I think the true horror of Frankenstein (1818) is that we are not always the victims of what we fear, specifically in regards to how white people have feared black people despite having oppressive power over them.
Womanhood is absolutely part of the story too, but I think a lot of the time white women hijack the conversation regarding this book as a way to present their womanhood as the ultimate victimhood, and overlooking how their privilege of living as WHITE women specifically is also relevant to the discussion of this novel.
Frankenstein was written at a time in which black bodies were used as science experiments, and when white people didnât find a way to use them for their own benefit, their very existence was a scorn.
Many black babies were used to lure alligators, and it was gleefully depicted in art and postcards.
But when slave revolts started to occur and black slaves killed their white captors for freedom, it was presented as unreasonable acts of violence.
Suddenly there were âtwo sidesâ and black slaves crossed the line of two communities that were only then presented on an equal playing field because it was convenient.
The creature is viewed as inhumane, a being beyond conventional ideas of gender or race.
From birth, he is only treated with abuse and torture, no matter what he does. Acts of kindness and malice are met with the same scorn, because it has nothing to do with who he has and everything to do with what people think his existence represents.
He exists in a body that survives suffering meant to kill a human because humans are not supposed to take it. Over and over and over.
Heâs hurt by people who go on with their lives without guilt, like itâs just the way it is in a way he never could without facing repercussions and viewed as inherently monstrous. He understands cognitively itâs not right, but mentally heâs running beyond thin.
Suddenly, when he kills, heâs humanized, but only to be held to the standards of humanity, only as a way to be scorned again. Heâs paradoxically viewed as an otherworldly being without reason or humanity AND viewed as a fully reasonable individual who deliberately made these choices with no nuance.
At no point is he provided the mercy and understanding of either implications, only the worst of both. He is a being that contains multitudes. Heâs not a hero but he doesnât HAVE to be.
Revolution was never pretty and wasnât always led by these perfect heroes. Victims donât need to be heroes to deserve basic rights that people of privilege have by default regardless of if they prove their âmoral worthâ.
White infants were shot in their cribs. They may not have been involved, but how can that matter to people who since infancy have been viewed as criminals, as less than?
Itâs not about these individual actions, itâs about them stemming from systematic oppression.
William was a white, upper class child who was not responsible for the acts of his family. But the creature only experienced being viewed as a part of a monolith of the uncanny.
Is it really such a surprise when he similarly sees William as an extension of the oppressive humanity heâs a part of?
Not to mention, the creature was a child too. He was at most six years old. Even regardless of that, itâs the content of the years lived that make someone an adult and not just the time frame itself. The creature learned a lot but he did not have a childhood.
The creature was extremely cognitively intelligent, but he was developmentally stunted mentally. He couldnât really be expected to use that cognition without guidance.
Similarly, black children are often adultified. They often have to grow up faster than white children, because if they express natural toddler emotions, theyâre viewed as violent and threatening. Theyâre made to walk on eggshells, because if they show too much of any sort of emotion, theyâll be viewed as a threat and risk facing violence. Police officers have shot literal children because they thought they were threatening.
Even now, black children and teens are viewed as uncivilized, unintelligent, inhuman, but once they get into trouble, even just the trouble most teenagers are expected to get into, suddenly theyâre âyoung menâ or âyoung womenâ who know exactly what theyâre doing and should have known better.
Thatâs not accountability. Thatâs not acknowledging autonomy.
Itâs not proving anything when people youâve abused into believing theyâre inherently violent lash out.
There is a genuine fear of black people from white people. Itâs a fear of the unknown, of the unfamiliar.
Itâs like seeing an uncertain figure in a dark hallway, but being unaware that, from that figureâs perspective, you look the exact same. Except you have the power. You have the weapon. You can hurt them in a way they cannot. You view your acts of violence as fearful defense without realizing you were never the one at risk.