NSFW I'm a 52 year-old ex-welder. This blog has some NSFW photos (non-nude) with occasional posts about living with incontinence. I'm following a bunch of NSFW picture blogs that feature what turns me on the most: Women wetting their pants and wearing diapers. The female pants wetting turn-on has been since forever, but the interest in diapers rapidly evolved once I landed in them myself. I've been incontinent since early 2008 from a spinal injury and wearing diapers 24/7/365 since. Life is complicated, and if you want a carefully curated presentation of only what you're interested in, you won't find that here. This blog will encapsulate all the bits of me, whether you like them or not, and it's up to you to scroll past them. I've tagged a few more posts that explain myself in a little more detail with #tinlizziedl.
Heads-Up: If you're seeking a "Mommy" or "Daddy" -dom role with me as a submissive or baby, you're going to be disappointed. I am not interested in any sort of dynamic like that.
Save yourself the time and effort and move along.
I'm more than willing to be friends with fellow ABDL's and would love to meet people IRL (if I can get over my shyness/introversion), but that's probably the limit unless we really feel some chemistry for a while. I've been a loner for so long, it may take some patience with me - I'm admittedly not very skilled in socializing and may miss hints.
Thank you for reading this, and I hope you enjoy what I post & reblog :)
"Accusations of rape ruin men's lives and careers."
You only have to look at how many footballers who have rape accusations against them that happily represent their countries in huge tournaments like the World Cup without anyone really giving a shit to see what bollocks that is.
Women are rarely taken seriously, rarely believed, rarely stood up for, especially when their abusers are rich and famous.
Do you know why people view what is happening in Palestine as a genocide? I’m a dumbass and I’m on Twitter for art and friends. I hope you’re ok
Propaganda. People have been calling this conflict (and every single war, exchange or skirmish between israel and Arab insurgents) a "genocide" since the 70s, yet lo and behold the Palestinian population only doubles itself every decade or so, and generally quintoupled since the 50s. Horrible genocide!
Question that I'm asking in good faith because I really do want to know about it: why does Herzl describe israel as a colony if it isn't one?
(All good faith questions are welcome, Anon - thanks for this one!)
TLDR: Because words change meanings over time and Herzl wasn't psychic.
In the 1890s, "colony" just meant a planned settlement or concentrated community. This included Jewish agricultural colonies in the Pale, temperance colonies in Colorado, and utopian communes everywhere.
It was basically the Victorian word for "intentional community," with absolutely no imperial baggage required.
The specific meaning activists now deploy (colony as racial domination, metropole extraction, indigenous suppression) is a 20th century framework that didn't exist when Herzl was writing in 1896.
So a reader of the 21st century finds the word "colony" in an old text and assumes it carries a technical definition that was coined decades later.
It's a little like finding the word "trauma" in a Civil War field report and concluding the surgeon was diagnosing PTSD.
Meanwhile, 'settler colonialism' as applied to Israel isn't a neutral analytical tool that happens to fit badly. It's a framework specifically constructed to exclude the features that distinguish Jewish return from actual settler colonialism...and it still fails on its own stated terms.
Jewish immigrants to the Levant were never agents of any empire. They were overwhelmingly refugees from empires who were fleeing Russian pogroms, Eastern European persecution, and later Nazi Germany. No metropole sent them. No metropole would take them back if the project failed.
That's not a minor quibble about definitions, either - it's the primary distinction between settler colonialism and every other form of large population movement in history.
There's also the matter of indigeneity. The Jews returning to the Levant weren't arriving in a place with which they had no connection.
Jewish presence in the region is documented continuously from ancient history, including in Egyptian records dating to roughly 1210 BCE.
The religious, linguistic, and ancestral connection to the land is what distinguishes this case from the British in Kenya or the French in Algeria, who had no such ties - and it is some of the best-documented, most indisputable history humans have ever gathered. (This is why they're so constantly engaged in historical revisionism.)
So when proponents of the settler colonialism framework of accusation encounter these objections, what do they do?
They move the goalposts.
The absence of a metropole gets explained away as an "exception."
The indigenous origin of the Jewish people to the Levant gets ahistorically dismissed or ignored, despite the fact that the Jewish people are the only group whose national identity, language, and religion originated in and remained oriented toward that specific land throughout their entire existence.
The framework gets rewritten and the history is revised until Israel fits the allegation.
So, one word in Der Judenstaat doesn't settle* any of this.
From The Atlantic: The False Narrative of Settler Colonialism (paywall bypassed)
Okay, there's actually a lot of interesting history around this, so let's dig into it.
It's completely correct that the semiotics of "colony", "colonization", etc., have evolved over time, and that back in the late 19th Century when Herzl was writing the connotation was more neutral than it became in the 20th Century. (I also need to stress that that one "it is something colonial" quote-mine you see shared everywhere is from a letter that was never even sent, because Herzl realized it was a bad idea.)
But more to the point: the old guard Zionists were fully aware of accusations they were European colonizers - and they actively refuted those claims.
— Jews and Muslims in the Arab World: Haunted by Pasts Real and Imagined (Jacob Lassner, Ilan S. Troen, 2007)
— Hebrew Repatriation to Eretz Yisrael (Samuel Kruglikoff, 1930)
— Eliahu Eliachar, Testimony to UNSCOP (United Nations Special Committee on Palestine) Regarding Jews in Arab Countries (1947)
— Ber Borochov, Poalei Tziyon Peace Manifesto (1917)
— David Ben-Gurion, Statement to the Elected Assembly of Palestine Jewry (1947)
Zionists wrote copious volumes about the indigeneity of Judeans to Eretz Yisrael, and denying accusations that they were merely pawns of an imperialist agenda (initially it was claimed they were Russian agents, and then later British colonists) or seeking to conquer or to exploit the land or its people. Contrary to the popular claim that Zionists thought (or promoted the concept) the land was uninhabited, a very substantial amount was written about the Palestinians (particularly from the perspective of class analysis), and how the return and liberation of Judeans must go hand-in-hand with class solidarity and the liberation of Arab workers. In other words: the exact opposite of colonialism. What we today would call decolonization - and specifically decolonization via proletarian revolution.
The simplistic quote-mining about "colonization" used today is a hundred years outdated: all such arguments were debunked before the state was even founded.
Gotta love how the gay rights, women’s rights, anti racism, anti classism, labour rights, islamophobia of this entire website go to hell when countries like China are concerned.
Is communism really all that important to you that you can ignore all the horrors these people are doing?
Is it that your propaganda of “communism good capitalism bad” really needs to be the only one heard, so the condition of workers in Shein and other companies is hindering you as you protest why communism gives labours rights?
Is your idea of every communist nation being utter utopia so fragile that the reality of horrors in that country really need to be muted?
I don’t know man, it feels to me that you guys are “putting your worldviews over people’s lives”.
The “left” in the USA has been breathtakingly hypocritical about the plight of Uighurs in particular, but you can see this elsewhere too (cough Ukraine cough), for years at this point. It’s giving “but the Soviets had good schools and women’s rights!” Tell me you are a braindead zealot without telling me you are a braindead zealot.
People need to start thinking critically for a change, and they also need to take a step back from their ideologies—whatever those may be—and start thinking in terms of actual principles, like human rights and justice and fairness.
The Left’s callousness when it comes to the Uyghur genocide still shocks me. There were 12 million Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang. Their only “crime” was existing as a racial and religious minority group. We don’t know how many have been murdered because China is trying to hide any evidence of wrongdoing and so the information we do have is limited and often outdated, and probably does not show the full extent of the horrors going on.
But even what is confirmed is awful. They’ve put people in camps. It’s the largest mass in internment of its type since the holocaust. They are subjected to systemic rape, not as random acts of violence (which would be bad enough) but as a planned policy. They are also subjected to Forced sterilizations, mass surveillance, and slavery. Where are the protests? Where are the boycotts? Where is the outrage? Where is the basic human decency that should make anyone care about the suffering of these people - men, women, and children?!
Actual liberals and progressives who value human rights would care about this. But the far left is neither liberal nor progressive. They are a pro-authoritarian hate movement fueled by Russian and Chinese propaganda. That’s why they’re against Ukraine and don’t care about the genocide in Xinjiang, and why they constantly prop up MAGA and undermine Democrats.
The thing is a lot of internet communism isn’t about how to utilize the philosophy of Marx or whatever, it’s an edge lord’s attempt at filling a how void. Many of these people are ex-alt righters, and instead of deconstructing, they just kinda replaced the old radicalization with the new one.
And the new radicalization is not that different. Far left and far right or both fascism with only very tiny differences. There’s a reason the Soviet Union and the Nazi Third Reich were natural allies and worked well together to invade and divide up Eastern Europe while committing horrific war crimes and would’ve continued to work together if Hitler hadn’t betrayed Stalin.
#from what i've seen most self-described internet leftists#are just social conservatives that aren't christian-enough to hang with maga#they still want misogyny and racism and authoritarianism -- they just want it to be based on marx instead of the bible via @sick-sad-little-world
holding firm to one's principles becomes very expensive very fast if one should acknowledge the CPC's (or CCP's, if you prefer) outright genocidal actions against minority groups in their own country. Not to mention how they've propped up the economies of Iran and Russia while those two have been terrorizing and invading their neighbors.
Most "leftists" will only hold a position on issues that don't actually force them to bear a real cost.
Honor, Integrity, Intellectual Honesty... they're all in short-supply once you get out into the wings on either side of this floundering freedumb birb.
But of course those are also the idiots who scream the loudest and try to force everyone else to cater to them, too.
[Image ID: a yellow sticker that reads “You cannot be anti-fascitst if you are anti-semitic” in bold black text. It is wet with beads of water on it. /End ID]
By now, almost everyone should have realized that debating pro-Palestinian activists is a complete waste of time. It’s like debating someone over whether it’s July. Not only do you have to abandon all dignity to keep proving something that is plainly obvious, but you’re also arguing with someone who has no interest in reality and is simply using the conversation to push an agenda. The very fact that you’re forced to “prove” it’s July means you’ve already lost the debate.
The same applies here.
You can show them videos of people in Gaza who are clearly well-fed, overweight, or even obese, and they’ll still insist there’s a famine.
You can show them hundreds of videos of Gazans crossing into Israel on October 7 and taking part in the massacre and butchery, and they’ll stare at the footage and still claim, “No, it was only Hamas.”
They’ll make claim after claim without evidence. They’ll accuse Israeli snipers of deliberately shooting children, yet years later they still can’t produce a single verified video showing an Israeli sniper shooting a child or a child with a verified Israeli bullet wound. They’ll circulate AI-generated images, recycled footage from other conflicts, and fabricated stories. When those claims are easily debunked, they simply move on to the next one. But again, the very fact that you’re spending your time proving the obvious means you’ve already lost the debate.
At some point, you have to ask yourself why you’re still debating people who reject reality whenever it gets in the way of their narrative. Even if you completely dismantle one claim, they’ll invent another the next day, and often repeat the same debunked claim the day after that. They simply don’t care whether something is true.
You don’t debate someone who refuses to acknowledge reality. You walk away. Otherwise, you’re not participating in a discussion. You’re volunteering your time to someone who has no intention of being honest.
Have some self-respect and dignity. Stop volunteering to be a useful idiot for these people.
The trick is to figure out just how "lost-cause" that person is. Are they on the fence? Or are they a rigid ideologue whose bias has already been formed and they cannot tolerate being challenged?
Challenging the rigid ideologues won't get you anywhere, I agree. If people can't be intellectually honest within the first few minutes of actual conversation, I tell them that there is no amount of evidence I can give them that will prove to them that their viewpoint is wrong and that they should NOT be proud of that fact.
Challenging those who truly just "go with the flow" and are casually antisemitic because they've been swamped in it their whole lives and genuinely don't know any better but their hearts are in the right place on most issues, they've just been uncritical thinkers and have fallen for propal propaganda.... If they are willing to learn, they may be worth the effort.
Sorting the wheat from the chaff is valuable work.
To me, this carries over to more inchoate pains, like the very real pain we feel when we feel shame after discovering that a stance we hold dear is actually immoral and unethical.
We should not be afraid to talk about our shame. Shame is an emotional pain that tells our brains that we held a bad stance or that it was a bad idea to do/say a thing. We fear talking about it because we don't want people to know that we weren't perfectly correct in all our takes in the first place.
Physical injury is easy to see, easy to empathize with. Emotional Injury is much more difficult for us because it's invisible, we're often filled with shame & guilt or anger over it, all of which rob us of our eloquence, and it feels like it keeps getting worse every time we think about it, and people are so unused to dealing with it and working through it, especially in a public forum, that they're incredibly judgemental about it. There's an astounding failure to empathize and understand.
when two musicians sing into the same microphone and lean in very close to each other… like omg are you guys gonna kiss now to relieve the homoerotic tension?😳
Okay, but this is really important: Bruce Springsteen occupied this really weird place in music history. His songs were all from this pessimistic, nihilistic view of an America that had let him down:
Just like the anti-Vietnam War protest songs that we associate with the 1960s, or the early nihilism that spawned punk music in the 1970s. But he didn’t *sound* like a punk anarchist; he sounded like a country rock singer. When he released Born in the U.S.A. people completely misinterpreted (or possibly ignored) the lyrics in favor of the tone of the music.
Politicians used his music to promote their ‘Murica Yes! brand, and he had to literally explain that that was not what he was about. He’s over here asking when we’re going to have jobs and heathcare, not stanning the politicians who weren’t helping the people.
It was also kind of a big deal that he had an integrated band, because even as late as the 1980s music was still kind of segregated and MTV was straight up racist. They refused to play and promote black artists and then claimed that were no black artists in the first place. Michael Jackson’s record company had to threaten a boycott of their white artists to get MTV to play his Thriller video.
Plus, the first black/white interracial kiss on TV was in 1968 (OG Star Trek). Also it took us until the 70s to get sympathetic gay characters on screen, and the 90s to get gay characters to kiss onscreen. And all of those firsts were met with outrage.
So keep that in mind when you see Bruce Springsteen not just playing with an interracial band, but engaging in an interracial, gay kiss on stage repeatedly.
Passages from American Popular Music by Larry Starr and Christopher Waterman
I used to think that Bruce and Clarence kissing onstage was exuberance, showmanship, and telling racist homophobes to fuck off. Like, they picked up a certain kind of audience and went “Racist homophobes? Not in our house!” And started the kissing then but then I actually looked it up and
It was a story where… we remade the city. We remade the city, shaping it into the kind of place where our friendship and our love for one another wouldn’t have been such an exceptional thing. - Bruce Springsteen
It wasn’t about showmanship or rejecting bigots or anything it was just. Damn right that was one of the loves of his life and damn right he was going to kiss him onstage
It gets me a little that Bruce has had a divorce, that he’s been married twice, but he loved Clarence for the rest of Clarence’s life and will presumably love him the rest of his own
Clemons said in one interview. “Bruce and I looked at each other and didn’t say anything, we just knew. We knew we were the missing links in each other’s lives. He was what I’d been searching for.” In another version of the story, Clemons says “He looked at me, and I looked at him, and we fell in love.”
I’m having some emotions about it!
“He was elemental in my life,“ Springsteen adds, “and losing him was like losing the rain.”
Not just! I love you pure and deep and true but! I am going to love you like that in front of the whole damn world!
We have fewer narratives about taking risks and making statements for platonic love rather than romantic and supposedly it would be easier to downplay this onstage than romance and! They refused! They fucking refused! In front of hundreds of thousands of people, over the course of years! In the spotlight, in word and deed, I love you!
The notion that such a minuscule and unmanageable minority secretly controls the world is comical, which may be why so many responsible people still do not take the anti-Semitic conspiracy theory seriously, or even understand how it works. In the moments after the Texas crisis, the FBI made an official statement declaring that the assailant was “particularly focused on one issue, and it was not specifically related to the Jewish community.” Of course, the gunman did not travel thousands of miles to terrorize some Mormons. He sought out a synagogue and took it hostage over his grievances, believing that Jews alone could resolve them. That’s targeting Jews, and there’s a word for that.
(…)
“Anti-Semitism has real impact beyond just hate crimes,” the civil-rights activist Eric Ward once told me. “It distorts our understanding of how the actual world works. It isolates us. It alienates us from our communities, from our neighbors, and from participating in governance. It kills, but it also kills our society.”
(…)
“Anti-Semitism isn’t just bigotry toward the Jewish community,” Ward explains. “It is actually utilizing bigotry toward the Jewish community in order to deconstruct democratic practices, and it does so by framing democracy as a conspiracy rather than a tool of empowerment or a functional tool of governance.” In other words, the more people buy into anti-Semitism and its understanding of the world, the more they lose faith in democracy.
there's this thing people often say, when you bring up an incident motivated by bigotry, they say 'yeah, but that's just a small group of people that's exceptionally loud. most people don't actually believe that.' what they mean is that nobody (well maybe some people) is gonna make a really big racket just to say 'hey, im normal about this group of people'. most people do not actually support the hateful things the exceptionally loud group of people does. they might have biases but they won't go on a rant about how a certain group of people should be killed and if you asked them they would condemn the hatecrimes committed.
And the thing is, I get why the silent majority is silent. I know how difficult it is to speak up. When you feel like you don't know enough. When you feel like you can't change anything anyway. When friends or family are the people you would have to speak up against. When you know you'll get hate for speaking up. When you know people will assume things about you that aren't true because you speak up. When people connect your speaking up about one thing with also picking a side in an at most only tangentially related conflict. When speaking up means arguing against people who actually claim to support the same cause as you.
It also took me a long time to find the nerve to speak up. Even though I was disgusted and horrified by the things people said immediately. Because the people weren't just random strangers, they were people I thought of as friends. Because I had seen the way people who spoke up about the antisemitism got relentlessly harassed. Because I was afraid of people's reactions. I was afraid of losing friends or getting hate or saying something wrong.
Sadly while in some conflicts staying silent is a way to stay neutral, in the case of a group of people spreading hate and bigotry silence is complicity. Not intentional, but unintentionally. Yes, there may be the silent majority who doesn't support the actions of that small, loud group of people spewing hate, but if the silent majority doesn't speak up, they just give this group more power. If people can go somewhere and spread conspiracy theories and hate speech and prejudices unchecked. When no one stands up and corrects them. Then their numbers will grow, because there will be people who believe them, there will be people who get radicalised, cause no one ever tried to combat the conspiracies and misinformation and prejudices. If no one gets up and protects people who are getting attacked and harassed, then the attackers will just get bolder, they will be able to claim they have the support of the masses. And one day it will be too late. Because then staying silent means condemning your neighbours to death. And speaking up just means you'll die side by side with them.
So this is my plea to everyone who has been afraid to speak up these last few years: I'm pretty sure you are aware of the rise of antisemitism in these past few years. If not then I urge you to inform yourself. There are people both on the left and right who get bolder everyday. The spread misinformation and conspiracies, they harass Jews just for existing. Especially leftists claim to do this under the guise of helping palestine and are fast to denounce anyone who points out their antisemitism as a 'genocide supporter'. I understand how difficult it is to speak up against those people. The suffering in Gaza is horrifying and I wish I could just end it. And knowing I can't feels awful, being helpless feels awful. If then people come to accuse you of not caring or being evil or being everything you don't want to be, that hurts. It hurts so damn bad. And that is exactly the intention of those people. They are trying to emotionally manipulate you. They are trying to isolate you by marking you as an 'enemy'.
This is bullshit. If people are willing to turn on you because you try to raise awareness about antisemitism they unwittingly shared, then those people are not your friends. I know it's terrible to hear, but it's not you who is 'destroying the friendship'. If you politely point out someone elses mistake and they react with hate, then that is not your fault. Speaking out against antisemitism does not at all say anything about anyone's stance on the war. These are completely separate things. The suffering of the Palestinians does not justify antisemitism and people spreading antisemitism in the name of Palestine are not helping in any way. It is totally okay if you don't want to speak out about the conflict because you don't feel informed enough. It is indeed in my mind much better than sharing misinformation or reducing the conflict to a black-and-white, good-vs-evil type of thing. You are not obligated to speak up and form an opinion. Donating to an organisation that brings aid into Gaza helps much more than posting slogans on social media. Voting for people who actually have both Palestinians and Israelis best interests in mind helps more. Supporting the Israelis protesting against their current government, maybe even coordinating peaceful protests with them helps more.
What doesn't help Palestinians at all is antisemitism. It only hurts. It just leads to more suffering. There have already been Jews killed in the name of Palestine. Jews all over the world get harassed just for existing. The murder, rape and kidnapping of Jews by Hamas gets called 'justified resistance'. Jewish children get attacked, Holocause memorials get vandalised, Synagogues get firebombed. It doesn't matter in whose name and from whom these attacks come. They are wrong. And we need to speak up. Because more and more people get radicalised into thinking murdering random Jews is justified. And if you even just start by maybe looking at your own biases and prejudices, by maybe listening to actual Jews (I am not one btw so don't just listen to me) and informing yourself you will already make an enormous difference. And if you then reblog posts informing about the terrifying rise in antisemitism then maybe you'll motivate more people to speak up. And then you can help prevent even more people falling into Jewhate. Then you can protect Jews and fight against bigotry. Because it doesn't make a difference if Nazis are going around robbing and murdering Jews, demolishing their businesses and setting their synagogues on fire, or if leftists do it in the name of Palestine. It's still a pogrom. And you can decide whether you want to be like the German civilians who looked on as the flames of the burning synagogues were reflected in the shards of the broken shop windows while their neighbours were deported or whether you would be one of the very few people who helped protect Jews.
i wrote this in the middle of the night while painfully aware i should sleep, so i guess it's a bit (or a lot) incoherent but i still think it's important.
i have gotten quite a few new followers recently due to the post about the phantom worm breaking containment and kinda expected a lot of them to immediately unfollow me as soon as they realised i regularly post about antisemitism - something that me and lots of other people have experienced in the past. i was thus positively surprised that as of yet that does not seem to have happened. with this post i wanted to explain to new followers why i speak up so vehemently and ask them to maybe also share posts about antisemitism and inform themselves so that the situation doesn't got worse than it already is.
i once said im not above begging people to listen to Jews and and speak up when someone says something antisemitic, no matter whether intentional or not. that hasn't changed. my pride is infinitely less worth than the lives that can be saved by stopping this rise of Jewhatred.
so this is me begging on my knees to everyone who sees this to take a moment to inform yourself about the thing Jews have to deal with, about the harassment and hate and violence and isolation they face everyday. to read up about antisemitism, especially leftist antisemitism, about what Zionism actually means, about ways to advocate for Palestine while simultaneously staunchly standing against antisemitism.
there are a lot of people hurting and killing Jews out there in the name of 'activism'. these people are no better than nazis. because it doesn't matter what your motive for a hate crime is, it is still a hate crime.
so please, please, please, think twice when someone calls for the death of all Zionists, or for the destruction of Israel or spams 'free palestine' or other slogans in the posts of Jews talking about their culture. twink twice and then SPEAK UP.
by staying silent you're just allowing more people to be radicalised into rampant Jewhate.
[Image ID: A cropped screenshot of two anon messades. The first says 'Hope you get beheaded and raped shiltib'. The second one says 'If it was ww2 i would have 100% led jews straight to their deaths'. /End ID]
LOOK AT THIS
please just take a moment to realise HOW FUCKING BAD IT HAS GOTTEN. this is dangerous, can you see how dangerous this it? if you don't speak up about antisemitism when you encounter it then this will just get worse, and those people will eventually make actions follow their words.
I would genuinely like to know who to blame for making these children so disconnected from the concept of imagination that they think the simpler explanation for what they’re doing is that they’re projecting their consciousness into one of infinite realities where fictional characters are real.
