too long. One page is fine. Two is the absolute maximum, and that's if you have a lot of specific things to say. It's a waste of your time and theirs to pad it out with fluff. Of my two most recent successful cover letters (i.e. jobs for which I was interviewed) one was 390 words and the other was 550. That's the length of this post. How long did it take me to write this post? About 15 minutes to write, 5 to proof and edit. That's how long you should be spending on a cover letter, maximum.
For much more information, examples, advice:
Your cover letter is where you make a case for why you’d excel at the job, aside from what’s in your resume. A good cover letter can be the
"i dont like intersectional feminist terminology because it implies that i have the capacity and means to enact violence and thats unfair because im literally so niceys" - one of the most dangerous and unsafe people youll ever meet
these people will say "hey dont group me in with all the other white/male/cis/TME people, im one of the good ones" without a shred of self-awareness
honestly one of the strangest and worst takes i have heard in a long time.
I wish people actually looked up what grooming actually is, because it's not "when you read something horny before your 18th birthday".
Grooming involves someone deliberately trying to gain a minor's trust and open them up for sexual abuse. The intent is important here, because a lot of the actions that can constitute grooming are superficially completely benign.
For example, being kind, listening to a child when they talk about their problems or giving them gifts can be grooming if the person doing it intends to abuse the child, but otherwise it is just being a decent person.
You can't be "groomed" by an inanimate object like a book because books do not have minds. They can't abuse you. They can't even want to abuse you.