Janaina Medeiros
Misplaced Lens Cap
AnasAbdin
i don't do bad sauce passes
ojovivo
#extradirty
YOU ARE THE REASON
h
Kiana Khansmith
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
d e v o n
No title available
almost home
Product Placement
taylor price
KIROKAZE
No title available
dirt enthusiast
roma★
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
@scheinheilig
If we limit bodily autonomy in some cases (ie. interfering with someone attempting suicide, self-harming, engaging in disordered eating) to protect a person's life, why do we think bodily autonomy should be limitless when the person in danger is unborn?
Is the message option unavailable for anyone else?
@guerrilleracallejera DMs
@crabs-and-bees that's so weird I can't even reply to my own posts either I'm so confused hahaha
Shadow ban maybe idk
So they deleted my blog before and now this, meanwhile there are people who tell me they want me and my family to die and nothing is happening with their blogs.
just start calling yourself trans and you can send all the death threats you like without repercussions.
I might actually make a new blog and call myself a gender fluid lesbian and just post the same things I do now and anyone disagreeing is actively participating in discrimination.
Is the message option unavailable for anyone else?
@guerrilleracallejera DMs
@crabs-and-bees that's so weird I can't even reply to my own posts either I'm so confused hahaha
Shadow ban maybe idk
So they deleted my blog before and now this, meanwhile there are people who tell me they want me and my family to die and nothing is happening with their blogs.
Is the message option unavailable for anyone else?
@apostolum you will need to send me an ask :/
When I talk about motherhood, homemakers or anything connected to this, people start talking about money.
Sure, we live in a world where we need money to live. However, never forget that your body, mind, heart and soul needs more than this to live, It needs above all nurturing, love and care.
And yes, it’s cliché but it’s the truth : money cannot buy you this. It’s not a monetary transaction.
Nurturing is so essential to our lives. It shouldn’t be a side thing. Something you do when you come back home exhausted, or during the weekend. It’s something honourable and essential.
So yes, some of us might not be at liberty to stay at home and tend the fire but for those who do it : they are doing something very important.
Just because they don’t earn money doesn’t mean they deserve less respect and regard.
Is the message option unavailable for anyone else?
@crabs-and-bees @guerrilleracallejera that sucks :(((( everything is normal in my settings so it must really be a shadow ban or something. I don't even have the option to view my DMs I just see activity
Is the message option unavailable for anyone else?
@guerrilleracallejera DMs
@crabs-and-bees that's so weird I can't even reply to my own posts either I'm so confused hahaha
Is the message option unavailable for anyone else?
One of the reasons why feminism is awful is because instead of advocating for protecting women by being anti sex work and therefore anti human trafficking, they are celebrating it. Instead of wanting to protect unborn babies they promote atrocious acts. Instead of celebrating femininity, they are advocates for its destruction by trying to erase what being a female means.
APOSTOLIC LETTER ISSUED "MOTU PROPRIO" BY THE SUPREME PONTIFF FRANCIS
Art. 1. The liturgical books promulgated by Saint Paul VI and Saint John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of Vatican Council II, are the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.
Art. 2. It belongs to the diocesan bishop, as moderator, promoter, and guardian of the whole liturgical life of the particular Church entrusted to him, [5] to regulate the liturgical celebrations of his diocese. [6] Therefore, it is his exclusive competence to authorize the use of the 1962 Roman Missal in his diocese, according to the guidelines of the Apostolic See.
Art. 3. The bishop of the diocese in which until now there exist one or more groups that celebrate according to the Missal antecedent to the reform of 1970:
§ 1. is to determine that these groups do not deny the validity and the legitimacy of the liturgical reform, dictated by Vatican Council II and the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs;
§ 2. is to designate one or more locations where the faithful adherents of these groups may gather for the eucharistic celebration (not however in the parochial churches and without the erection of new personal parishes);
§ 3. to establish at the designated locations the days on which eucharistic celebrations are permitted using the Roman Missal promulgated by Saint John XXIII in 1962. [7] In these celebrations the readings are proclaimed in the vernacular language, using translations of the Sacred Scripture approved for liturgical use by the respective Episcopal Conferences;
§ 4. to appoint a priest who, as delegate of the bishop, is entrusted with these celebrations and with the pastoral care of these groups of the faithful. This priest should be suited for this responsibility, skilled in the use of the Missale Romanum antecedent to the reform of 1970, possess a knowledge of the Latin language sufficient for a thorough comprehension of the rubrics and liturgical texts, and be animated by a lively pastoral charity and by a sense of ecclesial communion. This priest should have at heart not only the correct celebration of the liturgy, but also the pastoral and spiritual care of the faithful;
§ 5. to proceed suitably to verify that the parishes canonically erected for the benefit of these faithful are effective for their spiritual growth, and to determine whether or not to retain them;
§ 6. to take care not to authorize the establishment of new groups.
Art. 4. Priests ordained after the publication of the present Motu Proprio, who wish to celebrate using the Missale Romanum of 1962, should submit a formal request to the diocesan Bishop who shall consult the Apostolic See before granting this authorization.
Art. 5. Priests who already celebrate according to the Missale Romanum of 1962 should request from the diocesan Bishop the authorization to continue to enjoy this faculty.
Art. 6. Institutes of consecrated life and Societies of apostolic life, erected by the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, fall under the competence of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies for Apostolic Life.
Art. 7. The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments and the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, for matters of their particular competence, exercise the authority of the Holy See with respect to the observance of these provisions.
Art. 8. Previous norms, instructions, permissions, and customs that do not conform to the provisions of the present Motu Proprio are abrogated.
I didn’t want to add this to the original post, but in case anyone is interested this is my attempt in explaining it.
As described in Art. 1: Basically Novus Ordo is described as the ordinary form of Mass and Traditional Latin Mass is described as the extraordinary (unique) form of Mass. Which is ironic, because up until the Second Vatican Council there was no Novus Ordo.
Art. 2: Up until now any Priest could celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass, but now the Bishop is the one who will decide whether or not a Priest is allowed to celebrate Mass the traditional way. So the Bishop can just deny the Priest this option.
Art. 3 §1: The Bishop needs to determine if the Priests and the lay people and so on deny the validity and legitimacy of Vatican II when it comes to how Mass should be celebrated and if he is under the impression that they do he can take away the Priests right to celebrate Traditional Latin Mass.
§2: The Bishop can tell the Priest when he is allowed to celebrate TLM and where and it says “ not however in the parochial churches “, so then where? And it’s not allowed to establish a parish that exclusively celebrates TLM.
§3: From now on the Gospel etc. has to be proclaimed in the language of the people and no longer in Latin.
§4: This might be a problem, because if the Bishop thinks that the Priest isn’t well versed enough in Latin he can just not allow him to celebrate TLM.
§5: This might mean that if the bishop thinks that the celebration of TLM is not beneficial to the faithful for their spiritual growth he can decide that the Priest is no longer allowed to celebrate TLM. So if the Bishop is very modern and doesn’t understand the importance of Mass being held in Latin he can just say Nope no TLM for you???
§6: no more new groups? so does that mean any group at all or is this focused on a group of Priests coming together who explicitly want to celebrate TLM? I can’t wait to see how that will be applied.
Art. 4: So any Priest ordained after yesterday has to submit a request to his Bishop, who will then ask Rome to permit him to celebrate TLM.
Art. 5: Priests who were ordained before yesterday and already celebrate TLM need to ask their permission from their Bishop to continue to do so. So the Bishop can just deny them their wish to celebrate TLM.
Art. 6: So the Institute of Christ the King and the Fraternity of Saint Peter fall under the supervision of João Braz de Aviz, so from now on he will be responsible to handle any disputes within the communities.
Art. 7: Whenever their is a debate about anything in Lithurgy the issue used to go to Ecclesia Dei to settel the dispute/discussion, now the Priests have to go to The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments so if I got it right to Arthur Roche, who seems to be very liberal and doesn’t really agree with the traditional ways.
Art. 8: Priests who already had arragements before to celebrate TLM, their arragements are now revoked.
APOSTOLIC LETTER ISSUED "MOTU PROPRIO" BY THE SUPREME PONTIFF FRANCIS
Art. 1. The liturgical books promulgated by Saint Paul VI and Saint John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of Vatican Council II, are the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.
Art. 2. It belongs to the diocesan bishop, as moderator, promoter, and guardian of the whole liturgical life of the particular Church entrusted to him, [5] to regulate the liturgical celebrations of his diocese. [6] Therefore, it is his exclusive competence to authorize the use of the 1962 Roman Missal in his diocese, according to the guidelines of the Apostolic See.
Art. 3. The bishop of the diocese in which until now there exist one or more groups that celebrate according to the Missal antecedent to the reform of 1970:
§ 1. is to determine that these groups do not deny the validity and the legitimacy of the liturgical reform, dictated by Vatican Council II and the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs;
§ 2. is to designate one or more locations where the faithful adherents of these groups may gather for the eucharistic celebration (not however in the parochial churches and without the erection of new personal parishes);
§ 3. to establish at the designated locations the days on which eucharistic celebrations are permitted using the Roman Missal promulgated by Saint John XXIII in 1962. [7] In these celebrations the readings are proclaimed in the vernacular language, using translations of the Sacred Scripture approved for liturgical use by the respective Episcopal Conferences;
§ 4. to appoint a priest who, as delegate of the bishop, is entrusted with these celebrations and with the pastoral care of these groups of the faithful. This priest should be suited for this responsibility, skilled in the use of the Missale Romanum antecedent to the reform of 1970, possess a knowledge of the Latin language sufficient for a thorough comprehension of the rubrics and liturgical texts, and be animated by a lively pastoral charity and by a sense of ecclesial communion. This priest should have at heart not only the correct celebration of the liturgy, but also the pastoral and spiritual care of the faithful;
§ 5. to proceed suitably to verify that the parishes canonically erected for the benefit of these faithful are effective for their spiritual growth, and to determine whether or not to retain them;
§ 6. to take care not to authorize the establishment of new groups.
Art. 4. Priests ordained after the publication of the present Motu Proprio, who wish to celebrate using the Missale Romanum of 1962, should submit a formal request to the diocesan Bishop who shall consult the Apostolic See before granting this authorization.
Art. 5. Priests who already celebrate according to the Missale Romanum of 1962 should request from the diocesan Bishop the authorization to continue to enjoy this faculty.
Art. 6. Institutes of consecrated life and Societies of apostolic life, erected by the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, fall under the competence of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies for Apostolic Life.
Art. 7. The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments and the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, for matters of their particular competence, exercise the authority of the Holy See with respect to the observance of these provisions.
Art. 8. Previous norms, instructions, permissions, and customs that do not conform to the provisions of the present Motu Proprio are abrogated.
"What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered harmful."
-Pope Benedict XVI
A father with his child in Hagia Sophia Mosque
i kno this is cute n heartwarming but the conversion of the hagia sophia into a mosque was a political islamist move to erase the (christian) history of this city and it was like, mostly a desperate move by the AKP / erdoğan to secure votes right before the 2023 elections by appealing to their more radical islamist voters, incl the people in this video, and it’s leading to lots of damages of the icons etc originally present in the structure as it used to be a church in the byzantian era, as you can’t have icons where you pray, like it’s actually really gross that it’s not a museum but a mosque now so seeing this makes me. Ew
^ literally not the time and place to critiscize the ottoman empire or this issue but okay
Bro im literally a muslim-ish turk w some political consciousness you have no idea how fucking dumb both of yall look rn
“This isn’t the time and place to talk about it.”
- People who will always try to silence you regardless of the time and place.
I don't even know what to say about Francis anymore. I'm not very knowledgeable when it comes to past popes, I'm a Catholic convert and I guess I still have some things to learn when it comes to Church history. But some of the things he says or does really just make me speechless.
Catholics need to bring back the antipope tradition.
I still contend that Sedevacantism is the only valid form of Catholic thought these days but at that point you might as well just drop it entirely and become Orthodox.
I would never join a Church that is in schism. I do believe in the authority of the Catholic Church, I'm simply disappointed in some of the actions of the Pope. I won't just drop the one true Church for a Church that is in schism and in error.
They say we get the popes we deserve, Pope Francis isn't the cause of all the problems in the Church, if anything he is the product of them. The problems in The Church today were decades in the making, just like the Vatican II council isn't the cause of all the problems in the The Church today, it's what went on behind the scenes of the council that was the culmination of half a century or more of decay.
Sedevacantism isn't the right path, you're not protesting bad popes that we have earned from being unfaithful, you're betraying Christ's Church, abandoning ship, and proving you have no faith in God's plan -and God does have a plan.
Even though lukewarm Catholics are leaving the Church like wild geese in flocks, traditional Catholicism is flourishing in spite of oppression and opposition. Look at the parishes that have the highest numbers of converts, look at the parishes that have the most children, they're all traditional parishes that many if not most of, offer the Latin Mass, this is all despite the spread of modernist heresy throughout the Church, and despite desperate attempts to stifle the traditional Mass.
Traditionalism is flourishing, and its very hopeful seeing many of these young men coming out of seminary, because despite that these are the same seminaries that for decades turned out ill catechized priests that don't even believe in the true presence, many the young priests coming out of seminary today have a strong desire for tradition, and their bishops can't keep the lid on the pot much longer, they can't keep displacing deviant traditionalists and sweeping them under the rug.
The faithful, see the corruption in the hierarchy and they are turning more and more towards traditionalism, and despite the unfaithfulness of the world and the atrocities we have committed, our cries are not landing on deaf ears, God hears our prayers, he knows the plight of HIS Church, nothing goes without his allowing it.
I think it's safe to say that the Church and the world are being chastised, and it's only gonna get worse, but in the end there will be no lukewarm Catholics, the Church may be smaller, but it will be stronger and more faithful.
I don't even know what to say about Francis anymore. I'm not very knowledgeable when it comes to past popes, I'm a Catholic convert and I guess I still have some things to learn when it comes to Church history. But some of the things he says or does really just make me speechless.
Catholics need to bring back the antipope tradition.
I still contend that Sedevacantism is the only valid form of Catholic thought these days but at that point you might as well just drop it entirely and become Orthodox.
I would never join a Church that is in schism. I do believe in the authority of the Catholic Church, I'm simply disappointed in some of the actions of the Pope. I won't just drop the one true Church for a Church that is in schism and in error.
A church that is in schism and error according to whom? According to the same church led by fallible men throughout all of history, that you personally are now in disagreement with on certain issues?
Maybe you should write up your disagreements with the pope on some paper and nail it to his door?
In schism according to whom? Idk if you're aware but there was this event back in 1054 called the great schism. You should probably look it up. Having disagreements with the leadership of my Church is not a valid excuse to join the fractured, schismatic orthodoxy.
