Well you see when people say “dog eat dog” they typically mean that in the sense of dogs killing and eating each other which can be and is often used as a pretty blatant metaphor for the brutality of every-man-for-himself ideology. The milkbone here is a situational modifier, essentially making one option particularly enticing for said dogs, and because of its location cannot be easily discarded the way it could be if he were, say, just holding it. It differs from the usual occurrence of “milkbone underwear” by creating an almost visceral image—the underwear-wearer would be chased down for the underwear alone, and the material almost offers a protection to sensitive areas, so the idiom “bit me in the ass” may not even be applicable to him. Most certainly the underwear-wearer would be left alone once his underwear is gone, the dogs having eaten their fill. Whereas, of course, the man with a milkbone up his ass must be chased down and torn to pieces just for the treat to be found, a measly, standard piece out of the box rather than the specially baked and carved milkbone underwear feast. “Bit me in the ass” does not apply to him either, but only because it is not severe enough. Also as a side note my father and I are grown adults who both know what sex is and make jokes about that sometimes but I’m not really sure what that has to do with this entirely unrelated metaphor
ellievsbear
gummygunk
baratheonpilled
titsay
andulkaphoto
germansingergirl
kaledo-art
turnnoffyourmind
