girls i don't know if we can one-woman post-rock concept album about the end of the world our way out of this one. but i'll keep trying
(bandcamp) (the folder) (tidal) (spotify) (apple music) (etc)

titsay
Show & Tell
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
KIROKAZE
YOU ARE THE REASON
No title available
tumblr dot com

Discoholic 🪩
Cosmic Funnies
Sade Olutola
Keni
art blog(derogatory)
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
occasionally subtle
cherry valley forever
RMH

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
ojovivo
almost home

seen from Maldives

seen from Hungary
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Guatemala
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from Greece

seen from Germany
seen from India
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Netherlands
@poppiesnroses
girls i don't know if we can one-woman post-rock concept album about the end of the world our way out of this one. but i'll keep trying
(bandcamp) (the folder) (tidal) (spotify) (apple music) (etc)
I told a guy his total was 13.21 and he said “wish it were that year, could actually get some good music on the radio”
breaking news from the AP, our boys on the front have just sacked constantinople. take that, heretics. coming up next are the soothing lute dirges of bing crosby
*screams of a witch burning at the stake*
THOU ART CURRENTLY LISTENING TO
*Gregorian chanting*
13.21
*leper bell ringing*
HIGH MEDIAEVAL FM
*recording of John Lackland sobbing as he signs the Magna Carta*
WHENCE COMETH NAUGHT BUT LITURGIES
LITURGIES
AND MORE LITURGIES
*Templar knights praying out loud*
THIS ISN’T THY GRANDMOTHERES STATION
*Imagine Dragons - Radioactive starts playing*
just remembered i have a degree in sound engineering and can voice act
OH MY GOD THIS IS THE BEST DAY EVER
Terrible things happening in my kitchen.
I'm cleaning owl pellets.
It's very gross.
Gradual process.
This is for jewelry making! I figure you can't get much more ethically sourced for bones than "an owl ate it"
There are at least five skulls and sooooooooo many mandibles and lots of vertebrae. Also lots and lots of ribs.
Basically I've soaked the pellets in a bleach solution to break them up and sanitize them then skimmed off a lot of the fur and assorted gunk and picked out the biggest bones and put them in water to finish soaking off the fur and now I've got a ton of itty bitty bones to pick out of the remaining sludge.
Here are the most complete skulls (and one mandible)
This was like. Five pellets.
A couple more skulls (toothpick for scale) and the last of the bones I'm going to sort through. The shallow glass container has the mostly-de-furred skulls in soapy water, the taller jar has a ton of small bones in plain water just soaking the gunk off.
How are you going to make them into jewelry?
Bone mandala pendants in resin, or teeny tiny vertebra pendants. The skulls are too big for that so I'm probably going to just gild them and put them on a frame for a painting.
Basically like this!
You know, an interesting tumblr transformation that's happened gradually, and which I've seen no one talk about: ask-culture has essentially dropped off to nothing.
By which I mean, asks used to be WAY more of the tumblr economy. They used to be more common to send, and receive, and see. They were integral to the collaborative, forum-like behavior of old tumblr communities, not even to speak on the HUGE number of ask-blogs that used to exist to only be interacted with in ask-form.
I'm not saying this in a vying-for-attention way but instead in an observational way: I used to get way way more asks in like 2015, even with a fraction of my follower count. I wonder if it's due to the homogenization of social media sites? There's a lot more of this divide between "content creator" and "consumer" instead of just a bunch of peer blogs who would talk to each other. "Asks" aren't really a thing on twitter, are they? And as I understand it, the closest thing to an "ask" on instagram or tiktok would be a creator screenshotting some comment and responding to it in a new reel or video or whatever those content mediums are. Are asks just too tumblr-specific? Is that aspect of the site culture dying out as more and more people converge to using all their social media sites in the same way?
it's probably from assholes making asks a minefield of trolling/harassment for years with no real blocking ability, which turned people off from allowing asks on their blogs so as a whole the site moved away from it
but now that we do have better blocking, we should try to revive it.
Reblog if your ask box is open.
bringing back my too woke opinion that you should be allowed to change labels without the previous one being incorrect
i think you should be allowed to identify as trans without retroactively saying you were also trans in the past. i think the "born this way" rhetoric is limiting and you should be able say stuff like "i was fully a girl when i was a kid and now im a boy" without it invalidating your current identity but maybe that's just me
How many languages do you have knowledge of? (Maybe not fluent, but you can at least understand/speak and/or read a little bit)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
More than 10
I thiiinkkkk I'm done
Not to be incredibly vulgar and nasty or anything, but I’d like to close my eyes and rest my head in somebody’s lap while they run their fingers through my hair
I think people often misunderstand my position on the Habsburg incest thing as "no, don't make fun of the royals I like!"
When really it is "I find it unnerving how fast people make fun of physical disability and equate it to moral goodness when you make it slightly ok to do so in context."
You wouldn't believe how many history books sound like they want to say slurs when they talk about Ferdinand I having hydrocephalus and epilepsy. Conditions, I must stress, can be caused by other things. Conditions other people have.
Well, you see, I'm talking about them as real historical people with real disabilities and not the Targaryens.
But yes, I'm making the point that people are looking for a situation where it's ok to be abelist.
Look, if you want to critique the politics of the Habsburgs and the idea of the empire and the whole structure of monarchy, go ham. I will help you in that endeavor if you want.
However, there's so much going on with that approach to it, so here are my thoughts in no particular order:
This idea presumes so much choice that just did not realistically exist for so many people. Archdukes and Archduchesses more often than not had no say in their marriage partner, because marriage wasn't about what they wanted. You, woman in this family, have to marry your cousin because it's what is best politically, and how you feel about the concept doesn't matter one way or another. This happens to men too, though less so, but off the top of my head you can look at Crown Prince Rudolph's marriage being more or less decided over his head. So, preference to marry a cousin you barely know really isn't factored in at all. You're lucky if your parent cares about you being happy in the marriage.
It's not about purity, it's about politics. The rule isn't that you had to marry a relative, it's that you had to marry a Catholic from a ruling dynasty. Add in the idea that this was chosen for you from a set of politically advantageous matches, because daughters and sons are assets to be used strategically, and you get a lot of marriages into the same set of families. As crass as it is, letting your children marry downward is wasting a bargaining tool. For the Habsburgs, the religious bar is also important and pretty constraining, especially when they aren't on good political terms with the other major Catholic powers (France and Spain) so you get Italian state and Bavarian marriages. If you keep reinforcing those alliances through marriage, that also means you're probably marrying a relative. Look at how quickly they leap at having new options when Belgium is established as a friendly Catholic state.
The above problem is complicated when someone in your family becomes Grandmother of Europe. Maria Theresa's extensive marriage politics means that a lot of the possible marriage candidates are almost certainly related. This is also, by the way, how we get Victoria's hemophilia being so widespread in the Courts her children married into, and everyone seemingly being cousins by World War I.
There is a lot of "might" going on with how disability works here. Ferdinand I's Wikipedia page ("citation needed" all over the place by the way) is littered with how his disabilities "might" be caused by heredity. But they could also be caused or compounded by many of the other things that caused birth complications or disability to be more common historically, like insufficient medical knowledge about prenatal care, insufficient maternal nutrition, or infections during pregnancy or after birth. Epilepsy certainly isn't constrained to just when your parents are related to each other.
Look me in the eyes and tell me that historians routinely acting like this man (who actually functioned pretty well in a world without anti-seizure medications) had no sentience because he had a disability from birth is schadenfreude.
Even if it was the product of their parents willfully having a preference to never marry the lower nobility or the bourgeoisie because they think they're gross commoners or something, do we really want to reinforce the idea that disability is a moral punishment?
It wasn't just Habsburgs who married cousins, people, until just a few generations ago, most of the human race lived in small villages and married within them about half the time.
Yes, things are different now, we know what lethal recessives are and also we get more opportunities to travel and meet people from different families. Just like we know more about hygiene and nutrition. But that doesn't mean people who knew less were bad, or didn't care about their children.
Some woodpeckers make dainty little holes that barely damage the tree.
On the other hand, pileated woodpeckers
Your tree has been visited by the Flying Tree Doctor and diagnosed with Infested. He has removed the Unauthorized Fucking Thing. Praise be to Flying Tree Doctor.
Be yourself as best you can whenever you can.
every time someone treats Feeling Love™ as Political Praxis i want to beam this whole Moses Sumney quote into their head
🦔🦔🦔
does it feel weird or nice to be a tumblr microcelebrity? how do you feel about the way people talk to you online? i am curious, especially since unlike many other big tumblr accounts, it seems like you tripped into this rather than Posting For Notes, you know? anyway, hope your current research is going swell. frogs 👍
That is a very kind way to ask this question. Thanks, anon.
I would say it is usually nice; it is a joy for any scientist inclined towards science communication to have an enthusiastic and supportive audience/community. And I am glad to have come by it mostly honestly, without having to do much that I would consider pandering or over-hyped or anything. I just did a silly thing one day and it went viral—through almost no contribution of my own—and now I am somehow one of the most popular individuals on the site apparently. I must say, when I mention that I have something of a following on Tumblr to people in meatspace, the most popular response is 'oh tumblr is still a thing?' — which I honestly think is great.
As for tripping into it… well, I think I have wanted to be famous since I was a little kid. When I started to do scicomm and research blogging here on tumblr, I desperately wanted to grow my audience, to reach as many people as possible. I also wanted things to go viral, which is part of the reason I have always interspersed the serious with the silly—the former strengthens the audience, while the latter grows it. So, I didn't really trip into it so much as trying desperately to catch a break for about nine years, before finally by coincidence a nothing of a comment turned into the most popular thing I have ever done on the internet.
Also just turns out tumblrinas are pretty much freaks for frogs so *finger guns*
I have had some close encounters with fame and virality over the course of my life—both for myself, and others who I was close to—and these have had a significant mollifying effect on this desire, but there is a latent desire for attention on social media, certainly. I really admire and listen closely to the experiences of Hank and especially John Green in terms of a relationship with fame. It is intoxicating, but dangerous. It is easy to dehumanise and be dehumanised by fame. It is easy to lose the joy and one's moral compass in the thrill of it. It is intoxicating but toxic.
Tumblr 'microcelebrity' as you so elegantly put it is maybe a little different, but… not that different. If a post starts doing Numbers™, I can't stop refreshing the feed to see the tags and comments as people add them. When videos I made recently about the new frog species went a little viral on Instagram and Facebook, I was reminded again how simultaneously exhilarating and sickening the feeling can be. And that the point of most of the social internet now—the way the algorithms are set up—is to create discourse, for better and especially for worse. Most of the feedback on Instagram at least has been decidedly provocative or angry, but that is what the algorithms are *built* to do, because it drives engagement and keeps people on them. Spending time. Because time is money, and the companies behind the apps are the ones really profiting from it all.
This is not something I experience here on tumblr. The discourse is usually great, and when it's not, nobody is profiting from me spending time on here arguing. It's not incentivised by the algorithm, it's just part of discourse. I think this is how the internet should be, and I frankly think that the way it has been set up to incentivise divisiveness over much of the rest of the internet is evil, if anything can be said to be evil. We create here, we build on each other's works, we inspire and discuss and share. At least, that has been my experience. And I hope it is yours, too.
Also the research IS going well, thanks! There's a LOT of it, too. I have six or seven more people joining my lab between now and the end of the year, which is mad. But we are doing really cool work on so many different things at once, and I really look forward to sharing more of it here and across the internet!
Dear writers of historical/fantasy fiction
Please imagine me gently holding your hands, I am not reprimanding you, I say this with nothing but love and respect, but
If you give a character with no access to antibiotics a wound infection, they are going to die.
If a character is delirious with fever, they are going to die.
If a character sleeps and won't wake up or is unconscious for an extended amount of time, they are going to die.
Things you could do to the Character instead:
Make them lose a substantial amount of blood. For reference: For an adult human, about 8% of their body weight is blood. They can lose around 10% of that without much trouble, 20% will cause serious symptoms, more than 50-60% is generally incompatible with life. These numbers are estimations. The slower this blood loss, the better the body can compensate for it. Losing a significant amount of blood will affect the character's consciousness and take days or weeks to recover from.
Fever and malaise. Injuries are stressful. Inflammation is a natural response to that. Destroyed cells release proteins which can cause moderate fever (too much of that can cause kidney failure which is why excessive beatings can kill people, even when they don't initially sustain any life-threatening injuries). The character will be in pain, they'll feel like shit, they'll need plenty of rest and tender caretaking without their limb rotting off.
If you have to infect them, give them an abscess. That way, the pus and bacteria are walled off and can be drained out (by cutting the abscess open), with lower risk of it getting into the blood stream. It's also risky but much more survivable than phlegmone (diffuse infection of soft tissue).
Drugs. Just drug 'em. Ye Olde Opium/Laudanum will put them in a scarily deep sleep while Love Interest can sit there and hold vigil. Now this might also kill them so use with caution.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS WRITING ADVICE NOT MEDICAL ADVICE
Oh no! The Character has an ouchie! And they can't go to urgent care to have it looked at because that's not invented yet! Whatever shall we do!!!
Keep. It. Clean. Carefully and gently clean out gross stuff and things that do not belong in there, do not introduce foreign matter, and keep that wound covered.
The body will support Caretaker in this. Exudation is a natural defense mechanism to flush out germs and other dirt. Normal exudate is clear, with a slight yellow tinge, and almost odorless (wounds do have a characteristic smell, but they don't stink). Excessive exudate can form crusts around the wound, those should be cleaned away. Boiled water or saline solution is probably the safest bet for wound irrigation. Gentle mechanical cleaning (wiping with wet cloth) is appropriate.
Wounds want to be kept moist. Ointment can help with that, and also prevent the bandage from sticking to the wound. For a premodern setting, lard (rendered pig fat) is probably not a terrible option. It contains almost no water or sugar, so doesn't grow mold, and the grease prevents the tissue from drying out. Still, Caretaker will probably want to soak that bandage before they remove it.
The bandage should be clean linen. Not wool. If Caretaker has to rip up their clothes for bandages, at least use the undergarment, and the parts of it that are less dirty (sleeves).
A cavernous wound (ie from a drained abscess) might need to be tamponaded, that is, lined with a strip of wet cloth, to keep it open and help with drainage.
Various herbs, honey, spices, etc, have historically all been used to promote healing, some more successfully than others. However, everything is potentially contaminated with germs and fungal spores. Putting mashed plant matter that hasn't been otherwise treated into wounds is always a gamble.
Disinfection is a possibility, but an effective disinfectant will also damage healthy tissue. If Character has their wound bathed with wine or spirits every time the bandage is changed, that wound will become necrotic.
Stitches are likewise a double-edged sword. Pulling the edges of a deep wound together will make it heal quicker and more smoothly, but it also retains exudate in a warm, anaerobic environment, which makes an ideal growing environment for nasty bacteria. Balance risk and reward appropriately.
Some additional thoughts:
Medicine has taken unimaginable leaps during the last ~150 years. Things that would have been a death sentence to our ancestors are barely more than a nuisance to us. As a result, we have a fundamentally different attitude towards treatments, especially invasive treatments. We do surgeries as precaution or to restore optimal function, where in the past, surgery was often a last resort. It was very risky, and ran a good chance of killing the patient, so it would only be done if they would die anyway.
That doesn't mean doctors and surgeons of the past were helpless, there are a lot of amazing and very sophisticated treatments, that are older than you'd think. For as long as we have been human we have tried to heal each other, and were often successful.
Just because we know humoral pathology is wrong doesn't mean it's stupid. It's based on very solid observations of health and the human body. It was the accepted theory for a long time. It makes no sense for a doctor in that setting to reject it.
The human body is at once more resilient and more fragile than most people think. Humans can walk off devastating injuries, a lot of things will sort themselves out. However, once a tipping point is reached and the body can no longer compensate for whatever is going wrong, there's no turning that process around. This is why systemic infections are so dangerous: Bacteria/toxins overwhelm the immune system, everything is poisoned, multiple organ failure, death. It's very difficult to come back from that, even today.
THIS IS WRITING ADVICE, NOT MEDICAL ADVICE. In real life, there's no benevolent writer that makes sure you get the best possible outcome. Real illnesses don't care how relevant you are to the plot. Have that looked at by a professional.
i turned on the light in the dining room but Tubby had been sleeping in a chair and it woke her up and she was Not Pleased
yes
however we recently got her a new ceramic fountain that better suits her aesthetic
and her own fainting couch
but she still prefers a good lap whenever possible
@unpretty what is Ms. Tubby’s full name if it is not Tubby?
Tubbitha
reblog for Tubbitha
a princess.
It’s so fucking weird to see Tubby on my dash from just like a random unrelated blog I follow. That’s just my best friends’ cat. I commissioned a plate painted with her likeness.