He spent his last moments losing arguments to college students.
tumblr dot com

Discoholic 🪩
AnasAbdin

Kiana Khansmith
$LAYYYTER

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

No title available
occasionally subtle
🪼

roma★
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Janaina Medeiros
Stranger Things
almost home

JVL
cherry valley forever
No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

@theartofmadeline
Peter Solarz

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from T1

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy
seen from Algeria
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Mexico
seen from France
seen from Poland

seen from Hungary
seen from United States
@pamphlet-enjoyer
He spent his last moments losing arguments to college students.
From capitalstitchco on Threads
The devastating feeling of learning that something I always assumed was just a basic courtesy practiced by everyone is... not
when abled people talk about employability + disability I don't think they entirely understand the domino effect of unemployment/underemployment that can happen in a disabled person's life
the kinds of jobs that are considered 'unskilled' or 'entry level' are inaccessible for various reasons (e.g. involve having to stand up for long periods of time)
the time in your life when many people are expected to start working these entry level jobs is while you're still in school. the sheer exhaustion of school means that even when those jobs aren't completely inaccessible, many disabled people simply do not have the energy to do them
without any work experience, it's very hard to get work. the kinds of jobs that tend to have more accessible workplaces are either not entry-level or require a certain level of education to enter them. also without having gone through a hiring process before, it's very hard to even know what to expect from a job, which only creates additional barriers
even if you do have work experience, being disabled is not really taken as a valid reason to have gaps in your resume, which means you immediately look like a suspicious/risky hire to a HR department
disabled people, once we do have jobs, are more likely to be underemployed than abled people, meaning that we have fewer opportunities to demonstrate our skills in the workplace, and are less likely to be able to accumulate a back catalogue of good references to take with us in the 'getting a new job' mission. this itself keeps us underemployed
NOT to mention the fact that the exact same process can happen with respect to education (the being in special ed -> being able to go to university pipeline is basically non-existent. and if it is there, it is very hard to navigate). I'm not sure yet another 'employable skills program' can get us out of this one, chief
Hallo Frevblr! Your favourite year of the revolution? (Just going up to 89’-94’)
Fave year of the revolution
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
"this is DEFINITELY written by AI, I can tell because it uses the writing quirks that AI uses (because it was trained on real people who write with those quirks)"
c'mon dudes we have got to do better than this
I am big AI naysayer but I think making it into the latest of a series of unprovable accusations that you can use to harass anyone who annoys you slightly for any reason is literally the worst way to push back against its encroachment into our spaces
#the only AI quirk I believe is the use of the em dash (—)#just because it’s a pain to properly type out and real people really don’t use it that often
hey so. not meaning to pick on you for this, but:
there are various types of word processors or other text inputs which will automatically convert -- to —, meaning its difficulty in being typed out is irrelevant
there are a lot of people on tumblr, including in the notes of this thread, who have actively said that they use the emdash in their writing
the whole point of LLMs is that they train on real people's writing; they are not just randomly picking characters from the US-ASCII charset to include; AI would not generate text with emdashes if its training base did not also include writings by real people that used them
this is exactly the sort of thing I'm saying is a problem. people saying that they think they can tell that something is an "AI quirk" because "real people" don't use it, because their personal experience does not encompass its usage
The funny thing about this post is it was written out like an AI responce, or it was actual AI generated defense
The response follows a logical argument and has a list structure because lists are easy to read and understand. Humans like lists.
We don't write like AI, AI writes the way it does because it was trained on human writing. AI writes like us.
comments are turned off on this and i know it was a bloodbath in there
that post that's like "what's wrong with joining the army to kill people ain't that the point" always reminds me of how a few years into the iraq war this volunteer american soldier gave an interview to the washington post where he said exactly that and candidly confessed to having already killed someone for fun but being disappointed by how easy and unexciting he felt it was, and a month later he planned and participated in a gang rape and massacre of a little girl and her family. average poor dumb kid from little old usa just trying to afford college
Been listening to Chant II
having an online persona is kind of funny bc you post abt something like twice and suddenly that’s the only thing ur known for...u post about cheese a couple times and suddenly ur the cheese mutual
...you know what, OP? I think I truly do understand how that feels.
every time someone is asked to describe what they consider to be positive masculinity (hardworking, protective, whatever) they are at a loss when the follow up question is "okay but what makes these positive characteristic masculine? women have them too"... it's almost as if it's all patriarchal bullshit lol
it's even more cringe when they come up with this pseudo chivalry (lol) revival like DEFEND those who cannot defend themselves SWEAR by your honor... you are not lohengrin you are 27 and on reddit
what are masculine values?
- good behaviors and values an adult man should emulate
but what good behaviors or values should an adult man emulate that an adult woman should not?
- i never said these were EXCLUSIVE to men
then why do you call them masculine values if they are not gendered
- because they are associated with men
and why is that
- testosterone
i have noticed that the qualities you call masculine are high prestige and associated with authority while the qualities you call feminine are low prestige and associated with submission and caretaking. are you sure there are no social and cultural forces at play here?
- i don't know man that's just how it is
-> etc etc again and again and again lol
people are always slandering historians for saying reasonable things like "some things that seem romantic to us were platonic in the context of the times", when there's so many evil historians you actually have to look out for. number 1 : the closet royalist
They may look like travel shampoo bottles and smell like bubblegum, but after a few hundred puffs, some disposable, electronic cigarettes an
heavy metal poisoning!!!! this sucks :(((
i have many many friends who are addicted to vaping and it makes me sad!!!! this is horrible!!!
Worst part of popular left wing AI discourse online is that there's absolutely a need for a robust leftist opposition to use of cognitive automation without social dispensation to displaced human workers. The lack of any prior measures to facilitate a transition to having fewer humans in the workplace (UBI, more public control over industrial infrastructure, etc) is a disaster we are sleepwalking into - one that could lock the majority of our society's wealth further into the hands of authoritarian oligarchs who retain control of industry through last century private ownership models, while no longer needing to rely on us to operate their property.
But now we're seemingly not going to have the opposition we so desperately need, because everyone involved in the anti-AI conversation has pretty thoroughly discredited themselves and their movement by harbouring unconstrained reactionary nonsense, blatant falsehoods and woo. Instead of talking about who owns and benefits from cognitive automation, people are:
Demanding impossibilities like uninventing a now readily accessible technology
Trying to ascribe implicit moral value to said technology instead of the who is using it and how
Siding with corporations on copyright law in the name of "defending small artists"
Repeating obvious and embarrassing technical misconceptions and erroneous pop-sci about machine learning in order to justify their preferred philosophy
Invoking neo-spiritual conservative woo about the specialness of the human soul to try to incoherently discredit a machine that can quite obviously perform certain tasks just as well if not better than they can
Misrepresent numbers about energy use and environmental cost in an absurd double standard (all modern infrastructure is reliant on data centers to a similar level of impact, including your favourite fandom social media and online video games!) to build a narrative AI is some sort of malevolent spirit that damages our reality when it is called upon
It's a level of reactionary ignorance that has completely discredited any popular opposition to industrial AI rollout because it falls apart as soon as you dig deeper than a snappy social media post, or a misguided pro-copyright screed from an insecure web artist (who decries a machine laying eyes on their freely posted work while simultaneously charging commission for fan-art of corporate IPs... I'm sure that will absolutely resolve in their favour).
It would be funny how much people are fucking themselves over with all this, except I'm being fucked over to, and as a result am really quite mad about the situation. We need UBI, we need to liberate abundance from corporate greed, what we don't need is viral posts about putting distortion filters on anime fan-art to ward off the evil mechanical eye, pointless boycotts of platforms because they are perceived to have let the evil machines taint them, or petitions to further criminalize the creation of derivative works.
OP seems to have missed the part about people's work being used WITHOUT PERMISSION to train the LLMs. That's why the distortion overlays (not filters).
No I didn't miss that, I just don't give a fuck.
It's in no tangible way "stealing" your publicly-posted work for a machine to browse past it and subtly adjust some numbers in its world-expectations model, any more than it is for me to look at said publicly-posted work or and think "hey that's neat" or "I like that style". Nothing has been taken or stolen or disrespected. Nothing that could be reconstructed has even been "saved", in most cases. This is exactly the nonsense rhetoric I was talking about.
You sound like a Disney exec hopped up about robot thoughtcrime after discovering that the purpose of art is to influence the viewer. Be gay, create derivative works, copyright is not real.
(Insert nuance that it probably is at least quite rude and ungrateful to profit off a deliberate recreation of a specific piece of human artwork produced by a gen-AI model, in the same way that it would be to sell knock-off t-shirts of that same work. But that's not actually what said models are doing practically ever unless they're being guided to do so by the human operator, at which point the moral calculus is the same as for the knock-off-shirt guy).
Also I will once again point out that Glaze and Nightshade 1. don't actually work very well at doing what they claim to do and 2. are themselves built around generative AI models.
The most extravagant idea that can be born in the head of a political thinker is to believe that it suffices for people to enter, weapons in hand, among a foreign people and expect to have its laws and constitution embraced. It is in the nature of things that the progress of reason is slow and no one loves armed missionaries; the first lesson of nature and prudence is to repulse them as enemies. One can encourage freedom, never create it by an invading force.
Maximillien Robspierre
Soundtrack to a Coup d'Etat (2024, Johan Grimonprez)
"lunatic fringe" 🙄 Malcolm X deserves daily apologies here and in the afterlife for how hard they tried to make him sound unreasonable